SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2026 / Volume: 30 Issue: 1

Trait-Based Characterization of Barley Genotypes under Simulated Early Drought Stress Conditions

Selçuk Kodaz(ATATURK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE)0000-0002-4599-3574
Kamil Haliloğlu(ATATURK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE)0000-0002-4014-491X
Ali Öztürk(ATATURK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE)0000-0001-7673-114X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-06-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thirty-two varieties with a rank total between 40.4 and 51.6 were determined to be moderately sensitive, and 13 varieties with a rank total between 51.7 and 62.8 were determined to be sensitive.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the barley varieties that can be used as parents in drought resistance breeding and can be grown in regions where drought is experienced during the early growth and development periods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The seedling survival after drought rates of the varieties ranged from 8.0% to 76.0%, the coleoptile lengths ranged from 45.47 mm to 94.60 mm, the specific leaf area ranged from 100.1 cm2/g to 255.8 cm2/g, the 1st leaf width ranged from 3.11 mm to 8.93 mm, and the cell membrane damage rates ranged from 2.34% to 37.79%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thirty-two varieties with a rank total between 40.4 and 51.6 were determined to be moderately sensitive, and 13 varieties with a rank total between 51.7 and 62.8 were determined to be sensitive.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Barley · Early drought resistance · Germination

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the barley varieties that can be used as parents in drought resistance breeding and can be grown in regions where drought is experienced during the early growth and development periods. Seedling survival after drought (SSAD), coleoptile length (CL), seedling vigor (SV), cell membrane damage (CMD) and germination parameters at low water potential were measured. The seedling survival after drought rates of the varieties ranged from 8.0% to 76.0%, the coleoptile lengths ranged from 45.47 mm to 94.60 mm, the specific leaf area ranged from 100.1 cm2/g to 255.8 cm2/g, the 1st leaf width ranged from 3.11 mm to 8.93 mm, and the cell membrane damage rates ranged from 2.34% to 37.79%. In our study, the germination rate (GR), root length (RL), shoot length (SL) and seed vigor index (SVI) decreased as the osmotic potential increased. The 74 barley varieties used in the study were divided into four groups, resistant, medium resistant, medium sensitive and sensitive, according to the rank total values calculated over 6 selection criteria. Accordingly, the Konevi, İnce-04 and Fahrettinbey varieties were determined to be resistant to early drought. Twenty-six varieties of medium hardness with a rank total ranging from 29.1 to 40.3 were identified. Thirty-two varieties with a rank total between 40.4 and 51.6 were determined to be moderately sensitive, and 13 varieties with a rank total between 51.7 and 62.8 were determined to be sensitive.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kodaz, S., Haliloğlu, K., Öztürk, A. (2025). Trait-Based Characterization of Barley Genotypes under Simulated Early Drought Stress Conditions. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Volume: 30 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1664378

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (32)

  1. Ahmed, I.M., Nadira, U.A., Zhang, G., & Wu, F. (2016), Exploration and utilization of drought-tolerant barley germplasm. In Exploration, Identification and Utilization of Barley Germplasm, 115-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12- 802922-0.00005-4
  2. Balkan, T., & Genctan, A. (2013). Effect of osmotic stress on germination and early seedling growth in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 10(2):44-52.
  3. Bandurska, H., Stroiński. A., & Kubiś, J. (2003). The effect of jasmonic acid on the accumulation of ABA, proline and spermidine and its influence on membrane injury under water deficit in two barley genotypes. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 25(3):279-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-003-0009-0
  4. Beltrano, J., & Ronco, M.G. (2008). Improved tolerance of wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.) to drought stress and rewatering by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus claroideum: Effect on growth and cell membrane stability. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 20(1):29-37. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202008000100004
  5. Blum, A. (2011). Drought resistance and its improvement. In Plant breeding for water-limited environments, 53-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7491-4_3
  6. Blum, A., & Ebercon, A. (1981). Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Science, 21 (1):43-47. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100010013x
  7. Boyer, J.S. (1982). Plant productivity and environment. Science, 218 (4571): 443-448. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.218.4571.443
  8. Coleman, R., Gill, G., & Rebetzke, G. (2001). Identification of quantitative trait loci for traits conferring weed competitiveness in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 52(12):1235-1246. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR01055
  9. Dhanda, S., Sethi, G., & Behl, R. (2004). Indices of drought tolerance in wheat genotypes at early stages of plant growth. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190 (1): 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2004.00592.x
  10. Hall, A.E. (1993). Physiology and breeding for heat tolerance in cowpea, and comparison with other crops. Adaptation of food crops to temperature and water stress, 271-284.
  11. Hu, S.P., Hua, Y., Zou, G.H., Liu, H.Y., Liu, G.L., Mei, H.W., Run, C., Li, M.S., & Luo, L.J. (2007). Relationship between coleoptile length and drought resistance and their QTL mapping in rice. Rice Science, 14 (1): 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6308(07)60003-1
  12. Karami, A., & Sepehri, A. (2017). Multiwalled carbon nanotubes and nitric oxide modulate the germination and early seedling growth of barley under drought and salinity. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 82 (4): 331-339. https://hrcak.srce.hr/193519
  13. Kocheva, K., & Georgiev, G. (2003). Evaluation of the reaction of two contrasting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars in response to osmotic stress with PEG 6000. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology, 49: 290-294.
  14. Kusvuran, S. (2010). Relationships between physiological mechanisms of tolerances to drought and salinity in melons. PhD Thesis, Department of Horticulture Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences University of Çukurova, Adana Kutlu, İ. (2010). Drought Stress in Cereals. Turkish Journal of Scientific Reviews, 3 (1): 35-41.
  15. López-Castañeda, C., & Richards, R. (1994). Variation in temperate cereals in rainfed environments III. Water use and water-use efficiency. Field Crops Research, 39 (2-3): 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(94)90011-6
  16. Mitra, J. (2001). Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Current science, 758-763. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24105661
  17. Monti, L. (1987). Breeding plants for drought resistance: The problem and its relevance. Proc Agriculture drought resistance in plant, Amaifi, 1-8.
  18. Oukarroum, A., El Madidi, S., & Strasser, R. (2005). Analysis of the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient OJIP during drought stress and rewatering of barley cultivars (Hordeum vulgare L.). The 2nd International Conference on Integrated Approaches to Sustain and Improve Plant Production Under Drought Stress, Rome, Italy
  19. Ozturk, A., Bayram, S., Haliloglu, K., Aydin, M., Caglar, O., & Bulut, S. (2014). Characterization for drought resistance at early stages of wheat genotypes based on survival, coleoptile length, and seedling vigor. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 38 (6): 824-837. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1402-57
  20. Ozturk, A., Taskesenligil, B., Haliloglu, K., Aydin, M., & Caglar, O. (2016). Evaluation of bread wheat genotypes for early drought resistance via germination under osmotic stress, cell membrane damage, and paraquat tolerance. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 40 (2): 146-159. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1501-136
  21. Paynter, B.H., & Clarke, G.P.Y. (2010). Coleoptile length of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars. Genetic resources and crop evolution, 57 (3): 395-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-009-9478-3
  22. Radford, B. (1987). Effect of constant and fluctuating temperature regimes and seed source on the coleoptile length of tall and semidwarf wheats. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 27 (1): 113-117. http://www.publish.csiro.au/?act=view_file&file_id=EA9870113.pdf
  23. Rebetzke, G.J., Botwright, T.L., Moore, C.S., Richards, R.A., & Condon, A.G. (2004). Genotypic variation in specific leaf area for genetic improvement of early vigor in wheat. Field Crops Research, 88 (2-3): 179-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.007
  24. Rebetzke, G.J., Richards, R.A., Fischer, V.M., & Mickelson, B.J. (1999). Breeding long coleoptile, reduced height wheats. Euphytica, 106 (2): 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003518920119
  25. Richards, R., & Lukacs, Z. (2002). Seedling vigor in wheat-sources of variation for genetic and agronomic improvement. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 53 (1): 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR00147
  26. Robertson, M.J., & Giunta. F. (1994). Responses of spring wheat exposed to preanthesis water stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 45 (1): 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9940019
  27. Shavrukov, Y., Kurishbayev, A., Jatayev, S., Shvidchenko, V., Zotova, L., Koekemoer, F., De Groot, S., Soole, K., & Langridge, P. (2017). Early flowering as a drought escape mechanism in plants: How can it aid wheat production? Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1950. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01950
  28. Szira, F., Balint, A., Borner, A., & Galiba, G. (2008). Evaluation of drought‐Related traits and screening methods at different developmental stages in spring barley. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 194 (5): 334-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00330.x
  29. Tomar, S., & Kumar, G. (2004). Seedling survivability as a selection criterion for drought tolerance in wheat. Plant Breeding, 123 (4): 392-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2004.00993.x
  30. Van Oosterom, E., Kleijn, D., Ceccarelli, S., & Nachit, M. (1993). Genotype‐by‐environment interactions of barley in the Mediterranean region. Crop Science, 33 (4): 669-674. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300040004x
  31. Volaire, F. (2003). Seedling survival under drought differs between an annual (Hordeum vulgare) and a perennial grass (Dactylis glomerata). New Phytologist, 160 (3): 501-510. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00906.x
  32. Winter, S., Musick, J., & Porter, K. (1988). Evaluation of Screening Techniques for Breeding Drought‐Resistanct Winter Wheat. Crop Science, 28 (3): 512-516. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800030018x