SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2026 / Volume: 16 Issue: 1

The Effect of Science Teaching in a Future Classroom Laboratory Learning Environment on the Information and Technology Literacy, and Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills of 7th-Grade Students

Halil Turgut(SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-9201-923X
Cemre Ece Ünal(SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-5430-8703
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-04-13
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings of the study revealed that the instructional process implemented in the Future Classroom Lab significantly improved students' cognitive skills in the aforementioned areas.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the key goals of 21st-century education is to equip students with essential life and thinking skills required by the modern age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, the “Future Classroom Lab” model developed by the European Schoolnet has pioneered efforts in 18 different countries to establish flexible learning spaces that promote key competencies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings of the study revealed that the instructional process implemented in the Future Classroom Lab significantly improved students' cognitive skills in the aforementioned areas.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Future Classroom Lab · Information and Technology Literacy · Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skill

Abstract

One of the key goals of 21st-century education is to equip students with essential life and thinking skills required by the modern age. In line with this objective, many countries are carrying out national and international projects focused on flexible and innovative learning environments. In this context, the “Future Classroom Lab” model developed by the European Schoolnet has pioneered efforts in 18 different countries to establish flexible learning spaces that promote key competencies. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of science instruction, designed in alignment with this model, on seventh-grade middle school students’ information and technology literacy, as well as their critical thinking and problem-solving skills. A quantitative research approach was adopted, utilizing a one-group pretest-posttest experimental design. The study sample consisted of 30 seventh-grade students (15 girls, 15 boys) from a public middle school in Antalya, selected through stratified sampling. The implementation was carried out over a total of 33 class hours in a Future Classroom Lab located within a social sciences high school in Antalya. Various data collection tools were employed to assess students’ information and technology literacy, as well as their critical thinking and problem-solving abilities, including a project design form, assessment rubrics, and a scenario-based evaluation form. The collected data were analyzed using the SPSS 29.0 software. The findings of the study revealed that the instructional process implemented in the Future Classroom Lab significantly improved students' cognitive skills in the aforementioned areas.

🔖

Cite This Article

Turgut, H., Ünal, C. E. (2026). The Effect of Science Teaching in a Future Classroom Laboratory Learning Environment on the Information and Technology Literacy, and Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills of 7th-Grade Students. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Volume: 16 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1783637

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (81)

  1. Akyol, N. A., & Aşkar, N. (2022). 21st century skills in early childhood. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 42(3), 2597-2629. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1081472
  2. American Library Association. (2000, January). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Association of College and Research Libraries. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency
  3. Aygün, Ş. S., Atalay, N., Kılıç, Z., & Yaşar, S. (2016). The development of a 21st century skills and competences scale directed at teaching candidates: Validity and reliability study. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 40(40), 160-175. https://izlik.org/JA44DX53WT
  4. Bannister, D., & Ayre, J. (Eds.). (2017). Guidelines on exploring and adapting: Learning spaces in schools. European Schoolnet. https://files.eun.org/fcl/Learning_spaces_guidelines_Final.pdf
  5. Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils' learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013
  6. Benade, L. (2019). Flexible learning spaces: Inclusive by design? New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-019-00127-2
  7. Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
  8. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
  9. Bristol, T. J. (2014). Flipping the classroom. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 9(1), 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2013.11.002
  10. Büyükşahin, Y. (2019). Let’s sit skew and learn right: Investigation the classroom ergonomics prepared with flexible seating effects on the motivation levels of teacher and students. Academy Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 152-164. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/aebd/article/635136
  11. Cingöz, D. (2023). Investigation of teaching Turkish foreigners course books in terms of 21st century skills (Publication No. 854313) [Master’s thesis, Bartın University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  12. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
  13. Colton, S., Smith, C., & Sourdot, L. (2020). Designing a future classroom laboratory for exploring the science of teaching and learning. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 11(3), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v11i3.25860
  14. Creswell, J. W., Fetters, M. D., Plano Clark, V. L., & Morales, A. (2009). Mixed methods intervention trials. In V. L. Plano Clark & N. G. Creswell (Eds.), Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences (pp. 159–180). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316490.ch9
  15. Duo-Terron, P. (2024). The future classroom lab: Educational considerations from a systematic review. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 18(2), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.5044
  16. Durak, H. Y. (2017). Turkish adaptation of the flipped readiness scale for middle school students. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(3), 1056-1068. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.328826
  17. Durukan, A. Y. (2015). School librarianship in the digital world and the 21st century skills. National Education, 45(208), 106-120. https://izlik.org/JA34EZ28UJ
  18. Elbyaly, M. Y. H., & Elfeky, A. I. M. (2023). The impact of problem-solving programs in developing critical thinking skills. European Chemical Bulletin, 12, 6636–6642.
  19. Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). W. H. Freeman and Company.
  20. Eral, S. H. (2019). A case study on innovative practices of English language teachers in flexible learning spaces (Publication No. 595060) [Master’s thesis, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  21. Eroğlu, S., & Bektaş, O. (2016). Ideas of science teachers took STEM education about STEM based activities. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 4(3), 43-67. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.4c3s3m
  22. Eryılmaz, S., & Uluyol, Ç. (2015). Evaluation of Fatih Project in the consideration of 21st century skills. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 35(2), 209-229. https://izlik.org/JA24RY88JX
  23. Erten, P. (2020). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of 21st century skills competence and their views on gaining these skills. National Education, 49(227), 33-64. https://izlik.org/JA89BM96TW
  24. European Schoolnet. (2016). Future classroom lab. European Schoolnet. https://fcl.eun.org/documents/10180/13526/FCL+learning+zones+Dec+2016/a091a761-7a63-443e-afe0-d1870e430686
  25. Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). American Philosophical Association.
  26. Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. https://insightassessment.com/iaresource/critical-thinking-what-it-is-and-why-it-counts/
  27. Fullan, M. (2013). Stratosphere: Integrating technology, pedagogy, and change knowledge. Pearson.
  28. Göçen, A., Eral, S. H., & Bücük, M. H. (2020). Teacher perceptions of a 21st century classroom. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.638110
  29. Göksün, D. O., & Kurt, A. A. (2017). The relationship between pre-service teachers’ use of 21st century learner skills and 21st century teacher skills. Education and Science, 42(190), 107-130. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.7089
  30. Gundersen, P. E. (2019). How does the high school redesigned learning space influence collaboration, communication, creativity, and critical thinking? (Publication No. 2649) [Doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
  31. Güllü, A., & Faiz, M. (2022). Opinions of social study teachers on technology and technology literacy. National Education, 51(235), 2625-2650. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.899441
  32. Hacıoğlu, Y. (2017). The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education-based activities on prospective science teachers’ critical and creative thinking skills (Publication No. 461483) [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  33. Hacıömeroğlu, G. (2018). Examining elementary pre-service teachers' science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) teaching intention. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(1), 1–14.
  34. Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). Psychology Press.
  35. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536
  36. Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17118
  37. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
  38. Johnson, L., Adams-Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., & Meira, A. (2012). Technology outlook: Brazilian primary and secondary education 2012–2017: An NMC Horizon Project Regional Analysis. The New Media Consortium. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED595171.pdf
  39. Julian, S. (2013). Reinventing classroom space to re-energise information literacy instruction. Journal of Information Literacy, 7(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.11645/7.1.1720
  40. Kalemkuş, J. (2021). Investigation of science curriculum learning outcomes in terms of 21st century skills. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 11(1), 63-87. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.800552
  41. Karasar, N. (2006). Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, techniques (16th ed.). Nobel Publications.
  42. Kariippanon, K. E., Cliff, D. P., Lancaster, S. J., Okely, A. D., & Parrish, A. M. (2019). Flexible learning spaces facilitate interaction, collaboration and behavioural engagement in secondary school. PLOS ONE, 14(10), e0223607. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223607
  43. Katz, I. R., & Macklin, A. S. (2007). Information and communication technology (ICT) literacy: Integration and assessment in higher education. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 5(4), 50-55.
  44. Kızılışıkoğlu, S., & Mirici, S. (2025). Implementing 21st century skills through the Future Classroom Lab (FCL) model: A case study of an environmental education and climate change course. International Journal of Curriculum & Instruction, 17(2).
  45. Kim, T. K. (2015). T test as a parametric statistic. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 68(6), 540–546. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.6.540
  46. Koltay, T. (2011). The media and the literacies: Media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382
  47. Koray, Ö., & Azar, A. (2008). An analysis of high school students’ problem solving and logical thinking abilities in terms of gender and preferred field. Kastamonu Education Journal, 16(1), 125-136. https://izlik.org/JA98JM99KB
  48. Kress, G. (2010). Learning and environments of learning in conditions of provisionality. In B. Bachmair (Ed.), Medienbildung in neuen Kulturräumen: Die deutschsprachige und britische Diskussion (pp. 171–182). Springer VS.
  49. Kyllonen, P. C. (2012, May 7-8). Measurement of 21st century skills within the common core state standards [Symposium presentation]. Invitational Research Symposium on Technology Enhanced Assessments. K12 Centre at ETS. https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/session5-kyllonen-paper-tea2012.pdf
  50. Liu, Z. (2013). Digital reading and the impact on information behavior: A survey of emerging research. Journal of Information Science, 39(1), 1–12.
  51. Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. (1999). Problem solving. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 437–447). Academic Press.
  52. Ministry of National Education. (2020). The use of technology in education and the classrooms of the future [Annual Report]. Ministry of National Education. https://meb.gov.tr/egitimde-teknoloji-kullanimi-ve-gelecegin-siniflari.pdf
  53. Moreno, J. R., Montoro, M. A, & Ortiz-Colon, A. M. (2019). Changes in teacher training within the TPACK model framework: A systematic review. Sustainability, 11(7), 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071870
  54. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
  55. Nedel, M. Z., & Buzzar, M. A. (2020). El Future Classroom Lab de Bruselas: Modelo internacional de la clase del siglo XXI. A&P Continuidad, 7(13), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.35305/23626097v7i13.271
  56. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017). The OECD handbook for innovative learning environments. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2017/06/the-oecd-handbook-for-innovative-learning-environments_g1g7aeda/9789264277274-en.pdf
  57. Öçalan, T. (2021). Evaluation of the 21st century skills of secondary school students according to different variables (Publication No. 701334) [Master’s thesis, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  58. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 framework definitions. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519462.pdf
  59. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Pearson Prentice Hall.
  60. Pedro, N. (2017, December 11–13). Redesigning learning spaces: What do teachers want for future classrooms? [Conference presentation]. International Conference on Educational Technologies, Sydney, Australia. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED579306
  61. Pituch, K. A., & Stevens, J. P. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (6th ed.). Routledge.
  62. Poyraz, G. T. (2018). Examination of STEM education in Kayseri province and feasibility of distance STEM education (Publication No. 494244) [Master’s thesis, Anadolu University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  63. Romrell, D., Kidder, L. C., & Wood, E. (2014). The SAMR model as a framework for evaluating mLearning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i2.435
  64. Senra, C. P., & Braga, M. (2020). Future Classroom Lab in Portugal: Analyzing the relationship of teachers with an innovative educational environment. Revista Diálogo Educacional, 20(64), 434-461. https://doi.org/10.7213/1981-416x.20.064.ds04
  65. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
  66. Silva, P. H., Luengo, J. A. M., Muñoz, C. M., & Cortés, M. V. (2022). Implementation and development of a Future Classroom Lab in a school setting: Study of the project of IES Francisco Giner de los Rios. Tarbiya. Revista de Investigación e Innovación Educativa, 50, 23-46. https://doi.org/10.15366/tarbiya2022.50.001
  67. Sinha, P., & Ugwulebo, J. E. (2024). Digital literacy skills among African library and information science professionals – An exploratory study. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 73(4/5), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2022-0138
  68. Sourdot, L. A. & Smith, C. E. (2019). Breaking down the barrier with the Future Classroom Lab: supporting teacher candidates and education professionals with relevant technological tools for the 21st century classroom. K. Graziano (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 871-874). AACE. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/207748/
  69. Sungur, N. (1997). Creative thinking. Evrim Publications.
  70. Şenkal, O., & Dinçer, S. (2012). Transforming traditional classes into E-Learning platforms: A model study. Journal of Information Technologies, 5(1), 13-18. https://izlik.org/JA49ZH95ZH
  71. Tena-Fernandez, R., & Carrera-Martinez, N. (2020). The future classroom lab: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence. European Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 158-173.
  72. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
  73. Turgut, H., Kılıç, F. E., Aycan, R., & Ünal, C. E. (2024). Assessing middle school students critical thinking and problem-solving skills: An analytical rubric development study. International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences, 6(10), 107-126. https://izlik.org/JA74LG72SK
  74. Ünal, C. E., Kılıç, F. E., Aycan, R., & Turgut, H. (2022, November 24-25). Development of an information and technology literacy skills assessment rubric [Conference presentation]. 6th International Education and Innovative Sciences Congress, Burdur, Türkiye.
  75. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  76. Weber-Bezich, H. (2014). Classroom design and student engagement in post-secondary institutions: An evaluative case study (Publication No. 3621165) [Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
  77. Yaşar, E. B. (2021). Investigation of science teachers’ 21st century skills, self-efficacy perceptions and STEM attitudes (Publication No. 689038) [Master’s thesis, Kırıkkale University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  78. Yıldız, E. P. (2023). Next-generation technologies in education. Efe Akademi Publications.
  79. Yu, L., & Zin, Z. M. (2023). The critical thinking-oriented adaptations of PBL models: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1139987
  80. Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145-181. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1466891
  81. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997