SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 32 Issue: 1

Agricultural Residues in Turkey: Energy Potential and Evaluation of Existing Biomass Power Plants

Türkiye'deki Tarımsal Atıklar: Enerji Potansiyeli ve Mevcut Biyokütle Santrallerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Ayşegül Bahadıroğlu0000-0003-2874-0855
Buse Nur Atay0000-0002-4848-197X
Sibel Başakçılardan Kabakcı(YALOVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9717-5111
Pages
—
Publication Date
2022-03-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on AHP method, cost is the most important criterion in the selection of pretreatment before transportation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Biomass energy gains importance constantly in order to increase energy security, diversity and develop the rural economy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The most cultivated products across 81 provinces in Turkey are listed and the residues are concentrated on products with high calorific value.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on AHP method, cost is the most important criterion in the selection of pretreatment before transportation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biomass power plant · Agricultural residues/wastes · Energy potential

Abstract

Biomass energy gains importance constantly in order to increase energy security, diversity and develop the rural economy. Most of the existing biomass energy power plants in Turkey use solid waste, it is extremely important to encourage the use of agricultural residues in these facilities. In this study, agricultural residues were examined under two headings: primary residues (PR) are the residues left in the field after harvest (corn stalk, wheat straw, etc.), and secondary residues (SR) are the residues after the products are processed in the factory (almond shell, corn cob, etc.) When calculating the amount of agricultural residues, special uses such as soil protection, animal feeding, heating purposes are taken into account. The most cultivated products across 81 provinces in Turkey are listed and the residues are concentrated on products with high calorific value. The amount of primary and secondary residues belonging to these agricultural products was extracted and mapped based on provinces. Then the energy potential of these residues was calculated. The total amount of PR and SR produced in Turkey is 39 412 683 tonnes and 6 803 787 tonnes. By assuming the total efficiency of the power plant as 30% and the capacity factor of the biomass power plant as 0.65, the power to be obtained from only PRs will be 2 438.5 MW and from only SR will be 830 MW in the total of 81 provinces. Based on AHP method, cost is the most important criterion in the selection of pretreatment before transportation.

Özet

Biyokütle enerjisi; enerji güvenliğini, çeşitliliğini artırmak ve kırsal ekonomiyi geliştirmek için devamlı önem kazanmaktadır. Türkiye'deki mevcut biyokütle enerji tesislerinin daha fazla atık kullandığı bilinmesine rağmen, bu tesislerde tarımsal artıkların kullanımının teşvik edilmesi son derece önemlidir. Bu çalışmada tarımsal atıklar iki başlık altında incelenmiştir: birincil atıklar (BA), hasat sonrası tarlada kalan atıklardır (mısır sapı, buğday samanı, vb.), ikincil atıklar (İA) ise ürünlerin fabrikada işlenmesinden sonra kalan atıklardır (badem kabuğu, mısır koçanı, vb.). Tarımsal kalıntı miktarı hesaplanırken toprağın korunması, hayvanların beslenmesi, ısınma amaçlı gibi özel kullanımlar dikkate alınır. Türkiye'de 81 ilde en çok ekilen ürünler listelenmiş ve kalori değeri yüksek ürünlerin atıkları üzerinde yoğunlaşılmıştır. Bu tarım ürünlerine ait birincil ve ikincil atık miktarları iller bazında ayıklanmış ve haritalanmıştır. Daha sonra bu atıkların enerji potansiyeli hesaplanmıştır. Türkiye'de üretilen toplam BA ve İA miktarı yıllık 39 412 683 ton ve 6 803 787 tondur. Santralin toplam verimi %30 ve biyokütle santralinin kapasite faktörünün 0.65 olduğu varsayıldığında, toplam 81 ilde sadece BA'dan yılda 2 438,5 MW ve sadece İA'dan yılda 830 MW güç elde edilecektir. AHP yöntemine göre, nakliye öncesi ön işlem seçiminde maliyet en önemli kriterdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bahadıroğlu, A., Atay, B. N., Kabakcı, S. B. (2022). Agricultural Residues in Turkey: Energy Potential and Evaluation of Existing Biomass Power Plants. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 32 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1030233

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (95)

  1. Acar, S., & Ayanoglu, A. (2012). Determination Of Higher Heating Values (HHVs) Of Biomass Fuels. Energy Education Science and Technology Part A: Energy Science and Research, 28(2), 749–758.
  2. Akkuş, G. (2018). Bağ Budama Artıklarından Torrefaksiyon İle Katı Atık Üretimi.
  3. Alatzas, S., Moustakas, K., Malamis, D., & Vakalis, S. (2019). Biomass Potential from Agricultural Waste for Energetic Utilization in Greece. Energies, 12(6)(1095), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061095
  4. Aqsha, A., Tijani, M. M., & Mahinpey, N. (2014). Catalytic Pyrolysis Of Straw Biomasses (Wheat, Flax, Oat And Barley Straw) And The Comparison Of Their Product Yields. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 190 VOLUME, 1007–1015. https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ140942
  5. Atashbar, N. Z. (2017). Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains for Several Bio-Refineries.
  6. Avcıoğlu, A. O., Dayıoğlu, M. A., & Türker, U. (2019). Assessment of The Energy Potential of Agricultural Biomass Residues İn Turkey. Renewable Energy, 138, 610–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.053
  7. Ba, B. H., Prins, C., & Prodhon, C. (2016). Models For Optimization and Performance Evaluation Of Biomass Supply Chains: An Operations Research Perspective. Renewable Energy, 87, 977–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.045
  8. Bai, X., Wang, G., Gong, C., Yu, Y., Liu, W., & Wang, D. (2017). Co-Pelletizing Characteristics of Torrefied Wheat Straw With Peanut Shell. Bioresource Technology, 233, 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.091
  9. Bajwa, D. S., Peterson, T., Sharma, N., Shojaeiarani, J., & Bajwa, S. G. (2018). A Review of Densified Solid Biomass For Energy Production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 96(July), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.040
  10. Bilgiç, E. (2014). The Comparıson of Effects of Torrefaction and Carbonızation Treatments On Biomass (Issue June).
  11. Biomass Supply Chains Harvesting & Collection, Pre-Treatment And Upgrading, Storage, Transportation & Handling. (2018). World Bioenergy Association.
  12. Biswas, B., Pandey, N., Bisht, Y., Singh, R., Kumar, J., & Bhaskar, T. (2017). Pyrolysis Of Agricultural Biomass Residues: Comparative Study Of Corn Cob, Wheat Straw, Rice Straw And Rice Husk. Bioresource Technology, 237, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.046
  13. Bledzki, A. K., Mamun, A. A., Erdmann, K., & Volk, J. (n.d.). Characterization of Grain By-Products and Properties of Its Biodegrade Composites. Naro.Tech Messe Und Kongresse Fü Nachwa Chsende Rohstoffe; Sept 6-9., 1–11.
  14. Bledzki, A. K., Mamun, A. A., & Volk, J. (2010). Physical, Chemical and Surface Properties of Wheat Husk, Rye Husk and Soft Wood and Their Polypropylene Composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 41(4), 480–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.12.004
  15. Bojić, S., Datkov, D., Brcanov, D., Georgijević, M., & Martinov, M. (2013). Location Allocation of Solid Biomass Power Plants: Case Study of Vojvodina. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, 769–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.039
  16. Çakır, G. (2019). Tarımsal Ürünler Tedarik Zinciri Yönteimi: Çiçek Bamyası Uygulaması. cholar.google.es/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Funcionalidad+Familiar+en+Alumnos+de+1°+y+2°+grado+de+secundaria+de+la+institución+educativa+parroquial+“Pequeña+Belén”+en+la+comunidad+de+Peralvillo%2C+ubicada+en+el+distrito+de+Chancay+-+periodo+2018&btnG=
  17. Cebi, S., Ilbahar, E., & Atasoy, A. (2016). A Fuzzy Information Axiom Based Method to Determine the Optimal Location for A Biomass Power Plant: A Case Study in Aegean Region of Turkey. Energy, 116, 894–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.024
  18. Chang, P., & Lin, H. (2015). Manufacturing Plant Location Selection in Logistics Network Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 8(5), 1547–1575.
  19. Cobuloglu, H. I., & Büyüktahtakin, I. E. (2014). A Multi-Criteria Approach For Biomass Crop Selection Under Fuzzy Environment. IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2014, May 2014, 4003–4012.
  20. Danish, M., Naqvi, M., Farooq, U., & Naqvi, S. (2015). Characterization Of South Asian Agricultural Residues For Potential Utilization İn Future ‘Energy Mix.’ Energy Procedia, 75, 2974–2980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.604
  21. Delivand, M. K., Cammerino, A. R. B., Garofalo, P., & Monteleone, M. (2015). Optimal Locations of Bioenergy Facilities, Biomass Spatial Availability, Logistics Costs and GHG (Greenhouse Gas) Emissions: A Case Study on Electricity Productions in South Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.018
  22. Demirbaş, A. (2002). Fuel Characteristics Of Olive Husk And Walnut, Hazelnut, Sunflower, And Almond Shells. Energy Sources, 24(3), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/009083102317243601
  23. Demirbaş, A. (2003). Relationships Between Heating Value And Lignin, Fixed Carbon, And Volatile Material Contents Of Shells From Biomass Products. Energy Sources, 25(7), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908310390212336
  24. Demirbas, A. (2016). Calculation Of Higher Heating Values Of Biomass Fuels. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 38(18), 2693–2697. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2015.1115924
  25. Eker, M., Çoban, H. O., & Alkan, H. (2010). Hasat Artıkları Tedarik Zincirine Yönelik Sistem Tasarımı. III. Ulusal Karadeniz Ormancılık Kongresi 20-22 Mayıs 2010, 2, 524–534.
  26. Estiati, I., Freire, F. B., Freire, J. T., Aguado, R., & Olazar, M. (2016). Fitting Performance Of Artificial Neural Networks And Empirical Correlations To Estimate Higher Heating Values Of Biomass. Fuel, 180, 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.051
  27. Fornés Comas, J., Socias i Company, R., & Alonso Segura, J. M. (2019). Shell Hardness in Almond: Cracking Load and Kernel Percentage. Scientia Horticulturae, 245(June 2018), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.09.075
  28. From Phyllis, C. Wilén, A. Moilanen and E. Kurkula: Biomass feedstock analyses, VTT publications 282, Espoo 1996. (n.d.).
  29. From Phyllis, Demirbas, A.: Fuel characteristics of olive husk and walnut, hazelnut, sunflower, and almond shells. Energy Sources 24 (2002) 215-221. (n.d.).
  30. From Phyllis, H. Haykiri-Acma, S. Yaman, S. Kucukbayrak: Effect of biomass on temperatures of sintering and initial deformation of lignite ash. Fuel 89 (2010) 3063-3068. (n.d.).
  31. From Phyllis, http://edv1.vt.tuwien.ac.at/AG_HOFBA/BIOBIB/Biobib.htm (1997). (n.d.).
  32. From Phyllis, http://rredc.nrel.gov:80/biomass/doe/nrel/comp/alki/appendix.html (1998). Link obsolete. Instead, try http://www.nrel.gov/rredc/biomass_resource.html. (n.d.).
  33. From Phyllis, M. Theis, B.-J. Skrifvars, M. Zevenhoven, M. Hupa, H. Tran: Fouling tendency of ash resulting from burning mixtures of biofuels. Part 2: Deposit chemistry. Fuel 85 (2006) 1992-2001. (n.d.).
  34. From Phyllis, N. Magasiner and J. W. de Kock: Design criteria for fibrous fuel fired boilers. Energy World (8-9) pp. 4-12 (1987). (n.d.).
  35. From Phyllis, S. Gaur and T.B. Reed; An Atlas of Thermal Data For Biomass and Other Fuels. NREL/TP-433-7965, June 1995. (n.d.).
  36. From Phyllis, S. K. Sharma, K. L. Kalra and H. S. Grewal: Enzymatic saccharification of pretreated sunflower stalks. Biomass and bioenergy 23-3 (2002) 237-243. (n.d.).
  37. From Phyllis, W. R. Livingston: Straw ash characteristics, Babcock Energy Limited, DE92 519748, 23 p. (1991). (n.d.).
  38. From Phyllis, Y.J. Lu, L.J. Guo, C.M. Ji, X.M. Zhang, X.H. Hao, Q.H. Yan:Hydrogen production by biomass gasification in supercritical water: a parametric study. Int J Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006) 822-831. (n.d.).
  39. García, R., Pizarro, C., Lavín, A. G., & Bueno, J. L. (2014). Spanish Biofuels Heating Value Estimation. Part I: Ultimate Analysis Data. Fuel, 117(PARTB), 1130–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.048
  40. García-Cubero, M. T., González-Benito, G., Indacoechea, I., Coca, M., & Bolado, S. (2009). Effect Of Ozonolysis Pretreatment On Enzymatic Digestibility Of Wheat And Rye Straw. Bioresource Technology, 100(4), 1608–1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.012
  41. Gebreegziabher, T., Oyedun, A. O., Luk, H. T., Lam, T. Y. G., Zhang, Y., & Hui, C. W. (2014). Design and Optimization of Biomass Power Plant. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 92(8), 1412–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2014.04.013
  42. Ghaderi, H., Pishvaee, M. S., & Moini, A. (2016). Biomass Supply Chain Network Design: An Optimization-Oriented Review and Analysis. Industrial Crops & Products, 94, 972–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.027
  43. Gital Durmaz, Y., & Bilgen, B. (2020). Multi-Objective Optimization Of Sustainable Biomass Supply Chain Network Design. Applied Energy, 272, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115259
  44. Havrysh, V., Kalinichenko, A., Brzozowska, A., & Stebila, J. (2021). Life Cycle Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Agricultural Residue Feedstock for Bioenergy. Applied Sciences, 11(5), 2009. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052009
  45. https://enerji.gov.tr/, Date Accessed: 18 October 2021. (n.d.).
  46. Jeong, J. S., & Ramírez-Gómez, Á. (2017). A Multicriteria GIS-Based Assessment To Optimize Biomass Facility Sites With Parallel Environment - A Case Study İn Spain. Energies, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122095
  47. Jiang, H., Ye, Y., Lu, P., Zhao, M., Xu, G., Chen, D., & Song, T. (2021). Effects Of Torrefaction Conditions On The Hygroscopicity Of Biochars. Journal of the Energy Institute, 96, 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2021.03.018
  48. Jiang, Y., Havrysh, V., Klymchuk, O., Nitsenko, V., Balezentis, T., & Streimikiene, D. (2019). Utilization of Crop Residue For Power Generation: The Case of Ukraine. Sustainability, 11(24), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247004
  49. Kapluhan, E. (2014). Enerji Coğrafyası Açısından Bir İnceleme: Biyokütle Enerjisinin Dünyadaki ve Türkiye’deki Kullanım Durumu. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 30, 97–125. https://doi.org/10.14781/MCD.2014308146
  50. Khdair, A., & Abu-Rumman, G. (2020). Sustainable Environmental Management and Valorization Options for Olive Mill Byproducts in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region. Processes, 8(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/PR8060671
  51. Lo, S. L. Y., How, B. S., Leong, W. D., Teng, S. Y., Rhamdhani, M. A., & Sunarso, J. (2021). Techno-Economic Analysis For Biomass Supply Chain: A State-Of-The-Art Review. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 135, pp. 1–19). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110164
  52. Mani, T., Murugan, P., Abedi, J., & Mahinpey, N. (2010). Pyrolysis Of Wheat Straw İn A Thermogravimetric Analyzer: Effect Of Particle Size And Heating Rate On Devolatilization And Estimation Of Global Kinetics. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 88(8), 952–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2010.02.008
  53. Moayedi, H., Aghel, B., Abdullahi, M. M., Nguyen, H., & Safuan A Rashid, A. (2019). Applications Of Rice Husk Ash As Green And Sustainable Biomass. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117851
  54. Mohammed, I. Y., Abakr, Y. A., Musa, M., Yusup, S., Singh, A., & Kazi, F. K. (2016). Valorization Of Bambara Groundnut Shell Via İntermediate Pyrolysis: Products Distribution And Characterization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 717–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.090
  55. Montero, G., Coronado, M. A., Torres, R., Jaramillo, B. E., García, C., Stoytcheva, M., Vázquez, A. M., León, J. A., Lambert, A. A., & Valenzuela, E. (2016). Higher Heating Value Determination Of Wheat Straw From Baja California, Mexico. Energy, 109, 612–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.011
  56. Morato, T., Vaezi, M., & Kumar, A. (2019). Assessment Of Energy Production Potential From Agricultural Residues in Bolivia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 102(October 2018), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.032
  57. Murele, O. C., Zulkafli, N. I., Kopanos, G., Hart, P., & Hanak, D. P. (2020). Integrating Biomass Into Energy Supply Chain Networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119246
  58. Nhuchhen, D. R., & Abdul Salam, P. (2012). Estimation Of Higher Heating Value Of Biomass From Proximate Analysis: A New Approach. Fuel, 99, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.04.015
  59. Nunes, L. J. R., Causer, T. P., & Ciolkosz, D. (2020). Biomass For Energy: A Review On Supply Chain Management Models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 120, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109658
  60. Oladeji, J. (2010). Fuel Characterization of Briquettes Produced from Corncob and Rice Husk Resides. Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 11(1), 101–106.
  61. Parikh, J., Channiwala, S. A., & Ghosal, G. K. (2007). A Correlation For Calculating Elemental Composition From Proximate Analysis Of Biomass Materials. Fuel, 86(12–13), 1710–1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.029
  62. Pasaoglu, G., Garcia, N. P., & Zubi, G. (2018). A Multi-Criteria and Multi-Expert Decision Aid Approach to Evaluate the Future Turkish Power Plant Portfolio. Energy Policy, 119(January), 654–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.044
  63. Patomtummakan, J., & Nananukul, N. (2018). Biomass Power Plant Location And Distribution Planning System. GMSARN International Journal, 12(1), 11–18.
  64. Patsios, S. I., Kontogiannopoulos, K. N., Mitrouli, S. T., Plakas, K. v., & Karabelas, A. J. (2016). Characterisation of Agricultural Waste Co- and By-Products. In AgroCycle.
  65. Perea-Moreno, M. A., Manzano-Agugliaro, F., & Perea-Moreno, A. J. (2018). Sustainable Energy Based on Sunflower Seed Husk Boiler for Residential Buildings. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103407
  66. Pinho, T. M., Coelho, J. P., Moreira, A. P., & Boaventura-Cunha, J. (2017). A Multilayer Model Predictive Control Applied to A Supply Chain Management Problem. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 402, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43671-5_15
  67. POLAT, M. (2020). Türkiye’nin Tarımsal Atık Biyokütle Enerji Potansiyelindeki Değişim. Toprak Su Dergisi, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.21657/topraksu.692275
  68. Poudel, J., & Oh, S. C. (2014). Effect Of Torrefaction On The Properties Of Corn Stalk To Enhance Solid Fuel Qualities. Energies, 7(9), 5586–5600. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7095586
  69. Qian, H., Zhu, W., Fan, S., Liu, C., Lu, X., Wang, Z., Huang, D., & Chen, W. (2017). Prediction Models For Chemical Exergy Of Biomass On Dry Basis From Ultimate Analysis Using Available Electron Concepts. Energy, 131, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.037
  70. Rentizelas, A. A., Tolis, A. J., & Tatsiopoulos, I. P. (2009). Logistics Issues of Biomass: The Storage Problem and The Multi-Biomass Supply Chain. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 887–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.01.003
  71. Ríos-Badrán, I. M., Luzardo-Ocampo, I., García-Trejo, J. F., Santos-Cruz, J., & Gutiérrez-Antonio, C. (2020). Production And Characterization Of Fuel Pellets From Rice Husk And Wheat Straw. Renewable Energy, 145, 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.048
  72. Santos, J., Ouadi, M., Jahangiri, H., & Hornung, A. (2019). Integrated İntermediate Catalytic Pyrolysis Of Wheat Husk. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 114, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2018.11.001
  73. Sharma, B., Ingalls, R. G., Jones, C. L., & Khanchi, A. (2013). Biomass Supply Chain Design and Analysis: Basis, Overview, Modeling, Challenges, and Future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 608–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.049
  74. Shen, J., Zhu, S., Liu, X., Zhang, H., & Tan, J. (2010). The Prediction Of Elemental Composition Of Biomass Based On Proximate Analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 51(5), 983–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.11.039
  75. Soares, R., Marques, A., Amorim, P., & Rasinmäki, J. (2019). Multiple Vehicle Synchronisation In a Full Truck-Load Pickup And Delivery Problem: A case-Study In The Biomass Supply Chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 277(1), 174–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.025
  76. Solangi, Y. A., Tan, Q., Mirjat, N. H., Valasai, G. das, Khan, M. W. A., & Ikram, M. (2019). An İntegrated Delphi-AHP And Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach Toward Ranking And Selection Of Renewable Energy Resources İn Pakistan. Processes, 7(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7020118
  77. Tang, C., Zhang, D., & Lu, X. (2015). Improving The Yield And Quality Of Tar During Co-Pyrolysis Of Coal And Cotton Stalk. BioResources, 10(4), 7667–7680. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.10.4.7667-7680
  78. Thanarak, P. (2012). Supply Chain Management of Agricultural Waste for Biomass Utilization and CO2 Emission Reduction in the Lower Northern Region of Thailand. 14, 843–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.12.1021
  79. Üçgül, İ., & Akgül, G. (2010). Biyokütle Teknolojisi. SDÜ Yekarum E-Dergi, 1(1), 3–11.
  80. Uslu, A., Faaij, A. P. C., & Bergman, P. C. A. (2008). Pre-Treatment Technologies, and Their Effect On International Bioenergy Supply Chain Logistics. Techno-Economic Evaluation Of Torrefaction, Fast Pyrolysis and Pelletisation. Energy, 33(8), 1206–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.03.007
  81. Wang, C.-N., Tsai, T.-T., & Ying-Fang, H. (2019). A Model for Optimizing Location Selection for Biomass Energy Power Plants. National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, 7(6)(353), 1–13.
  82. Wang, L., Skreiberg, Ø., Becidan, M., & Li, H. (2016). Investigation Of Rye Straw Ash Sintering Characteristics And The Effect Of Additives. Applied Energy, 162, 1195–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.027
  83. Yang, T., Ma, J., Kai, X., Li, R., & Ding, J. (2016). Ash Transformation And Deposition Characteristic During Straw Combustion,. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 38(6), 790–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2013.837548
  84. Yao, X., Xu, K., Yan, F., & Liang, Y. (2017). The Influence Of Ashing Temperature On Ash Foulinq And Slagging Characteristics During Combustion Of Biomass Fuels. BioResources, 12(1), 1593–1610. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.1.1593-1610
  85. Yue, D., You, F., & Snyder, S. W. (2014). Biomass-to-Bioenergy And Biofuel Supply Chain Optimization: Overview, Key Issues And Challenges. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 66, 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.11.016
  86. Zahraee, S. M., Shiwakoti, N., & Stasinopoulos, P. (2020). Biomass Supply Chain Environmental And Socio-Economic Analysis: 40-Years Comprehensive Review Of Methods, Decision Issues, Sustainability Challenges, And The Way Forward. Biomass and Bioenergy, 142, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105777
  87. Zhang, L., & Hu, G. (2013). Supply Chain Design and Operational Planning Models for Biomass to Drop-in Fuel Production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 58, 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.08.016
  88. Zhao, C., Liu, X., Chen, A., Chen, J., Lv, W., & Liu, X. (2020). Characteristics Evaluation Of Bio-Char Produced By Pyrolysis From Waste Hazelnut Shell At Various Temperatures. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 00(00), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1754530
  89. Zhao, X., & Li, A. (2016). A Multi-Objective Sustainable Location Model for Biomass Power Plants: Case of China. Energy, 112, 1184–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.011
  90. Zhou, H., Luo, Z., Liu, D., & Ma, W. C. (2019). Effect Of Biomass Ashes On Sintering Characteristics Of High/Low Melting Bituminous Coal Ash. Fuel Processing Technology, 189(January), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.01.017
  91. Cebi, S., Ilbahar, E., & Atasoy, A. (2016). A Fuzzy Information Axiom Based Method to Determine the Optimal Location for A Biomass Power Plant: A Case Study in Aegean Region of Turkey. Energy, 116, 894–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.024
  92. Ghaderi, H., Pishvaee, M. S., & Moini, A. (2016). Biomass Supply Chain Network Design: An Optimization-Oriented Review and Analysis. Industrial Crops & Products, 94, 972–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.027
  93. Rentizelas, A. A., Tolis, A. J., & Tatsiopoulos, I. P. (2009). Logistics Issues of Biomass: The Storage Problem and The Multi-Biomass Supply Chain. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 887–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.01.003
  94. Yang, T., Ma, J., Kai, X., Li, R., & Ding, J. (2016). Ash Transformation And Deposition Characteristic During Straw Combustion,. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 38(6), 790–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2013.837548
  95. Zhao, X., & Li, A. (2016). A Multi-Objective Sustainable Location Model for Biomass Power Plants: Case of China. Energy, 112, 1184–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.011