SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

The Effects of Human-Animal Interactions on Animal Welfare

İnsan-Hayvan Etkileşimlerinin Hayvan Refahına Etkisi

Zehra BOZKURT
İbrahim KILIÇ
Özlem Gücüyener HACAN
Ö.faruk LENGER
Pages
41–50
Publication Date
2013-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to some innovative methods are studied like as the attitudinal–behavioral modification treatments consisting of cognitive–behavioral intervention procedures and cognitive-training program designs which target specific attitude–behavior areas in which the individual stockperson requires improvement will be discussed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The effects of human-animal interactions on animal welfare and productivity are very important.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The demographic characteristics, beliefs about mental abilities of animals, religious and cultural beliefs, and values and norms are effects on attitudes and behavior of stockpeople towards to animals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to some innovative methods are studied like as the attitudinal–behavioral modification treatments consisting of cognitive–behavioral intervention procedures and cognitive-training program designs which target specific attitude–behavior areas in which the individual stockperson requires improvement will be discussed
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Handling

Abstract

The effects of human-animal interactions on animal welfare and productivity are very important. The demographic characteristics, beliefs about mental abilities of animals, religious and cultural beliefs, and values and norms are effects on attitudes and behavior of stockpeople towards to animals. In this paper the factors affecting the human-animal interactions and the effects of this interaction on animal welfare and productivity will be discussed. In addition to some innovative methods are studied like as the attitudinal–behavioral modification treatments consisting of cognitive–behavioral intervention procedures and cognitive-training program designs which target specific attitude–behavior areas in which the individual stockperson requires improvement will be discussed

Özet

İnsan-hayvan etkileşimlerinin, hayvan refahı ve verimlilik üzerine etkisi çok önemlidir. Demografik özellikler, hayvanların zihin yeteneklerine ilişkin kanıtlar, dini ve kültürel inanışlar, değerler ve normlar hayvan bakıcılarının hayvanlara yönelik tutum ve davranışlarını etkiler. Bu çalışmada insan-hayvan etkileşimlerini etkileyen faktörler ile bu etkileşimin hayvan refahına ve verimliliğine etkileri ele alınacaktır. Ayrıca çiftçinin hayvana yönelik algısal ve davranımsal profillerinin değiştirilmesi ve iyileştirilmesini amaçlayan bilişsel davranışçı yaklaşımlar ve davranış terapileri ile çiftçinin bireysel gelişim ihtiyaçlarını göz önünde tutan ve belirli bir tutum-davranışı hedefleyen, bilişseldavranışçı müdahale prosedürlerini içeren tutumsal-davranımsal değişim uygulamaları ve bilişsel-eğitim programlarının tasarımları gibi yenilikçi yöntemler ele alınacaktır

Keywords
🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKURT, Z., KILIÇ, İ., HACAN, Ö. G., LENGER, Ö. (2013). The Effects of Human-Animal Interactions on Animal Welfare. Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 41–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/125018

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Barnett JL, Hemswort PH, Newman EA. 1992. Fear of humans and its relationships with productivity in laying hens at commercial farms. Br. Poult. Sci. 33: 699-710.
  2. Boivin X, Le Neindre P, Chupin JM, Garel JP, Trillant C. 1992. Influence of bred and early management on ease of handling and open-field behaviour of cattle. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 32: 313-323.
  3. Boivin X, Marcantognini L, Boulesteix P, Godet J, Brulé A and Veissier I. 2007. Attitudes of farmers towards Limousin cattle and their handling. Animal Welfare 16: 147-151.
  4. Boivin X, Novak R, Despres G, Tournadre H, Le Neindre P. 1997. Discrimination between shepherds by lambs reared under artificial conditions. J. Anim. Sci. 75: 2892-2898.
  5. Breuer BK, Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Matthews Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66: 273–288. 2000.
  6. Breuer K, Hemsworth PH, Coleman CJ. 2003. The effect of positive or negative handling on the behavioural and physiological responses of nonlactating heifers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 84: 3–22.
  7. Broida J, Tingley, L Kimball R, Miele J. 1993. Personality Differences between Pro- and Anti- vivisectionists. Sociaty and Animals, 1:129-144
  8. Coleman GJ, Hemsworth PH, Hay M, Cox M. 2000. Modifying stockperson attitudes and behaviour towards pigs at a large commercial farm. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66, 11–20.
  9. Coleman GJ, Rice M, Hemsworth PH. 2012. Human-animal relationship at sheep and cattle abattoirs. Animal Welfare 21: 15-21. Coleman GJ. 2004. Personnel management in agricultural systems. In Rollin, B.E. and Benson, J. (Eds) Maximizing Well-being and Minimizing Suffering in Farm Animals. Iowa State University Press, Iowa, 167-181.
  10. Coleman, GJ, McGregor M, Hemsworth PH, Boyce J, Dowling S. 2003. The relationship between beliefs, attitudes and observed behaviours of abattoir personel in the pig industry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 82 (3): 189–200.
  11. Davis MH, Mitchell KV, Hall, JA Lothert J, Snapp, Meyer Expectations, and Situational Preferences: Personality Influences on the Decision to Participate in Volunteer Helping Behaviors. Journal of Personality. 67: 469–503.
  12. Empathy, Deemer L. 2011. Public Concern with Farm-Animal Welfare: religion, politics, and human disadvantage in the food sector. Rural Sociology 76 (2): 167–1
  13. Dockes AC, Kling-Eveillard F. 2006. Farmers’ and advisers’ representations of animals and animal welfare. Livestock Science 103 (3): 243– 249. Duncan IJH. 1990. React