Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 27 Issue: 3

Role of Controlled Atmosphere, Ultra Low Oxygen or Dynamic Controlled Atmosphere Conditions on Quality Characteristics of ‘Scarlet Spur’ Apple Fruit

Cemile Ebru Onursal(ANTALYA BATI AKDENİZ TARIMSAL ARAŞTIRMA ENSTİTÜSÜ MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ)0000-0003-1201-4576
Mehmet Ali Koyuncu(ısparta uygulamalı bilimler üniversitesi)0000-0003-4449-6709
Pages
—
Publication Date
2021-09-04
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Result showed that; ULO and DCA conditions were more effective in maintaining quality compared to CA in terms of all quality parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effects of three cold storage technologies, (i) controlled atmosphere-CA (CO2 4%, O2 3%), (ii) ultra low oxygen-ULO and (iii) dynamic controlled atmosphere-DCA, were investigated on fruit quality of ‘Scarlet Spur’ apples stored during 10 months plus 7 days of shelf life at 20 °C.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After harvest, apples were stored at 0 °C and 90±5% relative humidity during 10 months in CA, ULO (CO2 3%, O2 1%,) and DCA (CO2 1%, O2 0.5%) conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Result showed that; ULO and DCA conditions were more effective in maintaining quality compared to CA in terms of all quality parameters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:apple · controlled atmosphere · postharvest

Abstract

In this study, the effects of three cold storage technologies, (i) controlled atmosphere-CA (CO2 4%, O2 3%), (ii) ultra low oxygen-ULO and (iii) dynamic controlled atmosphere-DCA, were investigated on fruit quality of ‘Scarlet Spur’ apples stored during 10 months plus 7 days of shelf life at 20 °C. After harvest, apples were stored at 0 °C and 90±5% relative humidity during 10 months in CA, ULO (CO2 3%, O2 1%,) and DCA (CO2 1%, O2 0.5%) conditions. HarvestWatch™ sensors were used for assessment of lower oxygen limit (LOL) of fruit during DCA storage. DCA was the best storage condition suppressing ethylene synthesis and respiration rate during storage. The ULO and DCA conditions showed similar results in the maintenance of firmness and TA amount. Weight loss in these conditions was also lower than CA. No significant difference was observed between storage conditions in terms of SSC. DCA technology gave better results in maintaining color of ‘Scarlet Spur’ than other conditions during cold storage. Result showed that; ULO and DCA conditions were more effective in maintaining quality compared to CA in terms of all quality parameters.

🔖

Cite This Article

Onursal, C. E., Koyuncu, M. A. (2021). Role of Controlled Atmosphere, Ultra Low Oxygen or Dynamic Controlled Atmosphere Conditions on Quality Characteristics of ‘Scarlet Spur’ Apple Fruit. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 27 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.631956

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (53)

  1. Ackerman J, Fisher M & Amado R (1992). Changes in sugars, acids, amino acids during ripening and storage of apples (cv. Glockenapfel). J.Agric.Food Chem. 40:1131-1134
  2. Aubert C, Mathieu-Hurtiger V & Vaysse P (2015). Effects of dynamic atmosphere on volatile compounds, polyphenolic content, overall fruit quality, and sensory evaluation of pink lady® apples. Acta Hort 1071, 275–280
  3. Balla B & Holb I (2007). Effect of three storage methods on fruit decay and Brown rot of apple. International of Horticultural Science 13(3): 55-57
  4. Batu A & Sen L (2014). Controlled atmosphere storage technology and ıts aplication. Electronic Journal of Food Technologies 9(3): 118-138
  5. Bekele E A, Ampofo-Asiama J, Alis R R, Hertog M, Nicolai B M & Geeraerd A H (2016). Dynamics of metabolic adaptation during initiation of controlled atmosphere storage of ‘Jonagold’ apple: Effects of storage gas concentrations and conditioning. Postharvest Biology and Technology 117: 9–20
  6. Bessemans N, Verboven P, Verlinden B & Nicolaï B, (2016). A novel type of dynamic controlled atmosphere storage based on the respiratory quotient (RQ-DCA). Postharvest Biology and Technology 115: 91–102
  7. Both V, Brackmann A, Thewes F R, Freitas Ferreira D & Wagner R (2014). Effect of storage under extremely low oxygen on the volatile composition of ‘Royal Gala’ apples. Food Chemistry 156: 50–57
  8. Both V, Thewes F R, Brackmann A, de Oliveira Anese A, de Freitas Ferreira D & Wagner R (2017). Effects of dynamic controlled atmosphere by respiratory quotient on some quality parameters and volatile profile of ‘Royal Gala’ apple after long-term storage. Food Chemistry 215: 483–492
  9. Brizzolara S, Santucci C, Tenori L, Hertog M, Nicolai B, Stürz S & Tonutti P (2017). A metabolomics approach to elucidate apple fruit responses to static and dynamic controlled atmosphere storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology 127: 76–87
  10. Brummell D A & Harpster M H (2001). Cell wall metabolism in fruit softening and quality and its manipulation in transgenic plants. Plant Molecular Biology 47: 311–340
  11. Çalhan Ö, Eren I, Onursal C E & Güneyli A (2012). Granny Smith Elma Çeşidin Dinamik Kontrollü Atmosferde (DKA) Depolanması. V. Bahçe Ürünlerinde Muhafaza ve Pazarlama Sempozyumu 18-21 Eylül, İzmir, pp.145-152
  12. De Castro E, Biasi W V & Mitcham E J (2007). Quality of Pink Lady Apples in Relation to Maturity at Harvest, Prestorage Treatments, and Controlled Atmosphere During Storage. HortScience 42: 605-610
  13. DeLong J M, Prange R K Harrison & P A (2007). Chlorophyll-fluorescence based low-O2 CA storage of organic ‘Cortland’ and ‘Delicious’ apples. Acta Hort 737: 31-37
  14. Erbaş D, Onursal C E, Babalık Z & Koyuncu M A (2014). The use of salicylic acid in cold storage of table grapes. Bahçe Bilimi 5: 22-31. VI. Bahçe Ürünlerinde Muhafaza ve Pazarlama Sempozyumu, 22-25 Eylül, Bursa
  15. Eren I, Çalhan Ö, Onursal C E & Güneyli A (2015). Effect of controlled atmosphere,dynamic controlled atmosphere and 1-MCP on quality of ‘Granny Smith’ apples. Acta Hortic. 1071: 495–502
  16. Fischer R L & Bennett A B (1991). Role of cell wall hydrolases in fruit ripening. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42: 675-703
  17. Gasser F, Dätwyler D, Schneider K, Naunheim W & Hoehn E (2005). Effects of decreasing oxygen levels in the storage atmosphere on the respiration and production of volatiles of Idared apples. Acta Hortic. 682: 1585–1592
  18. Gasser F, Eppler T, Naunheim W, Gabioud S & Hoehn E (2008). Control of the critical oxygen level during dynamic CA storage of apples by monitoring respiration as well as chlorophyll fluorescence. Acta Hort. 796:69-76
  19. Goulao L F & Oliveira C M (2008). Cell wall modifications during fruit ripening: when a fruit is not the fruit. Trends in Food Science & Technology 19(1): 4-25
  20. Gorny J R & Kader A A (1996). Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis in climacteric apple fruit by elevated CO2 and reduced 02 atmospheres. Postharvest Biology and Technology 9: 311-323
  21. Gwanpua S G, Van Buggenhout S, Verlinden B E, Christiaens S, Shpigelman A, Vicent V, Jamsazzadeh Kermani Z, Nicolai B M, Hendrickx M & Geeraerd A (2014). Pectin modifications and the role of pectin-degrading enzymes during postharvest softening of Jonagold apples. Food Chemistry 158: 283–291
  22. Hennecke C, Köpcke D & Dierend W (2008). Dynamische Absenkung des Sauerstoffgehaltes bei der Lagerung von Äpfeln. Erwerbs-Obstbau 50: 19 –29
  23. Kader A A (2002). Postharvest biology and technology: an overview. Kader A A Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops. University of California Agricultural and Natural Resources Publication 3311, pp. 39-47
  24. Kittemann D, McCormick R & Neuwald D A (2015). Effect of high temperature and 1-MCP application or dynamic controlled atmosphere on energy savings during apple storage. European Journal of Horticultural Science 80(1): 33–38
  25. Köpcke D (2015). 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) and dynamic controlled atmosphere (DCA) applications under elevated storage temperatures: Effects on fruit quality of ‘Elstar’, ‘Jonagold’ and ‘Gloster’ apple (Malus domestica borkh.). European Journal of Horticultural Science 80: 25–32
  26. Koyuncu M A & Bayındır D (2013). Scarlet Spur Elma Çeşidinin Normal ve Kontrollü Atmosfer Koşullarında Depolanması. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 28(2): 71-76
  27. Mattè P, Buglia L, Boschetti A, Fadanelli L, Chistè C & Zeni F (2005). ILOS + ULO as a practical technology for apple scald prevention. Acta Hortic. 682: 1543-1550
  28. Mattheis J, Buchanan D & Fellman J (1998). Volatile compounds emitted by ‘Gala'apples following dynamic atmosphere storage. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 123: 426–432
  29. Mditshwa A, Fawole O A, Vries F, van der Merwe K, Crouch E & Opara U L (2017a). Minimum exposure period for dynamic controlled atmospheres to control superficial scald in Granny Smith apples for long distance supply chains. Postharvest Biology and Technology 127: 27–34
  30. Mditshwa A, Fawole O A, Vries F, van der Merwe K, Crouch E & Opara U L (2017b). Repeated application of dynamic controlled atmospheres reduced superficial scald incidence in ‘Granny Smith’ apples. Scientia Horticulturae 220: 168–175
  31. Mditshwa A, Fawole O A & Opara U L (2018). Recent developments on dynamic controlled atmosphere storage of apples—A review Food Packaging and Shelf Life 16: 59–68
  32. Mir N & Beaudry R (2002). Atmosphere control using oxygen and carbon dioxide, Knee, M. (Ed), Fruit Quality and its Biological Basis, Sheffield Academic Press, ISBN 1-8127-230-2, UK, pp. 121-150
  33. Nath P, Trivedi P K, Sane VA & Sane A P (2006). Role of Ethylene in Fruit Ripening 151-184. Khan, N.A. (Ed.), Ethylene Action in Plants. ISBN-10 3-540-32716-9 Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.Özer, M.H. 2002. Elma çeşitlerinin kontrollü atmosferde muhafazası. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fak. Dergisi 16(2):189-202
  34. Payasi A, Nath Mishra N, Soares Chaves A L & Singh R (2009). Biochemistry of fruit softening: an overview. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 15(2): 103-113
  35. Prange R K, Delong J M, Harrison P, Mclean S, Scrutton J & Cullen J (2007). Method and apparatus for monitoring a condition in chlorophyll containing matter. U.S. Patent, n.WO/2002/006795
  36. Stephens B E & Tanner D J (2005). The harvest watch system - measuring fruit´s healthy glow. Acta Hortic. 687: 363-364
  37. Thewes F, Both, V, Brackmann A, Weber A & de Oliveira Anese R (2015). Dynamic controlled atmosphere and ultralow oxygen storage on ‘Gala’ mutants quality maintenance. Food Chemistry 188: 62–70
  38. Thewes F R, Brackmann A, Both V, Weber A, de Oliveira Anese R, dos Santos Ferrão T & Wagner R (2017). The different impacts of dynamic controlled atmosphere and controlled atmosphere storage in the quality attributes of ‘Fuji Suprema’ apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology 130: 7–20
  39. Thewes F R, Brackmann A, de Oliveira Anese R, Ludvig V, Schultz E E & Pasquetti Berghetti M R (2018). 1-methylcyclopropene suppresses anaerobic metabolism in apples stored under dynamic controlled atmosphere monitored by respiratory quotient. Scientia Horticulturae 227: 288–295
  40. Thompson A K (2010). Controlled atmosphere storage of fruits and vegetables. CABI.
  41. Tran D T, Verlinden B E, Hertog M & Nicolai B M (2015). Monitoring of extremely low oxygen control atmosphere storage of ‘Greenstar’ apples using chlorophyll fluorescence. Scientia Horticulturae 184: 18–22.
  42. Tuna Gunes N & Horzum O (2017). Bahçe Ürünlerinde Fizyolojik Olaylar. pp. 61-83. Türk, R., Tuna Güneş, N., Erkan, M. ve Koyuncu, M. A. (Editörler), Bahçe Ürünlerinin Muhafazası ve Pazara Hazırlanması. Somtad Yayınları Ders Kitabı No: 1, Antalya/Türkiye.
  43. Vanoli M, Eccher Zerbini P, Grassi M & Rizzolo A (2010). Ethylene production and quality in 1-methylcyclopropene treated 'Abbé fétel' pears after storage in dynamically controlled atmosphere. Acta Hortic. 876: 31-38
  44. Veltman R, Verschoor J & Van Dugteren J R (2003). Dynamic control system (DCS) for apples (Malus domestica Borkh. cv ‘Elstar’): Optimal quality through storage based on product response. Postharvest Biology and Technology 27(1): 79–86
  45. Watkins C B (2006). The use of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) on fruits and vegetables. Biotechnology Advances 24: 389–409
  46. Watkins C B (2008). Dynamic controlled atmosphere storage: A new technology for the New York storage industry. New York Fruit Quarterly 16(1): 23–26
  47. Weber A, Brackmann A, Both V, Pavanello E P, Anese Rd O & Thewes F R (2015). Respiratory quotient: Innovative method for monitoring Royal Gala apple storage in a dynamic controlled atmosphere. Scientia Agricola 72(1): 28–33
  48. Wright A H, DeLong J M, Gunawardena A & Prange R K (2012). Dynamic controlled atmosphere (DCA): does fluorescence reflect physiology in storage? Postharvest Biol. Technol. 64: 19–30
  49. Wright A, Delong J, Arul J & Prange R (2015). The trend toward lower oxygen levels during apple (Malus×domestica Borkh) storage. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 90(1): 1– 13
  50. Zanella A, Cazzanelli P, Panarese A, Coser M, Cecchinel M & Rossi O (2005). Fruit fluorescence response to low-oxygen stress: modern storage Technologies compared to 1-MCP treatment of apple. Acta Hort 682:1535-1542
  51. Zanella A, Cazzanelli P & Rossi O (2008). Dynamic controlled atmosphere (DCA) storage by the means of chlorophyll fluorescence response for firmness retention in apple. Acta Hort 796:77-82
  52. Zanella A & Rossi O (2015). Post-harvest retention of apple fruit firmness by 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) treatment or dynamic CA storage with chlorophyll fluorescence (DCA-CF). Europ. J. Hort. Sci. 80(1): 11–17
  53. Payasi A, Nath Mishra N, Soares Chaves A L & Singh R (2009). Biochemistry of fruit softening: an overview. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 15(2): 103-113