SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 32 Issue: 2

Urban Expansion and the Future of Agricultural Land in Adapazari, Türkiye: Integrating LPIS Data with CA-Markov Modeling

Selin Yıldız Görentaş(KİLİS 7 ARALIK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5497-0967
Ahmet Gül(KİLİS 7 ARALIK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2975-1388
Mehmet Fatih Döker(SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0414-0428
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The model achieved a high level of accuracy with an overall agreement of 93% and a strong Kappa coefficient.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Agricultural land is increasingly affected by rapid and uncontrolled urban expansion processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The intensification of land use/land cover (LULC) changes, driving by rising population densities in urban areas, poses significant threats to environmental sustainability and agricultural land resources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The model achieved a high level of accuracy with an overall agreement of 93% and a strong Kappa coefficient.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Urban growth simulation · Land use change · Agricultural land

Abstract

Agricultural land is increasingly affected by rapid and uncontrolled urban expansion processes. The intensification of land use/land cover (LULC) changes, driving by rising population densities in urban areas, poses significant threats to environmental sustainability and agricultural land resources. Focusing on the city of Adapazari, this study aims to simulate future urban growth and assess its potential impact on agricultural land loss by integrating Cellular Automata and Markov Chain (CA-Markov) modeling with Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) data. Using satellite images from 1990, 2005, and 2020, LULC changes were analysed and projected for the years 2035 and 2050. The model achieved a high level of accuracy with an overall agreement of 93% and a strong Kappa coefficient. Simulation results indicate that by 2050, settlement areas could increase by about 82%, primarily at the expense of agricultural land. LPIS-based analysis shows that 3,173 ha of agricultural land, including arable lands, grassland, and hazelnut, are at risk of conversion to urban use. These findings highlight the urgent need for sustainable urban planning policies that protect fertile agricultural land while accommodating urban growth. This research provides valuable insights for decision-makers and urban planners concerned with balancing development and environmental preservation in rapidly urbanizing regions.

🔖

Cite This Article

Görentaş, S. Y., Gül, A., Döker, M. F. (2026). Urban Expansion and the Future of Agricultural Land in Adapazari, Türkiye: Integrating LPIS Data with CA-Markov Modeling. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 32 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1789242

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (92)

  1. Agapiou A, Alexakis D D, Lysandrou V, Sarris A, Cuca B, Themistocleous K & Hadjimitsis D G (2015). Impact of urban sprawl to cultural heritage monuments: The case study of Paphos area in Cyprus. Journal of Cultural Heritage 16(5): 671-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2014.12.006
  2. Aghajani H, Sarkari F & Fattahi Moghaddam M (2024). Predicting land use/land cover changes using CA-Markov and LCM models in the metropolitan area of Mashhad, Iran. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 10: 7079–7096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-024-02051-x
  3. Ahmed B, Ahmed R & Zhu X (2013). Evaluation of model validation techniques in land cover dynamics. ISPRS International Journal of Geo Information 2(3): 577-597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi2030577
  4. Arsanjani J J, Kainz W & Mousivand A J (2011). Tracking dynamic land-use change using spatially explicit Markov Chain based on cellular automata: the case of Tehran. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion 2(4): 329-345. 10.1080/19479832.2011.605397
  5. Aydın Ş & Şentürk M (2017). The reproduction of space, urban entrepreneurship and the sociospatial segregation in new city centers: The case of Tekirdağ Süleymanpaşa. Sosyal Bilimler Metinleri 2: 45-57. (In Turkish).
  6. Ayhan F (2023). Effects of highway projects on spatial change and development: Sakarya section of northern Marmara Highway. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi 21 (1): 121-152. (In Turkish). 10.33688/aucbd.1236477
  7. Babalola K H, Hull S & Whittal J (2023). Assessing peri-urban land management using 8Rs framework of responsible land management: The case of peri-urban land in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Land 12(9): 1795. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12091795
  8. Babalola K H, Hull S & Whittal J (2025). Peri-urban land administration and management: understanding the challenges in Ekiti state, Nigeria, using case study and soft systems methodologies. Survey review 57(401): 120-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2024.2370598
  9. Bailly S, Giordano S, Landrieu L & Chehata N. (2018). Crop-rotation structured classification using multi-source Sentinel images and LPIS for crop type mapping. IGARSS 2018-2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Valencia, Spain. retaining urban
  10. Balta S & Atik M (2022). Rural planning guidelines for urban-rural transition zones as a tool for the protection of rural landscape characters and sprawl: Antalya https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106144 case from Mediterranean. Land Use Policy 119: 106144.
  11. Bayar R (2018). In terms of land use change in agricultural areas in Turkey. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi 16 (2): 187-200. (In Turkish).
  12. Berberoğlu S, Akın A & Clarke K C (2016). Cellular automata modeling approaches to forecast urban growth for adana, Turkey: A comparative approach. Landscape and urban planning 153: 11-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.017
  13. Blaschke T (2010). Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 65(1): 2-16
  14. Bren D’amour C, Reitsma F, Baiocchi G, Barthel S, Güneralp B, Erb K-H, Haberl H, Creutzig F & Seto K C (2017). Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(34): 8939-8944. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606036114
  15. Bruegmann R (2005). Sprawl: A compact history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  16. Ceylan E (2024). Food security in the context of sustainable urbanization: The case of Sakarya Province. Uluslararası Akademik Birikim Dergisi 7 (3): 438-465. (In Turkish).
  17. Chen X, He X & Wang S (2022). Simulated validation and prediction of land use under multiple scenarios in Daxing District, Beijing, China, Based on GeoSOS-FLUS Model. Sustainability(14): 11428. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811428
  18. Collins M G, Steiner F R & Rushman M J (2001). Land-use suitability analysis in the United States: historical development and promising technological achievements. Environmental Management 28: 611-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010247
  19. Dekolo S, Ekum M I, James O K, Aigbavboa C & Gumbo T (2025). Safeguarding rural-urban linkages: modeling drivers of peri-urban sprawl and impacts on ecosystem services. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 7: 1535619. doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2025.1535619
  20. Döker M F & Gül A (2019). Monitoring urban growth and land use change detection in Adapazarı (1985-2019). Türk Coğrafya Dergisi 73: 67-78. (In Turkish). 10.17211/tcd.616796
  21. Döker M F, Yıldız Görentaş S & Gül A. (2022). Predicting future urban growth pattern of Adapazari by using CA-Markov model. VIII. Remote Sensing-GIS Symposium, Ankara. (In Turkish).
  22. Eastman J R (2009). IDRISI Taiga guide to GIS and image processing. Clark Labs Clark University, Worcester, MA.
  23. Foley J A, Defries R, Asner G P, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter S R, Chapin F S, Coe M T, Daily G C & Gibbs H K (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734): 570-574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772
  24. Gandharum L, Hartono D M, Karsidi A, Ahmad M, Prihanto Y, Mulyono S, Sadmono H, Sanjaya H, Sumargana L & Alhasanah F (2024). Past and future land use change dynamics: Assessing the impact of urban development on agricultural land in the Pantura Jabar region, Indonesia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 196(7): 645. doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12819-4
  25. Gedikli B (2005). Urbanization and land-use planning in Adapazari (Turkey) reconsidered after the 1999 earthquake. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20(1): 79-91.
  26. Ghosh P, Mukhopadhyay A, Chanda A, Mondal P, Akhand A, Mukherjee S, Nayak S, Ghosh S, Mitra D & Ghosh T (2017). Application of Cellular Automata and Markov-chain model in geospatial environmental modeling-A review. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 5: 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2017.01.005
  27. Gidey E, Dikinya O, Sebego R, Segosebe E & Zenebe A (2017). Cellular Automata and Markov Chain (CA_Markov) model-based predictions of future land use and land cover scenarios (2015–2033) in Raya, northern Ethiopia. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 3: 1245 1262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0397-6
  28. Gilbert K M & Shi Y (2023). Urban growth monitoring and prediction using remote sensing urban monitoring indices approach and integrating CA-Markov model: A case study of Lagos city, Nigeria. Sustainability 16(1): 30. doi.org/10.3390/su16010030 Glaeser E L & Kahn M E (2004). ‘Sprawl and urban growth’, Henderson J V, Thisse J F (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics, Elsevier, Vol. 4, 2481-2527.
  29. Gül A, Döker M F & Aslan F (2024). Monitoring the urban growth process in Manisa (1990-2022). lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education 52: 96-121. (In Turkish). http://dx.doi.org/10.32003/igge.1449012
  30. Haack B N & Rafter A (2006). Urban growth analysis and modeling in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Habitat International, 30(4): 1056-1065.
  31. Halmy M W A, Gessler P E, Hicke J A & Salem B B (2015). Land use/land cover change detection and prediction in the north-western coastal desert of Egypt using Markov-CA. Applied Geography 63: 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.06.015
  32. Hamad R, Balzter H & Kolo K (2018). Predicting land use/land cover changes using a CA-Markov model under two different scenarios. Sustainability 10(10): 3421. 10.3390/su10103421
  33. Harini R, Rijanta R, Pangaribowo E, Putri R & Sukri I (2025). Modeling the effects of land use change on agricultural carrying capacity and food security. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management 11(2): 533-554. 10.22034/gjesm.2025.02.10
  34. Hayır M & Akyol M (2009). Disaster housing and effects on the development of the Adapazarı City. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi 14 (22): 125 145. (In Turkish).
  35. Hussain S, Mubeen M, Nasim W, Mumtaz F, Abdo H G, Mostafazadeh R & Fahad S (2024). Assessment of future prediction of urban growth and climate change in district Multan, Pakistan using CA-Markov method. Urban Climate 53: 101766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101766
  36. IDB (2025). Sakarya local climate change adaptation strategy and action plan (2025-2035). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change (In Turkish). https://iklim.gov.tr/db/turkce/dokumanlar/sakarya-yerel--8230-3148-20250311112709.pdf
  37. Ikiel C, Dutucu A A, Ustaoglu B & Kilic D E (2012). Land use and land cover (LULC) classification using Spot-5 image in the Adapazari Plain and its surroundings, Turkey. Tojsat 2(2): 37-42.
  38. Isinkaralar O (2024). A methodological benchmark in determining the urban growth: spatiotemporal projections for Eskişehir, Türkiye. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 17: 1485-1495.
  39. Isinkaralar O, Varol C & Yilmaz D (2022). Digital mapping and predicting the urban growth: integrating scenarios into cellular automata— Markov chain modeling. Applied Geomatics 14(4): 695-705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00464-w
  40. Karakuzulu Z, Arici F & Dogan S (2020). Spatial development of Adapazarı City (Turkey) after the 1999 earthquake (1999–2017). Arabian Journal of Geosciences 13: 1-10. doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06212-x
  41. Karimi F & Sultana S (2024). Urban expansion prediction and land use/land cover change modeling for sustainable urban development. Sustainability 16(6): 2285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062285
  42. Kaya Ö & Toroğlu E (2015). Monitoring urban development of Kayseri and change detection analysis. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi 65: 87-96. (In Turkish). http://dx.doi.org/10.17211/tcd.37722
  43. Khawaldah H, Farhan I & Alzboun N (2020). Simulation and prediction of land use and land cover change using GIS, remote sensing and CA Markov model. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management 6(2): 215-232. 10.22034/gjesm.2020.02.07
  44. Kisamba F C & Li F (2023). Analysis and modelling urban growth of Dodoma urban district in Tanzania using an integrated CA–Markov model. GeoJournal 88(1): 511-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10617-4
  45. Kouemou G L & Dymarski D P (2011). ‘History and theoretical basics of hidden Markov models’, Dymarski P (Ed.), Hidden Markov models, theory and applications, Vol. 1, 1-300.
  46. Kristy G (2018). The impact of urban sprawl on cultural heritage in Herat, Afghanistan: A GIS analysis. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 11: e00086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2018.e00086 Kundu K, Halder P & Mandal J K (2021). Detection and prediction of sundarban reserve forest using the CA-Markov chain model and remote sensing data. Earth Science Informatics 14(3): 1503-1520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00648-9
  47. Kurt S & Duman E (2016). The temporal change of the effects on land use and geomorphological units of urban development process in Sakarya Province. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi 34: 268-282. (In Turkish).
  48. Lun N S, Chaudhary S & Ninsawat S (2023). Assessment of machine learning methods for urban types classification using integrated SAR and optical images in Nonthaburi, Thailand. Sustainability 15(2): 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021051
  49. Mansour S, Al-Belushi M & Al-Awadhi T (2020). Monitoring land use and land cover changes in the mountainous cities of Oman using GIS and CA-Markov modelling techniques. Land use policy 91: 104414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104414
  50. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2014). Land parsel identification system. (In Turkish) https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/TRGM.
  51. Molla M B, Gelebo G & Girma G (2024). Urban expansion and agricultural land loss: a GIS-Based analysis and policy implications in Hawassa city, Ethiopia. Frontiers in Environmental Science 12: 1499804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1499804
  52. Mortoja M G, Yigitcanlar T & Mayere S (2020). What is the most suitable methodological approach to demarcate peri-urban areas? A systematic review of the literature. Land use policy 95: 104601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104601 Mubako S, Nnko H J, Peter K H & Msongaleli B (2022). Evaluating historical and predicted long-term land use/land-cover change in Dodoma Urban District, Tanzania: 1992–2029. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 128: 103205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2022.103205
  53. Nasar-U-Minallah M, Zia S, Rahman A-U & Riaz O (2021). Spatio-temporal analysis of urban expansion and future growth patterns of Lahore, Pakistan. Geography, Environment, Sustainability 14(3): 41-53. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2020-215
  54. Nasehi S, Imanpour Namin A & Salehi E (2019). Simulation of land cover changes in urban area using CA-MARKOV model (case study: zone 2 in Tehran, Iran). Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 5: 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0527-9
  55. Nuhu S (2019). Peri-urban land governance in developing countries: Understanding the role, interaction and power relation among actors in Tanzania. Urban Forum 30(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-018-9339-2
  56. OSM (2021). OpenStreetMap. https://www.openstreetmap.org/
  57. Öncel H & Levend S (2023). The effects of urban growth on natural areas: the three metropolitan areas in Türkiye. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 195(7): 816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11383-7
  58. Önkol C & Mentese S (2023). Determining the temporal change in land use using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System techniques: Pamukova (Sakarya) case (1984-2022). Ege Coğrafya Dergisi 32 (2): 343-359. (In Turkish). 10.51800/ecd.1269765
  59. Paul S, Rout S, Behera R N & Mallick S K (2025). How is peri-urban research evolved towards sustainable urban planning in last five decades: a quantitative analysis and systematic review. Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning 3(1): 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44243-025-00070-5
  60. Pontius Jr R G (2002). Statistical methods to partition effects of quantity and location during comparison of categorical maps at multiple resolutions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68(10): 1041
  61. Pontius Jr R G & Millones M (2011). Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. International Journal of Remote Sensing 32(15): 4407-4429. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.552923
  62. Reumaux R, Chopin P, Bergkvist G, Watson C A & Öborn I (2023). Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) data allows identification of crop sequence patterns and diversity in organic and conventional farming systems. European Journal of Agronomy 149: 126916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126916
  63. Rimal B, Sloan S, Keshtkar H, Sharma R, Rijal S & Shrestha U B (2020). Patterns of historical and future urban expansion in Nepal. Remote Sensing 12(4): 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040628
  64. Rimal B, Zhang L, Keshtkar H, Wang N & Lin Y (2017). Monitoring and modeling of spatiotemporal urban expansion and land-use/landcover change using integrated Markov chain cellular automata model. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 6(9): 288. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6090288
  65. Rimal B, Zhang L, Stork N, Sloan S & Rijal S (2018). Urban expansion occurred at the expense of agricultural lands in the Tarai region of Nepal from 1989 to 2016. Sustainability 10(5): 1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051341
  66. Saaty R W (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling 9(3-5): 161-176
  67. Saaty T L (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences 1(1): 83-98
  68. Sahana M, Ravetz J, Patel P P, Dadashpoor H & Follmann A (2023). Where is the peri-urban? A systematic review of peri-urban research and approaches for its identification and demarcation worldwide. Remote Sensing 15(5): 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15051316
  69. Salem M, Ravetz J, Divigalpitiya P, Rajan S C & Sahana M (2025a). Land-use management in peri-urban areas. 7: 1586052. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2025.1586052
  70. Salem M, Ravetz J, Sareen S, Dong T, Haque M, Bayoumi W, Tsurusaki N & Xu G (2025b). Managing the urban-rural transition: A review of approaches and policies for peri-urban land use. Journal of Urban Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2025.04.006
  71. Salem M & Tsurusaki N (2024). Impacts of rapid urban expansion on peri-urban landscapes in the Global South: Insights from landscape metrics in Greater Cairo. Sustainability 16(6): 2316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062316
  72. Salem M, Tsurusaki N & Divigalpitiya P (2020). Remote sensing-based detection of agricultural land losses around Greater Cairo since the Egyptian revolution of 2011. Land use policy 97: 104744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104744
  73. Salem M, Tsurusaki N, Xu X & Xu G (2024). Revealing the transformation of spatial structure of greater Cairo: insights from satellite imagery and geospatial metrics. Journal of Urban Management 13(4): 565-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2024.10.008
  74. SBB (2025). Sakarya Metropolitan Municipality https://www.sakarya.bel.tr/uploads/stratejik/NaNCU6FUbK.pdf 2025-2029 strategic plan (In Turkish).
  75. Schaak H, Bommarco R, Hansson H, Kuns B & Nilsson P (2023). Long-term trends in functional crop diversity across Swedish farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 343: 108269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108269 Shaw B J, Van Vliet J & Verburg P H (2020). The peri-urbanization of Europe: A systematic review of a multifaceted process. Landscape and Urban Planning 196: 103733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103733
  76. Shi Z, Liu M, Tian G & Kovács K F (2024). Web of science-based literature review of peri-urban areas: a comparison between Europe and China. European Journal of Remote Sensing 57(1): 2414475. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2024.2414475
  77. Singh B, Venkatramanan V & Deshmukh B (2022). Monitoring of land use land cover dynamics and prediction of urban growth using Land Change Modeler in Delhi and its environs, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29(47): 71534-71554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20900-z
  78. Siragusa A, Melchiorri M, Pesaresi M & Kemper T (2016). Atlas of the human planet 2016 – Mapping human presence on Earth with the global human settlement layer. Publications Office.
  79. Şimşek F F & Durduran S S (2023). Land cover classification using Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) data and open source Eo-Learn library. Geocarto International 38(1): 2146760. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2146760
  80. Tayebi S, Alavi S A, Esfandi S, Meshkani L & Shamsipour A (2023). Evaluation of land use efficiency in Tehran’s expansion between 1986 and 2021: Developing an assessment framework using DEMATEL and interpretive structural modeling methods. Sustainability 15(4): 3824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043824
  81. Tesfay S M, Gebregiorgis G A & Ayele D G (2025). Peri-Urban Land Transformation in the Global South: Revisiting Conceptual Vectors and Theoretical Perspectives. Land 14(7): 1483. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071483
  82. Tuncel M (2018). ‘“Adapazarı”’ TDV Islamic Encyclopedia, Ankara, Vol. 1, 354-355. (In Turkish). https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/adapazari
  83. Ugalde-Monzalvo M (2024). Sustainable urban growth patterns based on environmental fitness. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 6: 1382180. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2024.1382180
  84. USGS (2021). Earth Explorer. earthexplorer.usgs.gov
  85. Üzülmez M & Yılmaz A (2021). The effect of spatial development of Turgutlu City on agricultural lands. Ege Coğrafya Dergisi 30(1): 73-83. (In Turkish). 10.51800/ecd.875778
  86. Wilson E H, Hurd J D, Civco D L, Prisloe M P & Arnold C (2003). Development of a geospatial model to quantify, describe and map urban growth. Remote Sensing of Environment 86(3): 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00074-9
  87. Woiwode C, Ramachandran A, Philip T, Rishika D & Rajan S C (2024). Identifying entry points for adaptive governance in peri-urban Chennai (India): a multi-dimensional, multi-level, and multi-scalar approach. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 6: 1368240. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2024.1368240
  88. Yakup A E & Ayazlı İ E (2021). Creating a land cover change simulation model with SLEUTH, the case of Istanbul Province. Türkiye Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Dergisi 3(1): 40-47. (In Turkish).
  89. Yang C, Zhai H, Fu M, Zheng Q & Fan D (2024). Multi-scenario simulation of land system change in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area based on a Cellular Automata–Markov Model. Remote Sensing 16(9): 1512. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16091512
  90. Yıldız Görentaş S & Sargın S (2021). Spatial impacts of urban growth on the Mersin, Tarsus, and Adana lines. Coğrafya Dergisi 43: 127-142. (In Turkish). 10.26650/JGEOG2021-936379
  91. Yulu A & Doldur H (2023). Urban development and spatial changes in Iğdır. Journal of Geography 46: 1-18. (In Turkish). https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2023-1090739
  92. Zhang Z, Hu B, Jiang W & Qiu H (2021). Identification and scenario prediction of degree of wetland damage in Guangxi based on the CA Markov model. Ecological Indicators 127: 107764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107764