Journals / IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal / 2015 / Sayı: 20

THE SPATIAL DIMENSION OF DEVELOPMENT: ENTREPRENEURSHIP ANALYSIS OF NUTS LEVEL-3 TR212 REGION1

Pages
83–107
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of these analyses, it has been determined that there are significant differences between people living in this region in terms of entrepreneurship by their gender, profession, educational level and income

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Regional socio-economic segregation, which has been rapidly increased with the Industrial Revolution, is not the problem of only underdeveloped or developing countries, but also one of the major problems of many developed countries. "1973 Oil Crisis" was one of the most important events affected the approach to regional development in this long process from past to the present.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After the 2000s, Turkey has adopted a new regional development policy due to the increasing globalization with technological advancements and entering a new are in the Turkey-EU (European Union) relations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of these analyses, it has been determined that there are significant differences between people living in this region in terms of entrepreneurship by their gender, profession, educational level and income
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Regional socio-economic segregation, which has been rapidly increased with the Industrial Revolution, is not the problem of only underdeveloped or developing countries, but also one of the major problems of many developed countries. "1973 Oil Crisis" was one of the most important events affected the approach to regional development in this long process from past to the present. Because this crisis directly affected the production activities of developed and industrialized regions (both in national and global level), and indirectly affected the economic activities of other regions (developing and underdeveloped regions), who are depending on these economies, in a negative way. In other words, this crisis has revealed that structural reforms need to be done in underdeveloped regions to let them be viable or at least reduce their dependency on developed and industrialized regions or central governments. In the same period, some structural reforms and projects have begun to be implemented in the regional sense. After the 2000s, Turkey has adopted a new regional development policy due to the increasing globalization with technological advancements and entering a new are in the Turkey-EU (European Union) relations. In this new period, micro projects and entrepreneurship with high added value and involvement of local actors receive more support rather than slow, central-based and macro projects. In such policies to be implemented to reduce the inter-regional disparities; first analyses of financial support, technical support, training programs and then socio-economic, demographic and spatial analyses of the region, where these support policies will be implemented, should be performed in detail. In this study, it has been aimed to perform spatial analysis of TR21 Thrace Region, Nuts Level 3 TR212 (Edirne) region within the scope of a spatial dimension. The survey was conducted on a total of 398 people especially living in in the city center of Edirne in order to determine local potential of the region, select appropriate regional policy tools and create economic value expected. A total of 13 Likert type questions were asked to the participants to determine demographic structure, economic status and thoughts of the participants regarding entrepreneurship. SPSS (Statistical Package of Social Sciences) 17.0 Statistical Package Program was used to analyze the data obtained. According to the results of these analyses, it has been determined that there are significant differences between people living in this region in terms of entrepreneurship by their gender, profession, educational level and income

🔖

Cite This Article

DİNÇSOY, E. E. (2015). THE SPATIAL DIMENSION OF DEVELOPMENT: ENTREPRENEURSHIP ANALYSIS OF NUTS LEVEL-3 TR212 REGION1. IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal, Sayı: 20, 83–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/125289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. ARSLAN, E., (2010). Kalkınma Ajansları ve Kalkınma Ajanslarının Türkiye Ekonomi- sine Beklenen Katkıları. Kamu-İş Dergisi 11 (3): 96-98
  2. DESMET. K., ROSSİ-HANSBERG, E., (2014). Spatial Development. American Economic Review, 104 (4): 1211-1243
  3. DINCSOY, E. E., (2010).Regional and Secto- ral Disparities in Turkey. Yushodo Yayın- ları, Tokyo DINCSOY, E. E., (2013). Mekansal Gelişme Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu. Trakya Kalkınma Ajansı. http://www.trakya2023. com/uploads/docs/28062013zcazfb.pdf (Erişim: 25.07.2015) DOĞAN B. B., (2011). Kalkınma İktisadı- nın XX. Yüzyıldaki Gelişim Süreci, İkti- sat Politikalarına Etkisi ve Son On Yıllık Konjonktürün Disiplinin Geleceğine Ola- sı Etkileri. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 22 (2): 41-81
  4. EC (1999).
  5. European Commission, ESDP Eu- ropean Spatial Development perspective, EC Publihment, Italy. http://ec.europa. eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/of- ficial/reports/pdf/sum_en.pdf 20.07.2015) (Erişim: KOREL, G., (2005). Türkiye'de Bölge Poli- tikalarının Evrimi Ve Bölgesel Kalkınma Ajansları. Yerel Kalkınma için Ortaklıklar Uluslararası Konferansı, İstanbul,
  6. Türkiye KÜÇÜK, M., GÜNEŞ, G., (2013). Yerel Kal- kınmada Bir Etken Olarak Turizm: Yerel Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarının Görüşleri. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi 22 (4): 24-27
  7. MAÇ, N., (2006). Bölgesel Kalkınma Ajansla- rı ve Türkiye. Konya Ticaret Odası Araş- tırma ve Etüt Servisi Araştırma Raporu, Yayın No: 2006 - 117/76, Konya NOYAN YALMAN, İ., GÜNDOĞDU Ö., (2014). Kadın Girişimciliği Ve Bölgesel Kalkınma: TR72 (Kayseri, Sivas, Yozgat) Bölgesinde Uygulama. Journal of Entrep- reneurship and Development 9 (1): 40-70
  8. OKUR DİNÇSOY, M., (2013a). Kırsal Kalkın- ma Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu. Trak- ya Kalkınma Ajansı. www.trakya2023. com/uploads/docs/28062013ZP0_zM.pdf (Erişim: 25.07.2015)
  9. OKUR DİNÇSOY, M., (2013b). Regional Tar- gets and Strategies for Thrace Region in Turkey: A SWOT Analysis for Competiti- veness. The International Journal of Soci- al Sciences, 17 (1): 53-66
  10. ÖZEN, P., (2005). Bölge Kalkınma Ajansları. TEPAV/EPRI yayınları, Ankara, pp.4-6
  11. ÖZKAN, Ş., (2003). Türkiye'de Girişimci- lik ve Belirleyicileri: Marmara ve Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 58 (4): 147-150
  12. SUNGUR, D. M., (1998). Türkiye'de Uygu- lanan Teşvik Politikaları (1968-1998).
  13. TC Başbakanlık Hazine Müsteşarlığı, Ekono- mik Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü TAKIM, A., (2011). Türkiye'de 1960-1980 Yılları Arasında Uygulanan Kalkınma Pl