SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Issue: 1

Investigation of Pollen Tube Growth and Embryo Development in Olive

Cansu Dölek(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7628-0676
Mücahit Taha Özkaya(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, BAHÇE BİTKİLERİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-6571-5985
Şenay Karabıyık(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, BAHÇE BİTKİLERİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-8579-6228
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-01-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context it is thought that the critical embryo development periods obtained are also important in terms of the timing of maintenance operations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Olive is one of the most important fruit tree species worldwide, yet it frequently encounters fruit set problems caused by factors such as sexual incompatibility, climatic conditions, and alternate bearing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of this study, it was determined that pollen tubes reached the ovules within 2–3 days after pollination in all cultivars evaluated, indicating that there was no significant incompatibility problem among them.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context it is thought that the critical embryo development periods obtained are also important in terms of the timing of maintenance operations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Pollen tube · Pollination · Embryo

Abstract

Olive is one of the most important fruit tree species worldwide, yet it frequently encounters fruit set problems caused by factors such as sexual incompatibility, climatic conditions, and alternate bearing. In this study, the effectiveness of cross pollination of three cultivars and how embryo development varies among cultivars in fruits obtained as a result of open pollination conditions in these cultivars were determined. As a result of this study, it was determined that pollen tubes reached the ovules within 2–3 days after pollination in all cultivars evaluated, indicating that there was no significant incompatibility problem among them. Embryo development stages showed that the zygote started to divide as of the 2nd week in whole cultivars and Domat showed faster development than Gemlik and Sarı Ulak olive varieties. In the examinations, it was determined that problems may be encountered in the ovaries of the Sarı Ulak variety in some cases, and these problems were thought to be related to the first signs of parthenocarpic fruit formation. However, this situation needs to be examined in more detail. As a result, it was determined that there was no self-incompatibility between Domat, Gemlik and Sarı Ulak varieties used in the experiment, and embryo development occurred regularly in the orchard where these varieties were found together. In this context it is thought that the critical embryo development periods obtained are also important in terms of the timing of maintenance operations.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dölek, C., Özkaya, M. T., Karabıyık, Ş. (2026). Investigation of Pollen Tube Growth and Embryo Development in Olive. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1785869

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Arzani, K., & Javady, T. (2002). Study of flower biology and pollen tube growth of mature olive tree cv. ‘Zard’. Acta Horticulturae, 586, 545–548.
  2. Bradley, M. V., Griggs, W. H., & Hartmann, H. T. (1961). Studies on self- and cross-pollination of olives under varying temperature conditions. California Agriculture, 15(3), 4–5.
  3. Bradley, M. V., & Griggs, W. H. (1963). Morphological evidence of incompatibility in Olea europaea L. Phytomorphology, 13, 141–156.
  4. Cuevas, J. (1992). Pollen-pistil incompatibility, gametic processes and fruiting of olive cultivars (Olea europaea L.) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Córdoba].
  5. Cuevas, J., & Polito, V. S. (1997). Compatibility relationships in ‘Manzanilla’ olive. HortScience, 32(6), 1056–1058.
  6. Distefano, G., Caruso, M., La Malfa, S., Gentile, A., & Tribulato, E. (2009). Histological and molecular analysis of pollen–pistil interaction in Clementine. Plant Cell Reports, 28(9), 1439–1451.
  7. Dölek-Gencer, C., Özkaya, M. T., Eti, S., & Karabıyık, Ş. (2023). Evaluation of the effect of open-, self- and cross pollinations on fruit set in Domat, Gemlik and Sarı Ulak olive cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae, 311, Article 111780.
  8. Eti, S. (1991). Determination of pollen viability and germination capacity in some fruit species and cultivars using different in vitro tests. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Çukurova University, 6(1), 69–80.
  9. Germanà, M. A., Chiancone, B., & Hammami, S. B. M. (2014). Olive embryo in vitro germination potential: Role of explant configuration and embryo structure among cultivars. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 118(3), 409–417.
  10. Gustafson, F. G. (1942). Parthenocarpy: Natural and artificial. The Botanical Review, 8(9), 599–654.
  11. Kaplan, C., Karabıyık, Ş., Dönmez, D., Çetin, Ö., Mete, N., Şimşek, Ö., & Kaçar, Y. A. (2024). Determination of sexual incompatibility status in olive and pollination methods that can be used in incompatibility research. Çukurova Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences, 39(1), 25–34.
  12. Karabıyık, Ş. (2022). Effects of temperature on pollen viability and in vivo pollen tube growth in Citrus sinensis. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, 95, 1–8.
  13. Karabıyık, Ş., Karataş, N., Çağlar, A. B., & Eti, S. (2020). Identification of male parent suitability of some tristeza tolerant citrus rootstocks for sour orange. Alatarım, 19(1), 49–56.
  14. Kepiro, J. L., & Roose, M. L. (2007). Nucellar embryony. In Citrus genetics, breeding and biotechnology (pp. 141–149). CAB International.
  15. Kho, Y. O., & Baër, J. (1970). Die Fluoreszenzmikroskopie in der botanischen Forschung [Fluorescence microscopy in botanical research]. Zeiss Information, 18, 54–57.
  16. Kour, D., Bakshi, P., Wali, V. K., Sharma, N., Sharma, A., & Iqbal, M. (2018). Alternate bearing in olive: A review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(2), 2281–2297.
  17. Lavee, S. (1996). Biology and physiology of olive. In World Olive Encyclopedia (pp. 59–106). International Olive Oil Council.
  18. Lavee, S., Taryan, J., Levin, J., & Haskal, A. (2002). The significance of cross-pollination for various olive cultivars under irrigated intensive growing conditions. Olivae, 91, 25–36.
  19. Martins, P. C., Cordeiro, A. M., & Rapoport, H. F. (2006). Flower quality in orchards of olive, Olea europaea L., cv. Morisca. Advances in Horticultural Science, 20(4), 262–266.
  20. McGregor, S. E. (1976). Insect pollination of cultivated crop plants (Agriculture Handbook No. 496). Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
  21. Mehri, H., Mehri-Kamoun, R., Msallem, M., & Faïdi, A. (2003). Reproductive behaviour of six olive cultivars as pollenizer of the self-incompatible olive cultivar Meski. Advances in Horticultural Science, 17(1), 42–46.
  22. Mete, N., Mısırlı, A., & Çetin, Ö. (2012). Determining the biology of fertilization and pollinators in some olive cultivars. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Olive Culture and Biotechnology of Olive Tree Products, 69–74.
  23. Mete, N., Şahin, M., & Çetin, Ö. (2015). Fertilization biology in olive. Olive Science, 5(1), 27–32.
  24. Norton, J. D. (1966). Testing of plum pollen viability with tetrazolium salts. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 89, 132–134.
  25. Özkaya, M. T. (2019). Taxonomy of the olive tree. Apelasyon Journal, (64). https://apelasyon.com/icerikler/tarim/zeytin-agacinin-taksonomisi.html
  26. Rallo, L., Martin, G. C., & Lavee, S. (1981). Relationship between abnormal embryo sac development and fruitfulness in olive. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 106(6), 813–817.
  27. Rapoport, H. F., Moreno-Alías, I., de la Rosa-Peinazo, M. Á., Frija, A., de la Rosa, R., & León, L. (2022). Floral quality characterization in olive progenies from reciprocal crosses. Plants, 11(10), Article 1285.
  28. Rapoport, H. F., & Rallo, L. (1989). Ovule development in normal and parthenocarpic olive fruits. Acta Horticulturae, 286, 223–226.
  29. Seifi, E., Guerin, J., Kaiser, B., & Sedgley, M. (2008). Inflorescence architecture of olive. Scientia Horticulturae, 116(3), 273–279.
  30. Seifi, E., Guerin, J., Kaiser, B., & Sedgley, M. (2011). Sexual compatibility and floral biology of some olive cultivars. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 39(2), 141–151.
  31. Seifi, E., Guerin, J., Kaiser, B., & Sedgley, M. (2015). Flowering and fruit set in olive: A review. Iranian Journal of Plant Physiology, 5(2), 1263–1272.
  32. Selak, V. G., Perica, S., Ban, S. G., & Raduni, M. (2011). Reproductive success after self-pollination and cross-pollination of olive cultivars in Croatia. HortScience, 46(2), 186–191.
  33. Serrano, I., Suárez, C., Olmedilla, A., Rapoport, H. F., & Rodríguez-García, M. I. (2008). Structural organization and cytochemical features of the pistil in olive (Olea europaea L.) cv. Picual at anthesis. Sexual Plant Reproduction, 21(2), 99–111.
  34. Troncoso, A., Cantos, M., Liñán, J., Troncoso, J., & Rapoport, H. F. (2003). In vitro development and germination of immature olive embryos. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 78(5), 728–733.
  35. Ülger, S., Baktır, İ., & Kaynak, L. (1999). Determination of the effects of endogenous plant hormones on alternate bearing and flower bud formation in olives. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23(9), 619–624.
  36. Wu, S. B., Collins, G., & Sedgley, M. (2002). Sexual compatibility within and between olive cultivars. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 77(6), 665–673.