Journals / Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Hand Hygiene Profile of Food Handlers in Canteens of Erciyes University Campus

Erciyes Üniversitesi Kampüsündeki Kantin Çalışanlarının El Hijyen Durumlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
52–59
Publication Date
2020-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that coliforms were present in 73,91% of food handlers’ hands, compared to the literature suggesting a target value of ˂2,5 cfu/cm2, 40,47% exceeded the limit.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Foodborne bacterial diseases still occur as a result of improper handling practices by foodhandlers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Total of 23 food handlers’ were interviewed and their hands were sampled to determine the contamination.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that coliforms were present in 73,91% of food handlers’ hands, compared to the literature suggesting a target value of ˂2,5 cfu/cm2, 40,47% exceeded the limit.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Erciyes Üniversitesi · Gıda çalışanı · Gıda güvenliği bilgisi

Abstract

Foodborne bacterial diseases still occur as a result of improper handling practices by foodhandlers. The aim of this study was to evaluate food safety knowledge of food handlers’ and to determine the presence of indicator bacteria on food handlers’ hands in canteens and cafes in Erciyes University Campus, Kayseri. Total of 23 food handlers’ were interviewed and their hands were sampled to determine the contamination. Food handlers' knowledge were evaluated by questionnaires and checklists. Conventional methods were followed for microbiological analyses. The presence of total coliforms, E. coli, Enterobacteriaceae and S. aureus were analyzed. Results indicated that coliforms were present in 73,91% of food handlers’ hands, compared to the literature suggesting a target value of ˂2,5 cfu/cm2, 40,47% exceeded the limit. E. coli, Enterobacteriaceae and S.aureus were present in 56,52%, 82,6 % and 82,6 % of handlers’ hands respectively. Food safety knowledge evaluation received high scores with mean score of 72,17%. In spite of the high scores on food safety knowledge, high numbers of hand samples were found to be contaminated with pathogens. It is needed to revise the current training model of food handlers’, to ensure sustained training, to track the effectiveness of training and to carry out stringent surveillance programs at point of food sale.

Özet

Gıda kaynaklı bakteriyel hastalıkların büyük bir çoğunluğunun gıda çalışanlarının yanlış uygulamalarından kaynaklandığı bilinmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Erciyes Üniversitesi kampüsünde bulunan kantinlerde çalışan personel ellerinde indikatör bakteri varlığının belirlenmesi ve personelin gıda güvenliği bilgilerinin değerlendirilmesidir. Bu amaçla toplam 23 kantinde gıda ile teması olan çalışanlarla görüşme yapılmış ve parmakları örneklenmiştir. Gıda güvenliği bilgileri; belirlenen anket soruları ve kontrol listeleriyle değerlendirilmiştir. Mikrobiyolojik analizler, konvansiyonel yöntemlerle yapılmış, el örnekleri Staphylococcus aureus (S. auerus), Enterobacteriaceae, total koliform ve Escherichia coli (E. coli) açısından incelenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, çalışan ellerinden alınan örneklerin %73,91’inde koliform grubu belirlenirken, bunlardan %40,47’sinin literatürlerde belirlenen hedef değerlerin (<2.5 kob/cm2) üzerinde koliform içeriği belirlenmiştir. E. coli, Enterobacteriaceae ve S. auerus ise incelenen örneklerin sırasıyla %56,52 ve %82,6 ve % 82,6’sında belirlenmiştir. Gıda güvenliği bilgi değerlendirme skoru genel olarak yüksek olmakla birlikte ortalama %72,17’lik bir değer elde edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak çalışanların gıda güvenliği bilgi değerlendirme sonuçları yüksek skorlar ortaya koymuş olmasına karşın, el örneklerindeki patojen kontaminasyon yüzdeleri yüksek bulunmuştur. Gıda çalışanlarına yönelik mevcut eğitim modelinin revize edilerek etkin bir şekilde uygulanması, sürekliliğinin sağlanması, eğitim etkinliğinin denetlenmesi ve gıda satış yerlerinde katı ve sürekli kontrol programlarının uygulanması gerektiği sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇATAR, O., YILDIRIM, Y. (2020). Hand Hygiene Profile of Food Handlers in Canteens of Erciyes University Campus. Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 52–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/124673

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abdul Mutalib NA, Abdul Rashid MF, Mustafa S, Amin-Nordin S, Hamat RA, Osman M. Knowledge, attitude and practises regarding food hygiene and sanitation of food handlers in Kuala Pilah, Malaysia. Food Control. 2012; 27: 289-293.
  2. Angelillo IF, Viggiani NMA, Rizzo L, Bianco A. Food handlers and foodborne diseases: knowledge, attitudes, and reported behavior in Italy. J. Food Prot. 2000; 63(3):381-385.
  3. Barros MAF, Nero LA, Monteiro AA, Beloti V. Identification of main contamination points by hygiene indicator microorganisms in beef processing plants. Food Sci. Technol. 2007; 27(4): 856-862.
  4. Bas M, Ersun AS, Kıvanç G. The evaluation of food hygiene knowledge, attitudes, and practices of food handlers’ in food businesses in Turkey. Food Control. 2006; 17(4):317-322.
  5. Blood RM, Curtis GDW. Media for ‘total’ enterobacteriaceae, coliforms and Escherichia coli. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1995; 26(1):93-115.
  6. Bolton DJ, Meally A, Blair IS, McDowell DA, Cowan C. Food safety knowledge of head chefs and catering managers in Ireland. Food Control. 2008; 19(3):291-300.
  7. Burch NL, Sawyer CA. Food handling in convenience stores: the impact of personnel knowledge on facility sanitation. J. Environ. Health. 1991; 54(3):23-27.
  8. Cogan TA, Slader J, BloomWeld SF, Humphrey TJ. Achieving hygiene in the domestic kitchen: The efectiveness of commonly used cleaning procedures. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002; 92:885-892. Collins JE. Impact of changing consumer lifestyles on the emergence/re-emergence of foodborne pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001; 3(4):1-13.
  9. Çakıroglu FP, Uçar A. Employees’ perception of hygiene in the catering industry in Ankara, Turkey. Food Control. 2008; 19(1):9-15. De Boer E. Update on media for isolation of enterobacteriaceae from foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998; 45(1):43-53. Domínguez C, Gómez I, Zumalacárregui J. Prevalence of SalmonellaandCampylobacter in retailchickenmeat in Spain. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002; 72:165-168. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The Community Summary Report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in the European Union in 2008. The EFSA Journal. 2010; 8(1):1410-1496. FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration).Evoluation of risks related to microbiological contamination of redutiit food by food preparation workers and the effectiveness of intervations to minimize those risks. Food and Drug Administiration center for food safetiy and applied nutrition. 1999
  10. USA. Gomes-Neves E, Cardoso CS, Araújo AC, Cor