SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 37

EXAMINATION OF BEYLIKDUZU DISTRICT WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF ACCESSIBILITY

BEYLİKDÜZÜ İLÇESİ’NİN ERİŞİLEBİLİRLİK AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ

Fatma Zehra ERCAN
Tuncer TOPRAK
Pages
23–34
Publication Date
2020-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, it was determined that the most important satisfaction factor for disabled individuals living in Beylikdüzü is social relations and in addition, transportation and urbanism practices are also related to satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Considering the supply chain as a whole and contributing to every link of the chain is an important factor in its management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to examine the concept of accessibility in the disability literature and to examine the district of Beylikdüzü in Istanbul within the framework of accessibility.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, it was determined that the most important satisfaction factor for disabled individuals living in Beylikdüzü is social relations and in addition, transportation and urbanism practices are also related to satisfaction.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Beylikdüzü erişilebilirlik · engellilik · erişilebilirlik

Abstract

Considering the supply chain as a whole and contributing to every link of the chain is an important factor in its management. The aim of this study is to examine the concept of accessibility in the disability literature and to examine the district of Beylikdüzü in Istanbul within the framework of accessibility. For this purpose, satisfaction and dissatisfaction sources of disabled people living in Beylikdüzü were investigated and the data obtained as a result of face to face questionnaire interviews were analyzed with statistical analysis method. As a result of the study, it was determined that the most important satisfaction factor for disabled individuals living in Beylikdüzü is social relations and in addition, transportation and urbanism practices are also related to satisfaction.

Özet

Tedarik zincirini bir bütün olarak ele almak ve zincirin her bir halkasına katkıda bulunmak, yönetiminde önemli bir faktördür. Bu çalışmanın amacı, engellilik literatürü içerisinde geçen erişilebilirlik kavramını ele almak ve İstanbul' un Beylikdüzü ilçesini erişilebilirlik çerçevesinde incelemektir. Bu amaçla, Beylikdüzü’nde yaşayan engelli bireylerin memnuniyet ve memnuniyetsizlik kaynakları araştırılmış, yüz yüze anket görüşmeleri sonucunda elde edilen veriler istatistiksel analiz yöntemi ile incelenmiştir. Bu araştırmanın sonucunda, Beylikdüzü’nde yaşayan engelli bireyler için en önemli memnuniyet faktörünün toplumsal ilişkiler olduğu ve ek olarak ulaşım ve şehircilik uygulamalarının da memnuniyet ile ilişkili olduğu saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERCAN, F. Z., TOPRAK, T. (2020). EXAMINATION OF BEYLIKDUZU DISTRICT WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF ACCESSIBILITY. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 37, 23–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/123920

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Abberley, P., (1986), "The Concept of Oppression and the Dev. of a Social Theory of Disability. Disability", Handicap Society, 2(1), 5-19.
  2. Aslan, M., Şeker, S., (2012), Engellilere Yönelik Toplumsal Algı ve Dışlanmışlık, Siirt Belediyesi, 44-48.
  3. Bakanlığı, A.V., (2013), Erişilebilirlik İzleme ve Denetleme Yönetmeliği, Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı, Ankara.
  4. Bakanlığı, A. V., (2015), Engelli ve Yaşlı Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü (EYHGM), Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı, Ankara.
  5. Baser, T., (2008),
  6. Kentte Engelli Yaşam, Engelli Dostu Belediye Sempozyumu, pp.4-6,
  7. Ankara.
  8. Bezmez, D., Yardımcı, S., Şentürk, Y.S., (2010),
  9. Sakatlık Çalışmaları, Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları, 363-384, İstanbul. Beylikdüzü Kent Belleği, (2019), Erişim Tarihi: 9 Temmuz 2019, http://www.beylikduzukentbellegi.com/Icerik/Goruntule/327
  10. BM. (1948),
  11. Human Rights Agreement, New York: Birleşmiş Milletler. Bromley, R., Matthews, D., Thomas, C., (2006), "City Centre Accessibility for Wheelchair Users: The Consumer Perspective and the Planning İmplications", Cities, 24(3), 229-241.
  12. Davis, C., Lifchez, R., (1987), An Open Letter to Architects. Berkeley: University of California Press,
  13. California. DDA. (1995), Disability Discrimination Act 1995. OPSI, 50. Evcil, A., Usal, Y., (2013), Engelliler ve Kent Ergonomisi: Kadıköy ve Üsküdar Meydanları Örnekleri. Ulusal Ergonomi Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 239-249.
  14. Fawcett, B., (2000), Researching Disability: Meanings, Interpretations and Analysis. Routledge: Practice and Research in Social Work. Fleck, J., (2003). Accessible London: Achieving an Inclusive Environment. London: London: Greater London Authority. Gleeson, B., (1996), "A Geography for Disabled People", Trans. Inst. Br., 21(2), 387-396.
  15. Goldsmith, S., (1997), Designing for the Disabled: The New Paradigm, Routledge Architectural Press,
  16. New York. Imrıe, R., Kumar, M., (1998), "Focusing on Disability and Access in the Built Environment", Disability Society, 13(3), 357-374.
  17. Kanunu, Ö. 5378 Sayılı (2005),
  18. Engelliler Hakkında Kanun, Resmi Gazete, 7/7/2005,25868 Ankara:
  19. TBMM. Mishchenko, E., (2014), "Herkes İçin / İle Tasarım: Evrensel Tasarıma Katılımcı bir Yaklaşım Deneyimi", Mimarist, 105-111.
  20. Morris, J., (2003), Barriers to Independent Living. Disability Rights Commission, 5-6.
  21. Ozcebe, H., (2008), Halk Sagligi ve Engellilik. Engelli Dostu Belediye Sempozyumu, Ankara, 2-4.
  22. Papaioannou, K., (2008), European Legislation On People with Disabilities, Building Comfortable and Liveable Environmen