SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erzincan Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2024 / Sayı: SUIC Özel Sayı

Effect of Nanoparticle Addition on Biohydrogen Production

Nanopartikül İlavesinin Biyohidrojen Üretimine Etkisi

Burçin Karabey(İZMİR KAVRAM MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU, İZMİR KAVRAM MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0003-4834-6740
Candan Uçarkuş(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0009-0003-1216-3667
Güven Özdemir(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN FAKÜLTESİ, BİYOLOJİ BÖLÜMÜ, TEMEL VE ENDÜSTRİYEL MİKROBİYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0002-7577-4233
Nuri Azbar(EGE UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, DEPARTMENT OF BIOENGINEERING)0000-0003-4463-0197
Pages
116–128
Publication Date
2024-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, while reactors R1 and R2 produced a maximum volumetric percentage of biohydrogen of 10-15%, reactors R3 and R4 reached levels of 30% (on day 11) and 32% (on day 7), respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Rapid population growth and consumption lead to an increased demand for energy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fossil fuels as the most dominant resources used for energy production are depleting, and more importantly, their combustion leads to the release of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), triggering global warming and climate change.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, while reactors R1 and R2 produced a maximum volumetric percentage of biohydrogen of 10-15%, reactors R3 and R4 reached levels of 30% (on day 11) and 32% (on day 7), respectively.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biyohidrojen · Nanopartikül · Fe 3 O4

Abstract

Rapid population growth and consumption lead to an increased demand for energy. Fossil fuels as the most dominant resources used for energy production are depleting, and more importantly, their combustion leads to the release of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), triggering global warming and climate change. Therefore, recent studies have been focusing intensively on increasing the production of green hydrogen as a clean alternative [1- 2].Parallel to these efforts, bio-hydrogen has also been gaining significant attention. In this study, high temperature (110°C for 10 minutes), acidic conditions (pH 2-5.5), and nanoparticle addition (magnetite nanoparticle; obtained from Ege University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biochemistry) methods were tested for enhancing the biohydrogen production. For this purpose, initially, the sludge was autoclaved at 110°C for 10 minutes. Following these pretreatment steps, four different trial sets (R1: pH 5.5, R2: pH 5.5 + 5mg/L Fe 3 O 4 NP, R3: pH 7, R4: pH 7 + 5mg/L Fe 3 O 4 NP) were established to investigate biohydrogen production. The reactors were operated under static conditions at 38°C with fed- batch using 2-4 g COD/day substrate load. The volumetric contents of the produced biogas were determined by sampling of headspace gases and analyzed using gas chromatography (GC). According to the results, while reactors R1 and R2 produced a maximum volumetric percentage of biohydrogen of 10-15%, reactors R3 and R4 reached levels of 30% (on day 11) and 32% (on day 7), respectively. These results indicated that the acidification pretreatment did not increase hydrogen yield; however, the addition of nanoparticles under neutral conditions significantly improved biohydrogen production (compared to the control group) at earlier stages.

Özet

Hızlı nüfus artışı ve tüketim, enerji talebinde artışa yol açmaktadır. Enerji üretiminde en yaygın kullanılan fosil yakıtlar tükenmektedir ve daha da önemlisi, bunların yanması karbondioksit (CO 2 ) salımına yol açarak küresel ısınma ve iklim değişikliğini tetiklemektedir. Bu nedenle, son zamanlardaki çalışmalar, yeşil hidrojen üretimini artırmaya yoğunlaşmıştır [1-2].Bu çalışmalra paralel olarak biy0hidrojen çalışmalarına duyulan ilgi de önemli oranda artmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, biyohidrojen üretimini artırmak için yüksek sıcaklık (110°C'de 10 dakika), asidik koşullar (pH 2-5.5) ve nanoparçacık ekleme (manyetit nanopartikül; Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Biyokimya Bölümü'nden temin edilmiştir) yöntemleri test edilmiştir. Bu amaçla, öncelikle aşı çamur, 110°C'de 10 dakika boyunca otoklavlanmıştır. Bu ön işleme adımlarının ardından, biyohidrojen üretimini araştırmak için dört farklı deneme seti (R1: pH 5.5, R2: pH 5.5 + 5mg/L Fe3O4 NP, R3: pH 7, R4: pH 7 + 5mg/L Fe3O4 NP) oluşturulmuştur. Reaktörler, 38°C'de statik koşullarda, 2-4 g KOİ/gün günlük beslemeli olarak çalıştırılmıştır. Üretilen biyogazın hacimsel içerikleri, tepe gazlarının örneklenmesiyle belirlenmiş ve gaz kromatografisi (GC) kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlara göre, R1 ve R2 reaktörleri maksimum hacimsel biyohidrojen yüzdesi olarak % 10-15 üretirken, R3 ve R4 reaktörleri sırasıyla %30 (11.günde) ve %32 (7.günde) seviyelerine ulaşmıştır. Bu sonuçlar, asidifikasyon ön işleminin hidrojen verimini artırmadığını; ancak, nötr koşullar altında nanopartikül eklenmesinin (kontrol grubuna kıyasla) biyohidrojen üretimini erken aşamalarda başlattığını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karabey, B., Uçarkuş, C., Özdemir, G., Azbar, N. (2024). Effect of Nanoparticle Addition on Biohydrogen Production. Erzincan Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: SUIC Özel Sayı, 116–128. https://doi.org/10.18185/erzifbed.1523588

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Feng, S., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., Chang, S. W., Nguyen, D. D., Bui, X. T.,. & Hoang, B. N. (2023). Biohydrogen production, storage, and delivery: A comprehensive overview of current strategies and limitations. Chemical Engineering Journal, 144669.
  2. Genç, N. (2009). Biyolojik hidrojen üretim prosesleri. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(2), 17-36.
  3. DURSUN, N., & GÜLŞEN, H. (2019). Biyohidrojen üretim yöntemleri ve biyohidrojen üretiminde biyoreaktörlerin kullanımı. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 9(1), 66-75.
  4. Singh, A., Sevda, S., Abu Reesh, I. M., Vanbroekhoven, K., Rathore, D., & Pant, D. (2015). Biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomass: technology and sustainability. Energies, 8(11), 13062-13080.
  5. Srivastava, N., Srivastava, M., Mishra, P. K., Kausar, M. A., Saeed, M., Gupta, V. K.,. & Ramteke, P. W. (2020). Advances in nanomaterials induced biohydrogen production using waste biomass. Bioresource technology, 307, 123094.
  6. Alvarado-Cuevas, Z. D., Acevedo, L. G. O., Salas, J. T. O., & De León-Rodríguez, A. (2013). Nitrogen sources impact hydrogen production by Escherichia coli using cheese whey as substrate. New biotechnology, 30(6), 585-590.
  7. Bičáková, O., & Straka, P. (2012). Production of hydrogen from renewable resources and its effectiveness. International journal of hydrogen energy, 37(16), 11563-11578.
  8. Argun, H., & Kargi, F. (2011). Bio-hydrogen production by different operational modes of dark and photo-fermentation: an overview. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(13), 7443-7459.
  9. Rahman, S. N. A., Masdar, M. S., Rosli, M. I., Majlan, E. H., Husaini, T., Kamarudin, S. K., & Daud, W. R. W. (2016). Overview biohydrogen technologies and application in fuel cell technology. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 66, 137-162
  10. Srivastava, N., Srivastava, M., Malhotra, B. D., Gupta, V. K., Ramteke, P. W., Silva, R. N.,. & Mishra, P. K. (2019). Nanoengineered cellulosic biohydrogen production via dark fermentation: a novel approach. Biotechnology advances, 37(6), 107384.
  11. MUTLUBAŞ, H., & ÖZDEMİR, Z. Ö. (2019). Hydrogen as an energy carrier and hydrogen production methods. Bartın University International Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 2(1), 16-34.
  12. Kothari, R., Singh, D. P., Tyagi, V. V., & Tyagi, S. K. (2012). Fermentative hydrogen production–An alternative clean energy source. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(4), 2337-2346.
  13. Yavuz, İ., & Yılmaz, E. Ş. (2021). Biyolojik Sistemli Nanopartiküller. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 93-108.
  14. Mullai, P., Yogeswari, M. K., & Sridevi, K. J. B. T. (2013). Optimisation and enhancement of biohydrogen production using nickel nanoparticles–A novel approach. Bioresource technology, 141, 212-219.
  15. Lin, R., Cheng, J., Ding, L., Song, W., Liu, M., Zhou, J., & Cen, K. (2016). Enhanced dark hydrogen fermentation by addition of ferric oxide nanoparticles using Enterobacter aerogenes. Bioresource technology, 207, 213-219.
  16. Porwal, S., Kumar, T., Lal, S., Rani, A., Kumar, S., Cheema, S.,. & Kalia, V. C. (2008). Hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate producing abilities of microbes from diverse habitats by dark fermentative process. Bioresource technology, 99(13), 5444-5451.
  17. Han, H., Cui, M., Wei, L., Yang, H., & Shen, J. (2011). Enhancement effect of hematite nanoparticles on fermentative hydrogen production. Bioresource technology, 102(17), 7903- 7909.
  18. Mohanraj, S., Kodhaiyolii, S., Rengasamy, M., & Pugalenthi, V. (2014). Phytosynthesized iron oxide nanoparticles and ferrous iron on fermentative hydrogen production using Enterobacter cloacae: evaluation and comparison of the effects. International journal of hydrogen energy, 39(23), 11920-11929.
  19. Kumar, G., Mathimani, T., Rene, E. R., & Pugazhendhi, A. (2019). Application of nanotechnology in dark fermentation for enhanced biohydrogen production using inorganic nanoparticles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(26), 13106-13113.
  20. Gadhe, A., Sonawane, S. S., & Varma, M. N. (2015). Enhancement effect of hematite and nickel nanoparticles on biohydrogen production from dairy wastewater. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(13), 4502-4511.
  21. Jiang, X., Hu, J., Lieber, A. M., Jackan, C. S., Biffinger, J. C., Fitzgerald, L. A.,. & Lieber, C. M. (2014). Nanoparticle facilitated extracellular electron transfer in microbial fuel cells. Nano letters, 14(11), 6737-6742.
  22. Shanmugam, S., Hari, A., Pandey, A., Mathimani, T., Felix, L., & Pugazhendhi, A. (2020). Comprehensive review on the application of inorganic and organic nanoparticles for enhancing biohydrogen production. Fuel, 270, 117453
  23. Han, H., Cui, M., Wei, L., Yang, H., & Shen, J. (2011) Enhancement effect of hematite nanoparticles on fermentative hydrogen production. Bioresource Technology. 102(17): 7903-
  24. Masihi, F., Rezaeitavabe, F., Karimi-Jashni, A., & Riefler, G. (2024). Optimization and enhancement of biohydrogen production in a single-stage hybrid (dark/photo) fermentation reactor using Fe3O4 and TiO2 nanoparticles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 52, 295-305.
  25. Zhao, W., Zhao, J., Chen, G. D., Feng, R., Yang, J., Zhao, Y. F., & Zhang, Y. F. (2011). Anaerobic biohydrogen production by the mixed culture with mesoporous Fe3O4 nanoparticles activation. Advanced materials research, 306, 1528-1531.
  26. Feng, S., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., Chang, S. W., Nguyen, D. D., Bui, X. T.,. & Hoang, B. N. (2023). Biohydrogen production, storage, and delivery: A comprehensive overview of current strategies and limitations. Chemical Engineering Journal, 144669.
  27. Srivastava, N., Srivastava, M., Mishra, P. K., Kausar, M. A., Saeed, M., Gupta, V. K.,. & Ramteke, P. W. (2020). Advances in nanomaterials induced biohydrogen production using waste biomass. Bioresource technology, 307, 123094.
  28. Srivastava, N., Srivastava, M., Malhotra, B. D., Gupta, V. K., Ramteke, P. W., Silva, R. N.,. & Mishra, P. K. (2019). Nanoengineered cellulosic biohydrogen production via dark fermentation: a novel approach. Biotechnology advances, 37(6), 107384.
  29. Porwal, S., Kumar, T., Lal, S., Rani, A., Kumar, S., Cheema, S.,. & Kalia, V. C. (2008). Hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate producing abilities of microbes from diverse habitats by dark fermentative process. Bioresource technology, 99(13), 5444-5451.
  30. Jiang, X., Hu, J., Lieber, A. M., Jackan, C. S., Biffinger, J. C., Fitzgerald, L. A.,. & Lieber, C. M. (2014). Nanoparticle facilitated extracellular electron transfer in microbial fuel cells. Nano letters, 14(11), 6737-6742.