SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2024 / Volume: 14 Issue: 3

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technologies in Education According to Primary School Teachers: Opportunities and Challenges

Mustafa Erol(Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi)0000-0002-1675-7070
Ahmet Erol(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7538-952X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results help understand primary school teachers' opinions regarding using artificial intelligence tools in the learning process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Artificial intelligence (AI), which refers to technologies that mimic human cognition, affects many industries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants are 16 primary school teachers determined by the criterion sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results help understand primary school teachers' opinions regarding using artificial intelligence tools in the learning process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Artificial Intelligence · AI Tools · Artificial Intelligence in Education

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), which refers to technologies that mimic human cognition, affects many industries. Education is one of these sectors. Artificial intelligence affects many educational environments, from lectures to homework. In this process, both academic and ethical concerns call into question the future of artificial intelligence. These inquiries are essential as they show that the human factor will continue as an integral part of education. Because AI tools, even when best designed, can only partially replace human interaction or quality teaching. However, they can make the teacher's job easier and contribute to more effective learning. Therefore, teachers' awareness of this technology has become essential. This research aims to determine primary school teachers' opinions about using AI tools in education. The research was conducted using a case study. The participants are 16 primary school teachers determined by the criterion sampling method. Data were collected through a semi-structured interview form and analyzed with content analysis. According to the findings, teachers stated that AI tools may have advantages and disadvantages in educational environments. While teachers are concerned about the adverse effects of artificial intelligence tools on students, they also recognize their cognitive and socio-emotional contributions. Teachers also stated that artificial intelligence can make teachers' jobs easier but can only partially replace them. The results help understand primary school teachers' opinions regarding using artificial intelligence tools in the learning process.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erol, M., Erol, A. (2024). Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technologies in Education According to Primary School Teachers: Opportunities and Challenges. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Volume: 14 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1446227

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (64)

  1. Ahmad, K., Iqbal, W., Hassan, A., Qadir, J., Benhaddou, D., Ayyash, M., & Fuqaha, A. (2020). Data-Driven Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Comprehensive Review. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/zvu2n
  2. Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 431-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
  3. Akyel, Y., & Tur, E. (2024). Yapay zekanın potansiyelinin ve eğitim bilimlerindeki uygulamalarının araştırılması ve araştırmalarda beklentiler, zorluklar ve gelecek yönelimleri [Exploring the Potential of Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications in Educational Sciences: Expectations, Challenges, and Future Directions in Research]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 645-712. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.1322341
  4. Asimov, I. (2020). I, Robot (E. Odabaş, Çev.). İthaki Yayınları.
  5. Ayala-Pazmiño, M. (2023). Inteligencia artificial en la educación: Explorando los beneficios y riesgos potenciales [Artificial Intelligence in Education: Exploring the Potential Benefits and Risks]. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 8(3), 892-899. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2023.3.1827
  6. Bayraktar, B., Gülderen, S., Akça, S., & Serin, E. (2023). Yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin eğitimde kullanımına yönelik öğretmen görüşleri [Teachers' views on the use of artificial intelligence technologies in education]. Ulusal Eğitim Dergisi, 3(11), 2012–2030. Retrieved from https://uleder.com/index.php/uleder/article/view/380
  7. Bowman, J. (2023). How artificial intelligence is used in education, the motley fool. (13 Nov 2023). Retrieved from https://www.fool.com/investing/stock-market/market-sectors/information-technology/ai-stocks/ai-in-education/
  8. Bryant, J., Heitz, C., Sanghvi, S., & Wagle, D. (2020). How artificial intelligence will impact K-12 teachers. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/education/our-insights/how-artificial-intelligence-will-impact-k-12-teachers
  9. Bulut, M. A., Davarcı, M., Bozdoğan, N. K., & Sarpkaya, Y. (2024). Yapay zekanın eğitim üzerindeki etkileri [The effects of artificial intelligence on education]. Ulusal Eğitim Dergisi, 4(3), 976–986. Retrieved from https://uleder.com/index.php/uleder/article/view/498
  10. Caramiaux B., & Fdili Alaoui S. (2022). “Explorers of unknown planets”: Practices and politics of artificial ıntelligence in visual arts. Conference On Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, November 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555578
  11. Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
  12. Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence trends in education: A narrative overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233
  13. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264 – 75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2988510
  14. Chou, J., Murillo, O., & Ibars, R. (26 Sep, 2017). How to Recognize Exclusion in AI. Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/microsoft-design/how-to-recognize-exclusion-in-ai-ec2d6d89f850
  15. Druga, S., & Ko, A. J. (2021, June). How do children’s perceptions of machine intelligence change when training and coding smart programs?. In Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM interaction design and children conference (pp. 49-61).
  16. Edwards, B. I., & Cheok, A. D. (2018). Why not robot teachers: Artificial intelligence for addressing teacher shortage. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 32(4), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2018.1464286
  17. Edwards, S. (2023). Early childhood education and care, artificial intelligence and the post digital. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 48(3), 179-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391231198910
  18. Eren, Z. (2021). Eğitimde yapay zekâ uygulamaları ve geleceğe ilişkin yönelimler [Artificial Intelligence Applications in Education and Future Trends]. (Eds. N. Öykü İyigün & Mustafa K. Yılmaz). Yapay zekâ: güncel yaklaşımlar ve uygulamalar [Artificial Intelligence: Current Approaches and Applications]. İstanbul: Beta Kitap Yayıncılık.
  19. Erol, A., Yurdakal, H. İ., & Tekin Karagöz, C. (2023). Metaverse/Metaeducation belief scale. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 94-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.52380/mojet.2023.11.2.461
  20. Felix, C. V. (2021). The role of the teacher and AI in education. Sengupta, E., Blessinger, P. and Makhanya, M.S. (Der.). International perspectives on the role of technology in humanizing higher education (Innovations in higher education teaching and learning, 33), In (pp.33-48). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120200000033003
  21. Gondal, K. M. (2018). Artificial intelligence and educational leadership. Annals of King Edward Medical University, 24(4), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v24i4.2591
  22. Gordon, B. M. (2011). Artificial intelligence: Approaches, tools and applications. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
  23. Hawking, S., Russel, S., Tegmark, M., & Wilczek, F., (2014). Transcendence looks at the implications of artificial intelligence- but are we taking AI seriously enough? The Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/stephen-hawking-transcendence-looks-at-the-implications-of-artificial-intelligence-but-are-we-taking-ai-seriously-enough-9313474.html
  24. Holmes W., Persson J., Chounta I. A., Wasson B., & Dimitrova V. (2022). Artificial intelligence and education: A critical view through the lens of human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. Council of Europe.
  25. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  26. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2019). Cheating and plagiarism in schools and colleges. Psychology Press
  27. Kim, S., Jang, Y., Kim, W., Choi, S., Jung, H., Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2021, May). Why and what to teach: AI curriculum for elementary school. In proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 35, No. 17, pp. 15569-15576).
  28. Knox J. (2019). What does the ‘postdigital’ mean for education? Three critical perspectives on the digital, with implications for educational research and practice. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00045-y
  29. Kolchenko, V. (2018). Can modern AI replace teachers? Not so fast! Artificial intelligence and adaptive learning: Personalized education in the AI age. HAPS Educator, 22(3), 249-252. https://doi.org/10.21692/haps.2018.032
  30. Kurian, N. (2023). AI's empathy gap: The risks of conversational Artificial Intelligence for young children's well-being and key ethical considerations for early childhood education and care. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, (early view), 14639491231206004. https://doi.org/10.1177/14639491231206004
  31. Liang, J. C., Hwang, G. J., Chen, M. R. A., & Darmawansah, D. (2023). Roles and research foci of artificial intelligence in language education: An integrated bibliographic analysis and sysThemestic review approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4270-4296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1958348
  32. Lin, P., Van Brummelen, J., Lukin, G., Williams, R., & Breazeal, C. (2020). Zhorai: Designing a Conversational Agent for Children to Explore Machine Learning Concepts. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34(09), 13381-13388. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i09.7061
  33. Loeckx, J. (2016), Blurring boundaries in education: Conext and impact of MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 93-121. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2395
  34. Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2824–2838. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861
  35. McCarthy, J. (2007). From here to human-level AI. Artificial Intelligence, 171(18), 1174-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.10.009
  36. Mengesha Z, Heldreth C, Lahav M, et al. (2021). “I don’t think these devices are very culturally sensitive.” Impact of automated speech recognition errors on African Americans. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 26(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.725911
  37. Merriam, S. B. (2015). Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber [Qualitative Research: A Guide for Design and Implementation]. (Trans. Eds. Turan, S.). Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık.
  38. Minkkinen, M., & Mäntymäki, M. (2023). Discerning between the “easy” and “hard” problems of AI governance. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 4(2), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2023.3267382
  39. Mondal, B. (2020). Artificial intelligence: state of the art. In: Balas, V., Kumar, R., Srivastava, R. (eds) Recent trends and advances in artificial intelligence and internet of things. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, 389-425. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32644-9_32
  40. Öztürk Dilek, G. (2019). Yapay zekanin etik gerçekliği [The Ethical Reality of Artificial Intelligence]. Ankara Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(4), 47-59. Patton, M.Q. (2015). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri [Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods]. (Trans. Eds. Bütün, M., & Demir, S. B.). Pegem akademi yayıncılık: Ankara.
  41. Qin, F., Li, K., & Yan, J. (2020). Understanding user trust in artificial intelligence based educational systems: Evidence from China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1693-1710. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12994
  42. Schiff, D. (2020). Out of the laboratory and into the classroom: The future of artificial intelligence in education. AI and Society. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01033-8
  43. Sevil, Ş., & Saralar-Aras, İ. (2024). Eğitimde kullanılan yapay zeka araçları öğretmen el kitabı [Teacher’s Handbook on Artificial Intelligence Tools in Education]. Ankara. Retrieved from https://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/www/egitimde-kullanilan-yapay-zek-araclari-ogretmen-el-kitabi-yayimlandi/icerik/3631
  44. Seyrek, M., Yıldız, S., Emeksiz, H., Şahin, A., & Türkmen, M. T. (2024). Öğretmenlerin eğitimde yapay zekâ kullanımına yönelik algıları [Teachers' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Use in Education]. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 11(106), 845–856. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11113077
  45. Siegle, D. (2023). A role for chatgpt and AI in gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 46(3), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175231168443
  46. Su, J., & Yang, W. (2022). Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: A scoping review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100049
  47. Su, J., & Zhong, Y. (2022). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in early childhood education: Curriculum design and future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100072
  48. Su, J., Ng, D. T. K., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in early childhood education: The challenges and opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124
  49. Tseng, T., Murai, Y., Freed, N., Gelosi, D., Ta, T. D., & Kawahara, Y. (2021). PlushPal: Storytelling with interactive plush toys and machine learning. In Interaction design and children (pp. 236-245).
  50. UNİCEF, (2021). Children and AI Where are the opportunities and risks. Retrieved from Unicef. https://www.unicef.org/innovation/sites/unicef.org.innovation/files/2018-11/Children%20and%20AI_Short%20Verson, 20(283), 29.
  51. Williams, R., Park, H. W., Oh, L., & Breazeal, C. (2019). Popbots: Designing an artificial intelligence curriculum for early childhood education. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(1), 9729–9736.
  52. Yang, W. (2022). Artificial Intelligence education for young children: Why, what, and how in curriculum design and implementation. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100061
  53. Yi, H., Liu, T., & Lan, G. (2024). The key artificial intelligence technologies in early childhood education: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10637-7
  54. Yıldırım, H., & Şimşek, A. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences]. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  55. Yılmaz, Z. (2023). “Yapay zeka ve felsefe” soruşturması [Inquiry into “Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy”]. Düşünce ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 159-201. https://doi.org/10.55796/dusuncevetoplum.1412018
  56. Zanetti, M., Rendina, S., Piceci, L., & Cassese, F. P. (2020). Potential risks of artificial intelligence in education. Form@ re-Open Journal per la Formazione in Rete, 20(1), 368-378. https://doi.org/10.13128/form-8113
  57. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  58. Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025
  59. Zhang, P., & Tur, G. (2024). A systematic review of ChatGPT use in K‐12 education. European Journal of Education, 59(2), e12599. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12599
  60. Zhao, Y., & Liu, G. (2018). How do teachers face educational changes in artificial intelligence era. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 300, 47-50. Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/erss-18/55912681
  61. Zheng, L., Niu, J., Zhong, L., & Gyasi, J. F. (2023). The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on learning achievement and learning perception: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5650-5664. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2015693
  62. Liang, Y. (2023). Balancing: The Effects of AI Tools in Educational Context. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(8), 7-10. https://doi.org/10.54691/fhss.v3i8.5531
  63. Huang, L. (2023). Ethics of artificial intelligence in education: Student privacy and data protection. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 16(2), 2577-2587. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.23.re202
  64. Öztürk Dilek, G. (2019). Yapay zekanin etik gerçekliği [The Ethical Reality of Artificial Intelligence]. Ankara Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(4), 47-59.