SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3

The effect of socio-demographic characteristics of the dog owners on dog breed choices

Mustafa Özcan(Istanbul University, Veterinary Faculty, Department of Animal Breeding and Husbandry)
Bülent Ekiz(Istanbul University, Veterinary Faculty, Department of Animal Breeding and Husbandry)
Nurşen Öztürk(Istanbul University, Veterinary Faculty, Department of Animal Breeding and Husbandry)
Özlem Sertel Berk(Istanbul University, Faculty of Letters, Department of Psychology)
Pages
63–70
Publication Date
2017-12-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, marital status, income level, house sharing, child number in the family and owning another pet(s) at home didn’t have any significant affect on the breed choices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to identify the socio-demographic characteristics of the professional, semi-professional and non-professional dog owners who participate/interested are in any of association, social platform, pet fair and pet show related with dogs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The link of this survey was sent to members and followers of Dog Breed Federation through their corporate social networking site. 619 dog owners from various socio-demographic profile of the society attended voluntarily to this survey and 581 fully answered surveys were accepted as the material of the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, marital status, income level, house sharing, child number in the family and owning another pet(s) at home didn’t have any significant affect on the breed choices.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:dog · breed · dog owner

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the socio-demographic characteristics of the professional, semi-professional and non-professional dog owners who participate/interested are in any of association, social platform, pet fair and pet show related with dogs. Furthermore, it was purposed to determine the choices of owners from different demographic characteristics on size, dominance statue and function of the dog. This study was conducted by an online survey. The link of this survey was sent to members and followers of Dog Breed Federation through their corporate social networking site. 619 dog owners from various socio-demographic profile of the society attended voluntarily to this survey and 581 fully answered surveys were accepted as the material of the study. As a result, it was determined that more than half of the dog owners made their breed choices on breeds over 35 kg live weight, large size and with dominance traits. Owners’ tendencies for the dog breeds was affected by gender, age, education statues and environment where the dog is kept. However, marital status, income level, house sharing, child number in the family and owning another pet(s) at home didn’t have any significant affect on the breed choices.

Özet

The aim of this study was to identify the socio-demographic characteristics of the professional, semi-professional and non-professional dog owners who participate/interested are in any of association, social platform, pet fair and pet show related with dogs. Furthermore, it was purposed to determine the choices of owners from different demographic characteristics on size, dominance statue and function of the dog. This study was conducted by an online survey. The link of this survey was sent to members and followers of Dog Breed Federation through their corporate social networking site. 619 dog owners from various socio-demographic profile of the society attended voluntarily to this survey and 581 fully answered surveys were accepted as the material of the study. As a result, it was determined that more than half of the dog owners made their breed choices on breeds over 35 kg live weight, large size and with dominance traits. Owners’ tendencies for the dog breeds was affected by gender, age, education statues and environment where the dog is kept. However, marital status, income level, house sharing, child number in the family and owning another pet(s) at home didn’t have any significant affect on the breed choices.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özcan, M., Ekiz, B., Öztürk, N., Berk, Ö. S., *, M. Ö. (2017). The effect of socio-demographic characteristics of the dog owners on dog breed choices. Journal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.358316

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Anonymous (2017, November 20). Retrieved from http://mentalfloss.com/article/51153/10-benefits-being-dog-owner
  2. American Kennel Club (2017, November 20). Retrieved from http://www.akc.org/dog-breeds/
  3. British Kennel Club (2017, November 20). Retrieved from https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/activities/dog showing/breed-standards/
  4. Driscoll, C. A., Macdonald, D. W., & O’Brien S. J. (2009). From wild animals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication. PNAS. 106(1), 9971-9978.
  5. Federation Cynologique Internationale (2017, November 20). Retrieved from http://www.fci.be/en/Nomenclature/ Flint, E. L, Minot, E. O., Perry, P. E., & Stafford, K. J. (2010). Characteristics of adult dog owners in New Zealand, New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 58(2), 69-73.
  6. Freedman, A. H, Gronau, I., Schweizer, R. M., Vecchyo, D. O. D., Han, E., Silva, P. M., Galaverni, M., Fan, Z., Marx, P., Lorente-Galdos, B., Beale, H., Ramirez, O., Hormozdiari, F., Alkan, C., Vila, C., Squire, K., Geffen, E., Kusak, J., Boyko, A. R., Parker, H. G., Lee, C., Tadigotla, V., Siepel, A., Bustamante, C. D., Harkins, T. T., Nelson, S. F., Ostrander, E. A., Marques-Bonet, T., Wayne, R. K., & Novembre, J. (2014). Genome sequencing highlights the dynamic early history of dogs. PLOS Genetics, 10(1),1-12.
  7. Ghirlanda, S., Acerbi, A., & Herzog, H. (2014). Dog movie stars and dog breed popularity: A Case study in media influence on choice. Plosone, 1-5. Gunter LM., Barber RT, & Wynne CDL. (2016). What’s in a name? Effect of breed perceptions & labelling on attractiveness, adoptions & length of stay for pitbull type dogs. Ploseone, 1-19.
  8. Köpek Irkları ve Kinoloji Federasyonu (2017, November 20). Retrieved from http://www.kif.org.tr/
  9. Kubinyi E., Turcsan B., & Miklosi A. (2009). Dog and owner demographic characteristics and dog personality trait associations. Behavioural Processes, 81, 392-401.
  10. Marinelli, L., Adamelli, S., Normando S., & Bono G. (2007). Quality of life of the pet dog: Influence of owner and dog’s characteristics. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 108, 143-156.
  11. Meyer, I., & Forkman, B. (2014). Dog and owner characteristics affecting the dog-owner relationship. Journal of Veterinary Behaviour, 9, 143-150.
  12. Nemcova, D., & Novak,P. (2003). Adoption of dogs in the Czech Republic. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 72(3), 421-427. O’Brien, D. C, Andre, T. B, Robinson, A. D., Squires, L. D., & Tollefson, T. T. (2015). Dogs bite on head and neck: An evaluation of a comman pediatric trauma and associated treatment. Americcan Journal of Otolaryngology, 36(1): 32-38.
  13. SPSS (1999). Statistical Package For The Social Sciences, Release 10.0. SPSS Inc. IL, Chicago, USA.
  14. Taylor, D. (1993). Köpek Bakımı. İnkılap Kitapevi, ISBN:975-10-0572-8, İstanbul.
  15. UKC (2017, November 20). Retrieved from https://www.ukcdogs.com/breeds
  16. Weiss, E., Miller, K., Mohan-Gibbons, H. & Vela C. (2012). Why did you choose this pet? adopters and pet selection preferences in five animal shelters in the United States. Animals, 2, 144–159.
  17. Yalçın, B. C. (1981). Genel Zootekni. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Yayınları, Rektörlük No: 2769, Dekanlık No: 1, İstanbul.