Journals / Litera / 2026 / Cilt: 36 Sayı: 1

From Istanbul to Anatolia: Reconstructing Collective Memory in Loxandra and Farewell Anatolia

Journal
Litera
Pages
62–76
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings suggest that literature serves as a crucial medium for sustaining collective identity, showing that the negotiation of memory is intrinsically tied to specific geographical and social landscapes, and ultimately contributes to our understanding of the enduring impact of historical upheaval on cultural memory.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the reconstruction of collective memory in Maria Iordanidou’s Loxandra and Dido Sotiriou’s Farewell Anatolia, focusing on their portrayal of Greek communities in Istanbul and Anatolia, respectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Utilizing Maurice Halbwachs’s theory of collective memory and Pierre Nora’s concept of lieux de mémoire (sites of memory), the analysis explores how these novels function as literary archives for a vanished world.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings suggest that literature serves as a crucial medium for sustaining collective identity, showing that the negotiation of memory is intrinsically tied to specific geographical and social landscapes, and ultimately contributes to our understanding of the enduring impact of historical upheaval on cultural memory.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Modern Greek Literature · Collective Memory · Cultural Identity

Abstract

This study examines the reconstruction of collective memory in Maria Iordanidou’s Loxandra and Dido Sotiriou’s Farewell Anatolia, focusing on their portrayal of Greek communities in Istanbul and Anatolia, respectively. Utilizing Maurice Halbwachs’s theory of collective memory and Pierre Nora’s concept of lieux de mémoire (sites of memory), the analysis explores how these novels function as literary archives for a vanished world. The research addresses the central question of how space and memory are represented to preserve the cultural identity of these communities in the wake of displacement and historical rupture. Farewell Anatolia delves into the collective memory of rural Anatolia, where the land itself becomes a primary lieux de mémoire, embodying both belonging and the trauma of forced migration. In contrast, Loxandra captures the intricate social fabric of Istanbul’s Greek community through urban spaces, domestic rituals, and culinary traditions, portraying the city as a palimpsest of memory layered with cultural meanings. A comparative analysis reveals that while both novels are steeped in nostalgia and act as vessels for cultural preservation, they highlight distinct spatial contexts: the rural, communal memory of Anatolia versus the urban, cosmopolitan memory of Istanbul. The findings suggest that literature serves as a crucial medium for sustaining collective identity, showing that the negotiation of memory is intrinsically tied to specific geographical and social landscapes, and ultimately contributes to our understanding of the enduring impact of historical upheaval on cultural memory.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yerköy, S. (2026). From Istanbul to Anatolia: Reconstructing Collective Memory in Loxandra and Farewell Anatolia. Litera, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 1, 62–76. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2026-1815245

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Alexandris, A. (1992). The Greek minority of Istanbul and Greek-Turkish relations 1918-1974. Centre for Asia Minor Studies. google scholar
  2. Assmann, A. (2006). Memory, individual and collective. In R. E. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 210–226). Oxford University Press. google scholar
  3. Bali, R. (2012). Model citizens of the state: The Jews of Turkey during the multi-party period. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. google scholar
  4. Bedlek, E. Y. (2015). Imagined communities in Greece and Turkey. I.B. Tauris. google scholar
  5. Calotychos, V. (2013). The Balkan prospect: Identity, culture, and politics in Greece after 1989. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  6. Çete, A. (2024). 19. yüzyılda İstanbul’da yayımlanan iki Yunanca kurmaca metinde kadın karakterlerin sunumu. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 34(1), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2023-1384283 google scholar
  7. Damar Çakmak, A. (2025). Ancient Greek myths in modern Greek poetry: Angelos Sikelianos and Daedalus as a symbol of freedom. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 35(1), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1588145 google scholar
  8. Demirözü, D. (2003). İlk dönem Yunan romanında 1834-1880 öteki imajı. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 43(1), 187–194. google scholar
  9. Demirözü, D. (2005). Yunan düzyazınında 1922 ve zorunlu göç. In M. Pekin (Ed.), Yeniden kurulan yaşamlar: 80. yılında Türk-Yunan zorunlu nüfus mübadelesi (pp. 155–185). İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
  10. Demirözü, D. (2019). Çağdaş Yunan edebiyatının biri Rum (Loksandra) diğeri Yunan (Leonis) iki karakterinin gözünden İstanbul (1839-1922). Roman Kahramanları, 38, 127–138. google scholar
  11. Dessingué, A. (2015). From collectivity to collectiveness: Reflections (with Halbwachs and Bakhtin) on the concept of collective memory. In S. Kattago (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to memory studies (pp. 89–101). Ashgate. google scholar
  12. Erll, A. (2011a). Memory in culture. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  13. Erll, A. (2011b). Travelling memory. Parallax, 17(4), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2011.605570 google scholar Gedgaudaitė, K. (2021). Memories of Asia Minor in contemporary Greek culture: An itinerary. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  14. Güven, D. (2016). 6-7 Eylül olayları: Cumhuriyet dönemi azınlık politikaları ve stratejileri bağlamında. İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
  15. Halbwachs, M. (1980). The collective memory. Harper & Row. google scholar
  16. Hirschon, R. (Ed.). (2003). Crossing the Aegean: An appraisal of the 1923 compulsory population exchange between Greece and Turkey. Berghahn Books. google scholar
  17. Iordanidou, M. (2004). Λωξάνδρα. Βιβλιοπωλείον της Εστίας. google scholar
  18. Kefalidou, C. M. (2023). A story of two shores: transnational memory and Ottoman legacy in modern Greek novels. In A. Fabris, A. Göschl & S. Schneider (Eds.), Sea of literatures: Towards a theory of Mediterranean literature (pp. 47–64). De Gruyter. google scholar
  19. Lachmann, R. (2004). Cultural memory and the role of literature. European Review, 12(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S106279870400016X google scholar
  20. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Basic Blackwell. google scholar
  21. Liakos, A. (2008). History wars: Questioning tolerance. In G. Hálfdanarson (Ed.), Discrimination and tolerance in historical perspective (pp. 77–92). Pisa University Press. google scholar
  22. Nikoloupoulou, M. (2007). Space, memory and identity: The memory of the Asia Minor space in Greek novels of the 1960s. CAS Sofia Working Paper Series, 1, 1–18. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=124882 google scholar
  23. Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: les lieux de mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520 google scholar
  24. Nora, P. (1992). Realms of memory: the construction of the French past. Columbia University Press. google scholar Nora, P. (2011). Présent, nation, mémoire. Gallimard. google scholar
  25. Nosova, H. (2021). Pierre Nora’s concept of contrasting memory and history. International Journal of Philosophy, 9(4), 216-220. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20210904.16 google scholar
  26. Papadopoulos, Y. G. S. (2019). Collective trauma, transgenerational identity, shared memory: Public TV series dealing with the Ottoman Empire and Anatolian refugees in Greece. In D. Göttsche (Ed.), Memory and postcolonial studies: Synergies and new directions (pp. 469–492). Peter Lang. google scholar
  27. Radstone, S. (2011). What place is this? Transcultural memory and the locations of memory studies. Parallax, 17(4), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2011.605585 google scholar
  28. Rothberg, M. (2009). Multidirectional memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the age of decolonization. Stanford University Press. google scholar
  29. Russell, N. (2006). Collective memory before and after Halbwachs. The French Review, 79(4), 792–804. DOI:10.2307/25480359 google scholar
  30. Sotiriou, D. (1962). Ματωμένα χώματα. Κέδρος. google scholar
  31. Salvanou, E. (2024). The making of refugee memory: The Asia Minor catastrophe, historical writing and life practices. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. google scholar
  32. Şeker, N. (2013). Forced population movement in the Ottoman Empire and the early Turkish Republic: An attempt at reassessment through demographic engineering. European Journal of Turkish Studies – Social Sciences on Contemporary Turkey, 16, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejts.4396 google scholar
  33. Tally, Jr. R. T. (2020). Introduction: Spaces of the text: Literary studies after a spatial turn. In R. T. Tally Jr. (Ed.), Spatial literary studies: Interdisciplinary approaches to space, geography, and the imagination (pp. 1–10). Routledge. google scholar
  34. Tziovas, S. (2011). Ο μύθος της γενιάς του τριάντα: Νεοτερικότητα, ελληνικότητα και πολιτισμική ιδεολογία. Polis. google scholar
  35. Voutira, E. (2004). When Greeks meet other Greeks: Settlement policy issues in the contemporary Greek context. In R. Hirschon (Ed.), Crossing the Aegean: An appraisal of the 1923 compulsory population exchange between Greece and Turkey (pp. 145–162). Berghahn Books. google scholar