SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2024 / Volume: 34 Issue: 4

Removal of Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Liquid Dairy Manure using Microalgae

Nermine Koç(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Biyosistem Mühendisliği Bölümü, Bursa, Türkiye)0009-0000-7121-1954
Sude Barbaros(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Biyosistem Mühendisliği Bölümü, Bursa, Türkiye)0009-0004-7587-2863
Ebru Çelik(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Biyosistem Mühendisliği Bölümü, Bursa, Türkiye)0009-0004-7499-3065
Seyit Uğuz(Yozgat Bozok University)0000-0002-3994-8099
Ercan Şimşek(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Biyosistem Mühendisliği Bölümü, Bursa, Türkiye)0000-0001-9979-5496
Erkan Yaslıoglu(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Biyosistem Mühendisliği Bölümü, Bursa, Türkiye)0000-0002-3865-7863
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, integrating microalgae cultivation into wastewater treatment processes shows promise for nutrient removal and biomass production.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Animal production wastes and effluents are among the most highly produced wastewaters, containing high concentrations of nutrients and microbes that could lead to contamination and eutrophication of water sources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, a microalgae Ankistrodesmus sp. was employed for nutrient removal from dairy LM at concentrations of 10%, 20%, and 30% over 35 days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, integrating microalgae cultivation into wastewater treatment processes shows promise for nutrient removal and biomass production.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:photobioreactor · microalgae · liquid

Abstract

Animal production wastes and effluents are among the most highly produced wastewaters, containing high concentrations of nutrients and microbes that could lead to contamination and eutrophication of water sources. Large-scale enterprises in cattle breeding face challenges in storing and removing a substantial volume of liquid manure (LM). Therefore, the management of LM becomes an economic burden for producers. In this case, the question arises as to whether a more economical and sustainable treatment method can be employed by utilizing LM from animal production in algal growth, which has emerged as a renewable raw material source in recent years. In this study, a microalgae Ankistrodesmus sp. was employed for nutrient removal from dairy LM at concentrations of 10%, 20%, and 30% over 35 days. The total nitrogen reduction rates in the reactors with 10%, 20%, and 30% LM were 72.8%, 69.1%, and 71%, respectively, while the total phosphorus reduction rates were 65.7%, 52.6%, and 31.5%, respectively. Overall, integrating microalgae cultivation into wastewater treatment processes shows promise for nutrient removal and biomass production. By leveraging the nutrient-rich characteristics of LM from cattle farming, microalgae provide a sustainable and effective approach to reduce environmental pollution and enhance resource recovery in agriculture. Further research and development in this field are essential for optimizing treatment methods and improving the environmental sustainability of livestock operations.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koç, N., Barbaros, S., Çelik, E., Uğuz, S., Şimşek, E., Yaslıoglu, E. (2024). Removal of Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Liquid Dairy Manure using Microalgae. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 34 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1492195

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (47)

  1. Akca, M. S. (2015). Microalgal Growth In Anaerobic Digestate. (M.Sc). Graduate School Of Science Engıneerıng and Technology, İstanbul Technical University. İstanbul, Türkiye.
  2. Batista, A. P., Ambrosano, L., Graça, S., Sousa, C., Marques, P. A., Ribeiro, B.,. & Gouveia, L. (2015). Combining urban wastewater treatment with biohydrogen production–an integrated microalgae-based approach. Bioresource Technology, 184, 230-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.064
  3. Beauchamp, E. G., Kidd, G. E., & Thurtell, G. (1982). Ammonia volatilization from liquid dairy cattle manure in the field. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 62(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss82-00
  4. Becker, E. W. (1994). Microalgae: biotechnology and microbiology (Vol. 10). Cambridge University Press.
  5. Çakmakcı, T., Sahin, U., Kızıloglu, F. M., Tufenkci, Ş., Kuşlu, Y., & Erkuş, F. Ş. (2017). Yapay Sulak Alanlarında Atık Su Arıtımı ve Soğuk İklime Sahip Bölgelerde Kullanım Önerileri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 27(4), 651-656.
  6. Chang, R., Pandey, P., James, P., Pandey, P., Li, Y., Zhang, R., & Weimer, B. C. (2022). Assessment Impacts of Ozone on Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli O157: H7 in Liquid Dairy Waste. Applied Sciences, 12(13), 6527.
  7. Cheng, D., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., Chang, S. W., Nguyen, D. D., Liu, Y.,. & Wei, D. (2020). A critical review on antibiotics and hormones in swine wastewater: Water pollution problems and control approaches. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 387, 121682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121682
  8. Chiu, S. Y., Kao, C. Y., Chen, T. Y., Chang, Y. B., Kuo, C. M., & Lin, C. S. (2015). Cultivation of microalgal Chlorella for biomass and lipid production using wastewater as nutrient resource. Bioresource Technology, 184, 179-189.
  9. Coşkun, Ç., Pulatsü, S., & Coşkun, T. (2018). Evsel Atıksulardan Azot ve Fosforun Biyolojik Giderilme Yöntemleri. Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 2(2), 53-63.
  10. Fang, C., Zhang, T., Li, P., Jiang, R. F., & Wang, Y. C. (2014). Application of magnesium modified corn biochar for phosphorus removal and recovery from swine wastewater. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(9), 9217-9237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110909217
  11. Ferreira, V. S., Pinto, R. F., & Sant'Anna, C. (2016). Low light intensity and nitrogen starvation modulate the chlorophyll content of Scenedesmus dimorphus. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 120(3), 661-670. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13007
  12. Hadi, R. F., Hertanto, B. S., & Wati, A. K. Reducing the number of microorganisms and organic carbon by implementation of APS (Advanced Ponds System) in the wastewater of dairy goat with added liquid probiotics. Livestock and Animal Research, 18(3), 246-252. https://doi.org/10.20961/lar.v18i3.45997
  13. Halim, F. T., Guo, X., Su, G., Ngee, H. L., Zeng, X., He, N.,. & Danquah, M. K. (2016). Sustainable microalgae‐based palm oil mill effluent treatment process with simultaneous biomass production. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 94(10), 1848-1854. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.22584
  14. Hodaifa, G., Martínez, M. E., & Sánchez, S. (2009). Influence of pH on the culture of Scenedesmus obliquus in olive-mill wastewater. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 14, 854-860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-009-0119-7
  15. İlgi, K. K., & Şebnem, A. (2007). Sürekli İşletilen Alg-Fotobiyoreaktör Sisteminde Atık Sudan Azot Giderimi. 7. Ulusal Çevre Mühendisliği Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, İzmir, 267-273.
  16. Izmailov, A. Y., Lobachevsky, Y. P., Dorokhov, A. S., Kozhevnikov, Y. A., & Mamedova, R. A. (2021). Experimental modeling of the microalgae cultivation in a photobioreactor using manure. In BIO Web of Conferences (Vol. 37, p. 00114). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20213700114
  17. Kisielewska, M., Zieliński, M., Dębowski, M., Kazimierowicz, J., Romanowska-Duda, Z., & Dudek, M. (2020). Effectiveness of Scenedesmus sp. biomass grow and nutrients removal from liquid phase of digestates. Energies, 13(6), 1432. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061432
  18. Knight, R. L., Payne Jr, V. W., Borer, R. E., Clarke Jr, R. A., & Pries, J. H. (2000). Constructed wetlands for livestock wastewater management. Ecological Engineering, 15(1-2), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(99)00034-8
  19. Lopes, W. R. T., Orrico, A. C. A., Garcia, R. G., Orrico Jr, M. A. P., Manarelli, D. M., Fava, A. F., & Nääs, I. A. (2016). The addition of hatchery liquid waste to dairy manure improves anaerobic digestion. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 18, 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0279
  20. Martinez, J., Dabert, P., Barrington, S., & Burton, C. (2009). Livestock waste treatment systems for environmental quality, food safety, and sustainability. Bioresource Technology, 100(22), 5527-5536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.038
  21. Matsi, T., Lithourgidis, A. S., & Gagianas, A. A. (2003). Effects of injected liquid cattle manure on growth and yield of winter wheat and soil characteristics. Agronomy Journal, 95(3), 592-596. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.5920
  22. Osabutey, A., Haleem, N., Uguz, S., Min, K., Samuel, R., Albert, K.,. & Yang, X. (2023). Growth of Scenedesmus dimorphus in swine wastewater with versus without solid–liquid separation pretreatment. Bioresource Technology, 369, 128434.
  23. Pinedo-Hernández, J., Paternina-Uribe, R., & Marrugo-Negrete, J. (2016). Alternative electrocoagulation for livestock wastewater treatment. Portugaliae Electrochim. Acta, 34(4), 277-85. https://doi.org/10.4152/pea.201604277
  24. Psenovschi, G., Vintila, A., Matei, C., Paulenco, A., & Velea, S. (2019). Biogas Production by Anaerobic Digestion Coupled with Wastewater Treatment. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings, 29(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019029099
  25. Razzak, S. A., Hossain, M. M., Lucky, R. A., Bassi, A. S., & De Lasa, H. (2013). Integrated CO2 capture, wastewater treatment and biofuel production by microalgae culturing a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 622-653.
  26. Regueiro, I., Siebert, P., Liu, J., Müller-Stöver, D., & Jensen, L. S. (2020). Acidified animal manure products combined with a nitrification inhibitor can serve as a starter fertilizer for maize. Agronomy, 10(12), 1941.
  27. Shelknanloymilan, L., Atici, T., & Obal, O. (2012). Removal of nitrogen and phosphate by using Choleralla vulgaris on synthetic and organic materials waste water. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 5(2), 89-94.
  28. Sheng, L., Shen, X., Benedict, C., Su, Y., Tsai, H. C., Schacht, E.,. & Zhu, M. J. (2019). Microbial safety of dairy manure fertilizer application in raspberry production. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 2276.
  29. Sokołowska, L., & Seniczak, S. (2005). The effect of cattle liquid manure fertilization on alternating grassland and some groups of soil mesofauna. Folia Biologica (Kraków), 53(4), 133-137. https://doi.org/10.3409/173491605775789407
  30. Tam, N. F. Y., & Wong, Y. (1996). Effect of ammonia concentrations on growth of Chlorella vulgaris and nitrogen removal from media. Bioresource Technology, 57(1), 45-50.
  31. Thomas, B. W., Li, X., Nelson, V., & Hao, X. (2017). Anaerobically digested cattle manure supplied more nitrogen with less phosphorus accumulation than undigested manure. Agronomy Journal, 109(3), 836-844. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.12.0719
  32. Uguz, S., & Sozcu, A. (2023). Nutritional Value of Microalgae and Cyanobacteria Produced with Batch and Continuous Cultivation: Potential Use as Feed Material in Poultry Nutrition. Animals, 13(21), 3431. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13213431
  33. Uguz, S., Anderson, G., Yang, X., Simsek, E., & Osabutey, A. (2022). Cultivation of Scenedesmus dimorphus with air contaminants from a pig confinement building. Journal of Environmental Management, 314, 115129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115129
  34. Usui, M., Tamura, Y., & Asai, T. (2022). Current status and future perspective of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and resistance genes in animal-breeding environments. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 84(9), 1292-1298. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.22-0253
  35. Wang, H., Zhang, W., Chen, L., Wang, J., & Liu, T. (2013). The contamination and control of biological pollutants in mass cultivation of microalgae. Bioresource Technology, 128, 745-750.
  36. Wang, Y., Pandey, P., Chiu, C., Jeannotte, R., Kuppu, S., Zhang, R.,. & Aly, S. (2020). Quantification of antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements in dairy manure. Peer J. (23;9:e12408). doi: 10.7717/peerj.12408.
  37. Yen, H. W., Ho, S. H., Chen, C. Y., & Chang, J. S. (2015). CO2, NOx and SOx removal from flue gas via microalgae cultivation: A critical review. Biotechnology Journal, 10(6), 829-839. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400707
  38. Zhang, M., Gavlak, R., Mitchell, A., & Sparrow, S. (2006). Solid and liquid cattle manure application in a subarctic soil: Bromegrass and oat production and soil properties. Agronomy Journal, 98(6), 1551-1558. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0045
  39. Zhu, L., Wang, Z., Takala, J., Hiltunen, E., Qin, L., Xu, Z.,. & Yuan, Z. (2013). Scale-up potential of cultivating Chlorella zofingiensis in piggery wastewater for biodiesel production. Bioresource Technology, 137, 318-325.
  40. Zieliński, M., Dębowski, M., Szwaja, S., & Kisielewska, M. (2018). Anaerobic digestion effluents (ADEs) treatment coupling with chlorella sp. microalgae production. Water Environment Research, 90(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143017X14902968254890
  41. Batista, A. P., Ambrosano, L., Graça, S., Sousa, C., Marques, P. A., Ribeiro, B.,. & Gouveia, L. (2015). Combining urban wastewater treatment with biohydrogen production–an integrated microalgae-based approach. Bioresource Technology, 184, 230-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.064
  42. Cheng, D., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., Chang, S. W., Nguyen, D. D., Liu, Y.,. & Wei, D. (2020). A critical review on antibiotics and hormones in swine wastewater: Water pollution problems and control approaches. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 387, 121682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121682
  43. Halim, F. T., Guo, X., Su, G., Ngee, H. L., Zeng, X., He, N.,. & Danquah, M. K. (2016). Sustainable microalgae‐based palm oil mill effluent treatment process with simultaneous biomass production. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 94(10), 1848-1854. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.22584
  44. Osabutey, A., Haleem, N., Uguz, S., Min, K., Samuel, R., Albert, K.,. & Yang, X. (2023). Growth of Scenedesmus dimorphus in swine wastewater with versus without solid–liquid separation pretreatment. Bioresource Technology, 369, 128434.
  45. Sheng, L., Shen, X., Benedict, C., Su, Y., Tsai, H. C., Schacht, E.,. & Zhu, M. J. (2019). Microbial safety of dairy manure fertilizer application in raspberry production. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 2276.
  46. Wang, Y., Pandey, P., Chiu, C., Jeannotte, R., Kuppu, S., Zhang, R.,. & Aly, S. (2020). Quantification of antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements in dairy manure. Peer J. (23;9:e12408). doi: 10.7717/peerj.12408.
  47. Zhu, L., Wang, Z., Takala, J., Hiltunen, E., Qin, L., Xu, Z.,. & Yuan, Z. (2013). Scale-up potential of cultivating Chlorella zofingiensis in piggery wastewater for biodiesel production. Bioresource Technology, 137, 318-325.