SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2025 / Volume: 15 Issue: 3

Interdisciplinary Outdoor Education: Participants’ Experiences in a Science Camp

Yusuf Yıldırım(SIIRT UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF EDUCATION)0000-0003-0035-8443
Hüseyin Çalışkan(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-6849-1318
Turgay Öntaş(TEKIRDAG NAMIK KEMAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2258-0862
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed that the outdoor science camp significantly enhanced students’ understanding and perception of science by encouraging curiosity, active engagement, and the ability to view science as an interdisciplinary and real-life process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study was conducted to determine participant experiences regarding interdisciplinary outdoor education applications within the scope of a science camp project.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Designed as a qualitative case study, the research involved 64 participants, including 30 students, 22 parents, and 12 project team members.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed that the outdoor science camp significantly enhanced students’ understanding and perception of science by encouraging curiosity, active engagement, and the ability to view science as an interdisciplinary and real-life process.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Outdoor Education · Interdisciplinary Education · Participant Experiences

Abstract

The present study was conducted to determine participant experiences regarding interdisciplinary outdoor education applications within the scope of a science camp project. Designed as a qualitative case study, the research involved 64 participants, including 30 students, 22 parents, and 12 project team members. Data were collected through open-ended questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and student diaries, and analyzed using descriptive analysis. The findings revealed that the outdoor science camp significantly enhanced students’ understanding and perception of science by encouraging curiosity, active engagement, and the ability to view science as an interdisciplinary and real-life process. Students’ conceptualizations evolved from abstract and technical terms to more reflective and integrated ideas, as evidenced by their use of scientific imagery in drawings, including tools, natural elements, and representations from various scientific disciplines. The camp environment promoted emotional awareness, cognitive development, and key skills such as communication, teamwork, and problem-solving through enjoyable and hands-on learning experiences. Students frequently associated science with nature and demonstrated increased environmental sensitivity. They also reported high levels of satisfaction from engaging in collaborative, play-based, and discovery-oriented learning activities. Furthermore, feedback from instructors and counsellors emphasized the program’s effectiveness in fostering student growth and professional learning for educators. The program was noted for offering authentic learning experiences and supporting interdisciplinary thinking. However, some challenges were identified, including the intensity of the activity schedule, weather conditions, and the need to address diverse student backgrounds and learning needs. Overall, the science camp provided a meaningful, engaging, and multidimensional learning experience that enriched participants’ views of science and its role in everyday life.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yıldırım, Y., Çalışkan, H., Öntaş, T. (2025). Interdisciplinary Outdoor Education: Participants’ Experiences in a Science Camp. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Volume: 15 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1633939

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (56)

  1. Ahrenkiel, L., & Worm-Leonhard, M. (2014). Offering a forensic science camp to introduce and engage high school students in interdisciplinary science topics. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(3), 340-344. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400321a
  2. Akin, Y., & Bakar, R. A. (2023). The effectiveness of outdoor education on student creativity. JUARA: Jurnal Olahraga, 8(1), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.33222/juara.v8i1.2417
  3. Asfeldt, M., Purc-Stephenson, R., & Zimmerman, T. (2022) Outdoor education in Canadian post-secondary education: Common philosophies, goals, and activities. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 25, 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-022-00102-4
  4. Auer, M. R. (2008). Sensory perception, rationalism and outdoor environmental education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 17(1), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.2167/irgee225.0
  5. Avraamidou, L. (2015). Reconceptualizing elementary teacher preparation: A case for informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 108-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.969358
  6. Ayotte-Beaudet, J. P., Berrigan, F., Deschamps, A., L’Heureux, K., Beaudry, M. C., & Turcotte, S. (2023). K-11 teachers’ school-based outdoor education practices in the province of Québec, Canada: From local initiatives to a grassroots movement. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2022.2164787
  7. Başkale, H. (2016). Nitel araştırmalarda geçerlik, güvenirlik ve örneklem büyüklüğünün belirlenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 9(1), 23-28. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/deuhfed/issue/46796/586804
  8. Bentsen, P., & Jensen, F. S. (2012). The nature of udeskole: Outdoor learning theory and practice in Danish schools. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning 12(3), 199–219. oi.org/10.1080/14729679.2012.699806
  9. Bunting. C. J. (2006). Interdisciplinary teaching through outdoor education. Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.
  10. Cottrell, J. R., & Cottrell, S. P. (2020). Outdoor skills education: What are the benefits for health, learning and lifestyle? World Leisure Journal, 62(3), 219-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2020.1798051
  11. Çalışkan, H. & Yıldırım, Y. (2024). Social studies education in out-of-school settings- concept-, skill-, and value-oriented. [Okul dışı ortamlarda sosyal bilgiler eğitimi-Kavram, Beceri ve Değer Odaklı] Pegem Akademi.
  12. Çalışkan, H., & Yıldırım, Y. (2022). Values education in out-of-school settings. [Okul dışı ortamlarda değerler eğitimi]. Pegem Akademi.
  13. Çalışkan, H., Yıldırım, Y., & Demirhan, E. (2021). The evaluation of values education project which is conducted by the context of nature education. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 44-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.21.53.8.3
  14. Davies, R., & Hamilton, P. (2016). Assessing learning in the early years’ outdoor classroom: Examining challenges in practice, Education 3-13. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 46(1), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2016.1194448
  15. Dawidowicz, P. (2011). With scholarship & practice in mind: The case study as research method. The Journal of Instructional Design, 1(2), 5-12. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/facpubs/165/
  16. Demirhan, E. (2018). Opinions of gifted students and prospective teachers on nature education program based on mentoring approach. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19(3), 175-188. https://dx.doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.483536.
  17. Dettweiler, U., Gerchen, M., Mall, C., Simon, P., & Kirsch, P. (2023). Choice matters: Pupils' stress regulation, brain development and brain function in an outdoor education project. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 152-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12528
  18. Dikmenli, Y. (2017). Preservice teachers’ perception levels concerning consumer environmental consciousness. Journal of Education in Scıence Environment and Health, 3(2), 157-164. https://dx.doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.326741.
  19. Ertaş, H., Şen, A. İ., & Parmasızoğlu, A. (2011). The effects of out-of school scientific activities on 9th grade students’ relating the unit of energy to daily life, Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 178-198. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/balikesirnef/issue/3373/46558
  20. Fang, W. T., Hassan, A. A., & LePage, B. A. (2022). Outdoor education. In the living environmental education: Sound science toward a cleaner, safer, and healthier future (pp. 229- 260), Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4234-1
  21. Gerber, B. L., Marek, E. A., & Cavallo, A. M. L. (2001). Development of an informal learning opportunities assay. International Journal of Science Education 23(6), 569-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690116959
  22. Gülcan, C. (2021). A qualitative data collection tool: A study on the application and validity of focus group technique. Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences of Mersin University, 4(2), 94-109. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/meusbd/issue/63193/866942
  23. Gürdal, A., & Öztuna, A. (2010). Project-based learning [Proje tabanlı öğrenme]. In Y. Ersoy, G. Uzal, A. Erdem (Eds.) Science/Physics Education I – Perspectives, Developments, and New Approaches (pp. 145-157). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  24. Gürsoy, G., & Yıldırım-Polat, S. N. (2023). Systematic review of theses on out-of-school learning environment in science education. Journal of Research in Informal Learning Environments, 8(1), 1-20. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jrinen/issue/78626/1162800
  25. Hırça, N. (2013). Summer science camp experiences of gifted students. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 1(1), 22-30. http://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423937373.pdf
  26. Holland-Smith, D. (2022) Habitus and practice: Social reproduction and trajectory in outdoor education and higher education, Sport, Education and Society, 27(9), 1071-1085, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.1964460
  27. Isgren Karlsson, A., Alatalo, T., Nyberg, G., & Backman, E. (2023). Exploring physical education teachers’ perceptions and attitudes towards digital technology in outdoor education. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 23(4), 510-524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2022.2054835
  28. İnce, S., & Akcanca, N. (2021). Parents’ views on out-of-school learning environments in preschool education. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 58, 172-197. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.886446
  29. Laçin-Şimşek, C. (2004). Ethical and aesthetic values in environmental education in science education curriculum and textbooks. Journal of Value Education, 2(7), 127-146. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ded/issue/36881/312464
  30. Lakin, L. (2006). Science beyond the classroom. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 8890. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656021
  31. Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
  32. Melber, L. H., & Abraham, L. M. (1999). Beyond the classroom: Linking with informal education. Science Activities, 36, 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368129909601027
  33. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  34. Nielsen, M. K., Dyg, P. M., & Wistoft, K. (2020). Outdoor taste education: Danish perspectives on potentials and challenges for taste education in school gardens and outdoor education. Food, Culture & Society, 23(4), 523-541 https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2020.1776013
  35. Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and behavior, 41(5), 715-740. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177
  36. Oğurlu, I., Alkan, H., Unal, Y., Ersin, M. O., & Bayrak H. (2013). Contributions of environment and nature training to geography education: IDE projects case study, The 3rd Internatinal Geography Semposium-GEOMED 2013, Kemer-Antalya-Turkey, 2013, Symposium Proceedings, ISBN:978-605-62253-8-3 Pages 498-508.
  37. Ordin, Y. S., Bilik, Ö., Damar, H. T., & Çelik, B. (2018). The learning experiences of nursing students in surgical clinics reflected in reflection reports. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education., 6(3), 106-120. https://dx.doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.6c3s5m
  38. Paris, S. G., Yambor, K. M., & Packard, B. W. (1998). Hands-on biology: amuseum, school, university partnership for enhancing students interest and learning in science. Elementary School Jaurnal, 98(3), 267-288. https://doi.org/10.1086/461894
  39. Puhakka, R. (2023). Effects of outdoor adventures on emerging adults’ well-being and connection with nature. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2023.2220836
  40. Ramey-Gassert, L. (1997). Learning science beyond the classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 433-448. https://doi.org/10.1086/461875
  41. Remmen, K. B., & Iversen, E. (2023). A scoping review of research on school-based outdoor education in the Nordic countries. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 23(4), 433-451. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2022.2027796
  42. Saban, A. (2009). Prospective teachers’ mental images about the concept of student. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences. 7(2), 281-326. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/256272
  43. Samsudin, S., Kamalden, T. F. T., Aziz, A., Ismail, M. H., Yaakob, S. S. N., & Farizan, N. H. (2021). The impact of outdoor education camp program in building resilience among university students. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16185
  44. Saraç, H. (2017). Researches related to outdoor learning environments in Turkey: content analysis study. Journal of Research in Educational Theory and Practice, 3(2), 60-81. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/339611
  45. Seyhan, A. (2020). Effectiveness of out-of-school learning in social studies course according to prospective teachers. Turkish Journal of Educational Studies, 7(3), 27-51. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/919270
  46. Sjöblom, P., Eklund, G., & Fagerlund, P. (2023) Student teachers’ views on outdoor education as a teaching method−two cases from Finland and Norway, Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 23(3), 286-300, https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2021.2011338
  47. Sönmez, V. (2020). Science Philosophy. Anı.
  48. Stevens, S., Shin, N., Delgado, C., Cahill, C., Yunker, M., & Krajcik, J. (2007, April). Fostering students’ understanding of interdisciplinary science in a summer science camp. In annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
  49. Stevenson, A. D., & Casler-Failing, S. L. (2023). How clean is my water? A culturally responsive, project-based interdisciplinary summer camp. Afterschool Matters, 36, 28-36. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1389924.pdf
  50. Şeker, P. T., & Savaş, Ö. (2023). Okul dışı öğrenme ortamlarına ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty, 7(1), 64-83. https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1118257
  51. Tatar, N., & Bağrıyanık, K. (2012). Examination of teachers' views on out-of-school learning environments. Elementary Education Online, 14(4), 883-896 https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/90533
  52. Waite, S., Bølling, M., & Bentsen, P. (2016). Comparing apples and pears: A conceptual framework for understanding forms of outdoor learning through comparison of English forest schools and Danish udeskole. Environmental Education Research, 22(6), 868–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1075193
  53. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin.
  54. Yıldırım, Y. (2019). The effect of an out-of-school activity-based values education program on active citizenship values. [Unpublished Phd Dissertation, Sakarya Üniversitesi].
  55. Yıldız, E. (2022). An evaluation of preschool teachers' use of out-of-school learning environments. Bayburt Journal of Education Faculty, 17(33), 94-127. https://dx.doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.826566
  56. Yin, R. K. (2013) Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.