Journals / Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences / 2007 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

The Effects of Different Discharge and Slope Conditions on Rill Erosion and Sediment Concentration

Farklı Debi ve Eğim Koşullarının Parmak Erozyonu ve Sediment Konsantrasyonu Üzerine Etkileri

Pages
59–65
Publication Date
2007-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Rills were measured as 6-11 cm in wide.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was carried out in a laboratory on Çiftlik Series (Typic Calciorthid) soils to determine the effects of different discharge and slope conditions on rill erosion and sediment transportation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Soil pan with 160 cm length and 80 cm width was prepared to see the effects of different discharge and slopes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Rills were measured as 6-11 cm in wide.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Parmak Erozyonu · Yoğun Akış · Sediment Konsantrasyonu

Abstract

This research was carried out in a laboratory on Çiftlik Series (Typic Calciorthid) soils to determine the effects of different discharge and slope conditions on rill erosion and sediment transportation. Soil pan with 160 cm length and 80 cm width was prepared to see the effects of different discharge and slopes. The values were 5, 10 and 15 l min-1 for discharge and 5, 10, 15 and 20 % for slope. With the increment in discharge and slope sediment concentration increased. The highest sediment concentration was 1027.66 g l -1 at the discharge value of 15 l min -1 and 20 % slope while the lowest value, 212.51 g l-1, was obtained at that of 5 l min-1 and 5 % slope. The results of other trials changed between these values. With the increment in discharge flow velocity increased also. Rills were measured as 6-11 cm in wide.

Özet

Çiftlik Serisi (Typic Calciorthid) toprağında, parmak erozyonu ve sediment taşınımı üzerine farklı debi ve eğim koşullarının etkisini saptamak için, laboratuar çalışması yapılmıştır. 160 cm uzunluk ve 80 cm genişliğindeki toprak tavasında, denemeler 5, 10 ve 15 l dk-1 debi ve % 5, 10, 15 ve 20 eğimlerde yürütülmüştür. Debi ve eğimin artışıyla sediment konsantrasyonu artmıştır. 15 l dk-1 debi ve % 20 eğimde sediment konsantrasyonu 1027.66 g l-1 ile en yüksek değerde yer alırken, 5 l dk-1 debi ve % 5 eğimde 212.51 g l-1 ile en düşük seviyede yer almıştır. Diğer uygulamalar bu iki değer arasında değişim göstermiştir. Debinin artmasıyla akış hızı da artmıştır. Parmakların genişliği 6–11 cm olarak ölçülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

PARLAK, M., ÇANGA, M. R. (2007). The Effects of Different Discharge and Slope Conditions on Rill Erosion and Sediment Concentration. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 59–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/123831

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abrahams, A.D., Li, G. and Parsons, A.J., 1996. Rill Hydraulics on a Semiarid Hillslope, Southern Arizona. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 21: 35–47.
  2. Blake, G.R. and Hartge, K.H., 1986. Bulk Density. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. ASA and SSSA. Agronomy Monograph No: 9. Madison, Wisconsin USA. pp. 363–375
  3. Bouyocous, G.J., 1951. A Recalibration of Hydrometer for Making Mechanical Analysis of Soils. Agronomy Journal, 43: 434–438.
  4. Brown, L. C. 1988. Effects of Incorporated Crop Residue on Rill Erosion. Ph. D. thesis, Purdue University, 197 pp. Brown, L.C., Foster, G.R. and Beasley, D.B., 1989. Rill Erosion as Affected by Incorporated Crop Residue and Sesonal Consolidation. Transactions of the ASAE, 32: 1967-1978.
  5. Cassel, D.K. and Nielsen, D.R., 1986. Field Capacity and Available Water Capacity. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. ASA and SSSA. Agronomy Monograph No: 9. Madison, Wisconsin USA. pp. 901–926.
  6. Desment, P.J.J. and Govers, G., 1997. Two- dimensional Modelling of the Within-field Variation in Rill and Gully Geometry and Location Related to Topography. Catena, 29: 283–306.
  7. Foster, G.R. and Meyer, L.D., 1975. Mathematical Simulation of Upland Erosion by Fundamental Erosion Mechanics. In: Present and Prospective Technology for Predicting Sediments Yields and Sources. Agr. Res. Service Rep. ARS-S–40. pp. 190–207.
  8. Fox, D.M. and Bryan, R.B., 1999. The Relationship of Soil Loss by Interrill Erosion to Slope Gradient. Catena, 38: 211–222.
  9. Fullen, M.A. and Reed, A.H., 1987. Rill Erosion on Arable Loamy Sands in the West Midlands of England. In: R.B. Bryan (Editör), Rill Erosion: Processes and Significance. Catena Supp., 8. Cremlingen: Catena Verlag, pp. 85–96.
  10. Govers, G., 1990. Empirical Relationships for the Transporting Capacity of Overland Flow. In: A. Yair, S. Berckowicz and D. E. Walling (Editör), Erosion, transport and deposition (Proceedings of the Jerusalem Workshop). IAHS pub. 189. pp.45–63.
  11. Govers, G., 1991. Rill Erosion on Arable Land in Central Belgium: Rates, Controls and Predictability. Catena, 18: 133–155.
  12. Govers, G., 1992.
  13. Relationship between Discharge, Velocity and Flow Area for Rills Eroding Loose, Non-layered Materials. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 17: 515–518.
  14. Gökmen, S. ve Yüksel, M., 1993. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Kenan Evren Araştırma Uygulama Çiftliği Topraklarının Detaylı Etüd ve Haritalanması. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakü