Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 32 Issue: 2

The Expert System Approach in Dairy Farm Design

Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results demonstrate that ADDF significantly reduces design time, improves decision-making in herd housing and infrastructure planning, and supports animal welfare-focused design principles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ensuring animal welfare, labor efficiency, and sustainable productivity in dairy farms requires barn and facility designs that are compatible with herd structure and animal behaviour.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Each module operates with clearly defined input-output relationships, and the system was implemented as a desktop application using Visual Basic 6.0.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results demonstrate that ADDF significantly reduces design time, improves decision-making in herd housing and infrastructure planning, and supports animal welfare-focused design principles.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dairy cattle · Animal welfare · Farm designing

Abstract

Ensuring animal welfare, labor efficiency, and sustainable productivity in dairy farms requires barn and facility designs that are compatible with herd structure and animal behaviour. The aim of this study is to present the development of an expert system called the Architectural Designing of Dairy Farms (ADDF), designed to automate and support the architectural planning process of dairy cattle operations. The system is based on ten modules encompassing herd size estimation, group management, and architectural layout of pens and service structures. Each module operates with clearly defined input-output relationships, and the system was implemented as a desktop application using Visual Basic 6.0. User-defined parameters, including the number of mature cows and milking shift length, allow for dynamic scenario analysis across different herd sizes and farm management strategies. A hypothetical case involving 250 dairy cows and a 3-hour milking shift was used to validate the model, and architectural plans were generated using AutoCAD. The results demonstrate that ADDF significantly reduces design time, improves decision-making in herd housing and infrastructure planning, and supports animal welfare-focused design principles. The system offers a flexible and practical tool to improve the efficiency of dairy farm design processes, with potential for integration into future smart farming systems.

🔖

Cite This Article

Alkan, İ., Ünal, B. (2026). The Expert System Approach in Dairy Farm Design. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 32 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1748223

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. AgSource Cooperative Services (2006). P.O. Box 930230. Verona, WI 53593. Phone: 608-845-1900 Fax: 608845-1999. agsource.crinet.com/. Accessed July 20, 2017
  2. Alkan İ (2017). Development of an expert system for the architectural design of dairy cattle farms (Doctoral dissertation, Ege University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences). İzmir, Turkey. (In Turkish).
  3. Alkan İ & Akyüz Y (2024). Advantages of using expert systems to project dairy cattle farms: Case study of Menemen, Turkey. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 34(2): 476–484. https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2024.2.0733
  4. Arulmozhi E, Deb N C, Tamrakar N, Kang D Y, Kang M Y, Kook J, Basak J K & Kim H T (2024). From reality to virtuality: Revolutionizing livestock farming through digital twins. Agriculture 14(12): 2231. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122231
  5. Autodesk (2017). AutoCAD 2017 User Guide. Autodesk Inc., San Rafael, CA, USA. Berckmans D (2017). General https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2017.0102 introduction to precision livestock farming. Animal Frontiers, 7(1): 6–11.
  6. Bewley J, Palmer R W & Jackson‑Smith D B (2001). A comparison of free‑stall barns used by modernized Wisconsin dairies. Journal of Dairy Science, 84(2), 528–541. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74504-3
  7. Brouk M J, Smith J F & Harner JP (2003). Effect of feed line barrier on feed intake and milk production of dairy cattle. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Dairy Housing Conference:192-198. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.11621
  8. Cook NB & Nordlund KV (2004). Behavioral needs of the transition cow and considerations for special needs facility design. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 20(3): 495–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2004.06.011
  9. Cook N B & Nordlund KV (2009). The influence of the environment on dairy cow behavior, claw health and herd lameness dynamics. The Veterinary Journal 179(3): 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.09.016
  10. Cook NB (2009). Free-stall design for maximum cow comfort. WCDS Advances in Dairy Technology 21: 255–268 De Vries A (2020). Symposium review: Why revisit dairy cattle productive lifespan? Journal of Dairy Science 103(4): 3838–3845. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17361
  11. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin-Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortázar Schmidt C, Herskin M, Michel V, Miranda Chueca MÁ, Padalino B, Roberts HC, Spoolder H, Stahl K, Velarde A, Viltrop A, De Boyer des Roches A, Bak Jensen M, Mee J, Green M, Thulke H-H, Bailly-Caumette E, Candiani D, Lima E, Van der Stede Y & Winckler C (2023). Welfare of dairy cows. EFSA Journal 21(5): e07993. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7993
  12. Gieseke D, Lambertz C & Gauly M (2022). Effects of housing and management factors on selected indicators of the Welfare Quality® protocol in loose-housed dairy cows. Veterinary Sciences, 9(7): 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9070353
  13. Graves RE, Engle R & Tyson JT (2006). Design information for housing special dairy cows. Paper No: 064034, ASABE Annual International Meeting, 9 - 12 July, St. Joseph, Michigan.
  14. Holmes B, Cook N, Funk T, Graves R, Kammel D, Reinemann DJ, & Zulovich JM (2013). Dairy freestall housing and equipment. Midwest Plan Service: Ames, IA, USA.
  15. Kaur U, Malacco VMR, Bai H, Price TP, Datta A, Xin L, Sen S, Nawrocki RA, Chiu G, Sundaram S, Min BC, Daniels KM, White RR, Donkin SS, Brito LF & Voyles RM (2023). Invited review: Integration of technologies and systems for precision animal agriculture—a case study on precision dairy farming. Journal of Animal Science 101: skad206. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skad206
  16. Kammel DW & Graves RE (2007). Planning and design considerations for transition and special needs cow housing. Sixth International Dairy Housing Conference, 16-18 June, St. Joseph, Mich.: ASABE.
  17. Karmakar S, Laguë C, Agnew J & Landry H (2007). Integrated decision support system (DSS) for manure management: A review and perspective. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 57(2): 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.03.006
  18. MWPS (1997). Dairy Freestall Housing and Equipment. MWPS-7. Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department, 122 Davidson Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3080.
  19. Nordlund K, Cook N & Oetzel G (2006). Commingling dairy cows: Pen moves, stocking density, and health. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners:36–42. St. Paul, MN. Olgun M (2016). Agricultural structures (Publication No. 1577). Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture. (In Turkish).
  20. Pettersson K, Svensson C & Liberg P (2001). Housing, feeding and management of calves and replacement heifers in Swedish dairy herds. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 42: 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-42-465 United
  21. Rotz CA, Corson MS, Chianese DS, Montes F, Hafner SD, Jarvis R & Coiner CU (2011). The Integrated Farm System Model: Reference manual. States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/19020000/ifsmreference.pdf (4 February 2012)
  22. Samer M (2008). An expert system for planning and designing dairy farms in hot climates (Doctoral dissertation, University of Hohenheim, Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Livestock Systems Engineering). Beirut.
  23. Smith JF, Harner JP & Brouk MJ (2001). EP 100. Special needs facilities: Recommendations for housing for pregnant, lactating, and sick cows (EP 100). Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, Manhattan, KS. Retrieved from https://bookstore.ksre.ksu.edu/pubs/special-needs-facilities-recommendations-for-housing-for pregnant-lactating-and-sick cows_EP100.pdf
  24. Tucker CB, Jensen MB, de Passillé AM, Hänninen L & Rushen J (2021). Invited review: Lying time and the welfare of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(1): 20–46. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-18074