Journals / Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Scientific Approaches For On-Farm Animal Welfare Assessment

Çiftlik Düzeyinde Hayvan Refahı Değerlendirmesi İçin Bilimsel Yaklaşımlar

Pages
236–246
Publication Date
2016-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, some welfare assessment methods and welfare assessment protocols were discussed which have been developed using animal welfare indicators.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Consumer demands, national legislation and international food quality standarts shape the quality of the product in the market.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the global livestock production techniques, animal welfare which can be defined as the revision that was shaped based on the food and environmental protection principles, is one of the important factors defining product quality for food of animal origin.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, some welfare assessment methods and welfare assessment protocols were discussed which have been developed using animal welfare indicators.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bilimsel Yaklaşımlar · Çiftlik Düzeyinde · Refah Değerlendirme

Abstract

Consumer demands, national legislation and international food quality standarts shape the quality of the product in the market. In the global livestock production techniques, animal welfare which can be defined as the revision that was shaped based on the food and environmental protection principles, is one of the important factors defining product quality for food of animal origin. On- farm assessment of animal welfare has a key importance in order to sustain of the welfare quality standards. There are three different theoretical framework for assessing animal welfare in a scientific manner known as biological mechanism, the emotional state and natural behaviour. In this review, some welfare assessment methods and welfare assessment protocols were discussed which have been developed using animal welfare indicators.

Özet

Gerek tüketici talepleri ve ulusal yönetmelikler ve gerekse de uluslararası gıda kalite standartları pazardaki ürünün niteliğini şekillendirmektedir. Bugün, Dünya hayvansal üretim tekniklerinde gıda kalitesi ve çevre koruma prensiplerine dayanarak şekillenen revizyon olarak da tanımlayabileceğimiz hayvan refahı hayvansal gıda için ürün niteliğini tanımlayan önemli faktörlerden birisidir. Hayvan refahı kalite standartlarının sürdürülebilmesi için çiftlikte hayvan refahı değerlendirmeleri anahtar bir role sahiptir. Hayvan refahının bilimsel metotlarla değerlendirilmesi bakımından biyolojik işleyiş, duygusal durum ve doğal yaşam olarak isimlendirilen üç ayrı kuramsal çerçeve bulunmaktadır. Bu derlemede, hayvan refahı göstergeleri kullanılarak geliştirilmiş bazı refah değerlendirme yöntemleri ile refah değerlendirme protokolleri tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKURT, Z. (2016). Scientific Approaches For On-Farm Animal Welfare Assessment. Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 236–246. https://ajindex.com/articles/124693

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Amlaner CJ, MacDonald DW (eds). A handbook on Biotelemetry and Radio Tracking. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980. Anonim. AWIN Welfare Assessment Protocol For Sheep. Milan, Italy. 2015.
  2. Barnett JL, Hemsworth PH. Welfare monitoring schemes: using research to safeguard the welfare of animals on the farm. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 2009; 12: 114–31.
  3. Bizeray D, Estevez I, Leterriera C, Faurea JM. Effects of increasing environmental complexity on the physical activity of broiler chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2002; 79(1):27-41.
  4. Blokhuis HJ, Jones RB, Geers R, Miele M, Veissier I. Measuring and monitoring animal welfare: transparency in the food product quality chain. Animal Welfare 2003; 12 (4): 445-455.
  5. Boissy A, Manteuffe G, Jensen MB, Moe RO, Spruijt B, Keeling LJ, Winckler C, Frokman B, Dimitrov I, Langbein J., Bakken M, Veissier I, Aubert A. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to ımprove their welfare. Physiology and Behaviour 2007; 92: 375-97.
  6. Bozkurt Z, Bülbül T, Bozkurt MF, Bülbül A, Maralcan G, Çelikeloğlu K. Sıklığa maruz bırakılmış broilerlerde rasyona organik ve inorganik manganez ilavesinin kemik özellikleri, aşılara karsı immun yanıt ve oksidatif stres durumuna etkileri. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi 2015; 21: 623-630.
  7. Bracke MBM, Hopster H. Assessing the importance of natural behavior for animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2006; 19 (1): 77. Broom DM. Indicators of poor welfare. British Veterinary Journal 1986; 142:524-526.
  8. Broom D, Johnson K. Stress andAanimal Welfare. Charpmanand Hall, London, 1993. Bryant MJ. The social environment: behaviour and stress in housed livestock. Vet.Rec. 1972; 90 (22):351-359. Curtis SE. Animal well-being and animal care. Vet. Clin. N. Anim.(Food Anim. Pract.)1987; 3(2):369-382.
  9. Danbury TC, Weeks CA, Chambers JP, Waterman-Pearson AE, Kestin SC. Self-Selection of the analgesic drug carprofen by lame broiler chickens.Vet.Rec. 2000; 246(11):301-311. Dawkins MS. Using behaviour to assess animal welfare. Animal Welfare 2004; 13:S3-7. Dobson H, Smith RF. What is stress and how does it affect reproduction?. J.Reprod.Fert.Animal Reproduction Science. 2000;60-61:743-752. Duncan IJH. Poultry welfare: Science or subjectivity?.Br.Poult.Sci. 2002; 43(5):643-652. Duncan IJH. Science-based assessment of animal welfare: farm animals. Rev.sci.tech.Off.int.Epiz. 2005; 24(2):483-492.
  10. Duncan JJH, Dawkins MS. The Problem of Assessing “Well-Being” and “Suffering