SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 2

Looking at the Reform of the Century of Türkiye Education Model through the Lens of Synchronization Theory by Wearing Phenomenological Glasses

Yurdagül Doğuş(KOCAELI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6305-4271
Sena Alptekin(Nesibe Aydın Okulları)0009-0006-8231-4629
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-08-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study concluded that synchronization between policymakers and teachers is an important factor for the success of the Century of Türkiye Education Model reform initiative.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In 2024, Türkiye launched a reform movement that adopts the dynamics of Turkish culture to produce solutions to the chronic problems in the education system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to understand how primary school first-grade teachers experienced this process in the early stages of the reform movement called the Century of Türkiye Education Model. 10 teachers, who were determined using the criterion sampling technique, participated in the study, which was conducted using a qualitative method and phenomenological design.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study concluded that synchronization between policymakers and teachers is an important factor for the success of the Century of Türkiye Education Model reform initiative.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Education Reform · Primary School First-Grade Teacher · Synchronization Theory

Abstract

In 2024, Türkiye launched a reform movement that adopts the dynamics of Turkish culture to produce solutions to the chronic problems in the education system. This study aimed to understand how primary school first-grade teachers experienced this process in the early stages of the reform movement called the Century of Türkiye Education Model. 10 teachers, who were determined using the criterion sampling technique, participated in the study, which was conducted using a qualitative method and phenomenological design. In the study, data were obtained through semi-structured interviews and analyzed with content analysis. The findings showed that the teachers were thrust into a major reform process with very limited preparation. It was revealed that the teachers' inadequate knowledge about the changes introduced caused them to experience negative emotions and have negative thoughts. They transferred these negative feelings and thoughts to their behaviors by not fully fulfilling the requirements of the reform initiative. We used the synchronization theory as an explanatory way to discuss our findings. The study concluded that synchronization between policymakers and teachers is an important factor for the success of the Century of Türkiye Education Model reform initiative. In light of this important result, we offered some practical suggestions to teachers, policymakers, and researchers.

🔖

Cite This Article

Doğuş, Y., Alptekin, S. (2025). Looking at the Reform of the Century of Türkiye Education Model through the Lens of Synchronization Theory by Wearing Phenomenological Glasses. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Volume: 15 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1667279

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (91)

  1. Acton, R., & Glasgow, P. (2015). Teacher wellbeing in neoliberal contexts: A review of the literature. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(8), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n8.6
  2. Adolfsson, C. H. (2024). Large-scale school improvement: Results of and conditions for systemic changes within coupled school systems. J Educ Change, 25, 579–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-024-09509-w
  3. Akala, B. M. (2021). Revisiting education reform in Kenya: A case of Competency Based Curriculum (CBC). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100107
  4. Akpinar, B., & Aydin, K. (2007). Change in Education and Teachers’ perceptions of change. Education and Science, 32(144), 71-80.
  5. Arenas, A., Díaz-Guilera, A., Kurths, J., Moreno, Y., & Zhou, C. (2008). Synchronization in complex networks. Physics Reports, 469(3), 93-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2008.09.002
  6. Arslan, A. (2025). Evaluation of TYMM life sciences lesson curriculum according to first grade teachers’ opinions. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 13(162), 202-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ASOS.80345
  7. Bada, M. (2018). Social sciences teachers’ thoughts about constructivist education aproach [Master's Thesis, Erciyes University].
  8. Bakx, A., Koopman, M., de Kruijf, J., & den Brok, P. (2015). Primary school pupils’ views of characteristics of good primary school teachers: An exploratory, open approach for investigating pupils’ perceptions. Teachers and Teaching, 21(5), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.995477
  9. Balanov, A., Janson, N., Postnov, N., & Sosnovtseva, O. (2009). Synchronization from simple to complex. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72128-4
  10. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2022). Qualitative resaarch for education an introduction to theory and methods. (5th ed.). Pegem.
  11. Boland, T. (1993). The importance of being literate: Reading development in primary school and its consequences for the school career in secondary education. Eur J Psychol Educ, 8, 289-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174083
  12. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
  13. Borna Khajeh, M., Mahmoodi, F., Adib, Y., & Habibi, H. (2022). Studying the process of primary schools teachers' resistance towards formal curriculum. نظریه و عمل. 10(19), 373-408. http://cstp.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3321-en.html
  14. Burnes, B. (2004). Managing change: A strategic approach to organisational dynamics. Prentice Hall.
  15. Ceylan, S., & Peker, R. (2024). Examination of the primary school 1st grade life sciences textbook prepared according to the 2024 program in terms of environmental education. Journal of Innovative Research in Social Studies, 7(2), 140-172. https://doi.org/10.47503/jirss.1577998
  16. Cetin, A. (2017). A Case study on primary school science teachers appointed to public schools from private teaching institutions [Doctoral dissertation, Çukurova University].
  17. Cilliers, J., Fleisch, B., Prinsloo, C., & Taylor, S. (2020). How to improve teaching practice? An experimental comparison of centralized training and in-classroom coaching. Journal of Human Resources, 55(3), 926-962. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.55.3.0618-9538R1
  18. Creswell, J.W. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Qualitative research design according to five approaches. (5th ed.). Siyasal.
  19. Cuban, L. (2011). Teacher Resistance and Reform Failure. https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2011/04/30/teacher-resistance-and-reform-failure/
  20. Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review/teacher learning: What matters. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.
  21. Degenhart, J., & Wabara, K. (2021). Lean synchronization in teaching and learning: Evidence from a quasi-experiment in a venture capital (VC) methods class (March 30, 2021). SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3816137
  22. Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society and Education, 7(3), 252-263.
  23. Duyul, S., Duyul, Y., Kesmen, M., & Kesmen, M. (2025). Teachers’ views on the Turkish Century Education Model. Ulusal Eğitim Dergisi, 5(3), 1-19. https://uleder.com/index.php/uleder/article/view/562
  24. Eilam, E. (2019). Synchronization: A framework for examining emotional climate in classes. Palgrave Communications, 5(144). 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0356-0
  25. Erikson, E. (2018). 8 stages of human being (1st ed.). Okyan Us.
  26. Fullan, M. G. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press. Guskey, T., 2002. Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
  27. Hallinger, P., & Bryant, D. B. (2013). Synthesis of findings from 15 years of educational reform in Thailand: Lessons on leading educational change in East Asia. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16, 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2013.770076
  28. Hallinger, P., & Kulophas, D. (2019). The evolving knowledge base on leadership and teacher professional learning: a bibliometric analysis of the literature, 1960-2018. Professional Development in Education, 46(4), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1623287
  29. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2009). Change Wars. Solution Tree.
  30. Haug, B. S., & Mork, S. M. (2021). Taking 21st century skills from vision to classroom: What teachers highlight as supportive professional development in the light of new demands from educational reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103286
  31. Hidayah, R., Wangid, M. N., & Wuryandani, W. (2022). Elementary school teacher perception of curriculum changes in Indonesia. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(2), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.02.07
  32. Hilal, Y. Y., Hammad, W., & Polatcan, M. (2022). Does distributed leadership improve teacher agency? Exploring the mediating effect of teacher reflection. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(6), 1369-1387. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221134931
  33. Högberg, B., & Lindgren, J. (2022). From a crisis of results to a crisis of wellbeing – education reform and the declining sense of school belonging in Sweden. Comparative Education, 59(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2022.2140894
  34. Ishtiaque, F., Motahar, E. B., Sajal, M. S. R., Amin, M. A., Sarker, F., & Mamun, K. A. (2023). Students' attention classification during class lecture using BCI and machine learning: A pathway towards neurofeedback-based learning. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications (SKIMA) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SKIMA59232.2023.10387369
  35. Jiang, W., & Saito, E. (2024). Lightening the academic burden on Chinese children: A discourse analysis of recent education policies. J Educ Change, 25, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-022-09470-6
  36. Karjalainen, S., Åhlander, V. L., Sahlén, B., & Houmann, A. (2022). Teachers’ descriptions of classroom communication after an SLP-led in-service training. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 48(3), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2022.2043431
  37. Kaviti, L. (2018). The new curriculum of education in Kenya: A linguistic and education paradigm shift. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 23(2), 84-95. https://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/106450/KAVITI.pdf?sequence=1
  38. Kent, A. (2013). Synchronization as a classroom dynamic: A practitioner's perspective. Mind Brain and Education, 7(1), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12002
  39. Kilinc, M. (2014). Studies on teachers opinions about the changes in education system education model of the 4+4+4 [Master's Thesis, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University].
  40. Kirk, D., & MacDonald, D. (2001). Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(5), 551-567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270010016874
  41. Kondakci, Y., Beycioglu, K., Sincar, M., & Ugurlu, C. T. (2015). Readiness of teachers for change in schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(2), 176–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1023361
  42. Kucuk, Z. A., & Kurt, T. (2025). Evaluation of the Turkish Century Education Model in the context of effectiveness of educational reforms according to the opinions of school administratiors. International Journal of the Pursuit of Excellence in Social Sciences, 8, 2-27.
  43. Lindenberger, U., Li, S. C., Gruber, W., & Müller, V. (2009). Brains swinging in concert: Cortical phase synchronization while playing guitar. BMC Neuroscience, 10(1), 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-22
  44. Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016). Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.023
  45. McClintock M. K. (1971). Menstrual synchrony and suppression. Nature, 229, 244–245. https://doi.org/10.1038/229244a0
  46. Mellegård, I., & Pettersen, K. D. (2016). Teachers’ response to curriculum change: Balancing external and internal change forces. Teacher Development, 20(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1143871
  47. Merriam, S. B. (2018). A guide to qualitative research, design and implementation. Nobel.
  48. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.
  49. MoNE (2017). General competencies of the teaching profession. https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_12/11115355_YYRETMENLYK_MESLEYY_GENEL_YETERLYKLERY.pdf
  50. MoNE (2018). Turkey’s 2023 Education Vision. https://baklan.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_12/11144802_2023_EGITIM_VIZYONU.pdf
  51. MoNE (2023). National education statistics formal education 2022/’23. https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2023_09/29151106_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2022_2023.pdf
  52. MoNE (2024a). Türkiye Century Education Model curriculum common text. https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/ortak-metin
  53. MoNE (2024b). Teachers' "Türkiye Century Maarif Model Educator Training" has begun. https://www.meb.gov.tr/ogretmenlerin-turkiye-yuzyili-maarif-modeli-egitici-egitimleri-basladi/haber/33896/tr
  54. MoNE (2024c). Education in numbers from past to present 1923-2023. https://yuzuncuyilgalerisi.eba.gov.tr/ Moore, A., Edwards, G., Halpin, D., & George, R. (2002). Compliance, resistance and pragmatism: The (re)construction of schoolteacher identities in a period of intensive educational reform. British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 551-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000005823
  55. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
  56. Mulenga, I. M., & Kabombwe Y. M. (2019). Understanding a competency-based curriculum and education: The Zambian perspective. Journal of Lexicography and Terminology, 3(1), 106-134.
  57. Nummenmaaa, L., Glerean, E., Viinikainen, M., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Haria, R., & Sams, M. (2012). Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals. Biological Sciences, 109(24), 9599-9604. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206095109
  58. OECD (2019), TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners, TALIS. OECD Publishing. Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
  59. OECD (2023). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en
  60. OECD (2013). Leadership for 21st century learning. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264205406-en
  61. OECD (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Organization for Economic Co-operation Development. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2018/06/the-future-of-education-and-skills_5424dd26/54ac7020-en.pdf
  62. Oldac, Y. I., & Kondakci, Y. (2020). Multilevel analysis of the relationship between school-level variables and student achievement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 762-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219827303
  63. Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkin, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (7th ed.). Pearson.
  64. Orphanos, S., & Orr, M.T. (2013). Learning leadership matters: The influence of innovative school leadership preparation on teachers’ experiences and outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(5) 680–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213502187
  65. Oruc, Ş., & Ulusoy, K. (2008). Social studies education and dissertations in this field. Journal of Ahmet Kelesoglu Education Faculty, 26, 121-132.
  66. Ozdemir, S., Sezgin, F., Kilinc, A. C., & Polatcan, M. (2023). A cultural lens to school leadership effects on teacher instructional practices: The mediation of teacher collective efficacy and the moderation of uncertainty avoidance. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231177536
  67. Patton, M. Q. (2018). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3th ed.). Pegem. Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M., & Kurths, J. (2001). Synchronization A universal concept in nonlinear sciences (1st ed.). Cambridge University
  68. Sahlberg, P. (2016). The global educational reform movement and its impact on schooling. In A. G. K. Mundy, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The Handbook of global education policy (pp. 128–144).
  69. Scott, K., Dawson, G., & Quach, J. (2024). How are we measuring domains that influence teacher readiness for change? A scoping review of existing instruments in non-tertiary settings. J Educ Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-024-09521-0
  70. Seligman, M. E. P. (2019). Positive psychology: A personal history. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 15, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095653
  71. Sezer, B. B., & Dedeoglu, H. (2024). Literacy skills in the Maarif Model primary school curriculum: Financial, visual and critical. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 22(3), 2007-2027. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1511168
  72. Shao, G. (2023). A model of teacher enthusiasm, teacher self-efficacy, grit, and teacher well-being among English as a foreign language teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1169824
  73. Slavin, R. E. (1993). Students differ: So what? Educational Researcher, 22(9), 13-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X022009013
  74. Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Schwartz, N., Schkade, D., Krueger, A., & Kahneman, D. (2006). A population approach to the study of emotion: diurnal rhythms of a working day examined with the day reconstruction method. Emotion, 6(1), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.139
  75. Terhart, E. (2013). Teacher resistance against school reform: Reflecting an inconvenient truth. School Leadership & Management, 33(5), 486-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2013.793494
  76. Thien, L. M., & Yeap, S. B. (2023). Configuring effects of learning-centred leadership in promoting teacher professional learning and teacher self-efficacy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231211431
  77. TIMSS (2019). TIMSS 2019 International results in mathematics and science. https://timss2019.org/reports/
  78. Ulcay, O. (2024). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli değerlendirmesi. Ulusal Eğitim Toplum ve Dünya Dergisi, 1(2), 70-75. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11097248
  79. Uludag-Kircil, R., & Ulucinar-Sagir, S. (2025). Reflections of the Türkiye Century Education Model in the Classroom: Teaclers’ views. Erciyes Journal of Education, 9(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.32433/eje.1673094
  80. UNICEF (2020). What will a return to school during the COVID-19 pandemic look like? https://www.unicef.org/turkiye/en/stories/what-will-return-school-during-covid-19-pandemic-look
  81. United Nations (2020). Policy brief: Education during COVID-19 and beyond. United Nations. https://unsdg.un.org/resources/policy-brief-education-during-covid-19-and-beyond
  82. Unsal, S., Cetin, A., Korkmaz, F., & Aydemir, M. (2019). The change in the curricula: Teachers’ perceptions. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 48(1), 623-661.
  83. Uygun, K., & Akgul, G. (2024). Opinions of social studies teachers on the Turkish Century Education Model. Dumlupınar University Graduate School of Education Journal, 8(2), 81-102.
  84. Wang, T., Olivier, D. F., & Chen, P. (2020). Creating individual and organizational readiness for change: Conceptualization of system readiness for change in school education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(6), 1037–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1818131
  85. World Bank (2016). GPE 2020: Improving learning and equity through stronger education systems – strategic plan 2016–2020. World Bank Group.
  86. World Bank (2018). World bank world development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/padr.12164
  87. Yildirim, Y., & Caliskan, A. (2024). Evaluation of the Türkiye Century Education Model in terms of 21st Century Human Profile. Electronic Journal of Education Sciences, 13(26), 204-220. https://doi.org/10.55605/ejedus.1548121
  88. Yilmaz, K. (2022). Teachers’ professional collaboration: Current status, barriers and suggestions. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 55(3), 1023-1043. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.1143251
  89. Zayim, M., & Kondakci, Y. (2015). An exploration of the relationship between readiness for change and organizational trust in Turkish public schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214523009
  90. Zhao, Y., & Watterson, J. (2021). The changes we need: Education post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change, 22(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09417-3
  91. Zheng, L., Liu, W., Long, Y., Zhai, Y., Zhao, H., Bai, X., Zhou, S., Li, K., Zhang, H., Liu, L., Guo, T., Ding, G., & Lu, C. (2020) Affiliative bonding between teachers and students through interpersonal synchronisation in brain activity. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 15(1), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa016