SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of The Microbiological Quality of Sea Breeding (Sparus aurata) and Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) Fishes in Afyonkarahisar Province

Afyonkarahisar İli’nde Satışa Sunulan Çupra (Sparus aurata) ve Levrek (Dicentrarchus labrax) Balıklarının Mikrobiyolojik Kalitelerinin Araştırılması

Şebnem PAMUK
Yağmur Nil DEMİREL
Zeki GÜRLER
Pages
150–157
Publication Date
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to this; the microorganism ranges isolated from 43 Sparus aurata and 39 Dicentrarchus labrax were; 5.0-7.88/4.90-7.34 log10 mL-1 TVBC; 3.30-7.17/ 3.90-7.54 log10 mL-1 psychrophilic microorganism; 1.30-5.89/ 1.30-4.53 log10 mL-1 staphylococcus / micrococcus, only in Sparus aurata 2.30-4.14 log10 mL-1S. aureus; 1.30-6.49/1.30-6.11 log10 m-1 lactic acid bacteria (LAB); 1.30-6.55/ 1.30-7.14 log10 mL-1 enterobacteria, 1.30-6.62/1.30-6.60 log10 mL-1 total coliform and 1.30-4.30/1.30-4.47 log10 mL-1 levels E. coli and 1.2% of the samples (from Sparus aurata) Salmonella spp., were identified respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the microbiological quality levels of fish (Sparus aurata and Dicentrarchus labrax) sold in fishermen in Afyonkarahisar.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, 82 fish samples randomly selected and purchased from 14 different retail points were microbiologically analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to this; the microorganism ranges isolated from 43 Sparus aurata and 39 Dicentrarchus labrax were; 5.0-7.88/4.90-7.34 log10 mL-1 TVBC; 3.30-7.17/ 3.90-7.54 log10 mL-1 psychrophilic microorganism; 1.30-5.89/ 1.30-4.53 log10 mL-1 staphylococcus / micrococcus, only in Sparus aurata 2.30-4.14 log10 mL-1S. aureus; 1.30-6.49/1.30-6.11 log10 m-1 lactic acid bacteria (LAB); 1.30-6.55/ 1.30-7.14 log10 mL-1 enterobacteria, 1.30-6.62/1.30-6.60 log10 mL-1 total coliform and 1.30-4.30/1.30-4.47 log10 mL-1 levels E. coli and 1.2% of the samples (from Sparus aurata) Salmonella spp., were identified respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Balık · Deniz ürünü · Mikrobiyal kontaminasyon

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the microbiological quality levels of fish (Sparus aurata and Dicentrarchus labrax) sold in fishermen in Afyonkarahisar. In this study, 82 fish samples randomly selected and purchased from 14 different retail points were microbiologically analyzed. According to this; the microorganism ranges isolated from 43 Sparus aurata and 39 Dicentrarchus labrax were; 5.0-7.88/4.90-7.34 log10 mL-1 TVBC; 3.30-7.17/ 3.90-7.54 log10 mL-1 psychrophilic microorganism; 1.30-5.89/ 1.30-4.53 log10 mL-1 staphylococcus / micrococcus, only in Sparus aurata 2.30-4.14 log10 mL-1S. aureus; 1.30-6.49/1.30-6.11 log10 m-1 lactic acid bacteria (LAB); 1.30-6.55/ 1.30-7.14 log10 mL-1 enterobacteria, 1.30-6.62/1.30-6.60 log10 mL-1 total coliform and 1.30-4.30/1.30-4.47 log10 mL-1 levels E. coli and 1.2% of the samples (from Sparus aurata) Salmonella spp., were identified respectively.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Afyonkarahisar’da balıkçılarda satışa sunulan balıkların (çupra ve levrek) mikrobiyolojik kalite düzeylerinin belirlenmesidir. Çalışmada, 14 farklı balıkçıdan rastgele seçilen 82 adet (43 çupra, 39 levrek) balık satın alınarak, mikrobiyolojik analizleri yapılmıştır. Buna göre; çupra ve levrek balıklarından izole edilen mikroorganizma aralıkları sırasıyla; 5.0-7.88/4.90-7.34 log10 mL-1 AMGC; 3.30-7.17/3.90-7.54 log10 mL-1 psikrofil mikroorganizma; 1.30-5.89/1.30-4.53 log10 mL-1 stafilokok/mikrokok; sadece çupra balığında 2.30-4.14 log10 mL-1S. aureus ; 1.30-6.49/1.30-6.11 log10 mL-1 laktik asit bakterisi (LAB); 1.30-6.55/1.30-7.14 log10 mL-1 enterobakteri, 1.30-6.62/1.30-6.60 log10 mL-1 total koliform ve 1.30-4.30/1.30-4.47 log10 mL-1 düzeylerinde E. coli izole edilmiştir. Örneklerin %1.2’sinden (çupra balığı) Salmonella spp. identifiye edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAMUK, Ş., DEMİREL, Y. N., GÜRLER, Z. (2019). Investigation of The Microbiological Quality of Sea Breeding (Sparus aurata) and Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) Fishes in Afyonkarahisar Province. Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 150–157. https://ajindex.com/articles/124824

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Acco M, Ferreira FS, Henriques JAP, Tondo EC. Identification of multiple strains of Staphylococcus aureus colonizing nasal mucosa of food handlers. Food Microbiology. 2003; 20(5): 489-493. Adenike OMojisola. The effect of different processing methods on the nutritional quality and microbiological status of cat fish (Clarias lezera). Food Processing and Technology. 2014; 5:6. Adeyemo OK. Consequences of Pollution and Degradation of Nigerian Aquatic environment on Fisheries Resources. The Environmentalist 2003; 23(4): 297-306.
  2. Alak G, Hisar SA, Hisar O, Kaban G, Kaya M. Microbiological and chemical properties of bonito fish (Sarda sarda) fillets packaged with chitosan film, modified atmosphere and vacuum. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010; 16: 73-80.
  3. Alparslan Y, Metin C, Hasanhocaoğlu Yapıcı H, Baygar T. Köyceğiz lagününde avlanan kefal türlerinin duyusal, kimyasal ve mikrobiyolojik kalitesinin belirlenmesi. Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research. 2017; 3(4): 160-170. Alvarez Pellitero P. Fish immunity and parasite infections: from innate immunity to immunoprophylactic prospects. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 2008; 126: 171-198. Anon. Türk Gıda Kodeksi Mikrobiyolojik Kriterler Yönetmeliği, http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2011/12/20111229m3-6.htm. 2011; Ankara. Anon. Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı, Balıkçılık ve Su Ürünleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Su Ürünleri İstatistikleri.www.tarimorman.gov.tr/sgb/Belgeler/SagMenuVeriler/BSGM.pdfhttp://www.tarim.gov.tr/BSGM. 2018;
  4. Ankara.
  5. Attouchi M, Sadok S. The effect of powdered thyme sprinkling on quality changes of wild and farmed gilthead sea bream fillets stored in ice. Food Chemistry. 2010; 119: 1527-1534.
  6. Ayulo AMR, Machado RA, Scussel VM. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in fish and seafood from the southern region of Brazil. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1994; 24(1-2): 171-178.
  7. Begum M, Abu Ahmed AT, Das M, Parveen S. Acomparative microbiological assesment of five types of selected fishes collected from two different market. Advances in Biological Research. 2010; 4(5): 259-265.
  8. Bennett RW, Lancette GA: Staphylococus aureus. In, Bacteriological Analytical Manual. 7th ed. 1992; 161-164,
  9. AOAC, Arlington. Blood RM, Curtis GDW. Media for ‘total’ enterobacteriaceae, coliforms and Escherichia coli. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1995; 26(1): 93-115.
  10. Bojanic KL, Kozacinski I, Filipovic Z, Cvrtila N, Zdolec NB. Qu