SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Issue: 1

Exploring the Nexus Between Agriculture Orientation Index, Government Subsidies, and Exchange Rates: New Evidence from Türkiye

Ömer Keskin(VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1939-2791
Musa Gün(Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi)0000-0002-5020-9342
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-04-03
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate the existence of a significant cointegration relationship between the variables, with 1% increase in government agricultural support and exchange rate leading to a decline in AOIC by 3.13% and 2.62%, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Access to agricultural credit is a key factor of rural development, productivity growth, and food security; however, there is no clear consensus on how it should be allocated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using annual data from 1999 to 2023, this study investigates the long-run and causal relationship between the Agriculture Orientation Index for Credit (AOIC), government agricultural support, and exchange rates in Türkiye.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate the existence of a significant cointegration relationship between the variables, with 1% increase in government agricultural support and exchange rate leading to a decline in AOIC by 3.13% and 2.62%, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Agriculture Orientation Index · Agricultural Supports · Exchange Rate

Abstract

Access to agricultural credit is a key factor of rural development, productivity growth, and food security; however, there is no clear consensus on how it should be allocated. Using annual data from 1999 to 2023, this study investigates the long-run and causal relationship between the Agriculture Orientation Index for Credit (AOIC), government agricultural support, and exchange rates in Türkiye. To capture long-run dynamics and to accommodate structural breaks and nonlinearities, we employ the Fourier Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF), Fourier Autoregressive Distributive Lag (FADL), and Fourier Toda-Yamamoto (TY) causality tests. The results indicate the existence of a significant cointegration relationship between the variables, with 1% increase in government agricultural support and exchange rate leading to a decline in AOIC by 3.13% and 2.62%, respectively. Causality tests verify unidirectional linkages from government support and exchange rates to agriculture credit orientation. These findings suggest that subsidies can replace rather than complement formal agricultural credit, while exchange rate fluctuations further constrain banks’ willingness to direct funds into the sector. By identifying AOIC as a new indicator and applying sophisticated econometric tools, this study provides new empirical evidence for a middle-income economy, offering important implications for the construction of subsidy systems and macroeconomic stabilization policies.

🔖

Cite This Article

Keskin, Ö., Gün, M. (2026). Exploring the Nexus Between Agriculture Orientation Index, Government Subsidies, and Exchange Rates: New Evidence from Türkiye. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1773682

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (46)

  1. Akudugu, M. A. (2012). Estimation of the determinants of credit demand by farmers and supply by rural banks in Ghana's upper east region. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 2(2), 189-200.
  2. Ali, O., Odoemenem, I. U., & Lawal, W. L. (2011). Determinants of agricultural credit supply by rural banking institutions to small scale farmers in Benue State, Nigeria: 2009-2011. International Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, 2(2), 1-14.
  3. Amaglobeli, D., Benson, T., & Mogues, T. (2024). Agricultural producer subsidies: Navigating challenges and policy considerations. IMF Notes, 2024/002. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400285950.068
  4. Balana, B. B., & Oyeyemi, M. A. (2022). Agricultural credit constraints in smallholder farming in developing countries: Evidence from Nigeria. World Development Sustainability, 1, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2022.100012
  5. Banerjee, P., Arčabić, V., & Lee, H. (2017). Fourier ADL cointegration test to approximate smooth breaks with new evidence from Crude Oil Market. Economic Modelling, 67, 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.11.004
  6. Betubiza, E. N., & Leatham, D. J. (1995). Factors affecting commercial bank lending to agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 27(1), 112-126.
  7. Buyun, B. (2024). Does exchange rate volatility affect the bank lending channel? İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1343548
  8. Chidiebere-Mark, N. M., Oguoma, N., Onyeneke, R. U., & Henri-Ukoha, A. (2014). Factors influencing the disbursements of loans from selected commercial banks to small-scale and medium-scale agro-based enterprises in Imo State, Nigeria. Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica, 47(2), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.2478/ats-2014-0010
  9. Ciaian, P., Pokrivcak, J., & Szegenyova, K. (2011). Do agricultural subsidies crowd out or stimulate rural credit institutions?: The case of CAP payments (Comparative Analysis of Factor Markets for Agriculture across the Member States). Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS). https://aei.pitt.edu/58508/1/Factor_Markets_4.pdf, Access date: July 03, 2025.
  10. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531
  11. Efanga, U. O., Etim, R. S., & Akpan, O. D. (2020). Impact of exchange rate on commercial banks’ credit to agricultural sector in Nigeria. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Development (AJMRD), 2(4), 52-62.
  12. Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2012). The flexible Fourier form and Dickey-Fuller type unit root tests. Economics Letters, 117(1), 196-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.081
  13. Enya, V. E., & Alimba, J. O. (2008). Analysis of factors affecting the supply of commercial banks credit to the agricultural sector in Nigeria (1986-2005). Continental J. Agricultural Economics, 2, 74-77. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.809995
  14. FAO. (2022). Credit to agriculture. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/2f5b6de0-6668-4fcc-b837-48a038ae8751/content, Access date: July 03, 2025.
  15. FAO. (2023). Dataset information. https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/IC/README-Methodological-Note-C2A.pdf, Access date: September 08, 2025.
  16. FAO. (2024). The agriculture orientation index for government expenditures. https://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals-data-portal/data/indicators/2a1---agriculture-orientation-index-for-government-expenditures/en, Access date: July 03, 2025.
  17. FAO. (2025). Credit to agriculture. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/IC, Access date: July 06, 2025.
  18. Featherstone, A. M., Wilson, C. A., Kastens, T. L., & Jones, J. D. (2005). Factors affecting the agricultural loan decision-making process. Paper presented at the Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition, October 3-4, 2005, Minneapolis, Minnesota, https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.132749
  19. Heil, M., Pogach, J., & Polson, C. (2024). Agricultural lending, insurance, and implications of climate change. Working Paper No. 2024-05. Washington, D.C.: FDIC Center for Financial Research.
  20. Henning, J. I. F., Bougard, D. A., Jordaan, H., & Matthews, N. (2019). Factors affecting successful agricultural loan applications: The case of a South African credit provider. Agriculture, 9(11), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9110243
  21. Harish Kumar, H. V., Anuja, A. R., Shivaswamy, G. P., Lama, A., Rajesh, T., Singh, K. N., & Raju, R. (2024). Determinants of formal agricultural credit flow to districts in India: An econometric analysis. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 30(12), 438-446. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i122688
  22. Kalala T, F., Nkashama M, J-C., Tshibola B, G., & Mbiya M, E. (2023). Déterminants de la demande et de l’offre du crédit agricole aux petits exploitants de la Ville de Kinshasa. African Scientific Journal, 3(20), 1072-1098. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10159185
  23. Keskin, Ö. (2024a). Analysis of the impact of agricultural credits on agricultural mechanization in Türkiye. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29(1), 158-167. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1386236
  24. Keskin, Ö. (2024b). Analysis of the effects of agricultural credits and subsidies on crop production efficiency: Fractional-frequency fourier ARDL bounds testing. Bingol University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 8(1), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.33399/biibfad.1452129
  25. Keskin, Ö. (2024c). The impact of exchange rate on pesticide consumption in Türkiye: Evidence from fractional-frequency Fourier tests. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 61(4), 475-486. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1442274
  26. Keskin, Ö. (2024d). Analysis of the effect of agricultural loans on agricultural labor productivity in Türkiye. International Journal of Agricultural and Wildlife Sciences, 10(2), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.1387647
  27. Keskin, Ö., & Çalışır, M. (2024). A study on the effect of agricultural loan interest rates on crop production amount in Türkiye. Dogus University Journal, 25(2), 213-230. https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.1388182
  28. Kuhn, L., & Bobojonov, I. (2023). The role of risk rationing in rural credit demand and uptake: Lessons from Kyrgyzstan. Agricultural Finance Review, 83(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15185/izadp.7055.1
  29. Maloba, M., & Alhassan, A. L. (2019). Determinants of agri-lending in Kenya. Agricultural Finance Review, 79(5), 598-613. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-10-2018-0094
  30. Nazlioglu, S., Gormus, N. A., & Soytas, U. (2016). Oil prices and real estate investment trusts (REITs): Gradual-shift causality and volatility transmission analysis. Energy Economics, 60, 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.09.009
  31. Njuguna, E., & Nyairo, N. (2015). Formal conditions that affect agricultural credit supply to small-scale farmers in rural Kenya: Case study for Kiambu county. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 20(2), 59-66.
  32. Nthebe, T. (2025). Heterogeneous effects of real effective exchange rates on agricultural exports in emerging markets. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 28(1), 1-12, https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v28i1.6082
  33. Nwaru J. C., Essien, U. A., & Onuoha, R. E. (2011). Determinants of informal credit demand and supply among food crop farmers in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 6(1), 129-139.
  34. OECD. (2025). Total support estimate. Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation. https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?tm=Agricultural%20Policy%20Monitoring%20and%20Evaluation%3A%20all%20data&pg=0&snb=2&vw=tb&df[ds]=dsDisseminateFinalDMZ&df[id]=DSD_AGR_POLIND%40DF_MONEVA&df[ag]=OECD.TAD.ARP&df[vs]=&pd=2013%2C&dq=TUR.A.TSE.CPC_EX_TO.&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false, Access date: July 06, 2025.
  35. Okerenta, S. I., & Orebiyi, J. S. (2005). Determinants of agricultural credit supply to farmers in the Niger Delta area of Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Social Research, 5(1), 67-72.
  36. Okezie, C. R., & Erendu, I. (2016). Determinants of agricultural credit supply in Nigeria (1981-2014). International Journal of Economics and Business Management, 2(6), 25-34.
  37. Oluwasola, O., & Alimi, T. (2008). Determinants of agricultural credit demand and supply among small-scale farmers in Nigeria. Outlook on Agriculture, 37(3), 185-193.
  38. Rashmi, B., & Anusha, K. (2025). Effectiveness of government spending on agriculture: A study on impact of subsidy & access to agri-credit on agricultural gva. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 12(7), 540-545, https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120700054
  39. Salam, M., Rustan, Y., Rukka, R. M., Rahmadanih, R., Maulidiyah, R., Muslim, A. I., Ali, H. N. B., & Ridwan, M. (2024). Employing the Cobb-Douglas function model to examine how input allocation affects rice production: In search of ways to improve the rice farming management. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 34(4), 584-595. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1492753.
  40. Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66, 225-250.
  41. Ullah, A., Verner, V., Madaki, M. Y., Adams, F., & Bavorova, M. (2024). Factors influencing informal credit access and utilization among smallholder farmers: Insights from mountainous regions of Pakistan. Agriculture, 14(10), 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101764
  42. Wagao, H. J., Akyoo, A. M., & Ndyetabula, D. W. (2024). Macro-determinants of formal agricultural credit supply in Tanzania. African Journal of Social Issues, 7(1), 836-859. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajosi.v7i1.60
  43. Wasswa, G. (2021). Economic determinants of agricultural sector credit in Uganda. (PhD), Makerere University, Science in Quantitative Economics, Kampala, Uganda.
  44. WDI. (2025). Official exchange rate. Financial Sector: Exchange Rates & Prices. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators, Access date: July 06, 2025.
  45. Wulandari, R., Hermanto, S., Muhammad, F., & Irfan, S. B. (2024). Agricultural credit supply in D-8 member countries: The behavior towards agricultural risk. Agro Bali: Agricultural Journal, 7(3), 739-751. https://doi.org/10.37637/ab.v7i3.1773
  46. Yeasmin, S., Haque, S., Adnan, K. M. M., Parvin, M. T., Rahman, M. S., Rahman, K. M., Salman, M., & Hossain, M. E. (2024). Factors influencing demand for, and supply of, agricultural credit: A study from Bangladesh. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 16, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101173