Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 29 Issue: 2

Evaluation of some Water, Energy and Financial Indicators: A Case Study of Esenli Water User Association in Yozgat, Türkiye

Sinan Kartal(ALANYA ALAADDİN KEYKUBAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9600-8052
Hasan Değirmenci(KAHRAMANMARAS SUTCU IMAM UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING)0000-0002-6157-816X
Firat Arslan(ALANYA ALAADDİN KEYKUBAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, RAFET KAYIŞ MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-7168-226X
İsmail Gizlenci(devlet su işleri genel müdürlüğü)0000-0001-9952-2869
Pages
—
Publication Date
2023-03-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was concluded that, on average, the irrigation rate was 39%, annual irrigation water supply per unit irrigated area was 8229 m3 ha−1, specific energy was 0.33 kWh m−3, energy consumed per unit irrigated was 2671 kWh ha−1, total maintenance, operation and management cost per unit irrigation water supply was 403 € ha−1 in the years (2008-2017) when the study was conducted.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Energy is one of the most important inputs for pressurized irrigation systems in the world’s agriculture sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In studies performed with performance indicators in Türkiye, the use of energy indicators is limited.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was concluded that, on average, the irrigation rate was 39%, annual irrigation water supply per unit irrigated area was 8229 m3 ha−1, specific energy was 0.33 kWh m−3, energy consumed per unit irrigated was 2671 kWh ha−1, total maintenance, operation and management cost per unit irrigation water supply was 403 € ha−1 in the years (2008-2017) when the study was conducted.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Financial management · Energy use · Performance evaluation

Abstract

Energy is one of the most important inputs for pressurized irrigation systems in the world’s agriculture sector. As in all areas of life, energy used in irrigation has become an important research subject for researchers. In studies performed with performance indicators in Türkiye, the use of energy indicators is limited. The scarcity of energy resources makes the efficiency of energy used in irrigation schemes extremely important. This study evaluated the performance of a pressurized irrigation scheme in the Yozgat water, energy and financial indicatorsater, energy and financial. The data obtained were compared with other countries in the Mediterranean region. As a result, it was concluded that, on average, the irrigation rate was 39%, annual irrigation water supply per unit irrigated area was 8229 m3 ha−1, specific energy was 0.33 kWh m−3, energy consumed per unit irrigated was 2671 kWh ha−1, total maintenance, operation and management cost per unit irrigation water supply was 403 € ha−1 in the years (2008-2017) when the study was conducted. The finding showed that the specific energy value was about three times lower than in other countries. However, when the energy consumed per unit in the irrigated area was examined, it was found that the irrigation scheme has a high consumption of energy.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kartal, S., Değirmenci, H., Arslan, F., Gizlenci, İ. (2023). Evaluation of some Water, Energy and Financial Indicators: A Case Study of Esenli Water User Association in Yozgat, Türkiye. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 29 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1008458

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Abadia R, Rocamora M C, Corcoles J I, Ruiz-Canales A, Martinez-Romero A & Moreno M A (2010). Comparative analysis of energy efficiency in water users associations. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2: 134-142
  2. Alcon F, García-Bastida, P A, Soto-García M, Martínez-Alvarez V, Martin-Gorriz B & Baille A (2017). Explaining the performance of irrigation communities in a water-scarce region. Irrigation science 35(3): 193-203.
  3. Anonymous (2011). Yozgat Agriculture, Livestock and Food Sectoral Working Group Report http://oran.org.tr/materyaller/Editor/document/PlanlamaBirimi/Yozgat_TarimHayvancilikGida_SCG_Raporu_Agustos2011.pdf. (in Turkish).
  4. Bastiaanssen W G M & Bos M G (1999). Irrigation performance indicators based on remotely sensed data: a review of literature. Irrigation and drainage systems 13(4): 291-311
  5. Cakmak B, Kibaroglu A, Kendirli B & Gokalp Z (2010). Assessment of the Irrigation Performance of Transferred Schemes in Turkey: A Case Study Analysis. Irrigation and Drainage: The journal of the International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage 59(2):138-149 Carrillo-Cobo MT, Rodriguez-Diaz, J A & Camacho-Poyato E (2010). The role of energy audits in irrigated areas. The case of ‘Fuente Palmera’ irrigation district (Spain). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2:152-161
  6. Cifci S (2019). Assessment of water user associations in Asi basin. MSc Thesis. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş Turkey
  7. Córcoles J I, Tarjuelo J M, Moreno M A, Ortega J F & De Juan J A (2010). Evaluation of Irrigation Systems by Using Benchmarking Techniques. XVII. World Congress of the International Commission of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (CIGR), Canada, June 13-17
  8. Degirmenci H, Buyukcangaz & H, Kuscu H (2003). Assessment of irrigation schemes with comparative indicators in the Southeastern Anatolia Project. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 27(5): 293-303
  9. Diker C (2018). Assesment of Lower Seyhan Plain irrigation associations. MSc Thesis. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey DSI (2019). Annual Report 2018. General Dictorate of State Hydraulic Works. (in Turkish)
  10. Elshaikh A E, Jiao X & Yang S (2018). Performance evaluation of irrigation projects: Theories, methods, and techniques. Agricultural water management 203: 87-96
  11. Espinosa-Tasón J, Berbel J & Gutiérrez-Martín C (2020). Energized water: Evolution of water-energy nexus in the Spanish irrigated agriculture, 1950–2017. Agricultural Water Management 233: 106073
  12. FAO (2011). The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture (SOLAW) – Managing systems at risk. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and London, Earthscan.
  13. García I F, Rodríguez Díaz J A, Poyato E C, Montesinos P & Berbel J (2014). Effects of modernization and medium term perspectives on water and energy use in irrigation districts. Agricultural systems 131: 56-63
  14. García-Bolaños M, Borgia C, Poblador N, Dia M, Seyid O M V & Mateos L (2011). Performance assessment of small irrigation schemes along the Mauritanian banks of the Senegal River. Agricultural water management 98(7): 1141-1152
  15. González P R, Camacho E, Montesinos P, Fernández G I & Rodríguez-Díaz J A (2015). Reducing the Energy Demand in Irrigation Water Supply Systems. Experiences From Southern Europe. International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage 26th Euro-mediterranean Regional Conference and Workshops “Innovate to improve Irrigation performances” Montpellier (France), October 12-15
  16. Hoff H (2011). Understanding the Nexus. Background Paper for the Bonn2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI).
  17. IEA (2010). World Energy Outlook 2010. Paris: OECD/ International Energy Agency.
  18. Kukul Y S, Akçay S, Anaç S & Yeşilırmak E (2008). Temporal irrigation performance assessment in Turkey: Menemen case study. Agricultural water management 95(9): 1090-1098
  19. Moreno M A, Ortega J F, Córcoles J I, Martínez A & Tarjuelo J M (2010). Energy analysis of irrigation delivery systems: monitoring and evaluation of proposed measures for improving energy efficiency. Irrigation Science 28(5): 445-460
  20. Playán E, Salvador R, Bonetc L, Camacho E, Intrigliolo D S, Moreno M A, Rodríguez-Díaz J A, Tarjuelo J M, Madurga C, Zazo T, Sánchez-de-Ribera A, Cervantes A & Zapata N (2018). Assessing telemetry and remote control systems for water users associations in Spain. Agricultural Water Management 202: 89-98
  21. Rocamora C, Vera J & Abadía R (2013). Strategy for Efficient Energy Management to solve energy problems in modernized irrigation: analysis of the Spanish case. Irrigation Science 31(5): 1139-1158
  22. Rodríguez-Díaz J A, Pérez-Urrestarazu L, Camacho-Poyato E & Montesinos P (2011). The paradox of irrigation scheme modernization: more efficient water use linked to higher energy demand. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 9 (4): 1000-1008
  23. Soto-García M, Martin-Gorriz B, García-Bastida P A, Alcon F &Martínez-Alvarez V (2013). Energy consumption for crop irrigation in a semiarid climate (south-eastern Spain) Energy 55: 1084-1093
  24. Svendsen M & Murray-Rust D H (2001). Creating and consolidating locally managed irrigation in Turkey: the national perspective. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 15(4): 355-371
  25. Vanino S, Capone S, Nino P, Fabiani S, Barouchas P & Maretas D (2015). Irrigation Management by Water Users Associations: Case Studies in the Regions of Apulia, Epirus and Western Greece. International Conference on Modern technologies, strategies and tools for sustainable irrigation management and governance in Mediterranean agriculture, Valenzano (Bari, Italy) 23-25 September 2015
  26. Yercan M, Atis E & Salali H E (2009). Assessing irrigation performance in the Gediz River Basin of Turkey: water user associations versus cooperatives. Irrigation Science 27(4): 263-270
  27. Zema D A, Nicotra A, Mateos L & Zimbone S M (2018). Improvement of the irrigation performance in Water Users Associations integrating data envelopment analysis and multi-regression models. Agricultural Water Management 205: 38-49
  28. Zema D A, Nicotra A, Tamburino V & Zimbone S M (2015). Performance assessment of collective irrigation in Water Users’ Associations of Calabria (Southern Italy). Irrigation and drainage 64(3): 314-325