SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 35 Issue: 3

Morphological and Morphometric Characterization of an Extremely Short-beaked Turkish Pigeon

Hakan Erdem(ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-8757-4685
Türker Savaş(ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-3558-2296
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that male Mısıri pigeons are larger than females, 275.59 g and 243.85 g respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the morphological and morphometric characteristics of the Mısıri pigeon, a unique short-beaked breed from Türkiye.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The three components explain 73.26% and 81.18% of the variation for head and body traits, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that male Mısıri pigeons are larger than females, 275.59 g and 243.85 g respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Local pigeons · Owl · Morphometry

Abstract

This study examines the morphological and morphometric characteristics of the Mısıri pigeon, a unique short-beaked breed from Türkiye. Among Türkiye’s local short-beaked breeds, the Mısıri pigeon stands out with its extremely short beak, cubic head, and prominent eyes. Despite Türkiye’s long pigeon breeding history, limited scientific research has led to inconsistencies in breed classification. Morphological and morphometric traits were recorded in Mısıri pigeons. Analysis of variance and principal component analysis were applied to these traits. The three components explain 73.26% and 81.18% of the variation for head and body traits, respectively. The results showed that male Mısıri pigeons are larger than females, 275.59 g and 243.85 g respectively. However, significant differences were not found between color pattern varieties. Compared to other short-beaked breeds the Mısıri pigeon has the shortest beak ever recorded in Türkiye. Their beak lengths vary between 7.97-12.22 mm. Historical sources suggest that similar pigeons originated in Anatolia and were brought to Europe. However, the Mısıri pigeon’s unique skull structure and short beak distinguish it from related breeds. This study emphasizes the need to document and conserve Türkiye’s local pigeon breeds, which remain underrepresented in scientific registries. Despite their distinct traits, many breeds lack formal recognition due to the absence of studies. Identifying and preserving these genetic resources is crucial for maintaining Türkiye’s rich pigeon heritage. In conclusion, the Mısıri pigeon is a genetically and morphologically significant breed. Its documentation contributes to the conservation of Türkiye’s local breeds and the continuation of the country’s historical pigeon breeding culture.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erdem, H., Savaş, T. (2025). Morphological and Morphometric Characterization of an Extremely Short-beaked Turkish Pigeon. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 35 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1675061

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (38)

  1. Atasoy, F., Erdem, E., & Hacan, Ö. G. (2013). Ankara ilinde yetiştirilen taklacı güvercinlerde (Columba livia domestica) morfolojik özelliklerin belirlenmesi. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 60, 135-143. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1098239
  2. Baldwin, S. P., Oberholser, H. C., & Worley, L. G. (1931). Measurements of birds. Scientific Publications of the Cleveland Museum of Natural History, 2.
  3. Bourgeois, K., Curé, C., Legrand, J., Gómez-Díaz, E., Vidal, E., Aubin, T., & Mathevon, N. (2007). Morphological versus acoustic analysis: what is the most efficient method for sexing yelkouan shearwaters Puffinus yelkouan?. Journal of Ornithology, 148, 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-007-0127-3
  4. Brown, J. (2009). Choosing the right number of components or factors in PCA and EFA. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 13(2).
  5. Bungartz, J. (1890). Neue asiatische Mövchen. Mitteilungen des Ornithologischen Vereins in Wien, 14, 96-97.
  6. Carey, M. J. (2011). Sexual size dimorphism, within-pair comparisons and assortative mating in the short-tailed shearwater (Puffinus tenuirostris). Notornis, 58, 8-16. https://doi.org/ 10.63172//246834cdboxd
  7. Çelik, R. (2023). Morphological characteristics of Şebap Pigeons (Columba livia domestica). Journal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences, 7(1), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.15312/EurasianJVetSci.2024.428
  8. Darwin, C. (1984). Türlerin kökeni (4th Edition). Şahin Matbaası, Istanbul.
  9. Drectorate of State Archives (DSA), Güvercin yetiştiriciliğe dair lahiya [HSD.AFT], File No: 9, Folder No:16, 29.12.1341(12.09.1923), https://katalog.devletarsivleri.gov.tr/Sayfalar/eSatis/ BelgeGoster.aspx?ItemId=21216495&Hash=614AB80714072DA68CF98E773F0131B0B9EE674B758AC37916CDF2B7C70FDCEC&A=2&Mi=0. Access date: 31.07.2024.
  10. Erdem, E., Özbaşer, F. T., Gürcan, E. K., & ihsan Soysal, M. (2024). Türkiye's indigenous genetic resource: Muradiye Kelebek pigeon. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 71(1), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.1060211
  11. Erdem, E., Özbaşer, F. T., Gürcan, E. K., & Soysal, M. I. (2021). The morphological and morphometric characteristics of Alabadem pigeons. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 45(2), 372-379. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-2005-58
  12. Erdem, H., Konyalı, C., & Savaş, T. (2018). Morphological Characterization of Edremit Kelebek Roller Pigeons. COMU Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 6(2), 93-100.
  13. Fulton, R. (1876). Wright, L. (Ed.), & Ludlow, J. W. (Painter). Illustrated book of pigeons, with standards for judging. England: Cassel Company.
  14. Greenacre, M., Groenen, P. J., Hastie, T., d’Enza, A. I., Markos, A., & Tuzhilina, E. (2022). Principal component analysis. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00184-w
  15. JMP Statistical Discovery (2024). JMP Software Version 18.0.1. JMP Statistical Discovery, Cary, NC
  16. Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (6th edition). Pearson Prentice Hall, USA.
  17. Joo, E. J., Ha, M. R., Jeong, G., & Yoon, J. (2018). A non-invasive sexing method reveals the patterns of sex-specific incubation behavior in Saunders's Gulls (Saundersilarus saundersi). The Ornithological Society of Korea, 25(2), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.30980/KJO.2018.12.25.2.69
  18. Karris, G., Thanou, E., Xirouchakis, S., Voulgaris, M. D., Fraguedakis-Tsolis, S., Sfenthourakis, S., & Giokas, S. (2013). Sex determination of Scopoli's shearwater (Calonectris diomedea) juveniles: a combined molecular and morphometric approach. Waterbirds, 36(2), 240-246.
  19. Lyell, J. C. (1881). Fancy pigeons. London, UK: The Bazaar Office.
  20. Mishra, S. P., Sarkar, U., Taraphder, S., Datta, S., Swain, D. P., Saikhom, R., Panda, S., & Laishram, M. (2017). Multivariate statistical data analysis- Principal Component Analysis (PCA). International Journal of Livestock Research, 7, 60-78. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20170415115235
  21. Özbaşer Bulut, F. T., Erdem, E., Gürcan, E. K., & Soysal MI (2022). Genetic animal heritage of anatolia: short-beaked pigeon genotypes. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, 15(4), 450-459. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj. 1181236
  22. Parés Casanova, P. M., & Kabir, A. (2020). Bigger Males, Bigger Females? Pigeons' Sexual Size Dimorphism. Annual Research & Review in Biology, 35(10), 20-24. https://doi.org/10.9734/arrb/2020/v35i1030286.
  23. Parvez, M. N. H., Akter, M. T. D., & Sarder, M. J. U. (2016). Phenotypic characteristics and biometrical study on different breeds of pigeon in northern Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3329/bjvm.v14i2.31382
  24. Pigot, A. L., Sheard, C., Miller, E. T., Bregman, T. P., Freeman, B. G., Roll, U.,. & Tobias, J. A. (2020). Macroevolutionary convergence connects morphological form to ecological function in birds. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(2), 230-239. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1070-4
  25. SAS Institute (2002). Statistical Analysis System SAS/STAT Software Version 9.0. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
  26. Savaş, T., & Erdem, H. (2021). On the Problem of" Breed" in Pigeon Breeding. International Journal of Poultry-Ornamental Birds Science and Technology, 2(1), 23-29.
  27. Savaş, T., & Erdem, H. (2022). Sexual dimorphism in body size and some exterior traits of pigeon breed groups. Journal of Poultry Research, 19(2), 68-77. http://doi.org/ 10.34233/jpr.1219731
  28. Savaş, T., Erdem, H., & Tölü, C. (2025). Hatchability and nestling viability in an extremely short-beaked pigeon breed. (under review).
  29. Savaş, T., Erdem, H., Gündüz, S., & Damgacı, İ. (2023). Morphometric Comparison of Three Short-Beak Pigeon Breeds from The Aegean Region (Turkey) By Discriminant Analysis. International Journal of Poultry-Ornamental Birds Science and Technology, 4(1), 15-20.
  30. Savaş, T., Konyalı, C., Das, G., & Yurtman, I. Y. (2007). Effect of beak length on feed intake in pigeons (Columba livia f. domestica). Animal Welfare, 16(1), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600030955
  31. Şimsek, U. G., Altundal, B., Akarsu, S., & Karadag, R. (2024). Morphometric identification of Bursa Oynarı pigeon varieties. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 40(2).
  32. Soysal, M. İ., Gürcan, E. K., Alter, K., Akar, T., & Genç, S. (2011). Determination of Various Morphological Characteristics of the Trakya Makaracı Pigeon Breed Raised in Thrace. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 8(3), 61-68.
  33. Starr, E. S. (1886). The breeding of fancy pigeons. Cent Illus Mon Mag, 32, 94–107.
  34. Türkeş, M., & Gündüz, S. (2021). The classic Manisa hünkâri piegons: History and classification. Kebikeç: İnsan Bilimleri İçin Kaynak Araştırmaları Dergisi, (51).
  35. Türkeş, M., & Gündüz, S. (2024). Introduction and Morphological Description of the Classic Hünkâri Pigeons in Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 12(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12i1.22-32.6314
  36. Twombly, C. E. (1900). The Pigeon Standart. Boston, USA
  37. Vogel, C., Vogel, M., Detering, W., & Löffler, M. (1998). Tauben. Berlin: Behtermünz Verlag.
  38. Pigot, A. L., Sheard, C., Miller, E. T., Bregman, T. P., Freeman, B. G., Roll, U.,. & Tobias, J. A. (2020). Macroevolutionary convergence connects morphological form to ecological function in birds. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(2), 230-239. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1070-4