SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 35 Issue: 2

Effect of Different Additives and Ratios on Silage Quality Characteristics of Common Reed Growing in Drainage Channels

Süleyman Temel(IĞDIR ÜNİVERSİTESİ, IĞDIR ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, TARLA BİTKİLERİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-9334-8601
Bilal Keskin(IGDIR UNIVERSITY, IĞDIR FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF FIELD CROPS)0000-0001-6826-9768
Hüseyin Uluca(Igdir Special Provincial Administration)0009-0006-6029-5447
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Analyse results showed that all additives increased crude protein, raw ash (RA), dry matter (except molasses), Fleig score, and lactic acid content (except alfalfa) of Common reed silage compared to the control but decreased the pH (except alfalfa), ammonia production, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber contents.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine some nutritional, chemical, and fermentation properties of Common reed silage using different additives (alfalfa grass, crushed corn, sugar beet molasses, and 1:1 alfalfa grass + sugar beet molasses) and their ratios (0%, 5%, 10% and 15%).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Additives were added based on fresh weight to the Common reed grass, which was cut and chopped (1.0 cm sizes) at the beginning of the panicle.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Analyse results showed that all additives increased crude protein, raw ash (RA), dry matter (except molasses), Fleig score, and lactic acid content (except alfalfa) of Common reed silage compared to the control but decreased the pH (except alfalfa), ammonia production, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber contents.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fermentation characteristics · Nutritional and Chemical contents · Phragmites australis

Abstract

This study aims to determine some nutritional, chemical, and fermentation properties of Common reed silage using different additives (alfalfa grass, crushed corn, sugar beet molasses, and 1:1 alfalfa grass + sugar beet molasses) and their ratios (0%, 5%, 10% and 15%). Additives were added based on fresh weight to the Common reed grass, which was cut and chopped (1.0 cm sizes) at the beginning of the panicle. Then it was bagged in a vacuum device and left to ferment at 25±2 °C for 60 days. Analyse results showed that all additives increased crude protein, raw ash (RA), dry matter (except molasses), Fleig score, and lactic acid content (except alfalfa) of Common reed silage compared to the control but decreased the pH (except alfalfa), ammonia production, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber contents. A similar situation (except RA) occurred as the levels of additives increased. On the other hand, molasses, crushed corn, and increasing levels of these additives increased the lactic acid content of the silage, while decreasing the acetic, propionic, and butyric acid contents. As a result, a quality silo material can be obtained from the Common reed by applying 5% alfalfa grass + 5% molasses.

🔖

Cite This Article

Temel, S., Keskin, B., Uluca, H. (2025). Effect of Different Additives and Ratios on Silage Quality Characteristics of Common Reed Growing in Drainage Channels. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 35 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1639210

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (40)

  1. Acar, Z., & Bostan, M. (2016). The effects of some natural additives on quality of alfalfa silage. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31(3), 433-440. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.269998.
  2. Açıkgöz, E. (2001). Forage Crops (3rd Ed.). Uludag University, Strengthening Foundation Publication, Number: 182, Bursa.
  3. Albrecht, K. A., & Muck, R. E. (1991). Proteolysis in ensiled forage legumes that vary in tannin concentration. Crop Science, 31, 464-469.
  4. AOAC, (1990). Official Methods of Analysis (15th Ed.). Washington DC, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
  5. AOAC, (1997). Official Methods of Analysis (16th Ed., 3rd revision). Arlington VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
  6. Asano, K., Ishikawa, T., Araie, A., & Ishida, M. (2018). Improving quality of common reed (Phragmites communis Trin.) silage with additives. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 31(11), 1747-1755. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0807.
  7. Aydoğan, D., & Demiroğlu Topçu, G. (2022). Effect of different harvesting times on the dry matter yield and some forage quality characteristics of common reed (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin Ex. Steud). ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(3), 492-499. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6980254.
  8. Baran, M., Váradyová, Z., Kráčmár, S., & Hedvábný, J. (2002). The Common Reed (Phragmites australis) as a source of roughage in ruminant nutrition. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 71, 445-449. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200271040445.
  9. Bingöl, N. T., Bolat, D., Karslı, M. A., & Akça, İ. (2009). Effects of molasses addition into barley-sainfoin mixture at varying levels on silage quality and digestibility. Atatürk University Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 4(1), 23-30.
  10. Büyükkılıç Beyzi, S., Ülger, İ., & Konca, Y. (2022). Chemical, fermentative, nutritive and anti‑nutritive composition of Common Reed (Phragmites australis) plant and silage. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 14, 927-936. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-022-01903-w.
  11. Canale, A., Valente M. E., & Ciotti, A. (1984). Determination of volatile carboxylic acids (C1–C5i) and lactic acid in aqueous acid extracts of silage by high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 35, 1178-1182. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740351106.
  12. Canbolat, Ö., Kalkan, H., Karaman, Ş., & Filya, İ. (2010). The investigation of possibility of grape pomace as carbohydrate source in alfalfa silages. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 269-276. Doi: https://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2009.679.
  13. Cacan, E., Başbağ, M., & Aydın, A. (2012). The determination of quality characters of some annual alfalfa species (Medicago spp.) collected in natural rangelands in Diyarbakır. Turkish Journal of Nature and Science, 1(1), 34-38.
  14. El-Talty, Y. I., Abdel-Gwad, M. H., & Mahmoud, A. E. M. (2015).Effect of common reed (Phragmites australis) silage on performance of growing lambs. Asian Journal of Animal Sciences, 9(1), 1-12. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajas.2015.1.12.
  15. Erbeyli, B., Erol, S., & Çarpıcı, E. B. (2022). Determination of hay yield and quality traits of some alfalfa cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Bursa Uludag University, 36(2), 245-254. Doi: https://doi.org/10.20479/bursauludagziraat.1011280.
  16. Fales, S. L., & Fritz, J. (2007). Factors Affecting Forage Quality. In RF. Barnes, CJ. Nelson, KJ. Moore & M. Collins (Eds), 6th Edition, Forages (pp. 569-580). Blackwell Publishing.
  17. Gülümser, E., Mut, H., Başaran, U., & Doğrusöz, M. Ç. (2019). Effects of molasses or crushed barley addition on the quality of cowpea and soybean silages. Bilecik Seyh Edebali University Journal of Science, 6, 161-167. Doi: https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.589388.
  18. Güner, Z., & Temel, S. (2022). Determination of silage quality of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) varieties grown with different row spacings under dry conditions. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 12(4), 2506-2519. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1175686.
  19. Hussian, H. M. (2018). Effect of level of formic acid and urea on microbial evaluations of common reed Phragmites communis silage. Euphrates Journal of Agriculture Science, 10(4), 6-12.
  20. Kadi, S.A., Ouendi, M., Bannelıer, C., Berchiche, M., & Gidenne, T. (2018). Nutritive value of sun-dried common reed (Phragmites australis) leaves and its effect on performance and carcass characteristics of the growing rabbit. World Rabbit Science, 26(2), 113-121. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2018.5217.
  21. Kardeş, Y. M., Mut, H., & Gülümser, E. (2023). The effect of quality traits of alfalfa added to sweet corn silages in different ratio. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 13(3), 2205-2216. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1264318.
  22. Kaymak, G., Gülümser, E., Can, M., Acar, Z., & Ayan, I. (2021). Determination the silage quality of leafy and semi-leafy forage pea and annual ryegrass mixtures. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 11(2), 1595-1602. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.867823.
  23. Kazemi, M., Mokhtarpour, A., & Saleh, H. (2024). Toward making a high-quality silage from common reed (Phragmites australis). Journal of Animal Physiolgy and Animimal Nutrition (Berl), 108(2), 338-345. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13895.
  24. Keskin, B., & Aksoy, K. (2024). Effects of crushed corn and wheat bran added in different rates on silage quality of quinoa. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 14(3), 1353-1365. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1462901.
  25. Keskin, B., Temel, S., & Eren, B. (2021). Determination of quality characteristics of some alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) varieties in Iğdır ecological conditions. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 11(2), 1568-1581. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.854390.
  26. Kılıç, A. (1986). Silo Feed (Teaching-Learning and Application Suggestions) Handbook. Hasat Publishing, İstanbul-Turkey.
  27. Mal, T. K., & Narine, L. (2004). The biology of Canadian weeds. 129. Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 84(1), 365-396. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4141/P01-172.
  28. Mcdonald, P., Henderson, A. R., & Heron, S. J. E. (1991). The Biochemistry of Silage (2nd Ed.). Chalcombe Publications; Bucks, England.
  29. Menke, K. H., & Huss, W. (1975). Tierernahrung und Futtermittelkunde. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.
  30. Özinan, L. (2017). Determination of possibilities of the prickly weed plants using as silage. (Master thesis), Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University School of Graduate Studies Field Crop Department, Çanakkale,Türkiye.
  31. Saad-Allah, K. M., & Youssef, M. S. (2018). Phytochemical and genetic characterization of five quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes introduced to Egypt. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 24(4), 617-629. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-018- 0541-4.
  32. Saeed, A. A., Hussien, H. M., Kareem, R. S., Hamza, A. A., Fadhl, M. A., & Radhi, H. S. (2019). Effect of addition of different levels of formic acid and urea on chemical compositıon and fermentation characteristics of Wild reed Phragmites communis silage. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 50(5), 1324-1335.
  33. Tanaka, T. S. T., Irbis, C., Kumagai, H., & Inamura, T. (2016). Timing of harvest of Phragmites australis (CAV.) Trin. ex Steudel affects subsequent canopy structure and nutritive value of roughage in subtropical highland. Journal of Environmental Management, 166, 420-428. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.055.
  34. Temel, S., Keskin, B., Güner, Z., & Atalay, A. İ. (2023). Determination of yield and quality characteristics of common reed (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud) harvested at different growth stages. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 28(1), 70-78. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1235699.
  35. Temel, S., & Şahin, K. (2011). The current situation, problems and suggestions for forage crops in Iğdır Province. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21(1), 64-72.
  36. Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. D., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for diatery fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animals nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583-3597.
  37. Virtanen, A. I. (1993). The A.I.V. method of preserving fresh fodder. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture, (1), 143-155.
  38. Yavuz, T., Kır, H., & Gül, V. (2020). Evaluation of roughage production potential in Turkey: The case of Kirsehir Province. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(3), 345-352.
  39. Yeşil, Ş. D., & Güney, M. (2023). The Effect of Oregano (Origanum onites) pulp to quality parameters of meadow silage. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33(3), 408-419. Doi: https:/doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1235890.
  40. Weinberg, Z. G., & Ashbell, G. (2003). Engineering aspects of ensiling. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 13(2-3), 181-188. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-703X(02)00130-4.