Journals / Research Journal of Business and Management / 2025 / Volume: 12 Issue: 2

MIND THE GAP: A CASE STUDY OF TURKISH AIRLINES ON ALIGNING SUSTAINABLITY INITIATIVES WITH CONSUMER EXPECTATIONS

Ali Aycı(ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT UNIVERSITY, INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES)0000-0001-8173-1152
Hassan Ismail Botan(ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT UNIVERSITY, INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES)0009-0000-5166-768X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings- The findings reveal a significant "information gap," with 43% of passengers unaware of key green aviation concepts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose- This study investigates the alignment between airline sustainability strategies and passenger perceptions, focusing on the case of Turkish Airlines.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It aims to identify the gaps between corporate sustainability messaging, operational realities, and consumer awareness and expectations in the context of an emerging market.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings- The findings reveal a significant "information gap," with 43% of passengers unaware of key green aviation concepts.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aviation · Green marketing · carbon offsetting

Abstract

Purpose- This study investigates the alignment between airline sustainability strategies and passenger perceptions, focusing on the case of Turkish Airlines. It aims to identify the gaps between corporate sustainability messaging, operational realities, and consumer awareness and expectations in the context of an emerging market. Methodology- A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining an academic literature review with a qualitative field study and a case study analysis. The field research involved structured interviews with 70 passengers at Ankara Esenboğa Airport to gauge awareness of concepts like Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) and carbon offsetting. The case study critically evaluates Turkish Airlines' sustainability reports and strategic initiatives. Findings- The findings reveal a significant "information gap," with 43% of passengers unaware of key green aviation concepts. While a of travelers (71%) express a willingness to pay more for sustainable flights, this support is conditional upon transparency and trust. exhibit skepticism towards indirect measures like carbon offsetting, preferring tangible actions such as fleet modernization. The Turkish Airlines indicates that while the airline has a strong, credible strategy in fleet modernization, its initiatives in SAF and majority Passengers analysis of carbon offsetting lack scale and are not effectively communicated, creating a "credibility gap". Conclusion- This paper contributes to the sustainable aviation literature by empirically demonstrating the disconnect between airline strategy and consumer perception in the Turkish context. It highlights that gaining a competitive advantage requires airlines to move beyond symbolic gestures and bridge the credibility gap through transparent communication and measurable, tangible actions.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aycı, A., Botan, H. I. (2025). MIND THE GAP: A CASE STUDY OF TURKISH AIRLINES ON ALIGNING SUSTAINABLITY INITIATIVES WITH CONSUMER EXPECTATIONS. Research Journal of Business and Management, Volume: 12 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2010

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Abrantes, I., Ferreira, A. F., Silva, A., & Costa, M. (2021). Sustainable aviation fuels and imminent technologies – CO2 emissions evolution towards 2050. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127937
  2. Bahman, N., & Shaker, M. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of sustainable aviation in the Middle East: A study of two UAE-based carriers. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2247233/v2
  3. Baledón, M. S., Trudel, M., & Kosoy, N. (2022). Alternative jet fuels and climate geopolitics: What, why does it and who matters in the environmental policy-making process. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 16(10), 916–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1912225
  4. Baumeister, S., Nyrhinen, J., Kemppainen, T., & Wilska, T. A. (2022). Does airlines’ eco-friendliness matter? Customer satisfaction towards an environmentally responsible airline. Transport Policy, 128, 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.016
  5. Baxter, G. (2021). An assessment of Singapore Airlines environmentally sustainable energy management. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 6(6), 232–247. https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijeab.66.26
  6. Baxter, G. (2023). An assessment of the role of carbon offsets programs as an airline carbon footprint mitigation strategy. Journal of Sustainable Tourism and Development, 27(1), 15-24. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSTD/article/view/260447
  7. Chao, H., Agusdinata, D. B., DeLaurentis, D., & Stechel, E. B. (2019). Carbon offsetting and reduction scheme with sustainable aviation fuel options: Fleet-level carbon emission impacts for U.S. airlines. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 75, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.015
  8. Chen, F. Y., Tu, S., & Wang, H. (2016). Green market segmentation: A case of airline customers in Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(1), 99–111. https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v9n1p99
  9. Dichter, A., Henderson, K., Riedel, R., & Riefer, D. (2020). How airlines can chart a path to zero-carbon flying. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/travel/our-insights/how-airlines-can-chart-a-path-to-zero-carbon-flying
  10. Fathi, B. M., Ansari, A., & Ansari, A. (2023). Green commercial supply chain: A European path to environment sustainability. Sustainability, 15(8), 6574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086574
  11. Han, H., Chua, B. L., & Hyun, S. S. (2020). Consumers’ intention to adopt eco-friendly electric airplanes: The moderating role of perceived uncertainty of outcomes and attachment to eco-friendly products. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(9), 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2019.1607957
  12. Han, H., Lee, M. J., Chua, B. L., & Kim, W. (2019). Triggers of traveler willingness to use and recommend eco-friendly airplanes. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 38, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.01.001
  13. Han, M. A., Gu, G., & Rhee, K. J. (2021). The structural effects of airlines' eco-friendly activities on corporate trust and customer citizenship behavior. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 25(3), 1–13.
  14. Hwang, J., & Lyu, S. O. (2020). Relationship among green image, consumer attitudes, desire, and customer citizenship behavior in the airline industry. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(6), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2019.1573280
  15. Karanki, F. (2024). Redefining the skies: How sustainability aviation fuel alters airlines' cost structure and market dynamics. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 18(8), 695–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2024.2397642
  16. Keivanpour, S., Kadi, D. A., & Mascle, C. (2017). End-of-life aircraft treatment in the context of sustainable development, lean management, and global business. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(5), 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2016.1256455
  17. Koc, E. (2023). Green marketing strategies and climate change awareness in sustainability transportation: The case of airline companies. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 12(4), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.1375842
  18. Korba, P., Sekelova, I., Koscakova, M., & Behunova, A. (2023). Passengers’ knowledge and attitudes toward green initiatives in aviation. Sustainability, 15(7), 6187. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076187
  19. Peixoto de, M. F., & Rosario, M. (2024). Assessing the efficacy of EU greenwashing directive: A study of European airlines’ voluntary carbon offset programs. Journal of the Air Transport Research Society, 1, 100028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jatrs.2024.100028
  20. Rüger, M., & Maertens, S. U. (2023). The content scope of airlines' sustainability reporting according to the GRI standards: An assessment for Europe’s five largest airline groups. Administrative Sciences, 13(1), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13010010
  21. Shahriar, M. F., & Khanal, A. (2022). The current techno-economic, environmental, policy status and perspectives of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Fuel, 325, 124905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124905
  22. Stüben, J. M., & Cantoni, L. (2024). Sustainability nudges while booking a flight on an OTA website. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2024 (pp. 367–378). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58839-6_31
  23. Szyc, R., & Lenort, R. (2024). Sustainability aviation fuels as the path to carbon neutrality in air transportation. Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska, 26, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.54740/ros.2024.062
  24. Wong, F. W., Kadi, D. A., Rio, D. F., Foley, A., Rooney, D., & Abai, M. (2024). Decarbonizing and offsetting emissions in the airline industry: Current perspectives and strategies. Energy, 311, 133809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133809
  25. Zungur, N., Orhan, G., & Bakir, M. (2024). Exploring intention to travel with eco-friendly airlines: A dual-stage SEM-ANN approach. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 16, 101138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101138