SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Issue: 1

Evaluation of Yield and Its Components in Different Peanut Lines and Varieties

Mustafa Yılmaz(Texas A&M AgriLife Research)0000-0002-1816-0729
Cenk Burak Şahin(HATAY MUSTAFA KEMAL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE)0000-0001-6270-8184
Necmi İşler(HATAY MUSTAFA KEMAL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE)0000-0001-5877-7830
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-02-18
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, these lines are recommended as crucial breeding material for developing new, high-performing peanut cultivars to better meet the demands of producers and consumers in Türkiye.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Peanut breeding is a lengthy process, and existing cultivars in Türkiye fail to fully meet the demands of producers and consumers, necessitating the development of improved varieties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to identify superior peanut lines with enhanced pod yield and protein content for use as elite breeding material.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, these lines are recommended as crucial breeding material for developing new, high-performing peanut cultivars to better meet the demands of producers and consumers in Türkiye.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Arachis hypogea L. · Pod yield · Protein content

Abstract

Peanut breeding is a lengthy process, and existing cultivars in Türkiye fail to fully meet the demands of producers and consumers, necessitating the development of improved varieties. This study aimed to identify superior peanut lines with enhanced pod yield and protein content for use as elite breeding material. The plant material comprised fifteen Indian lines (ICGV 10176, ICGV 10178, ICGV 10179, ICGV 10193, ICGV 10207, ICGV 10208, ICGV 10209, ICGV 10220, ICGV 15074, ICGV 16013, ICGV 16017, ICGV 06040, and ICGV 06099) alongside four cultivars registered in Türkiye (Sultan, Halisbey, BATEM 5025, and NC 7). A two-year field study (2020 and 2021) was conducted in Osmaniye, Türkiye, using a randomized complete block design with three replications. Analysis of variance revealed that the effects of genotypes, years, and their interaction on the investigated parameters were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The line ICGV 10218 produced the highest pod yield (4320 ± 19.39 kg ha⁻¹), while ICGV 10208 exhibited the highest protein content (29.58 ± 0.31%). The findings demonstrate that ICGV 10218 and ICGV 10208 possess highly desirable and complementary traits. Therefore, these lines are recommended as crucial breeding material for developing new, high-performing peanut cultivars to better meet the demands of producers and consumers in Türkiye.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yılmaz, M., Şahin, C. B., İşler, N. (2026). Evaluation of Yield and Its Components in Different Peanut Lines and Varieties. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1762329

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Arıoğlu, H., Bakal, H., Güllüoğlu, L., Kurt, C., & Onat, B. (2016). The Determination of Some Important Agronomical and Quality Properties of Peanut Varieties in Main Crop Conditions. Biotech Studies, 25(2), 24–29. http://doi.org/10.21566/tarbitderg.281656
  2. Arıoğlu, H., Bakal, H., Güllüoğlu, L., Onat, B., & Kurt, C. (2018). The effect of harvesting dates on some agronomic and quality characteristics of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties grown as a main crop in Mediterranean Region (Türkiye). Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 23(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.414856
  3. Aşık, F. F., Yıldız, R., & Arıoğlu, H. H. (2018). The determination of new peanut varieties for Osmaniye region and their important agronomic and quality characteristics. Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 21(6), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.452842
  4. Aytekin, R. İ., Üstüntaş, H. E., & Çalışkan, S. (2016). Determination of growing possibilities of some groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars in Niğde conditions. Biotech Studies, 25(2), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.21566/tarbitderg.281598
  5. Bakal, H., & Arıoğlu, H. H. (2019). The determination of fatty acids composition and oil quality factors of some peanut varieties having different market types at different harvesting times in main and double crop growing seasons in Mediterranean Region. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 24(2), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.655078
  6. Benkerroum, N. (2020). Aflatoxins: Producing-molds, structure, health issues and incidence in Southeast Asian and Sub-Saharan African countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041215
  7. Bertioli, D. J., Seijo, G., Freitas, F. O., Valls, J. F., Leal-Bertioli, S. C., & Moretzsohn, M. C. (2011). An overview of peanut and its wild relatives. Plant Genetic Resources, 9(1), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262110000444
  8. Caliskan, S., Caliskan, M. E., & Arslan, M. (2008a). Genotypic differences for reproductive growth, yield, and yield components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 32(5), 415–424.
  9. Caliskan, S., Caliskan, M. E., Arslan, M., & Arioglu, H. (2008b). Effects of sowing date and growth duration on growth and yield of groundnut in a Mediterranean-type environment in Turkey. Field Crops Research, 105(1-2), 131–140.
  10. Canavar, Ö., & Kaynak, M. A. (2013). Determination of yield and yield components and seed quality of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) at different harvest times. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4(S), 3791–3803.
  11. Cil, A. N., Cil, A., Akkaya, M. R., & Şahin, V. (2016). Investigation of some agricultural properties of some peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes in Çukurova irrigated conditions. Journal of Central Research Institute for Field Crops, 25(Special Issue 2), 18–23.
  12. Ergun, Z., & Zarıfıkhosroshahı, M. (2020). A comparative analysis of oil content and fatty acid in different varieties of Arachis hypogaea L. from Turkey. International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences, 4(1), 42–47.
  13. FAO. (2026). World peanut production list. FAOSTAT. Retrieved January 7, 2026, from https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL
  14. Gulluoglu, L., Bakal, H., Onat, B., El-Sabagh, A., & Arioglu, H. (2016). Characterization of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seed oil and fatty acids composition under different growing season under Mediterranean environment. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 4(5S), 465–571. https://doi.org/10.18006/2016.4(5S).564.571
  15. Isanga, J., & Zhang, G. N. (2007). Biologically active components and nutraceuticals in peanuts and related products. Food Reviews International, 23(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559120701224956
  16. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151.
  17. Karabulut, B., & Tuncturk, R. (2019). Investigation of agricultural and quality characteristics of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars growing as main crop in the Diyarbakir-Bismil ecological conditions. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of the Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, 24(2), 97–104.
  18. Kaya, A. R., & Kılınç, A. (2020). Determination of yield and yield components of some peanut varieties (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Kahramanmaraş conditions. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of the Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, 25(1), 21–31.
  19. Kıllı, F., & Beycioğlu, T. (2022). Genetic and environmental variability, heritability and genetic advance in pod yield, yield components, oil and protein content of peanut varieties. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 27(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1050448
  20. Kumar, R., Pandey, M. K., Roychoudhry, S., Nayyar, H., Kepinski, S., & Varshney, R. K. (2019). Peg biology: Deciphering the molecular regulations involved during peanut peg development. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 1289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01289
  21. Kurt, C., Bakal, H., Gulluoglu, L., & Arıoglu, H. (2017). The effect of twin row planting pattern and plant population on yield and yield components of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) at main crop planting in Cukurova region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 22(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.301768
  22. Magagula, N., Mabuza, M. P., & Zubuko, N. (2019). Effects of plant density and planting on growth and seed yield of groundnuts [Arachis hypogaea (L.)] in the wet Middleveld of Eswatini. Asian Plant Research Journal, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.9734/APRJ/2019/v3i230065
  23. Onat, B., Bakal, H., Gulluoglu, L., & Arıoglu, H. (2017). The effects of row spacing and plant density on yield and yield components of peanut grown as a double crop in Mediterranean environment in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 22(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.17557/TJFC.303885
  24. Rao, V. T., Venkanna, V., Bhadru, D., & Bharathi, D. (2014). Studies on variability, character association and path analysis on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience, 2(2), 194–197.
  25. Shin, E. C., Craft, B. D., Pegg, R. B., Phillips, R. D., & Eitenmiller, R. R. (2010). Chemometric approach to fatty acid profiles in Runner-type peanut cultivars by principal component analysis (PCA). Food Chemistry, 119(3), 1262–1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.058
  26. Tana, M. G. T., & Urage, E. (2017). Effect of planting density on yield components and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties at Abeya, Borena Zone Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science, 3(3), 23–34.
  27. Toomer, O. T. (2018). Nutritional chemistry of the peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 58(17), 3042–3053.
  28. TUIK. (2026). Crop production statistics. Turkish Statistical Institute. Retrieved January 7, 2026, from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/
  29. Yasli, S., Isler, N., & Sahin, C. B. (2020). The effect of single and twin planting patterns on yield and important agricultural characteristics of main cropped peanut under Diyarbakir conditions. Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 23(1), 91–98.
  30. Yilmaz, M. (2023). Effect of vermicompost treatment on oil quality and fatty acid composition of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33(4), 656-664. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1242029
  31. Yol, E., Ustun, R., Golukcu, M., & Uzun, B. (2017). Oil content, oil yield and fatty acid profile of groundnut germplasm in Mediterranean climates. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 94(6), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-017-2981-3
  32. Yol, E., & Uzun, B. (2018). Influences of genotype and location interactions on oil, fatty acids and agronomical properties of groundnuts. Grasas Y Aceites, 69(4), e276. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0109181
  33. Yousif, D. P., & Hussain, A. (2019). Effect of genotype and plant density on growth characteristics and yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in central region of Iraq. Agricultural Research and Technology: Open Access Journal, 19(3), 101–106.