SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Issue: 1

Efficient in vitro Micropropagation of Hemp (Cannabis sativa) genotype

Cennet Yaman(Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü)0000-0002-2364-8171
Güngör Yılmaz(YOZGAT BOZOK UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-0070-5484
Talip Koçer(YOZGAT BOZOK UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-2434-8314
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This propagation technique can contribute to future hemp rapid breeding programs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, an effective regeneration and micropropagation protocol was developed from segregating the F4 industrial hemp genotype Narlısaray.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The maximum number of shoots per explant (4.7) was obtained at 1.0 mg l⁻¹ TDZ, and was statistically different from 0.5 mg l⁻¹ (4.3) and 2.0 mg l⁻¹ TDZ (4.0).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This propagation technique can contribute to future hemp rapid breeding programs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cannabis sativa · Micropropagation · Shoot regeneration

Abstract

In this study, an effective regeneration and micropropagation protocol was developed from segregating the F4 industrial hemp genotype Narlısaray. The apical shoot meristem and nodal (from different parts of the plant) explants were cultured at various concentrations of TDZ, BAP or Kin. Shoot regeneration was observed in all treatments, including the control treatment. The maximum number of shoots per explant (4.7) was obtained at 1.0 mg l⁻¹ TDZ, and was statistically different from 0.5 mg l⁻¹ (4.3) and 2.0 mg l⁻¹ TDZ (4.0). The longest shoots (6.5 cm) were recorded on 1.0 mg l-1 TDZ. The position of the nodal explant source on the plant also affected its regeneration ability. The 1st stem node explant was more responsive to in vitro regeneration than the 2nd stem node. All tested concentrations of IBA induced root regeneration, with frequencies ranging from 62.5% to 87.5%. The regenerated plants were successfully acclimatized, reaching a maximum survival rate of 66.7%. This propagation technique can contribute to future hemp rapid breeding programs.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yaman, C., Yılmaz, G., Koçer, T. (2026). Efficient in vitro Micropropagation of Hemp (Cannabis sativa) genotype. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1804815

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (58)

  1. Abbaszadeh, B., Valizadeh, N., Ağamirzaoğlu, M., & Bengisu, G. (2026). Responses of Different Cannabis sativa L. Populations to Plant Density and Various Fertilization Treatments. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, (1), 1697183.
  2. Adamek, K., Jones, A. M. P., & Torkamaneh, D. (2022). Accumulation of somatic mutations leads to genetic mosaicism in cannabis. The Plant Genome, 15(1), e20169.
  3. Adhikary, D., Kulkarni, M., El-Mezawy, A., Mobini, S., Elhiti, M., Gjuric, R., Ray, A., Polowick, P., Slaski, J. J., Jones, M. P., & Bhowmik, P. (2021). Medical cannabis and industrial hemp tissue culture: Present status and future potential. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 275.
  4. Andre, C. M., Hausman, J.-F., & Guerriero, G. (2016). Cannabis sativa: The plant of the thousand and one molecules. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 19.
  5. Campbell, L. G., Naraine, S. G., & Dusfresne, J. (2019). Phenotypic plasticity influences the success of clonal propagation in industrial pharmaceutical Cannabis sativa. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0213434.
  6. Chandola, V., Chandra, S., Nautiyal, A. R., Kumar, R. R., & Purohit, V. K. (2023). TDZ and zeatin induced in vitro shooting for efficient vegetative propagation in Trillium govanianum, an endangered alpine medicinal herb. Vegetos, 1–9.
  7. Chandra, S., Lata, H., ElSohly, M. A., Walker, L. A., & Potter, D. (2017). Cannabis cultivation: Methodological issues for obtaining medical-grade product. Epilepsy & Behavior, 70, 302–312.
  8. Chandra, S., Bandopadhyay, R., Kumar, V., & Chandra, R. (2010). Acclimatization of tissue cultured plantlets: From laboratory to land. Biotechnology Letters, 32(9), 1199–1203.
  9. Chaohua, C., Gonggu, Z., Lining, Z., Chunsheng, G., Qing, T., Jianhua, C., Xinbo, G., Dingxiang, P., & Jianguang, S. (2016). A rapid shoot regeneration protocol from the cotyledons of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Industrial Crops and Products, 83, 61–65.
  10. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2016). Cannabis domestication, breeding history, present-day genetic diversity, and future prospects. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 35(5-6), 293-327.
  11. Crini, G., Lichtfouse, E., Chanet, G., & Morin-Crini, N. (2020). Traditional and new applications of hemp. In G. Crini & E. Lichtfouse (Eds.), Sustainable agriculture reviews (pp. 37–87). Springer.
  12. Dev, R., Singh, S., Dayal, V., Kumar, K., & Singh, T. (2019). Standardization of in vitro hardening strategies for tissue cultured wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.) genotypes. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(2), 2108–2119.
  13. Devi, P. S., Arundathi, A., & Rao, T. R. (2011). Multiple shoot induction and regeneration of whole plants from cotyledonary node and nodal explants of Sterculia urens Roxb. a gum yielding tree. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 20, 161–165.
  14. Dimitrova, N., & Nacheva, L. (2021). An optimized micropropagation protocol by ex vitro rooting of pear rootstock OHF 333 (Pyrus communis L.). Acta Agrobotanica, 74, 1.
  15. Dinani, E. T., Shukla, M. R., Turi, C. E., Sullivan, J. A., & Saxena, P. K. (2018). Thidiazuron: Modulator of morphogenesis in vitro. In Thidiazuron: From urea derivative to plant growth regulator (pp. 1–36). Springer.
  16. Dushimimana, C., Sakha, M. A., Korir, M. J., Jefwa, J., Vandenabeele, J., Magomere, T., Mutitu, E., Mulatya, J., Olubayo, F., Smagghe, G., & Werbrouck, S. (2022). Early growth performance of in vitro raised Melia volkensii Gürke plantlets in response to beneficial microorganisms under semi-arid conditions. Plants, 11(10), 1300.
  17. Gehl, C., Li, G., & Serek, M. (2020). An efficient protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and regeneration of Campanula medium (Canterbury bells) based on leaf disc explants. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 140, 635–645.
  18. González, M. M., Yañuk, G., Sannazzaro, A., Butassi, E., Di Liberto, M., Perez, E.,. & Clemente, M. (2025). Optimization of a Cannabis sativa micropropagation protocol (chemotype III) to preserve its cannabinoid profile. bioRxiv, 2025-05.
  19. Grzelak, M., Pacholczak, A., & Nowakowska, K. (2024). Challenges and insights in the acclimatization step of micropropagated woody plants. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 159(3).
  20. Holmes, J. E., Lung, S., Collyer, D., & Punja, Z. K. (2021). Variables affecting shoot growth and plantlet recovery in tissue cultures of drug-type Cannabis sativa L. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 732344.
  21. Huetteman, C. A., & Preece, J. E. (1993). Thidiazuron: A potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 33, 105–119.
  22. Hurgobin, B., Tamiru‐Oli, M., Welling, M. T., Doblin, M. S., Bacic, A., Whelan, J., & Lewsey, M. G. (2021). Recent advances in Cannabis sativa genomics research. New Phytologist, 230(1), 73–89.
  23. Ingvardsen, C. R., & Brinch-Pedersen, H. (2023). Challenges and potentials of new breeding techniques in Cannabis sativa. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1154332.
  24. Ioannidis, K., Dadiotis, E., Mitsis, V., Melliou, E., & Magiatis, P. (2020). Biotechnological approaches on two high CBD and CBG Cannabis sativa L. (Cannabaceae) varieties: In vitro regeneration and phytochemical consistency evaluation of micropropagated plants using quantitative 1H-NMR. Molecules, 25(24), 5928.
  25. Ioannidis, K., Tomprou, I., Mitsis, V., & Koropouli, P. (2022). Genetic evaluation of in vitro micropropagated and regenerated plants of Cannabis sativa L. using SSR molecular markers. Plants, 11(19), 2569.
  26. Isah, T. (2020). Nodal segment explant type and preconditioning influence in vitro shoot morphogenesis in Ginkgo biloba L. Plant Physiology Reports, 25(1), 74–86.
  27. Kose, M. S. H., Dogan, M., & Sadi, G. (2021). Enhanced in vitro shoot proliferation through nodal explants of Staurogyne repens (Nees) Kuntze. Biologia, 76(3), 1053–1061.
  28. Lata, H., Chandra, S., Khan, I., & ElSohly, M. A. (2009). Thidiazuron-induced high-frequency direct shoot organogenesis of Cannabis sativa L. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 45, 12–19.
  29. Lata, H., Chandra, S., Techen, N., Khan, I., & ElSohly, M. A. (2010). Assessment of the genetic stability of micropropagated plants of Cannabis sativa by ISSR markers. Planta Medica, 76, 97–100.
  30. Lata, H., Chandra, S., Techen, N., Khan, I., & ElSohly, M. A. (2016). In vitro mass propagation of Cannabis sativa L.: A protocol refinement using novel aromatic cytokinin meta-topolin and the assessment of ecophysiological, biochemical and genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 3, 18–26.
  31. Lata, H., Chandra, S., Khan, I. A., & ElSohly, M. A. (2017). Micropropagation of Cannabis sativa L.—an update. In Cannabis sativa L.-botany and biotechnology (pp. 285-297). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  32. Li, Y., Hu, J., Xiao, J., Guo, G., & Jeong, B. R. (2021). Foliar thidiazuron promotes the growth of axillary buds in strawberry. Agronomy, 11(3), 594.
  33. Liu, Y., Liu, H. Y., Li, S. H., Ma, W., Wu, D. T., Li, H. B., & Gan, R. Y. (2022). Cannabis sativa bioactive compounds and their extraction, separation, purification, and identification technologies: An updated review. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 149, 116554.
  34. Mahendra, R., Chauhan, N., Sharma, J. B., Rana, K., & Bakshi, M. (2020). Ex-vitro establishment of tissue cultured plants in fruit crops - A review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(11), 3321–3329.
  35. Marks, T. R., & Myers, P. E. (1992). Effect of explant location upon early culture development in vitro. Journal of Horticultural Science, 67(5), 583–591.
  36. Martini, A. N., Vlachou, G., & Papafotiou, M. (2022). Effect of explant origin and medium plant growth regulators on in vitro shoot proliferation and rooting of Salvia tomentosa, a native sage of the Northeastern Mediterranean Basin. Agronomy, 12(8), 1889.
  37. Monthony, A. S., Kyne, S. T., Grainger, C. M., & Jones, A. M. P. (2021). Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration: A multi-genotype replication study. PLOS ONE, 16(8), e0235525.
  38. Movahedi, M., Ghasemi-Omran, V., & Torabi, S. (2015). The effect of different concentrations of TDZ and BA on in vitro regeneration of Iranian cannabis (Cannabis sativa) using cotyledon and epicotyl explants. Journal of Plant Molecular Breeding, 3(2), 20–27.
  39. Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473–497.
  40. Murphy, R., & Adelberg, J. (2021). Physical factors increased quantity and quality of micropropagated shoots of Cannabis sativa L. in a repeated harvest system with ex vitro rooting. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 1–9.
  41. Page, S. R. G., Monthony, A. S., & Jones, A. M. P. (2020). Basal media optimization for the micropropagation and callogenesis of Cannabis sativa L. bioRxiv, 1–23.
  42. Page, S. R. G., Monthony, A. S., & Jones, A. M. P. (2021). DKW basal salts improve micropropagation and callogenesis compared with MS basal salts in multiple commercial cultivars of Cannabis sativa. Botany, 99(5), 269–279.
  43. Ranaweera, K. K., Gunasekara, M. T. K., & Eeswara, J. P. (2013). Ex vitro rooting: A low cost micropropagation technique for tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntz) hybrids. Scientia Horticulturae, 155, 8–14.
  44. Rao, A. N., & Lee, S. K. (1986). Overview of the in vitro propagation of woody plants and plantation crops. In L. A. Withers & P. G. Aldeson (Eds.), Plant tissue culture and its agricultural application (pp. 123–138). Cambridge University Press.
  45. Razumova, O. V., Alexandrov, O. S., Divashuk, M. G., Sukhorada, T. I., & Karlov, G. I. (2016). Molecular cytogenetic analysis of monoecious hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars reveals its karyotype variations and sex chromosomes constitution. Protoplasma, 253, 895–901.
  46. Shekhawat, M. S., Manokari, M., & Ravindran, C. P. (2015). An improved micropropagation protocol by ex vitro rooting of Passiflora edulis Sims. f. flavicarpa Deg. through nodal segment culture. Scientifica, 2015(1), 578676.
  47. Smýkalová, I., Vrbová, M., Cvečková, M., Plačková, L., Žukauskaitė, A., Zatloukal, M., & Griga, M. (2019). The effects of novel synthetic cytokinin derivatives and endogenous cytokinins on the in vitro growth responses of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) explants. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 139, 381–394.
  48. Stephen, C., Zayas, V. A., Galic, A., & Bridgen, M. P. (2023). Micropropagation of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). HortScience, 58(3), 307–316.
  49. Talei, D., Shams, A., & Khayam Nekouei, M. (2025). A comprehensive review of cannabis as a crucial pharmaceutical plant and its efficient propagation methods. ACS Agricultural Science & Technology, 5(7), 1191–1214.
  50. Thiem, B., Hermosaningtyas, A. A., Budzianowska, A., & Kikowska, M. (2023). Polish contributions in developing medicinal plant in vitro propagation system. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 155(1), 1–17.
  51. Wang, F., Li, Y., Pang, Y., Hu, J., Kang, X., & Qian, C. (2025). Thidiazuron enhances strawberry shoot multiplication by regulating hormone signal transduction pathways. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(9), 4060.
  52. Wang, R., He, L. S., Xia, B., Tong, J. F., Li, N., & Peng, F. (2009). A micropropagation system for cloning of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) by shoot tip culture. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41(2), 603–608.
  53. Wongchaya, P., Bansra, T., & Mahadtanapuk, S. (2025). Rapid micro-propagation of disease-free hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to improve industrial production. Trends in Sciences, 22(1), 9057.
  54. Wróbel, T., Dreger, M., Wielgu, K., & Słomski, R. (2022). Modified nodal cuttings and shoot tips protocol for rapid regeneration of Cannabis sativa L. Journal of Natural Fibers, 19(2), 536–545.
  55. Xiong, Y., Chen, S., Wei, Z., Chen, X., Guo, B., Zhang, T.,. & Zeng, S. (2022). Transcriptomic analyses provide insight into adventitious root formation of Euryodendron excelsum HT Chang during ex vitro rooting. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 148(3), 649–666.
  56. Zhang, Z., Sun, Y., & Li, Y. (2020). Plant rejuvenation: From phenotypes to mechanisms. Plant Cell Reports, 39, 1249–1262.
  57. González, M. M., Yañuk, G., Sannazzaro, A., Butassi, E., Di Liberto, M., Perez, E.,. & Clemente, M. (2025). Optimization of a Cannabis sativa micropropagation protocol (chemotype III) to preserve its cannabinoid profile. bioRxiv, 2025-05.
  58. Xiong, Y., Chen, S., Wei, Z., Chen, X., Guo, B., Zhang, T.,. & Zeng, S. (2022). Transcriptomic analyses provide insight into adventitious root formation of Euryodendron excelsum HT Chang during ex vitro rooting. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 148(3), 649–666.