Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 35 Issue: 2

Pesticide Residues in Raisin and Health Risk Assessment

Ömer Faruk Özbek(TOKAT GAZIOSMANPASA UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4561-7237
Tarık Balkan(Tokat Gazıosmanpasa Unıversıty Faculty of Agrıculture Department of Plant Protectıon)0000-0003-4756-4842
Kenan Kara(TOKAT GAZIOSMANPASA UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-0439-5639
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings provide valuable insights into improving sustainable agricultural practices in grape production and establishing a more effective monitoring system for pesticide residues in raisins

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to determine pesticide residues in raisin samples from the Besni and Gölbaşı districts of Adıyaman province, located in the Southeastern Anatolia region of Türkiye.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results met the criteria outlined in SANTE/11312/2021.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings provide valuable insights into improving sustainable agricultural practices in grape production and establishing a more effective monitoring system for pesticide residues in raisins
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 · 100 samples
⚙️Variables:LC–MS/MS · Dried grape · Processing factor

Abstract

This study aimed to determine pesticide residues in raisin samples from the Besni and Gölbaşı districts of Adıyaman province, located in the Southeastern Anatolia region of Türkiye. Method validation was carried out for parameters including linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), recovery, precision (repeatability and in-laboratory reproducibility), and measurement uncertainty. The results met the criteria outlined in SANTE/11312/2021. A total of 260 pesticides were analyzed, with pesticide residues detected in 95 out of 100 samples. Among these, 42 samples contained a single pesticide, while 53 samples had two or more residues. The insecticides cypermethrin, indoxacarb, and malathion, along with the fungicides boscalid, flubendiamide, fluopyram, pyrimethanil, and spiroxamine, were identified. All detected pesticide residues were within the LOQ and maximum residue limit (MRL), with no residues exceeding the MRL. According to the analysis, eight different pesticides were identified in the samples. The study confirms that pesticide residues in dried grape samples comply with the MRLs, suggesting minimal health risks for consumers, as both long-term and short-term dietary risks were found to be negligible. However, the presence of multiple pesticide residues underscores the need for ongoing monitoring and stringent regulatory measures to ensure food safety and maintain compliance. These findings provide valuable insights into improving sustainable agricultural practices in grape production and establishing a more effective monitoring system for pesticide residues in raisins

🔖

Cite This Article

Özbek, Ö. F., Balkan, T., Kara, K. (2025). Pesticide Residues in Raisin and Health Risk Assessment. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 35 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1637150

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Balkan, T., & Kara, K. (2023). Dissipation kinetics of some pesticides applied singly or in mixtures in/on grape leaf. Pest Management Science, 79, 1234-1242. doi:10.1002/ps.7299
  2. Balkan, T., & Yılmaz, Ö. (2022). Efficacy of some washing solutions for removal of pesticide residues in lettuce. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 11, 143. doi:10.1186/s43088-022-00324-x
  3. Cebeci, A. N. (2020). A research on the use of agricultural pollution and pesticide: Manisa Province, Sarıgol and Alasehir sample. Journal of Current Research on Engineering, Science and Technology, 6, 1-22. doi:10.26579/jocrest.41
  4. Constantinou, M., Louca-Christodoulou, D., & Agapiou, A. (2021). Method validation for the determination of 314 pesticide residues using tandem MS systems (GC–MS/MS and LC-MS/MS) in raisins: focus on risk exposure assessment and respective processing factors in real samples (a pilot survey). Food Chemistry, 360, 129964. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129964
  5. Demiray, A., & Hatırlı, S. A. (2021) Econometric analysis of Turkey's raisins export. Eurasian Journal of Researches in Social and Economic, 8, 165-182.
  6. Dinçay, O., İsfendiyaroğlu, G., & Aydın, A. (2017). Determination and comparison of pesticide residues in fresh grapes harvested from different vineyards and raisins obtained from fresh grapes after two different drying methods. Turkish Journal Of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 5, 1031–1037. doi:10.24925/turjaf.v5i9.1031-1037.1206
  7. Dülger, H., & Tiryaki, O. (2021). Investigation of pesticide residues in peach and nectarine sampled from Çanakkale, Turkey, and consumer dietary risk assessment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193, 561. doi:10.1007/s10661-021-09349-8
  8. Duman, A., & Tiryaki, O. (2022). Determination of chlorpyrifos-methyl, lambda-cyhalothrin and tebuconazole residues in Sultana seedless grapes sprayed with pesticides under farmer’s conditions. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 57, 325–332. doi:10.1080/03601234.2022.2051415
  9. EU-MRL, (2024). European Union pesticides database, pesticide residues MRLs. Directorate General for Health & Consumers. https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/start/screen/mrls. Access date: 18.01.2024.
  10. FAO, (2024). Cropsdata. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Access date: 25.12.2024.
  11. FAO/WHO, (2018). Discussion paper on the review of the International Estimate of Short-Term Intake Equations (IESTI). Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues, 50th Session, Haikou, P.R. China, 9-14 April 2018.
  12. Farshidi, M., Mohebbi, A., Moludi, J., & Ebrahimi, B. (2023). Evaluation of ready-to-eat raisins marketed in Iran: physicochemical properties, microbiological quality, heavy metal content, and pesticide residues. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 65, 1013–1025. doi:10.1007/s10341-022-00749-9
  13. Gazioğlu Şensoy, R. İ., Ersayar, L., & Doğan, A. (2017). Determination of pesticide residue amounts in fresh grapes, raisins and pickled grape leaves sold in Van Province. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 27(3), 436-446. doi:10.29133/yyutbd.318144
  14. Güçer, Y., Poyrazoğlu, E. S., & Artık, N. (2021). GC/MS determination of volatile aromatic compounds of Kalecik Karasi must produced by cold maceration. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 36, 1531-1538. doi:10.17341/gazimmfd.719047
  15. Kanbolat, M., Balkan, T., & Kara, K. (2023). Verification of QuEChERS Method for the Analysis of Pesticide Residues and Their Risk Assessment in Some Fruits Grown in Tokat, Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29(2), 573-588. doi:10.15832/ankutbd.1122538
  16. Lehotay, S. J. (2007). Determination of pesticide residues in foods by acetonitrile extraction and partitioning with magnesium sulfate: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International, 90, 485-520. doi:10.1093/jaoac/90.2.485
  17. Magnusson, B., & Örnemark, U. (2014). Eurachem guide: the fitness for purpose of analytical methods – a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics. 2nd ed. ISBN 978-91-87461-59-0. http://www.eurchem.org. Accessed: 08.02.2024.
  18. Mahdavi, V., Gordan, H., Peivasteh-Roudsari, L., Thai, V. N., & Fakhri, Y. (2022). Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk assessment induced by pesticide residues in commercially available ready-to-eat raisins of Iran based on Monte Carlo Simulation. Environmental research, 206, 112253. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.112253
  19. Nalcı, T., Dardeniz, A., Polat, B., & Tiryaki, O.(2018). Determination of pesticide residue amounts of early and middle/late turfan grape cultivars by quechers analysis method. COMU Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 6(special issue), 39-44.
  20. Nerpagar, A., Langade, N., Patil, R., Chiplunkar, S., Kelkar, J., & Banerjee, K. (2023). Dynamic headspace GC-MS/MS analysis of ethylene oxide and 2-chloroethanol in dry food commodities: a novel approach. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 58, 659–670. doi:10.1080/03601234.2023.2264740
  21. Polat, B. (2021). Reduction of some insecticide residues from grapes with washing treatments. Turkish Journal of Entomology, 45(1), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.16970/entoted.843754
  22. Polat, B., & Tiryaki, O. (2022). Determination of insecticide residues in soils from Troia agricultural fields by the QuEChERS method. Turkish Journal of Entomology, 46(3), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.16970/entoted.1101713
  23. PPP, (2023). Plant Protection Product Database Application. https://bku.tarimorman.gov.tr/Kullanim/TavsiyeArama?csrt=2789820862056200932. Access date: 08.07.2023.
  24. Rahimi, A., Heshmati A., & Nili-Ahmadabadi, A. (2021). Changes in pesticide residues in field-treated fresh grapes during raisin production by different methods of drying. Drying Technology, 40, 1715–1728. doi:10.1080/07373937.2021.1919140
  25. RASFF, (2024). Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/rasff-window/screen/list. Access date: 10.01.2024.
  26. SANTE, (2021). Guidance document on analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticides residues analysis in food and feed. SANTE/1132/2021. https://www.eurl-pesticides.eu/userfiles/file/EurlALL/SANTE_11312_2021.pdf. Access date: 08.02.2022.
  27. Shabeer, T. P. A., Jadhav, M., Girame, R., Hingmire, S., Bhongale, A., Pudale, A., & Banerjee, K. (2017). Targeted screening and safety evaluation of 276 agrochemical residues in raisins using buffered ethyl acetate extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. Chemosphere, 184, 1036–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.086
  28. Soydan, D. K., Turgut, N., Yalçın, M., Turgut, C., & Karakuş, P. B. K. (2021). Evaluation of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from the Aegean region of Turkey and assessment of risk to consumers. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(2021), 27511-27519. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12580-y
  29. TUIK, (2024). Turkish Statistical Institute, Crop Production Statistics. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Bitkisel-Urun-Denge-Tablolari-2023-53451&dil=1. Accessed 18.03.2025.
  30. TUIK, (2025). Turkish Statistical Institute, Turkey Health Interview Survey. Web page: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/DownloadIstatistikselTablo?p=WEBW229PP/91tMV2m71fU6pRWq2F1ZD/lzOFFk0bNDi2rjAC8QDCRN62nr2M3n1K. Accessed 18.03.2025.
  31. Turgut, C., Ornek, H., & Cutright, T. J. (2010). Pesticide residues in dried table grapes from the Aegean region of Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 167, 143–149. doi:10.1007/s10661-009-1037-z
  32. Turgut, C., Ornek, H., & Cutright, T. J. (2011). Determination of pesticide residues in Turkey's table grapes: the effect of integrated pest management, organic farming, and conventional farming. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 173, 315–323. doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1389-4
  33. WHO, (2024). Food safety GEMS/Food consumption database. https://www.who.int/teams/nutrition-and-food-safety/databases/global-environment-monitoring-system-food-contamination. Accessed 18.03.2025.
  34. Yakar, Y. (2018). Determination of pesticide residues in seedless table grapes. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28(4), 444-447. doi:10.29133/yyutbd.453960
  35. Zhang, Y., Jiao, B., Zhao, Q., Wang, C., Chen, A., Cui, Y., He, Y., & Li, J. (2024). Determination, temporal variation and potential health risk assessment of pesticide residues in grapes from South and Southwest China. Food Additives & Contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure & Risk Assessment, 41(3), 287–302. doi:10.1080/19440049.2024.2309256
  36. Zincke, F., Fischer, A., Arno, Kittelmann., Kraus, C., Scholz, R., & Michalski, B. (2022). European database of processing factors for pesticides residues in food (Versiyon 2). Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6827098