Journals / İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi / 2021 / Sayı: 53

Transformation of Self Presentation in Virtual Space

Pages
93–108
Publication Date
2021-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The result of the research has shown that people consume space while making self presentations and the consumed space transforms privacy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Technology detaches people from time and space and puts different contextual structures before them.
📊
Key Findings & Data:First caused by traditional media, this rupture prevails in virtuality, resulting in a paradigm shift in space and self.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The result of the research has shown that people consume space while making self presentations and the consumed space transforms privacy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Space · Self · Virtuality

Abstract

Technology detaches people from time and space and puts different contextual structures before them. First caused by traditional media, this rupture prevails in virtuality, resulting in a paradigm shift in space and self. Virtual space, like the physical world, witnesses a collective production. In other words, contrary to popular belief, virtual space has a connection with reality and allows the subject to reproduce herself. However, virtual space has a sense of space that breaks down contexts in the physical world. The space of new media uncovers the self-presentation where public and private boundaries are blurred. The desire for visibility conflicts with privacy. The subject presents herself in a space where the boundary between the front stage and backstage becomes fuzzy. The change in our perception of space in virtuality transforms privacy, and the desire of subjects to meet their identity needs affects their self-presentation. This study investigated the interrelated transformations in space and self resulting from the paradigm shift induced by advances in technology. For this purpose, semiological analysis was conducted on a YouTube video criticizing the virtuality in Instagram. The result of the research has shown that people consume space while making self presentations and the consumed space transforms privacy.

Özet

Technology detaches people from time and space and puts different contextual structures before them. First caused by traditional media, this rupture prevails in virtuality, resulting in a paradigm shift in space and self. Virtual space, like the physical world, witnesses a collective production. In other words, contrary to popular belief, virtual space has a connection with reality and allows the subject to reproduce herself. However, virtual space has a sense of space that breaks down contexts in the physical world. The space of new media uncovers the self-presentation where public and private boundaries are blurred. The desire for visibility conflicts with privacy. The subject presents herself in a space where the boundary between the front stage and backstage becomes fuzzy. The change in our perception of space in virtuality transforms privacy, and the desire of subjects to meet their identity needs affects their self-presentation. This study investigated the interrelated transformations in space and self resulting from the paradigm shift induced by advances in technology. For this purpose, semiological analysis was conducted on a YouTube video criticizing the virtuality in Instagram. The result of the research has shown that people consume space while making self presentations and the consumed space transforms privacy.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOMBUL, I., SARI, G. (2021). Transformation of Self Presentation in Virtual Space. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, Sayı: 53, 93–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/124165

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Barthes, R. (2000). Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Richard Howard (trans.). London: Vintage Books. Barthes, R. (1993). Göstergebilimsel Serüven. Mehmet Rıfat, Sema Rıfat (Trans.). İstanbul:
  2. Yapı Kredi Publishing. Bauman, Z. (1999). The Self in a Consumer Society. The Hedgehog Review / Fall 99. 35-40.
  3. Berger, J. (1972).
  4. Ways of Seeing, London: Penguin. Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in The Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books. Blatterer, H. (2010).
  5. Social Networking, Privacy, and the Pursuit of Visibility. Harry Blatterer, Pauline Johnson & Maria R. Markus (Ed.). Modern Privacy: Shifting Boundaries, New Forms. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 73-87.
  6. Blumenberg, H. (1987). The Genesis of the Copernican World. Robert M. Wallace (Çev.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  7. Boellstorff, T. (2011). "Placing The Virtual Body: Avatar, Cbora, Cypberg". Frances E. Mascia-Lees (Ed.). Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment. Malden, MA. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. 504-520.
  8. Crary, J. (1990). The Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  9. Debord, G. (1970). Society of Spectacle. Detroit: Black and Red. Donath, J. S. (1999). "Identity and Deception in The Virtual Community". Communities in Cyberspace. Mark A. Smith, Peter Kollock (Ed.), 29-59. London: Rotledge. Dourish, P. & Bell, G. (2007). The Infrastructure of Experience and the Experience of Infrastructure: Meaning and Structure in Everyday Encounters with Space. Environment and Planning B, Vol 34, Issue 3, 414-430. DOI:10.1068/b32035t
  10. Dourish, P. (1993). “Culture and Control in a Media Space”, in Proc. Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW93, Milano, Italy, September. Foucault, M. (1995). Disipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Alan Sheridan (trans.). New York: Vintage Books. Gergen, K. (2004). “The Challenge of Absent Presence,” J. E. Katz & M. A. Aakus (ed.), Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 227–241.
  11. Giddens A. (2006). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  12. Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Social Sciences Research Centre. Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. T. Burger &