Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1

Investıgatıon of the relatıonshıp between patellofemoral (q) angle dıfferences wıth lower extremıty performance ın young and veteran volleyball players

Kürşat Hazar(MUĞLA SITKI KOÇMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6159-2631
Pages
136–143
Publication Date
2019-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this respect, Q angle differences are thought to be related to lower extremity performances of young and veteran volleyball players.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the relation between patellofemoral (Q) angle differences and static equilibrium, flexibility and take-off force in young and veteran volleyball players.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To the study 20 young males with an average age of 18 ± 00, 19 young females with a mean age of 18 ± 73, 21 veteran males with a mean age of 49 ± 04, 20 veteran females with a mean age of 48 ±70 who are registered players in Muğla Provincial Directorate of Youth and Sports, a total of 80 athletes voluntarily participated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this respect, Q angle differences are thought to be related to lower extremity performances of young and veteran volleyball players.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Volleyball · Q Angle · Volleyball

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the relation between patellofemoral (Q) angle differences and static equilibrium, flexibility and take-off force in young and veteran volleyball players. To the study 20 young males with an average age of 18 ± 00, 19 young females with a mean age of 18 ± 73, 21 veteran males with a mean age of 49 ± 04, 20 veteran females with a mean age of 48 ±70 who are registered players in Muğla Provincial Directorate of Youth and Sports, a total of 80 athletes voluntarily participated. The height, body weight, right and left leg Q angles in standing and laying, balance, flexibility and vertical take-off measurements were performed in the research group respectively. The statistical evaluation of the obtained data was done in SPSS 21.00 package program on a personal computer. In the data with normal distribution, the parametric statistical methods were used. While the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used for intergroup comparisons, the Tukey test was used for multiple comparisons, and the correlation level was used to determine the relationship between the variables and the significance level was taken as p <0.05. According to the findings, there were significant differences between the Q angles, balance, flexibility, and take-off values of the participants (p <0.01). Also, there was a positive relationship between Q angle values and elasticity values in standing and laying position, and a negative relationship between balance and take-off force values (p <0.05). As a result: Q angle values of volleyball players were examined and it was seen that the difference between groups has resulted from gender; the difference between young and veteran volleyball players was not statistically significant. As the Q angle increased, the increase in the elasticity values and the decrease in the balance and splash values were determined. In this respect, Q angle differences are thought to be related to lower extremity performances of young and veteran volleyball players.

🔖

Cite This Article

Hazar, K., *, K. H. (2019). Investıgatıon of the relatıonshıp between patellofemoral (q) angle dıfferences wıth lower extremıty performance ın young and veteran volleyball players. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1, 136–143. https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.542827

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Bompa, T.O., (1998). Antrenman kuramı ve Yöntemi. Çeviri; Keskin., Tuner, A. Bağırgan Yayınevi: Ankara
  2. Brody, D. M., 1980 "Running injuries". Ciba Clinical Symposia 32 (4): 9-13.
  3. Byl T, Cole J, Livingston L. 2000. What determines the magnitude of the Q-angle? A preliminary study of selected skeletal and muscular measures. Journal of Sports Rehabilitation. 2000;9.26-34.
  4. Caylor D, Fites R, Worrell T. The relationship between quadriceps angle and anterior knee pain syndrome. JOSPT. 1993;17.11-5
  5. Grant, S., Hynes, V., Whittaker, A., & Aitchison, T. (1996). Anthropometric, strength, endurance and flexibility characteristics of elite and recreational climbers. Journal of sports sciences, 14(4), 301-309.
  6. Horton MG, Hall TL. Quadriceps femoris muscle angle-normal values and relationships with gender and selected skeletal measures. Phys. Ther. 1989;69.897-901
  7. İpek, Z., Ziyagil, M.A., (2002). Erkek ve bayan voleybolcuların fiziksel özellikleri ve fizyolojik kapasitelerinin sedanterlerle karşılaştırılması. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bil. Dergi. 4(2), 12-16.
  8. Koç H, Aslan CS. Erkek Hentbol ve Voleybol Sporcularının Seçilmiş Fiziksel ve Motorik Özelliklerinin Karşılaştırılması. Selçuk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitim ve Spor Bilim Dergisi, 2010; 12(3): 227-231.
  9. Koç, H., Özcan, K., Pulur, A., Ayaz, A., (2007). Elit bayan hentbolcular ile voleybolcuların bazı fiziksel ve fizyolojik parametrelerinin karşılaştırılması. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(3). 123-128.
  10. Lale, B., Müniroğlu, S., Çoruh, E.E., Sunay, H., (2003). Türk erkek voleybol milli takımının somatotip özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Spormetre Bed. Eğ. Ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 1(1), 53-56.
  11. Nalçakan GR. Voleybolcuların İzokinetik Kas Kuvvetleri ile Dikey Sıçrama Yükseklikleri Arasındaki İlişki düzeyi. Spor Fizyolojisi Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir, 2001.
  12. Puhl J, Case S, Fleck S, Handel V.Physicalandphysiologicalcharacteristics of elitevolleyballplayers. Res. Quart, 1982; 53: 257–262.
  13. Recreational Climbers, Journal of Sports Sciences, 14: 301-309, 1996.
  14. Riley, D. (1995). “Voleybol İçin Kuvvetlilik Çalışması”. Çeviri: H. Can. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Voleybol Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi. 3 (5): 22–39.
  15. Schnabel G, Harre D, Borde A. Grundkonzept “SportlicheLeistung”. In: Trainingswissenschaft. 10. Ausg. G Schnabel, Hrsg, Berlin, SportVerlag, 1997, 32-79.
  16. Schulties SS, Francis RS, Fisher AG, Van der Graaf KM. Does the Q angle reflect the forces on the patella in thefrontal plane? Phys Ther 1995; 75(1): 24-30
  17. Şipal MC, (1989). Eurofit Bedensel Yetenek Testleri El Kitabı. T.C. Başbakanlık G.S. G.M Dış İlişkiler Dairesi Başkanlığı Yayını, Yayın No 78. Ankara.
  18. Tamer, K. (1995): Sporda Fiziksel ve Fizyolojik Performansın ölçülmesi ve Değerlendirilmesi, Türkerler Kitabevi, Ankara, 4-158.
  19. Wilson T, Kitsell F. Is the Q-angle an absolute or variable measure? Physiotherapy. 2002;88.296–302
  20. Yenigün, Ö. (2003). “Voleybolcuların alt ekstremite antropometrik ölçümleri ile biodex aleti ile ölçülen diz fleksiyon ekstansiyon kas kuvvetlerinin değerlendirilmesi”. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Kocaeli