SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 83

Meaning in the Workplace: A Qualitative Study on the Sources of Meaningful Work and the Role of Gender

İş Yaşamında Anlam Arayışı: Anlamlı İşin Kaynakları Üzerine Cinsiyet Odaklı Nitel Bir İnceleme

Pelin Karaca Kalkan(Ankara Bilim Üniversitesi)0000-0002-7951-6389
Pages
371–398
Publication Date
2026-07-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings indicate that the sources of meaningful work primarily emerge at the individual level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to explore the concept of meaningful work through its individual, organizational, and job-level sources, as well as the influence of gender roles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Qualitative data were collected from in-depth semi-structured interviews with twenty white-collar employees from various professions and analyzed through content analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings indicate that the sources of meaningful work primarily emerge at the individual level.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anlamlı İş · Toplumsal Cinsiyet · Nitel Araştırma

Abstract

This study aims to explore the concept of meaningful work through its individual, organizational, and job-level sources, as well as the influence of gender roles. Qualitative data were collected from in-depth semi-structured interviews with twenty white-collar employees from various professions and analyzed through content analysis. Findings indicate that the sources of meaningful work primarily emerge at the individual level. Among the individual sources, contribution to others and society, personal growth, work calling, and relationships with service recipients stand out as key factors. At the organizational level, meaningfulness is primarily fostered through managerial attitudes and behaviors and interactions with coworkers, whereas organizational practices and culture have a relatively limited effect. At the job level, autonomy and right of initiative identified as major determinants of meaningfulness. Regarding gender, meaningful work is not directly shaped by gender itself, though socially constructed gender roles subtly influence how women and men construct meaning at work. In conclusion, this study contributes to literature by revealing the dynamic and multilayered nature of meaningful work.

Özet

Bu çalışma, anlamlı iş kavramını bireysel, örgütsel ve iş düzeyindeki kaynaklar ile toplumsal cinsiyet bağlamında incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Farklı meslek gruplarından yirmi beyaz yakalı çalışanla gerçekleştirilen derinlemesine yarı yapılandırılmış mülakatlardan elde edilen nitel veriler, içerik analizi yöntemiyle değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, anlamlı işin kaynaklarının öncelikle bireysel düzeyde şekillendiğini göstermektedir. Bireysel kaynaklardan özellikle bireye ve topluma katkı sağlama, kişisel gelişim, meslek aşkı ve hizmet alıcılarla kurulan bağ öne çıkmaktadır. Örgütsel düzeyde, anlamı güçlendiren başlıca unsurların yönetici tutum ve davranışları ile çalışma arkadaşlarıyla etkileşim olduğu belirlenmiştir. Buna karşın, örgütsel uygulamalar ve kültürün anlam üzerindeki etkisi görece sınırlıdır. İş düzeyinde ise özerklik ve inisiyatif kullanımı, anlamın temel belirleyicilerinden biri olarak dikkat çekmektedir. Cinsiyet bağlamında, anlamlı iş deneyiminin doğrudan cinsiyetle açıklanamayacağı, ancak toplumsal cinsiyet rollerinin kadın ve erkek çalışanların anlam inşa biçimlerini dolaylı biçimde etkilediği görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma anlamlı işin dinamik ve çok katmanlı yapısını ortaya koyarak literatüre katkı sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kalkan, P. K. (2026). Meaning in the Workplace: A Qualitative Study on the Sources of Meaningful Work and the Role of Gender. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 83, 371–398. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.1807886

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (54)

  1. Aca, Z., Kırcal-Şahin, A., Özdemir, A., & Kaymakcı, Y. S. (2025). Gender stereotypes and professional experiences of female nurses in Türkiye. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, Article 1538517. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1538517
  2. Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499
  3. Afota, M. C., Provost Savard, Y., Léon, E., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2024). Changes in belongingness, meaningful work, and emotional exhaustion among new high-intensity telecommuters: Insights from pandemic remote workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 97(3), 817–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12494
  4. Akçakanat, T., Erhan, T., & Uzunbacak, H. H. (2019). Meslek aşkının iş tatmini üzerine etkisi: Akış deneyiminin aracı rolü. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 80–95.
  5. Allan, B. A. (2017). Task significance and meaningful work: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.07.011
  6. Allan, B. A., Batz-Barbarich, C., Sterling, H. M., & Tay, L. (2019). Outcomes of meaningful work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 500–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12406
  7. Ashmos, D. P., & Duchon, D. (2000). Spirituality at work: A conceptualization and measure. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/105649260092008
  8. Bailey, C., & Madden, A. (2016). The mismanaged soul: Existential labor and the erosion of meaningful work. Human Resource Management Review, 26(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.11.001
  9. Bailey, C., Yeoman, R., Madden, A., Thompson, M., & Kerridge, G. (2019). A review of the empirical literature on meaningful work: Progress and research agenda. Human Resource Development Review, 18(1), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318804653
  10. Balcı, A., Öztürk, İ., & Akar, F. (2019). Akademisyenlerin işlerini anlamlı kılan faktörlere ilişkin görüşleri. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(3), 867–892. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.527374
  11. Blustein, D. L., Lysova, E. I., & Duffy, R. D. (2023). Understanding decent work and meaningful work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031921-024847
  12. Boddy, R., Bourne, D., Özbilgin, M., & Jankowicz, D. (2024). Does work mean something different to men and women? An empirical examination of the psychological contract in the workplace across two countries. Journal of Psychological Research, 6(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.30564/jpr.v6i1.6250
  13. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  14. Burbano, V. C., Folke, O., Meier, S., & Rickne, J. (2024). The gender gap in meaningful work. Management Science, 70(10), 7004–7023. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01807
  15. Byrd, M. Y. (2022). Creating a culture of inclusion and belongingness in remote work environments that sustains meaningful work. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2047252
  16. Cartwright, S., & Holmes, N. (2006). The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.012
  17. Chatman, J. A., Sharps, D., Mishra, S., Kray, L. J., & North, M. S. (2022). Agentic but not warm: Age-gender interactions and the consequences of stereotype incongruity perceptions for middle-aged professional women. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 173, Article 104190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104190
  18. Chen, S. J., Wang, M. J., & Lee, S. H. (2018). Transformational leadership and voice behaviors: The mediating effect of employee perceived meaningful work. Personnel Review, 47(3), 694–708. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2017-0016
  19. Cicekli, E., & Kabasakal, H. (2017). The opportunity model of organizational commitment: Evidence from white-collar employees in Turkey. International Journal of Manpower, 38(2), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-06-2015-0086
  20. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  21. De Boeck, G., Dries, N., & Tierens, H. (2019). The experience of untapped potential: Towards a subjective temporal understanding of work meaningfulness. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 529–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12417
  22. Demirtas, O., Hannah, S. T., Gok, K., Arslan, A., & Capar, N. (2017). The moderated influence of ethical leadership, via meaningful work, on followers’ engagement, organizational identification, and envy. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2907-7
  23. Dirik, D., & Özdoğan, B. (2025). To start or not to start? An exploratory study of work meaningfulness among start-up co-founders. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1500036. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1500036
  24. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735
  25. Ely, R. J. (1995). The power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 589–634. https://doi.org/10.5465/256740
  26. Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000). Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 103–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22004-2
  27. Ermiş-Mert, A. (2017). Gendered jobs and occupational prestige in Turkey: Women in the hierarchy elevator. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 23(4), 442–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2017.1385248
  28. Fürstenberg, N., Alfes, K., & Shantz, A. (2021). Meaningfulness of work and supervisory-rated job performance: A moderated-mediation model. Human Resource Management, 60(6), 903–919. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22041
  29. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  30. Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
  31. Lepisto, D. A., & Pratt, M. G. (2017). Meaningful work as realization and justification: Toward a dual conceptualization. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(2), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386616630039
  32. Lips-Wiersma, M., & Morris, L. (2009). Discriminating between ‘meaningful work’ and the ‘management of meaning’. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 491–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0118-9
  33. Lips-Wiersma, M., & Wright, S. (2012). Measuring the meaning of meaningful work: Development and validation of the comprehensive meaningful work scale (CMWS). Group & Organization Management, 37(5), 655–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112461578
  34. Lips-Wiersma, M., Haar, J., & Wright, S. (2020). The effect of fairness, responsible leadership and worthy work on multiple dimensions of meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3967-2
  35. Lips-Wiersma, M., Wright, S., & Dik, B. J. (2016). Meaningful work: Differences among blue-, pink-, and white-collar occupations. Career Development International, 21(5), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-04-2016-0052
  36. Lysova, E. I., Allan, B. A., Dik, B. J., Duffy, R. D., & Steger, M. F. (2019). Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110(Part B), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.07.004
  37. Martela, F., & Pessi, A. B. (2018). Significant work is about self-realization and broader purpose: Defining the key dimensions of meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00363
  38. Martela, F., & Riekki, T. J. (2018). Autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence: A multicultural comparison of the four pathways to meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 327587. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01157
  39. Martela, F., Gómez, M., Unanue, W., Araya, S., Bravo, D., & Espejo, A. (2021). What makes work meaningful? Longitudinal evidence for the importance of autonomy and beneficence for meaningful work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 131, Article 103631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103631
  40. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013005020
  41. Nikolova, M., & Cnossen, F. (2020). What makes work meaningful and why economists should care about it. Labour Economics, 65, Article 101847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101847
  42. Oelberger, C. R. (2019). The dark side of deeply meaningful work: Work-relationship turmoil and the moderating role of occupational value homophily. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 559–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12411
  43. Pavlish, C., & Hunt, R. (2012). An exploratory study about meaningful work in acute care nursing. Nursing Forum, 47(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2012.00261.x
  44. Peng, J., Chen, L., Yang, X., & Xie, L. (2024). Meaningfulness at work: Role of distributive justice, managerial respect and work self-efficacy. Management Decision, 62(3), 885–912. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2022-1078
  45. Ridgeway, C. L. (2009). Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender & Society, 23(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208330313
  46. Rojas, A., Gölgeci, I., & Santoro, G. (2025). Navigating meaningful work: Exploring the impact of mobile telepresence robots on healthcare professionals. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 217, Article 124156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124156
  47. Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001
  48. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  49. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563 Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
  50. Shafaei, A., & Nejati, M. (2024). Creating meaningful work for employees: The role of inclusive leadership. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 35(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21512
  51. Steger, M. F., Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160
  52. Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063
  53. Vogel, D. L., Wester, S. R., Heesacker, M., & Madon, S. (2003). Confirming gender stereotypes: A social role perspective. Sex Roles, 48(11), 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023575212526
  54. You, J., Kim, S., Kim, K., Cho, A., & Chang, W. (2021). Conceptualizing meaningful work and its implications for HRD. European Journal of Training and Development, 45(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-01-2020-0005