SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 1

Proactivity as a Predictor of Social Sensitivity in University Students

Golsa Parvizi Ağaya(SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3800-4835
Kübra Dombak(SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1362-3958
Samet Makas(SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9896-4013
Eyüp Çelik(SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7714-9263
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

T-test findings illustrated women had higher social sensitivity levels compared to men.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated the relationship between proactive personality and social sensitivity among university students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample comprised 543 participants (445 women, 98 men).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:T-test findings illustrated women had higher social sensitivity levels compared to men.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Social sensitivity · Proactivity · Proactive Personality

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between proactive personality and social sensitivity among university students. The sample comprised 543 participants (445 women, 98 men). Data were collected using the Social Sensitivity Scale and the Brief Proactive Personality Scale. Correlation analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between social sensitivity and proactive personality. Regression analysis further indicated that proactive personality is a significant predictor of social sensitivity. Additionally, findings showed that married participants exhibit significantly higher social sensitivity than those in dating relationships. T-test findings illustrated women had higher social sensitivity levels compared to men.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ağaya, G. P., Dombak, K., Makas, S., Çelik, E., *, S. M. (2025). Proactivity as a Predictor of Social Sensitivity in University Students. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Volume: 15 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1493518

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (48)

  1. Akın, A., Abacı, R., Kaya, M., & Arıcı, N. (2011, Haziran). Kısaltılmış Proaktif Kişilik Ölçeği'nin (KPÖ) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliği. ICES11 International Conference on Educational Sciences içinde (ss. 22-25).
  2. Asıcı, E., & Akyavuz, E. K. (2021). The effect of social sensitivity course on benevolence and intercultural sensitivity. e-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 355-369.
  3. Aydın, M. Z. (2005). Ailede çocuğun ahlak eğitimi. EM Yayınları.
  4. Balat, G. U., & Dağal, A. B. (2006). Examination of studies on values education in preschool education. Kök Yayıncılık.
  5. Balcı, S., & Öztürk, M. (2023). The effect of sociodemographic factors and empathy on social sensitivity: A research on Bayburt University. Faculty of Letters Journal of Social Sciences, 47(1), 43-49.
  6. Banks, J. A. (2004). Teaching for social justice, diversity, and citizenship in a global world. The Educational Forum, 68(4), 296-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720408984645
  7. Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202
  8. Bender, L., Walia, G., Kambhampaty, K., Nygard, K. E., & Nygard, T. E. (2012). Social sensitivity and classroom team projects: An empirical investigation. Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education içinde (ss. 403-408). https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157258
  9. Bolino, M., Valcea, S., & Harvey, J. (2010). Employee, manage thyself: The potentially negative implications of expecting employees to behave proactively. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 325-345. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X493134
  10. Bozbayındır, F., & Alev, S. (2018). The analysis of the relationship between self-efficacy, proactive personality and openness to change perceptions teachers. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19(2), 293-311. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.346666
  11. Bozdağ, F., & Bozdağ, S. (2021). Development of social sensitivity scale. Journal of Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty of Education (HAYEF), 18(1), 84-101. https://doi.org/10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
  12. Bozdağ, F., & Ergün, N. (2020). Psychological resilience of healthcare professionals during COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Reports. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120965477
  13. Bozkan, R. E. (2019). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin toplumsal duyarlılıklarının incelenmesi [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Yök Tez Merkezi. (Tez No: 812512)
  14. Butler, A. F. (2009). Service learning, civic responsibility and attitudes of secondary students [Doktora tezi, Walden University]. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7481&context=dissertations
  15. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2021). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (30. bs.). Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  16. Chen, X., Liu, J., Ellis, W., & Zarbatany, L. (2016). Social sensitivity and adjustment in Chinese and Canadian children. Child Development, 87(4), 1115-1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12514
  17. Chen, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Collaborative data networks for public service: Governance, management, and performance. Public Management Review, 20, 672-690. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1305691
  18. Coşkun, A. M., Şenturan, L., Çayır, G., & Yakıt, E. (2016). Social sensitivity development about the problem of childbrides. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 1107-1122. https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3583
  19. Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00044-1
  20. Demir, A. H., & Arabacı, İ. B. (2021). The relationship between proactive personality traits and engagements towards the profession and career development desires of classroom teachers. Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice, 12(23), 1-21.
  21. Ercan, B. (2009). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin sosyal sorumluluk anlayış ve uygulamaları Antalya örneği [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Akdeniz Üniversitesi.
  22. Hilmi, M. Z., & Apriawan, A. (2021). Peran keterlibatan orang tua dalam menumbuhkan kepekaan sosial anak di desa sepit kecamatan keruak kabupaten lombok timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 7(7), 273-280.
  23. Joo, B. K., Hahn, H. J., & Peterson, S. L. (2015). Turnover intention: The effects of core self-evaluations, proactive personality, perceived organizational support, developmental feedback, and job complexity. Human Resource Development International, 18(2), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2015.1026549
  24. Kale, E. (2019). The impact of proactive personality and locus of control on career satisfaction and innovative work behavior. Journal of Tourism Theory and Research, 5(2), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.24288/jttr.527358
  25. Kalın, Z. T., & Nalçacı, A. (2017). Examination of tendencies towards tolerance among 5th year secondary school students on the basis of different variances. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(23), 293-304.
  26. Keskin, Y., & Öğretici, B. (2013). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde "duyarlılık" değerinin etkinlikler yoluyla kazandırılması: Nitel bir araştırma. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 11(25), 143-181.
  27. Kim, T. Y., Hon, A. H. Y., & Lee, D. R. (2010). Proactive personality and employee creativity: The effects of job creativity requirement and supervisor support for creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410903579536
  28. Kocademir, F. N., Değerli, M. N. Ö., & Altuntaş, O. (2023). Investigation of occupational therapy students' social sensitivity, empathy skills, and susceptibility to ethical values. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 11(3), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.30720/ered.1274141
  29. Küçükoğlu, A. (2012). Community service-learning in teacher education: An experimental learning approach. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, 1(4), 214-226.
  30. Küçükoğlu, A., Korkmaz, Z. S., Köse, E., & Taşgın, A. (2014). Analysis on preservice teachers' views about community service learning. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 5(17), 1-26. https://hdl.handle.net/11494/4830
  31. Li, D., Xu, X., Liu, J., Dai, Y., & Chen, X. (2021). Cybervictimization and adjustment in late childhood: Moderating effects of social sensivity. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 73, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101258
  32. Liu, Q., Wu, J., Zhou, Z., & Wang, W. (2020). Parental technoference and smartphone addiction in Chinese adolescents: The mediating role of social sensitivity and loneliness. Child & Youth Services Review, 118, Article 105434. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12702
  33. Liu, Y., Zhao, S., Jiang, L., & Li, R. (2016). When does a proactive personality enhance an employee's whistle-blowing intention?: A cross-level investigation of the employees in Chinese companies. Ethics & Behavior, 26(8), 660-677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2015.1113382
  34. Loban, W. (1953). A study of social sensitivity (sympathy) among adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 44(2), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057034
  35. Magrì, E. (2022). Social sensitivity and the ethics of attention. European Journal of Philosophy, 30(2), 725-739. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12702
  36. Ocal, A., & Altunok, A. (2016). Developing social sensitivity with service-learning. Social Indicators Research, 129, 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1091-6
  37. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Örgütsel davranış (İ. Erdem, Çev.; 14. bs.). Nobel Yayınları.
  38. Robbins, S., Judge, T. A., Millett, B., & Boyle, M. (2013). Organisational behaviour. Pearson Higher Education AU.
  39. Staub, E. (2012). Psychology and morality in genocide and violent conflict: Perpetrators, passive bystanders, and rescuers. M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Ed.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil içinde (ss. 381-398). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13091-021
  40. Tang, T-W. (2015). Competing through customer social capital: The proactive personality of bed and breakfast operators. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 20(2), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2013.866969 Tarhan, N. (2015). Kadın psikolojisi. Nesil Yayınları.
  41. Toyin, A., Kolapo, A., Oladimeji, S., & Toyin, K. (2021). Availability and utilization of information and communication technology among instructors in adult and non-formal education centers in Kwara state, Nigeria. OUSL Journal, 16(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.4038/ouslj.v16i1.7521
  42. Töremen, F. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının sorumluluk eğitimi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(1), 263-274.
  43. Turğut, F. (2017). The transformation of family in historical process and its possible projection to the future. Medeniyet ve Toplum, 1(1), 93-117.
  44. Tymon, A., & Batistic, S. (2016). Improved academic performance and enhanced employability? The potential double benefit of proactivity for business graduates. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 915-932. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1198761
  45. Uncuoğlu Yolcu, İ., & Çakmak, A. F. (2017). Mediating effect of psychologic empowerment workers in the relationship of proactive personality and proactive work behavior. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 13(2), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2017228692
  46. Vrasmas, A. (2001). Family and Education. M. Calin & M. Dumitrana (Ed.), Values and education in Romania today içinde. The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
  47. Way, B. M., & Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Is there a genetic contribution to cultural differences? Collectivism, individualism and genetic markers of social sensitivity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(2-3), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq059
  48. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. Penguin UK.