SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 31 Issue: 1

A New Innovative Approach with Revised Pythagorean Fuzzy SWARA in Assessing of Soil Erodibility Factor

Aykut Çağlar(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0436-4237
Barış Özkan(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7767-4087
Orhan Dengiz(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0458-6016
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-01-14
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, the method developed here suggests that fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods can be an alternative approach for determining the soil erodibility factor.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Soil erosion is a significant issue that threatens to soil in land degradation processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To achieve this case, 78 surface soil samples were collected from micro basins and analyzed for organic matter, clay, sand, silt, very fine sand, degree of structure, and hydraulic conductivity parameters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, the method developed here suggests that fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods can be an alternative approach for determining the soil erodibility factor.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Soil erodibility · Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets · SWARA

Abstract

Soil erosion is a significant issue that threatens to soil in land degradation processes. The soil erodibility factor is a crucial tool for assessing the susceptibility of soils to erosion. The main aim of this study was to compare the results obtained using the Pythagorean Fuzzy-SWARA method which evaluates the impact weights of the criteria considered for the soil erodibility factor of the soils in the micro-basins located in the district of Çarşamba district of Samsun province, with the results obtained using the formula developed by Wischmeier and Smith. To achieve this case, 78 surface soil samples were collected from micro basins and analyzed for organic matter, clay, sand, silt, very fine sand, degree of structure, and hydraulic conductivity parameters. The erodibility factor was then calculated using these data, and spatial distribution maps were created for both methods. In this study, a revised of the Pythagorean Fuzzy-SWARA approach is proposed to calculate the weight values of the criteria. The values were 0.418 for organic matter, 0.227 for clay, 0.120 for degree of structure, 0.100 for hydraulic conductivity, 0.058 for sand, 0.053 for silt, and 0.039 for very fine sand. Soil erodibility values were determined using a linear combination approach, which normalized all parameter values by a standard scoring function. In estimating soil erodibility, our revised Pythagorean Fuzzy-SWARA approach was found to have a significant relationship with the soil erodibility factor method (R2 = 0.691 at the 1% level) compared to the soil erodibility factor method in estimating soil erodibility. Consequently, the method developed here suggests that fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods can be an alternative approach for determining the soil erodibility factor.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çağlar, A., Özkan, B., Dengiz, O. (2025). A New Innovative Approach with Revised Pythagorean Fuzzy SWARA in Assessing of Soil Erodibility Factor. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 31 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1501907

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (49)

  1. Andrews S S, Karlen D L & Mitchell J P (2002). A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agri Ecosyst Environ 90: 25–45. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00174-8
  2. Baskan O & Dengiz O (2008). Comparison of traditional and geostatistical methods to estimate soil erodibility factor. Arid Land Research and Management 22(1): 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/15324980701784241
  3. Baskan O (2022). Analysis of spatial and temporal changes of RUSLE-K soil erodibility factor in semi-arid areas in two different periods by conditional simulation, Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 68:12, 1698-1710. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2021.1922673
  4. Beretta A N & Carrasco Letelier L (2017). USLE/RUSLE K-factors allocated through a linear mixed model for Uruguayan soils. Ciencia e investigación agraria: revista latinoamericana de ciencias de la agricultura 44(1): 100-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/rcia.v44i1.1622
  5. Bouyoucos G J (1962). Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils 1. Agronomy journal 54(5): 464-465
  6. Bölük E (2016). According to Erinç Climate Classification Turkish Climate, Ministry of Forestry and Water Management General Directorate of Meteorology, Ankara
  7. Cartwright J H, Shammi S A & Rodgers III J C (2022). Use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for Mapping Erosion Potential in Gulf of Mexico Watersheds. Water 14(12): 1923. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14121923
  8. Cui Y, Liu W, Rani P & Alrasheedi M (2021). Internet of Things (IoT) adoption barriers for the circular economy using Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-CoCoSo decision-making approach in the manufacturing sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 171: 120951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120951
  9. Çakır M & Dengiz O (2021). Land Evaluation Study Using Linear Combination Technique, Case Study Sefali Village. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 9(1): 43-56. https://doi.org/10.33409/tbbbd.899746 (In Turkish)
  10. Dede V, Dengiz O, Demirağ Turan İ, Zorlu K, Pacci S & Serin S (2022). Determination of erosion susceptibilities of soils formed on the periglacial landforms of mount Ilgar and its estimation using artificial neural network (ANN). International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE) 47: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.1097942 (In Turkish)
  11. Delgado D, Sadaoui M, Ludwig W & Mendez W (2023). Depth of the pedological profile as a conditioning factor of soil erodibility (RUSLE K-Factor) in Ecuadorian basins. Environmental Earth Sciences 82(12): 286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-10944-w
  12. Demirağ Turan İ & Dengiz O (2017). Erosion Risk Prediction Using Multi-Criteria Assessment in Ankara Güvenç Basin. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 23(3): 285-297. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.447600 (In Turkish)
  13. Dotterweich M (2013). The history of human-induced soil erosion: Geomorphic legacies, early descriptions and research, and the development of soil conservation—A global synopsis. Geomorphology 201: 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.07.021
  14. Efthimiou N (2018). The importance of soil data availability on erosion modeling. Catena 165:551–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.03.002
  15. Gao G, Liang Y, Liu J, Dunkerley D & Fu B (2023). A modified RUSLE model to simulate soil erosion under different ecological restoration types in the loess hilly area. International Soil and Water Conservation Research https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.08.007
  16. İmamoğlu A & Dengiz O (2017). Determination of soil erosion risk using RUSLE model and soil organic carbon loss in Alaca catchment (Central Black Sea region, Turkey). Rendiconti Lincei 28(1): 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-016-0556-0
  17. Jackson M L (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
  18. Kamali Saraji M, Streimikiene D & Ciegis R (2022). A novel Pythagorean fuzzy-SWARA-TOPSIS framework for evaluating the EU progress towards sustainable energy development. Environmental monitoring and assessment 194(1): 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09685-9
  19. Keshavarzı A & Sarmadian A (2012). Mapping of spatial distribution of soil salinity and alkalinity in a semi-arid region. Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Land Reclamation 44(1): 3–14
  20. Keršulienė V, Zavadskas E K & Turskis Z (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara). Journal of Business Economics and Management 11(2): 243-258. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.12
  21. Klute A & Dirksen C (1986). Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: Laboratory methods. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 physical and mineralogical methods 5: 687-734
  22. Liebig M A, Varvel G & Doran J (2001). A simple performance-based ındex for assessing multiple agroecosystem functions. Soil and Crop Management 93(2): 313-318. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.932313x
  23. Malczewski J & Rinner C (2015). Multicriteria decision analysis in geographic information science 1:55-77. New York: Springer
  24. Miháliková M & Dengiz O (2019). Towards more effective irrigation water usage by employing land suitability assessment for various irrigation techniques. Irrigation and Drainage 68(4): 617-628. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2349
  25. Mercan Ç (2023). Coğrafi bilgi sistemi ve ahp ile arıcılık faaliyet alanları için arazi uygunluk değerlendirmesi: Bitlis/Türkiye örneği (Land suitability assessment for Apiculture (Beekeeping) activity areas using Geographic Information System and AHP: A Case Study Bitlis/Türkiye, Extended Abstract in English). U. Arı D. / U. Bee J 23(1): 61-77. DOI: 10.31467/uluaricilik.1245078
  26. Pacci S, Saflı M E & Dengiz O (2023). Fuzzy-Analitic Hierarchy Process Approach in Soil Erodibility Studies under SemiHumid Ecological Conditions. COMU Journal of Agriculture Faculty 11(1): 148-165. https://doi.org/10.33202/comuagri.1276110 (In Turkish)
  27. Panagos, P., Meusburger, K., Ballabio, C., Borrelli, P., & Alewell, C. (2014). Soil erodibility in Europe: A high-resolution dataset based on LUCAS. Science of the total environment 479: 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.010
  28. Parlak M, Yiğini Y & Ekinci H (2014). Seasonal Change of Erodibility in the Soils of Çanakkale-Umurbey Plain. COMU Journal of Agriculture Faculty 2(1): 123–131(In Turkish)
  29. Patrono A (1998). Multi-Criteria Analysis and Geographic Information Systems: Analysis of Natural Areas and Ecological Distributions. Multicriteria Analysis for Land-Use Management, Edited by Euro Beinat and Peter Nijkamp, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Environment and Management 9: 271-292. AA Dordrecht, TheNetherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9058-7_15
  30. Peng X & Yang Y (2016). Pythagorean fuzzy choquet integral based MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst 31 (10): 989–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21814
  31. Perez Rodriguez R, Marques M J & Bienes R (2007). Spatial variability of the soil erodibility parameters and their relation with the soil map at subgroup level. Sci. Total Environ 378 (1e2): 166e173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.044
  32. Pimentel D & Burgess M (2013). Soil erosion threatens food production. Agriculture 3(3): 443-463. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture3030443
  33. Pirmoradian N, Rezaei M, Davatgar N, Tajdari K & Abolpour B (2010). Comparing of interpolation methods in rice cultivation vulnerability mapping due to groundwater quality in Guilan, north of Iran. International Conference on Environmental Engineering and Applications (ICEEA) 147–150. Singapore
  34. Pontes S F, Silva Y J A B D, Martins V, Boechat C L, Araújo A S F, Dantas J S & Barbosa R S (2022). Prediction of Soil Erodibility by Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy in a Neotropical Dry Forest Biome. Land 11(12): 2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122188
  35. Rani P, Mishra A R, Mardani A, Cavallaro F, Štreimikienė D & Khan S A R (2020). Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA–VIKOR framework for performance evaluation of solar panel selection. Sustainability 12(10): 4278. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104278
  36. Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A, McCool D K & Yoder D C (1997). Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). USDA Agriculture Handbook 703. USDA, Washington, DC, USA
  37. Saeidi P, Mardani A, Mishra A R, Cajas V E C & Carvajal M G (2022). Evaluate sustainable human resource management in the manufacturing companies using an extended Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-TOPSIS method. Journal of Cleaner Production 370: 133380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133380
  38. Saygın S D, Basaran M, Ozcan A U, Dolarslan M, Timur O B, Yilman F E & Erpul G (2011). Land degradation assessment by geo-spatially modeling different soil erodibility equations in a semi-arid catchment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 180: 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1782-z
  39. Teegavarapu R & Chandramouli V (2005). Improved weighting methods, deterministic and stochastic data-driven models for estimation of missing precipitation records. J Hydrol 312: 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.015
  40. Valkanou,K, Karymbalis E, Papanastassiou D, Soldati M, Chalkias C & GakiPapanastassiouK (2021). Assessment of Neotectonic Landscape Deformation in Evia Island, Greece, Using GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Analysis. ISPRS Int. J. Geo.-Inf. 10: 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10030118
  41. Wilding L P (1985). Spatial variability: its documentation, accomodation and implication to soil surveys. In Soil spatial variability 166-194
  42. Wischmeier W H& Smith D D (1965). Predicting Rainfall-Erosion Losses from Cropland East of the Rocky Mountains. USDA, Washington, DC, USA
  43. Wischmeier W H& Smith D D (1978). Predicting rainfall erosion losses. USDA, Washington, DC, USA Wu SJ& Wei GW (2017). Pythagorean fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Knowledge-based Intell. Eng. Syst 21: 189–201. DOI: 10.3233/KES-170363
  44. Yager R R (2013). Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 22(4): 958–965. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
  45. Yang D, Kanae S, Oki T, Koike T& Musiake K (2003). Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes. Hydrol. Process 17: 2913–2928. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1441
  46. Zadeh L A (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control 8(3): 338-353
  47. Zavadskas E K, Čereška A, Matijošius J, Rimkus A & Bausys R (2019). Internal Combustion engine analysis of energy ecological parameters by neutrosophic MULTIMOORA and SWARA methods. Energies 12(8): 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081415
  48. Zhang H, Zhang J, Zhang S, Yu C, Sun R, Wang D, Zhu C& Zhang J (2020). Identification of Priority Areas for Soil and Water Conservation Planning Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Using Choquet Integral. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17: 1331
  49. Zhang X& Xu Z (2014). Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst 29 (12): 1061–1078. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/int.21676