SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2025 / Volume: 15 Issue: 3

Investigation of Digital Inequalities in Asynchronous Video-Based Distance Learning

Mehmet Özkaya(Necmettin Erbakan University, Big Data Coordination Office)0000-0002-3562-0125
Celal Karaca(AKSARAY UNIVERSITY, AKSARAY VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0002-4082-2207
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Research findings revealed that students from low-income households or rural areas predominantly used smartphones to follow their courses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine digital inequalities among students in the Faculty of Education who participated in asynchronous video-based distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Adopting a cross-sectional research model, the study was conducted with 501 students from the Faculty of Education at a state university in Turkey’s Central Anatolia region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Research findings revealed that students from low-income households or rural areas predominantly used smartphones to follow their courses.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Digital Inequality · Digital Divide · Asynchronous Learning

Abstract

This study aims to examine digital inequalities among students in the Faculty of Education who participated in asynchronous video-based distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research investigates students' basic and qualitative access to information and communication technologies (ICT), their perceived ICT skills, and their views on how ICT factors affect distance education, with respect to gender, household income, and place of residence. Adopting a cross-sectional research model, the study was conducted with 501 students from the Faculty of Education at a state university in Turkey’s Central Anatolia region. Research findings revealed that students from low-income households or rural areas predominantly used smartphones to follow their courses. More than half of the participants had internet connections with low or medium speeds, and a significant portion had limited (quota-based) internet usage. The perceived ICT skills of Education Faculty students were found to be at a good level, suggesting that second-level digital inequalities are less pronounced in this population. No statistically significant difference was observed in perceived ICT skills scores by gender. Furthermore, students living in rural areas had significantly higher perceptions regarding the impact of ICT factors on distance education compared to those living in urban centers. The results indicate that first-level inequalities related to basic access to ICT remain the primary challenge for pre-service teachers, particularly those from rural and low-income backgrounds, despite their adequate perceived ICT skills. This suggests that policy efforts should prioritize addressing fundamental access issues in asynchronous video-based distance education, particularly during crisis periods.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özkaya, M., Karaca, C. (2025). Investigation of Digital Inequalities in Asynchronous Video-Based Distance Learning. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Volume: 15 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1528244

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Agung, A. S. N., Surtikanti, M. W., & Quinones, C. A. (2020). Students’ perception of online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A case study on the English students of STKIP Pamane Talino. SOSHUM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 10(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.31940/soshum.v10i2.1316
  2. Aissaoui, N. (2022). Digital divide: A literature review and some directions for future research considering COVID-19. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71(8/9), 686–708. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2020-0075
  3. Azubuike, O., Adegboye, O. O., & Quadri, H. A. (2021). Who gets to learn in a pandemic? Exploring the digital divide in remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100022
  4. Bahia, K., & Suardi, S. (2019). The state of mobile internet connectivity 2019. GSMA Connected Society: London. https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/GSMA-State-of-Mobile-Internet-Connectivity-Report-2019.pdf
  5. Beaunoyer, E., Dupéré, S., & Guitton, M. J. (2020). COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424
  6. Borda, M., Grishchenko, N., & Kowalczyk-Rólczyńska, P. (2022). Impact of digital inequality on the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from European Union Countries. Sustainability, 14(5), 2850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052850
  7. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
  8. Chen, T., Peng, L., Yin, X., Rong, J., Yang, J., & Cong, G. (2020). Analysis of user satisfaction with online education platforms in china during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare, 8(3), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030200
  9. Coleman, V. (2021). Digital divide in UK education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Literature review. Research Report; Cambridge Assessment. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/628843-digital-divide-in-uk-education-during-covid-19-pandemic-literature-review.pdf.
  10. Council of Higher Education [Yükseköğretim Kurulu]. (2018). New undergraduate teacher education programs [Yeni öğretmen yetiştirme lisans programları]. Council of Higher Education. https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idari-birimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/yeni-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programlari.
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  12. Delaporte, A., & Bahia, K. (2022). The state of mobile internet connectivity 2022. GSMA Connected Society: London.
  13. Dorn, E., Hancock B., Sarakatsannis, J., & Viruleg, E. (2020). COVID-19 and student learning in the United States: The hurt could last a lifetime. McKinsey & Company, 1, 1-9. https://kremen.fresnostate.edu/centers-projects/weltycenter/documents/COVID-19-and-student-learning-in-the-United-States-FINAL.pdf
  14. González-Betancor, S. M., López-Puig, A. J., & Cardenal, M. E. (2021). Digital inequality at home. The school as a compensatory agent. Computers & Education, 168, 104195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104195 Hargittai, E. (2021). Handbook of digital inequality. Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788116572
  15. Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1998). Bridging the racial divide on the internet. Science, 280(5362), 390–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5362.390
  16. Huang, R. H., Liu, D. J., Tlili, A., Yang, J. F., & Wang, H. H. (2020). Handbook on facilitating flexible learning during educational disruption: The Chinese experience in maintaining undisrupted learning in COVID-19 outbreak.
  17. Beijing: Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University. https://iite.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Handbook-on-Facilitating-Flexible-Learning-in-COVID-19-Outbreak-SLIBNU-V1.2-20200315.pdf
  18. ITU, (2022). Facts and Figures 2022: The gender digital divide. https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/2022/11/24/ff22-the-gender-digital-divide/
  19. Lai, J., & Widmar, N. O. (2020). Revisiting the Digital Divide in the COVID‐19 Era. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(1), 458–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13104
  20. Laufer, M., Leiser, A., Deacon, B., De Brichambaut, P. P., Fecher, B., Kobsda, C., & Hesse, F. W. (2021). Digital higher education: A divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on estech in COVID-19 reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6
  21. Law on Universal Service Provision (2005). Official Gazette (Issue: 5369). Law on the Provision of Universal Service and Amendments to Certain Laws. [In Turkish: Evrensel Hizmetin Sağlanması Hakkında Kanun] https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2005/06/20050625-2.htm
  22. Lowenthal, P. R., Borup, J., West, R. E., & Archambault, L. (2020). Thinking beyond Zoom: Using asynchronous video to maintain connection and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383–391. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216192/paper_216192.pdf.
  23. Maheshwari, G. (2021). Factors affecting students’ intentions to undertake online learning: An empirical study in Vietnam. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6629–6649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10465-8
  24. Manzano, D., & Fernández-Mellizo, M. (2019). Origen familiar, uso del tempo y de las tecnologas de la información. Revista Internacional De Sociologia, 77(3), 136. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2019.77.3.17.165
  25. Muñoz-Najar, A., Gilberto S., Alison Grace; Hasan, A., Cobo, R., Juan, C., Azevedo, J. P. W. D., & Akmal, M. (2022). Remote learning during COVID-19: Lessons from today, principles for tomorrow (English). World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/160271637074230077/Remote-Learning-During-COVID-19-Lessons-from-Today-Principles-for-Tomorrow
  26. Nguyen, M. T., Hargittai, E., & Marler, W. (2021). Digital inequality in communication during physical distancing: The case of COVID-19. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106717.
  27. Norman, H., Adnan, N. A., Nordin, N., Ally, M., & Tsinakos, A. A. (2022). The educational digital divide for vulnerable students in the pandemic: Toward a new agenda 2030. Sustainability, 14(16), 10332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610332
  28. Özkaya, M., Hebebci, M. T., & Kaleci, F. (2025). A comparison of the digital divide across faculties in synchronous online distance education. Journal of Necmettin Erbakan University Ereğli Faculty of Education, 7(1), 308-3028. https://doi.org/10.51119/ereegf.2025.132
  29. Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/framework_guide_v1_002_harward.pdf
  30. Srinivasan, M., D. J., & Shamala, R. (2021). COVID-19 and online education: Digital inequality and other dilemmas of rural students in accessing online education during the pandemic. World of Media, 4(2021), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.30547/worldofmedia.4.2021.2
  31. Teacher Task Force. (2021, March 24). COVID-19 highlights digital divide in distance learning. https://teachertaskforce.org/news/covid-19-highlights-digital-divide-distance-learning.
  32. The National Broadband Strategy and Action Plan 2017-2020 (2017). Official Gazette (Issue: 48558, December 25, 2017). [In Turkish: Ulusal Genişbant Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı 2017–2020] (2017). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2017/12/20171221M1-1.pdf
  33. UNESCO. (2020b). Distance learning solutions. https://webarchive.unesco.org/web/20220626170824/https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/solutions.
  34. UNESCO. (2020a, March 25). Startling digital divides in distance learning emerge. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/startling-digital-divides-distance-learning-emerge.
  35. Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, & J. Schulz (Eds.), Communication and information technologies annual (Vol. 9, pp. 29–52). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
  36. Wiwatowska, A. (2021). How many data does youtube use? WhistleOut. https://www.whistleout.com.au/MobilePhones/Guides/How-Much-Data-Does-YouTube-Use.