SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2022 / Volume: 12 Issue: 4 Special Issue

Conceptually Examination of the Studies on Writing Mistakes in Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language

Musa Kaya(BAYBURT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, BAYBURT EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-6600-6753
Pages
—
Publication Date
2022-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Mistake is used 2 times, incorrect is 4 in PhD theses; incorrect is 19 times, mistake is 10, problem is 5 times and incorrectness is 1 in the master theses; incorrect is 33 times, mistake is 26, problem is used 3 times, incorrectness is 5 and difficulty is used 2 times in the articles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Articles, master thesis and PhD theses on writing mistakes in teaching Turkish as a foreign language are analyzed in this research conducted through qualitative methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Studies on writing mistakes in Turkish texts written by learners as a foreign or secondary language constitute paradigm of this research; are handled for analysis of concepts used in classification of type, numerical rates to language levels, place conducted and writing mistakes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Mistake is used 2 times, incorrect is 4 in PhD theses; incorrect is 19 times, mistake is 10, problem is 5 times and incorrectness is 1 in the master theses; incorrect is 33 times, mistake is 26, problem is used 3 times, incorrectness is 5 and difficulty is used 2 times in the articles.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Teaching Turkish as a foreign language · writing mistakes · using of concept

Abstract

Articles, master thesis and PhD theses on writing mistakes in teaching Turkish as a foreign language are analyzed in this research conducted through qualitative methods. Studies on writing mistakes in Turkish texts written by learners as a foreign or secondary language constitute paradigm of this research; are handled for analysis of concepts used in classification of type, numerical rates to language levels, place conducted and writing mistakes. The total 88 studies on this research show that 5 PhD theses constitute 5,6% of these studies, 31 master theses constitute 35,2% and 52 articles constitute 59% . There are 4 PhD theses in Türkiye, 1 PhD thesis in abroad; 23 master theses in Türkiye, 8 master theses in abroad; 34 of articles in Türkiye, 18 articles in abroad. 61 studies conducted on determining writing mistakes and being evaluated were conducted in Türkiye, 27 studies were in abroad. Mistake is used 2 times, incorrect is 4 in PhD theses; incorrect is 19 times, mistake is 10, problem is 5 times and incorrectness is 1 in the master theses; incorrect is 33 times, mistake is 26, problem is used 3 times, incorrectness is 5 and difficulty is used 2 times in the articles.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kaya, M. (2022). Conceptually Examination of the Studies on Writing Mistakes in Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Volume: 12 Issue: 4 Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1182576

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Ak Başoğul, D., & Can, F.S. (2014). the analysis on the mistakes in written expression that have been made by balkan students learning Turkish as a foreign language. Dil ve Edebiyat Egitimi Dergisi 2(10).
  2. Alan, B. & Güven, M. (2022). A universal confusion of concept: a document analysis on the concept of proficiency, sufficiency, competence. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 12 (1), 271-293. DOI:10.18039/ajesi.1004416
  3. Arslan, M. (2012). The studies on teaching-learning Turkish as a foreign language in historical period. KSU Journal of Social Sciences 9, (2).
  4. Arslan, M., & E. Klicic, E. (2015). The problems encountered in the improvement of writing skills in teaching Turkish as a foreign language: the example of Bosnia and Herzegovinia. Kırıkkale University Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2):169-82.
  5. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). California: Thompson Wadsworth.
  6. Azizoğlu, N. İ., Demirtaş Tolaman, T., & İdi Tulumcu, F. (2019). Academic writing skill in teaching Turkish as a foreign language: the encountered problems and solution suggestions’’. Journal of Teaching Turkish as an International Foreign Language, 2(1):7-22.
  7. Biçer, N. (2012). Teaching Turkish to foreigners from Huns to today. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education, Number: 1/4 2012 s. 107-133, TURKIYE.
  8. Bojana P. (2002). Students’ attitude towards writing and the development of academic writing skills. The Writing Center Journal, 22(2):9-27.
  9. Büyükikiz, K. K., & Hasırcı, S. (2013). The evaluation of the written expressions of the students learning Turkish as a foreign language according to the error analysis approach. Journal of Education of Native Language, 1(4):51-62.
  10. Demir, F. (2017). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde yazma becerisi geliştirmeye yönelik öykü kullanımı: b2 düzeyi. [The use of stories to improve writing skill in teaching Turkish as a foreign language: b2 level]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
  11. Demiriz, H. N., & Okur, A. (2019). A view of teaching writing in teaching Turkish over foreign students in academic Turkish. Jounral of Education of Native Language, 7(2):436-49. Drompp, M. R. (1999). Breaking The Orkhon tradition: Kirghiz adherence to the Yenisei Region after AD 840. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 390-403.
  12. Erbay, N. (2017). the concept of the Orient and the West from the Orkhon Inscriıptıons to the Classic Poem. Atatürk University the Journal of the Instıtute of Turcology Research, (60), 139-154.
  13. Genç, H. N. (2017). Writing and punctuation in the context of teaching Turkish as a foreign language. Journal of Language, 168(2):31-42.
  14. Göçer A. Moğul, S. (2011). A general view of studies related to teaching Turkish as a foreign language. International Perodical For the Languages, Literature and Hıstory of Turkish or Turkic, Volume 6/3 Summer 2011.
  15. Günaydın, H. R. (2021). Günaydın, H. R. (2021). Türkçeyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenenlerin yazılı metinlerindeki yanlışlar: bir sistematik derleme [The mistakes in written texts of students learning Turkish as a foreign language: a systematic collation]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu.
  16. Hovdhaugen, E. (1974). The relationship between the two Orkhon inscriptions. Acta Orientalia, 36, 28-28.
  17. Hoşça, F. (2020). Difficulties encountered in teaching Turkish in Sudan. The Journal of Social Sciences Academy, 3(1):77-87.
  18. İşcan, A. (2015). A view of the writing anxiety in teaching Turkish as a foreign language (the example of University of Jordan). The Journal of the Education of Language and Literature, (14).
  19. Jobeen, A., Kazemian, B. & Shahbaz, M. (2015). The role of error analysis in teaching and learning of second and foreign language. Education and Linguistic Research, 1(2):52-62.
  20. Kara, M. (2020). The concept confusion appearing with philosophy of Kierkegaard: is it apprehension, worry, anxiety, fear?. FSM Scholarly Studies Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, (16), 279-308. DOI: 10.16947/fsmia.849168. Karasar, N. (2006). Scientific search method, (16th edition), Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
  21. Kıral, B. (2020). The document analysis as a qualitative data analysis method. Siirt University TheJournal of the Institute of Social Sciences, Volume 8, Number 15, 2020, 170-189. Klimova, B. F. (2014). Approaches to the teaching of writing skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 112:147-51.
  22. Korkmaz, Z. (2010). The historical development processes of Oghuz Turkish, Turkish Studies International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, Volume 5/1 Winter.
  23. Limpo, T., Rui A. A., & Fidalgo, R. (2014). Children’s high-level writing skills: Development of planning and revising and their contribution to writing quality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2):177-93.
  24. Miles, M. B., Hubeman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. New York: Sage Publications, Inc.
  25. Nurlu, M. (2019). Teaching Turkish as a foreign language, Ankara: Kalemkitap publishing.
  26. Ross, E. D. (1930). The Orkhon Inscriptions: being a translation of Professor Vilhelm Thomsen's final Danish rendering. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 5(4), 861876.
  27. Tezcan, M. (2017). Which group Orkhon Inscriptions belong to diplomatically?. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education (TEKE), 6(3), 1267-1284.
  28. Topsakal, C. (2018). The analysis of Orkhun Inscriptions from the aspect of education sciences. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University The Journal of Social Sciences, 4(8), 296-312.
  29. Turhan, O., & Baş B. (2017). “Web 2 tools for writing skills in teaching Turkish to foreigners: the example of poll everywhere”. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education 13(3):1233-48.
  30. Üstün, M. C. (2010). The notes on the differences in reading and interpreting Orkhon Inscriptions of Turkologist descent Turkish. Turkish Studies (Electronic), 5(2), 1392-1413.
  31. Ültay, E., Akyurt, H., & Ültay, N. (2021). The descriptive content analysis in social sciences. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, (10), 188-201.
  32. URL 1: YÖK Thesis Center (2022). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/giris.jsp
  33. URL 2: https://scholar.google.com/schhp?hl=tr
  34. URL 3: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/
  35. Alan, B. & Güven, M. (2022). A universal confusion of concept: a document analysis on the concept of proficiency, sufficiency, competence. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 12 (1), 271-293. DOI:10.18039/ajesi.1004416
  36. Kara, M. (2020). The concept confusion appearing with philosophy of Kierkegaard: is it apprehension, worry, anxiety, fear?. FSM Scholarly Studies Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, (16), 279-308. DOI: 10.16947/fsmia.849168. Karasar, N. (2006). Scientific search method, (16th edition), Ankara: Nobel Publishing.