Journals / Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Investigation of The Interaction Between Milk Urea Nitrogen (MUN) and Some Parameters in Determining The Level of Nutrition in Dairy Cows

Sütçü İneklerde Beslenme Seviyesinin Belirlenmesinde, Sütte Üre Azotu (MUN) ile Bazı Parametreler Arasındaki Etkileşimin Araştırılması

Pages
246–253
Publication Date
2019-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a concluded that some further detailed studies are required to get to know a deeper understanding of MUN levels in milk cows between acetone, BHBA and other parameters and metabolic diseases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the relationship between the amount of Milk Urea Nitrogen (MUN) and nutritional level in dairy cows.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research material was milk samples which were collected from 100 different commercial dairy farms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a concluded that some further detailed studies are required to get to know a deeper understanding of MUN levels in milk cows between acetone, BHBA and other parameters and metabolic diseases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Süt ineği · MUN · Beslenme düzeyi

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the relationship between the amount of Milk Urea Nitrogen (MUN) and nutritional level in dairy cows. The research material was milk samples which were collected from 100 different commercial dairy farms. Three groups were assigned according to the milk analysis in the experiment. Group A, those having normal MUN values between 12-16 mg / dl in milk samples, group B, those having less MUN value and group C, those having high MUN value. Apart from this acetone, Beta hydroxy butyric acid (BHBA), total solid matter, fat, fat-free dry matter, crude protein (CP),true protein (TP), lactose, saturated fatty acids (SFA), total unsaturated fatty acids (TUFA), Polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), Monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) and aflatoxin M1 values measured in milk and these were compared with low, normal and high MUN levels. In the study the MUN values of the groups were 14.46, 10.05 and 20.15 mg / dl respectively. At the end of the study, although the differences between the groups' acetone values were statistically significant (P <0.05), the values of all three groups were among the normal acetone values determined for dairy cows. Moreover, there were differences in milk regarding BHBA, fat, CP,TP, SFA, MUFA and AFM1 values (P<0.01) between the groups. As a concluded that some further detailed studies are required to get to know a deeper understanding of MUN levels in milk cows between acetone, BHBA and other parameters and metabolic diseases.

Özet

Bu araştırma, süt ineklerinde süt üre azotu miktarı ile beslenme düzeyi arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın materyalini 100 farklı süt ineği işletmesinden toplanan süt numuneleri oluşturmuştur. Araştırmada sütte yapılan analizlere göre 3 grup oluşturulmuştur. Alınan süt numunelerinde MUN değerleri 12-16 mg/dl arasında olanlar normal (grup A) bu değerin altında olanlar düşük (grup B) üzerinde olanlar ise yüksek (grup C) olarak kabul edilmiştir. Ayrıca sütte ölçülen aseton ve beta hidroksi bütirik asit (BHBA) değerlerinin yanı sıra toplam katı madde, yağ, yağsız kuru madde, ham protein, gerçek protein, laktoz, doymuş yağ asidi, toplam doymamış yağ asitleri (TUS), çoklu doymamış yağ asitleri (PUFA), tekli doymamış yağ asitleri (MUFA) ve aflatoksin M1 seviyelerine göre düşük, normal ve yüksek üre azotu değerleri ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Araştırmada, grupların MUN değerleri sırasıyla: 14.46, 10.05 ve 20.15 mg/dl’dir. Araştırma sonunda grupların aseton değerleri arasındaki farklılıklar istatistik olarak anlamlı olmasına (P<0.05) rağmen her üç grubun değerleri de süt inekleri için belirlenen normal aseton değerleri arasındadır. Benzer şekilde sütte BHBA, yağ, ham protein, gerçek protein, doymuş yağ asitleri, MUFA ve AFM1 değerleri açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmaktadır (P<0.01). Sonuç olarak süt ineklerinde MUN değeri, aseton, BHBA ve diğer parametreler ile metabolik hastalıklar arasındaki ilişkileri anlamak için daha ayrıntılı çalışmalara ihtiyaç bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAYTAK, M., BAYRAM, İ. (2019). Investigation of The Interaction Between Milk Urea Nitrogen (MUN) and Some Parameters in Determining The Level of Nutrition in Dairy Cows. Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 246–253. https://ajindex.com/articles/124631

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abdouli H, Rekik B, Haddad-Boubaker A. Non-nutritional factors associated with milk urea concentrations under Mediterranean conditions. World J Agric Sci. 2008; 4(2):183-188.
  2. Amaral-Philllips, D.M. Milk urea nitrogen-a nutritional evaluation tool. http://www.uky.edu/Ag/AnimalSciences/dairy/exten sion/nut00029.pdf. Accesien date: 15 February 2009. Andersson L. Subclinical ketosis in dairy cows. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract.1988; 4:233-248. Andersson L. Concentrations of blood and milk ketone bodies, blood isopropanol and plasma glucose in dairy cows in relation to the degree of hyperketonemia and clinical signs. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A.1984; 31:683-693. Anonimous. Türk Gıda Kodeksi Gıda Maddelerinde Belirli Bulaşanların Maksimum Seviyelerinin Belirlenmesi Hakkında Tebliğ. Tebliğ No: 2002/63, 23 Eylül 2002 tarihli ve 24885 sayılı Resmi Gazete, Ankara. 2002. Anonimous. EC No: 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union, 2006. 364, 5-24.
  3. Arunvipas P, Van Leeuwen JA, Dohoo IR, Keefe GP, Burton SA, Lissemore KD. Relationships among milk urea-nitrogen, dietary parameters, and fecal nitrogen in commercial dairy herds. The Canadian J Vet Research. 2008;72: 449-453.
  4. Arunvipas P, Van Leeuwen JA, Dohoo IR, Kefe GP. Evaluation of the reliability and repeatability of automated milk urea nitrogen testing. The Canadian J Vet Research. 2003;67: 60-63.
  5. Barton BA, Rosario HA, Andersson GW, Grindle BP, Carroll DJ. Effects of dietary crude protein, breed, parity, and health status on the fertility of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 1996;79, 2225–2236.
  6. Bauman DE, Griinari JM. Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis. Annu Rev Nutr. 2003;23:203. Beckman JL, Weiss WP. Nutrient digestibility of diets with different fiber to starch ratios when fed to lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2005; 88(3): 1015-1023.
  7. Broderick GA, Clayton MK. A statistical evaluation of animal and nutritional factors influencing concentrations of milk urea nitrogen. J Dairy Sci. 1997; 80: 2964–2971.
  8. Bruhn JC, Franke AA. Monthly variations in gross composition of California herd milks. J. Dairy Sci. 1977; 60: 696-700. Canfield RW; Sniffen CJ, Butler WR. Effects of excess degradable protein on postpartum reproduction and energy balance in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 1990; 73: 2342-2349.
  9. Carlsson J, Pehrson B. The relationship between seasonal variations in the concentration of urea in bulk milk and the production and fertility of dairy herds.