SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity / 2025 / Volume: 12 Issue: 2

Gifted education in the Philippines: Status and challenges

Tyrone Gil(University of the Philippines)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-26
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The development of culturally sensitive counseling programs and the promotion of research and development are crucial for fostering the well-being and academic success of gifted learners, enabling them to reach their full potential within a supportive and enriching environment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines the landscape of gifted education in the Philippines, highlighting key challenges and proposing actionable solutions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Addressing these challenges requires a multi-pronged approach encompassing standardized guidelines, enhanced teacher training in evidence-based practices, and increased resource allocation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The development of culturally sensitive counseling programs and the promotion of research and development are crucial for fostering the well-being and academic success of gifted learners, enabling them to reach their full potential within a supportive and enriching environment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gifted Education · Philippines · Talent Development

Abstract

This paper examines the landscape of gifted education in the Philippines, highlighting key challenges and proposing actionable solutions. The absence of clear policies and legislation, coupled with inadequate teacher training and limited resources, hinders the effective identification, support, and programming for gifted learners. Addressing these challenges requires a multi-pronged approach encompassing standardized guidelines, enhanced teacher training in evidence-based practices, and increased resource allocation. The development of culturally sensitive counseling programs and the promotion of research and development are crucial for fostering the well-being and academic success of gifted learners, enabling them to reach their full potential within a supportive and enriching environment.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gil, T. (2025). Gifted education in the Philippines: Status and challenges. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, Volume: 12 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18053887

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (37)

  1. Aboud, Y. Z. (2023). Evaluating the status of gifted education in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2206080. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2206080
  2. Alghawi, M. A. (2017). Gifted education in the United Arab Emirates. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1368891. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1368891
  3. Anuruthwong, U. (2017). Education for the gifted/talented in Thailand. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1332825. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1332825
  4. Aziz, A. R., Razak, N. H. A., Sawai, R. P., Kasmani, M. F., Amat, M. I., & Shafie, A. A. H. (2021). Exploration of challenges among gifted and talented children. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(4), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i4.760
  5. Chan, D. (2015). Education for the gifted and talented. In Elsevier eBooks (p. 158). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92137-8
  6. Choi, K. M., & Hong, D. S. (2009). Gifted education in Korea: Three Korean high schools for the mathematically gifted. Gifted Child Today, 32(2), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2009-883
  7. Daniels, V. I. (2005). Students with gifts and talents. In Advances in special education (p. 325). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0270-4013(03)80045-4
  8. Delisle, J. R. (2012). Reaching those we teach. Gifted Child Today, 35(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217511427513
  9. Fadila, F. (2022). Counseling the academically gifted children. International Journal of Education Research and Development, 2(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.52760/ijerd.v2i2.33
  10. Faustino, J. B., & Hiwatig, A. D. F. (2012). Special Science Elementary School: Project and education in the Philippines prospects for gifted. Japan Society for Science Education, 36(2), 131–140.
  11. Frantz, K. T. (2007). Strategies for teaching gifted students in the inclusive classroom. Hamline University Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/699/
  12. Gagné, F. (2001). Gifted and talented individuals: Developmental and educational overview. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (p. 6218). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02401-3
  13. Harrison, M., King, R. B., & Hocson, S. M. G. (2023). The roles of school counsellors in the Philippines: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 33(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2023.4
  14. Kang, D. Y. (2019). Past, present, and future of gifted science education in Korea: A historical perspective. Asia- Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0045-8
  15. Kim, H., & Gentry, M. (2008). A survey of Korean elementary teachers’ perceptions of and in-service needs for gifted education. Gifted and Talented International, 23(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2008.11673513
  16. Kim, Y. C., Jo, J., & Jung, J. (2020). The education of academically gifted students in South Korea: Innovative approaches in shadow education. European Journal of Education, 55(3), 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12399
  17. Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
  18. Laili, N., Sabila, N. S., Vibraena, V. M., Junaidi, A. R., & Dewantoro, D. A. (2020). Gifted education in ASEAN. Advances
  19. in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, 487, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201112.002
  20. Larroder, A. C., & Ogawa, M. (2015). The development of a self-evaluation checklist for measuring Filipino students’ science giftedness. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 1(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-015-0002-0
  21. Leaño, A. J. (2022). Curriculum implementation, teachers’ competencies and preferred teaching approaches for kindergarten gifted education program: An assessment. Jurnal Pendidikan Awal Kanak-Kanak Kebangsaan, 11(Special Issue), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpak.vol11.sp.5.2022
  22. Lee, L. W., & Low, H. M. (2014). The evolution of special education in Malaysia. British Journal of Special Education, 41(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12048
  23. Mohd Adnan, A. H., Kusmawan, U., Ismayatim, W. F. A., Hendharli, R., & Md Yusof, M. R. (2024). Developing the gifted and talented potential of Malaysian youngsters via ‘Potentia Project.’ [Journal Name].
  24. Neihart, M., & Teo, C. T. (2013). Addressing the needs of the gifted in Singapore. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(3), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213494821
  25. Papadopoulos, D. (2021). Parenting the exceptional social-emotional needs of gifted and talented children: What do we know? Children, 8(11), 953. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8110953
  26. Pawilen, G. T. (2018). Development and implementation of a science-based integrated curriculum for nurturing the gifted potentials of young Filipino children. Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 12(3), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.17206/apjrece.2018.12.3.45
  27. Pawilen, G. T., & Manuel, S. J. (2018). A proposed model and framework for developing a curriculum for the gifted in the Philippines. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 10(2), 118–134. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1207237.pdf
  28. Phillipson, S. N., Phillipson, S., & Eyre, D. M. (2011). Being gifted in Hong Kong. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(4), 235– 249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986211421959
  29. Satova, A. (2015). Features of teachers’ preparedness to work with gifted youth. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5s3), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s3p45
  30. Seo, H., Cho, S., Kim, H., & Jung, H. C. (2004). Policy issues related to curriculum development and implementation for gifted education in science in Korea. Gifted Education International, 18(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940301800207
  31. Smith, S. (2020). Some implications for the future of gifted education in the Asia-Pacific. In Springer international handbooks of education (pp. 1–13). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3021- 6_69-1
  32. Spawi, M., Zakaria, Z., Islieh, A. R. I. S., Kamaruddin, W. A. Z. W., Ali, M. Z. M., Amin, A. F. M., & Usop, R. (2022). The Islamic gifted curriculum framework: Conceptualising gifted education from an Islamic perspective. Creative Education, 13(4), 1121–1136. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.134070
  33. Tominez, B., Cruz, L. M. D., & Gabatino, B. (2013). Usage of instructional materials among teacher education faculty in Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines. IAMURE International Journal of Education, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7718/iamure.ije.v6i1.493
  34. Willison, M. T. (2014). National Association for Gifted Children. In Encyclopedia of special education. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118660584.ese1646
  35. Worrell, F. C., & Erwin, J. (2011). Best practices in identifying students for gifted and talented education programs. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27(4), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2011.615817
  36. Yassin, S. F. M., Ishak, N. M., Yunus, M. M., & Majid, R. A. (2012). The identification of gifted and talented students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.540
  37. Yudha, E. S., Kartadinata, S., & Rusmana, N. (2017). Gifted innovation education: New perspective in identification and development of gifted student in inclusion education setting. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Sociology Education (pp. 27–32). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icosop-16.2017.7