Journals / Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Life cycle assessment of a laying hen farm

Bir yumurta tavukçuluğu işletmesinin yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesi

Pages
0–0
Publication Date
2016-03-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This method defines potential environmental impacts which appear for each phase of egg production and it also recommend the most appropriate control strategies, minimized environmental impacts, for laying hen farm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Egg is an important product since egg is inexpensive, healthy, and economic and can be produced in short time and it also remove insufficient of protein in human activity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Life cycle assessment (LCA) is used commonly in European Countries for environmental management of laying hen farms and it provides widespread knowledge on the environmental burdens associated to an egg production.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This method defines potential environmental impacts which appear for each phase of egg production and it also recommend the most appropriate control strategies, minimized environmental impacts, for laying hen farm.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yumurta tavukçuluğu · Asidifikasyon · Ötrofikasyon

Abstract

Egg is an important product since egg is inexpensive, healthy, and economic and can be produced in short time and it also remove insufficient of protein in human activity. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is used commonly in European Countries for environmental management of laying hen farms and it provides widespread knowledge on the environmental burdens associated to an egg production. In this study, applicability of LCA to environmental impact assessment of agricultural activities was examined a representative scheme of private laying hen farm in Bursa province. This method defines potential environmental impacts which appear for each phase of egg production and it also recommend the most appropriate control strategies, minimized environmental impacts, for laying hen farm.

Özet

Yumurta, ucuz, sağlıklı, ekonomik ve kısa zamanda üretilebilmesi ve insanlardaki protein açığının kapatılması açısından oldukça önemli bir üründür. Yaşam döngüsü değerlendirme yöntemi, yumurta üretiminin çevre etkisi ile ilgili kapsamlı bilgi sağlamasından dolayı özellikle yumurta tavukçuluğu işletmelerinin çevresel yönetimi için Avrupa ülkelerinde yaygın olarak kullanılır. Bu çalışmada, yaşam döngüsü yönteminin tarımsal faaliyetlerin çevresel etki değerlendirmesindeki uygulanabilirliği, Bursa’da üretim yapan özel bir yumurta tavukçuluğu işletmesi örnek alınarak araştırılmıştır. Bu yöntem, yumurta üretiminin her aşamasında ortaya çıkan potansiyel çevre etkilerinin tanımlanmasının yanı sıra bu etkileri en aza indirgeyecek işletmeye en uygun kontrol stratejilerinin geliştirilmesi ile ilgili öneriler sunar.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, İ., KARAMAN, S. (2016). Life cycle assessment of a laying hen farm. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/123132

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Audsley A, Alber S, Clift R, Cowell S, Crettaz R, Gaillard G, Hausheer J, Jolliet O, Kleijin R, Mortensen B, Pearce D, Roger E, Teulon H,Weidema B, Van Zeijts H (1997) Harmonisation of life cycle assessment for agriculture. Final report, Concerted Action AIR3- CT94-2028,
  2. European Commission DG VI, Brussels, Belgium. Basset-Mens C, Werf VDHMG (2003) Environmental assessment of contrasting pig farming systems in France. Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-food Sector Proceedings from the 4th International Conference, October 6-8,
  3. Bygholm, Denmark. Basset-Mens C, Ledgard S, Carran A (2005) First life cycle assessment of milk production from New Zealand dairy farm systems. Ecological Economics in Action, December 11-13,
  4. Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Blake JP (2004) Methods and Technologies for handling mortality losses, World Poultry Science 60 (4): s.489-499.
  5. Cederberg C, Mattsson B (2000) Life cycle assessment of milk production - a comparison of conventional and organic farming. Journal of Cleaner Production 8: 49–60.
  6. Choiniere Y, Munroe AJ (1997) Air quality inside livestock barns. Ministry of Agriculture and Food, AGDEX 400/717, Factsheet, Ontorio. Conner DE, Blake JP, Donald JO, Kolroko JI (1992) Composting poultry carcesses. Microbiological Safety in Proceedings National Poultry Waste Management Symposium, pp. 418-423.
  7. Consoli F (1993) Guidelines for Life Cycle Assessment: A code of practice. Sesimbra: SETAC. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (1995). Waste Management and Utilization in Food Production and Processing. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, 4420 West Lincoln Way, Ames USA. De Boer IJM (2003) Environmental impact assessment of conventional and organic milk production. Livestock Production Science, 80: 69–77.
  8. De Boer IJM, Iepema G, Thomassen MA (2003) Environmental impact assessment at commercial dairy farms. 4th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-food Sector Proceedings., October 6-8, 2003,
  9. Bygholm, Denmark. Demirulus H, Aydın A (1996) Tavukçuluk artık ve atık maddelerinin işlenerek çevre kirliliğinin azaltılması. Ekoloji Çevre Dergisi, 19:s. 22-26.
  10. Donald JO, Blake JP (1990) Dead poultry composter construction. In: Proceeding National Poultry Waste Management Symposium, pp. 38-44.
  11. EEA (1998) Europe’s Environment: The Second Assessment. EEA, Copenhagen. EEA (2001)
  12. Environmental Signals (2001)
  13. EEA Regular Indicator Report. EEA, Copenhagen. Erensayın C (1992) Tavukçuluk Kit