SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 1

21st Century Skills Research Trends in Türkiye: Investigating Graduate Theses in Curriculum and Instruction

Aylin Akinlar(Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi)0000-0002-4448-2721
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These recommendations highlight pathways to deepen academic understanding and support the continued evolution of 21st-century skills research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The internationalization of higher education institutions is a positive development, offering significant opportunities for growth and advancement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is imperative that students are equipped with 21st-century skills.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These recommendations highlight pathways to deepen academic understanding and support the continued evolution of 21st-century skills research.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:21st-Century Skills · Curriculum and Instruction · Research Trends.

Abstract

The internationalization of higher education institutions is a positive development, offering significant opportunities for growth and advancement. It is imperative that students are equipped with 21st-century skills. This paper presents the latest research trends on 21st-century skills in higher education, focusing on graduate theses in curriculum and instruction programs in Türkiye. This research examines the context in which these graduate programs study 21st-century skills from 2014 to 2024, along with the results of these studies. This study employs a qualitative content analysis method using MAXQDA. The analysis reveals an increasing academic focus on 21st-century skills, marked by a peak in dissertation completions in 2022, reflecting a response to evolving technological and societal needs. The emphasis on quantitative and mixed methods, alongside diverse research tools, illustrates the complexity of this research area and underscores a commitment to empirical study. These findings highlight the critical need for ongoing investigation, particularly at the doctoral level and within foundation universities, to further enrich understanding in this evolving educational field. The study suggests fostering diverse research approaches, particularly qualitative and interdisciplinary methods, to enrich insights into 21st-century skills. Expanding doctoral-level research and increasing contributions from foundation universities are recommended to broaden perspectives and strengthen theoretical frameworks. Additionally, the development of specialized data collection tools is encouraged to enhance accuracy and support detailed analysis in this complex field. These recommendations highlight pathways to deepen academic understanding and support the continued evolution of 21st-century skills research.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akinlar, A. (2025). 21st Century Skills Research Trends in Türkiye: Investigating Graduate Theses in Curriculum and Instruction. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Volume: 15 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1544081

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000183219
  2. Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competencies for new millennium learners in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41. OECD Publishing. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED529649
  3. Bedir, H. (2019). Pre-service ELT teachers' beliefs and perceptions on 21st-century learning and innovation skills (4Cs). Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 231-246.
  4. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first-century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st-century skills (pp. 17-66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
  5. Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, Jr., D., Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez, Jr., A. V., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P., & Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878572
  6. Coşanay, G., & Karalı, Y. (2022). Examination of classroom teachers' 21st-century teaching skills. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 9(1), 432-448. https://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/1563
  7. Council of Higher Education. (n.d.). What is the Bologna process? https://uluslararasi.yok.gov.tr/en/internationalisation/bologna/whats-the-bologna-process
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
  9. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  10. Erdem, C. (2019). Introduction to 21st-century skills and education. In C. Erdem, H. Bagci, & M. Kocyigit (Eds.), 21st century skills and education. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  11. Gömleksiz, M. N., Sinan, A. T., & Doğan, F. D. (2019). Perceptions of prospective teachers of Turkish, Turkish language and literature and contemporary Turkish dialects of the 21st century skills and competences. International Journal of Eurasian Research, 7(19), 163-185. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1180053
  12. Güneş, F. (2012). Bologna süreci ile yükseköğretimde öngörülen beceri ve yetkinlikler. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 2(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2012.026
  13. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27, 1-12. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
  14. İlhan, E., & Kalaycı, N. (2018). Üniversitelerin lisans programlarında uygulanan çekirdek program tasarısının değerlendirilmesi. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 8(3), 264-281. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.18.014
  15. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
  16. Kim, K. H., Park, H., Yoo, S. J., & Kim, H. Y. (2019). Edutainment, serious games, and experiential environments: Effects on digital literacy, problem-solving, and creativity in learners. Computers & Education, 134, 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.012
  17. Korkmaz, G., & Kalayci, N. (2021). Problem and project-based learning as an educational philosophy: A novel conceptual model for higher education. African Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 774-789. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1324144
  18. Kozikoğlu, İ., & Senemoğlu, N. (2015). The content analysis of dissertations completed in the field of curriculum and instruction (2009-2014). Education & Science, 40(182). https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4784
  19. Literacy, C. (2009). P21 Framework Definitions. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED519462
  20. Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures, and software solution. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
  21. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
  22. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
  23. Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2009). Curriculum foundations, principles, and issues (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
  24. Ozdemir, M. Ç., & Arı, A. (2008). Eğitim programları ve öğretim bilim dalında yapılmış bazı doktora tezlerinin incelenmesi. II. Lisansüstü Eğitim Sempozyum, 26(28), 40-63. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.647030
  25. P21 Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Battelle for Kids. http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf
  26. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
  27. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
  28. Petek, E. (2018). Critical thinking as a nourishing interface to EFL context in higher education. International Education Studies, 11(5), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n5p1
  29. Powers, B., & Knapp, T. (2006). Dictionary of nursing theory and research (3rd ed.). Springer.
  30. Schleicher, A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on education: Insights from Education at a Glance 2020. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en
  31. Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 2: What kind of learning for the 21st century? UNESCO Education Research and Foresight Working Papers, 14. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000242996
  32. Shaw, A. (2004). About the 21st century and education. 21st-century school – professional staff development and curriculum design. http://www.21stcenturyschools.com/index.html
  33. Soffer, J. (2016). Ten 21st-century skills every student needs. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/03/21st-century-skills-future-jobs-students/
  34. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Sage.
  35. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage.
  36. Tekerek, B., Karakaya, F., & Tekerek, M. (2018). An investigation on undergraduate programs of teacher training regarding 21st-century skills: Example of elementary mathematics and science. Education Conference.
  37. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
  38. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st-century competencies: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
  39. Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029
  40. Vural, M., & Turan, A. H. (2019). Yönetim bilişim sistemleri bölümü mezunlarının sahip olması gereken bilgi, beceri ve yetkinlikler. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi (JOBS), 7(2), 357-388. https://doi.org/10.22139/jobs.562327
  41. Xing, B., & Marwala, T. (2017). Implications of the Fourth Industrial Age for Higher Education. The Thinker, 73(3). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3225331
  42. Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473915480
  43. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0