Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 32 Issue: 3

Micro- and Nanoplastic Effects on Nematodes: A Systematic Review of Toxicity Mechanisms, Exposure Characteristics, and Soil Ecological Implications

Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Addressing these limitations will be critical for refining terrestrial risk frameworks and clarifying the long term implications of plastic contamination for soil ecosystem functioning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) are now widely recognized as pervasive contaminants in terrestrial ecosystems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To achieve this, we followed PRISMA guidelines and screened 251 records retrieved from the Web of Science and Scopus databases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Addressing these limitations will be critical for refining terrestrial risk frameworks and clarifying the long term implications of plastic contamination for soil ecosystem functioning.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Microplastics · Nanoplastics · Nematodes

Abstract

Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) are now widely recognized as pervasive contaminants in terrestrial ecosystems. However, their effects on soil nematodes remain largely confined to dispersed experimental studies, resulting in a fragmented evidence base that necessitates integrative synthesis. In this review, we consolidate current knowledge on the biological and ecological consequences of MNP exposure in nematodes, with particular emphasis on agricultural and greenhouse soil environments where plastic inputs are especially intensive. To achieve this, we followed PRISMA guidelines and screened 251 records retrieved from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. After duplicate removal and eligibility assessment, 166 studies were retained for qualitative evaluation, of which 154 provided extractable experimental datasets suitable for comparative analysis. Species representation revealed a pronounced taxonomic skew, with Caenorhabditis elegans serving as the dominant experimental model in more than 150 studies. In contrast, other free-living and entomopathogenic nematodes were only sporadically investigated. Exposure characterization further demonstrated a strong reliance on polystyrene (PS)-based materials, with both micro- and nanopolystyrene frequently employed in experimental designs, followed by polyethylene (PE) as the second most studied polymer. Particle size distributions showed a marked bias toward nanoscale fractions—most commonly around ~100 nm—whereas larger microplastics more representative of soil contamination profiles were comparatively underexplored. Reported exposure concentrations spanned a wide gradient, ranging from environmentally relevant µg L⁻¹ levels to elevated mechanistic doses designed to elicit toxic responses. Across studies, recurring toxicological outcomes included oxidative stress induction, intestinal injury, neurotoxicity, reproductive impairment, and transgenerational effects mediated through epigenetic pathways. Toxicity was often intensified by environmental aging processes, polymer-specific chemistry, and interactions with co-occurring contaminants. Taken together, the available evidence indicates that although mechanistic understanding of MNP toxicity in nematodes has advanced substantially, significant gaps persist in ecological realism, polymer diversity, and multi-species soil assessments. Addressing these limitations will be critical for refining terrestrial risk frameworks and clarifying the long term implications of plastic contamination for soil ecosystem functioning.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gundogdu, S., Uludamar, E. B. K., Dişkaya, S. V., Avcıoğlu, S., Elekcioğlu, İ. H. (2026). Micro- and Nanoplastic Effects on Nematodes: A Systematic Review of Toxicity Mechanisms, Exposure Characteristics, and Soil Ecological Implications. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 32 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1886411

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. Ali S S, Elsamahy T, Al-Tohamy R, Zhu D, Mahmoud Y A G, Koutra E, Metwally M A, Kornaros M & Sun J (2021). Plastic wastes biodegradation: mechanisms, challenges and future prospects. Science of The Total Environment 780: 146590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146590
  2. Akca M O (2025). Microplastic accumulation in soils around open dumping and scrapyard sites in Türkiye. Soil Use and Management 41(1): e70021. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.70021
  3. Akca M O, Gündoğdu S, Akca H, Delialioğlu R A, Aksit C, Turgay O C & Harada N (2024). An evaluation on microplastic accumulations in Turkish soils under different land uses. Science of The Total Environment 911, 168609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168609
  4. Bläsing M & Amelung W (2018). Plastics in soil: Analytical methods and possible sources. Science of the Total Environment 612: 422-435.
  5. Boctor J, Hoyle F C, Farag M A, Ebaid M, Walsh T, Whiteley A S & Murphy D V (2025). Microplastics and NPs: fate, transport, and governance from agricultural soil to food webs and humans. Environmental Sciences Europe 37: 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025 01104-x
  6. Bongers T & Ferris H (1999). Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in environmental monitoring. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14(6): 224–228
  7. Chen H, Chen X, Ding P, Gu Y, Jiang Y, Li X, Hu G, Li L. Wang C, Yu J & Li H (2024a). Photoaging enhances combined toxicity of microplastics and tetrabromobisphenol A by inducing intestinal damage and oxidative stress in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science of the Total Environment 912: 169259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169259
  8. Chen H, Hua X, Yang Y, Wang C, Jin L, Dong C, Chang Z, Ding P, Xiang M, Hui Li & Yu Y (2021). Chronic exposure to UV-aged microplastics induces neurotoxicity by affecting dopamine, glutamate, and serotonin neurotransmission in Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Hazardous Materials 419: 126482. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126482
  9. Chen J, Chen C, Luo Z, Jin X, Chen Y, Wu Q, Gong Z, Yang J, Jiang S, Lin S, Li J, Li F, Wu J, Guo J, Chen X, Lin L, Guo Z, Yu G, Shao W, Wu H & Zheng F (2024b). The role of Sod-2 in different types of neuronal damage and behavioral changes induced by polystyrene nanoplastics in Caenorhabditis elegans. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 288: 117416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117416
  10. Cusworth S J, Davies W J, Mcainsh M R & Stevens C J (2023). A nationwide assessment of microplastic abundance in agricultural soils: The influence of plastic crop covers within the United Kingdom. Plants people planet de Souza Machado A A Kloas W, Zarfl C, Hempel S & Rillig M C (2018). Microplastics as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biology 24(4): 1405-1416. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14020
  11. de Souza Machado A A, Lau C W, Kloas W, Bergmann J, Bachelier J B, Faltin E, Becker R, Görlich A S & Rillig M C (2019). Microplastics can change soil properties and affect plant performance. Environmental Science & Technology 53(10): 6044-6052
  12. Gencer M, Akca M O, Acar M, Abdelrazik Z S, Wahab T S, Gündogdu S & Turgay O C (2026). Microplastic Accumulation and Soil Quality Changes Under Varying Plastic Mulching Durations in the Mediterranean Region. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 1:16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-026-03010-4
  13. Gigault J, ter Halle A, Baudrimont M, Pascal P, Gauffre F, Phi T, El Hadri H, Grassl B & Reynaud S (2021). Current opinion: What is a nanoplastic? Environmental Pollution 279: 116953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.024
  14. Gündoğdu S, Köşker A R, Akça H, Akça M O, Harada N & Turgay O C (2025a). Microplastics in food production and agricultural environments. In Microplastics in Agriculture and Food Science (pp. 285-307). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-22210-8.00022-5
  15. Gündoğu S, Akca M O, Gursoy M, Yılmaz M, Zhang X, Rodrıguez-Seijo A, Bibi A, Di Gioia M L & Velimirovic M (2025b). Microplastics in soil: a comprehensive review of analytical techniques. Frontiers in Soil Science 5: 1614075. doi: 10.3389/fsoil.2025.1614075
  16. Gündoğdu S, Akça M O, Özkan İ, Sarıdaş M A, Küçükel E, Rodríguez-Seijo A, Er E & Turgay O C (2026). A review of non-petroleum alternatives of plastic mulches in agriculture: Knowledge gaps and future recommendations. European Journal of Agronomy 172: 127831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127831
  17. Gündoğdu R, Önder D, Gündoğdu S & Gwinnett C (2022). Plastics derived from disposable greenhouse plastic films and irrigation pipes in agricultural soils: a case study from Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29(58): 87706-87716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21911-6Hu
  18. C & Qi Y C (2010). Abundance and diversity of soil nematodes as influenced by different types of organic manure. Helminthologia 47(1): 58-66. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11687-010-0009-8 leachate
  19. Jaafarzadeh N & Talepour N (2024). Microplastics as carriers of antibiotic resistance genes and pathogens in municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill and soil: A review. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering 22(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-023-00879-6
  20. Kim S W & An Y J (2020). Effects of different microplastics on nematodes. Environmental Science & Technology 54: 13868–13878
  21. Kumar M, Xiong X, He M, Tsang D C W, Gupta J, Khan E, Harrad S, Hou D, Sik Ok Y & Bolan N S (2020). Microplastics as pollutants in agricultural soils. Environmental Pollution 265: 114980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114980
  22. Lee Y K, Yoo H Y, Ko K S, He W, Karanfil T & Hur J (2022). Tracing microplastic (MP)-derived dissolved organic matter in the infiltration of MP-contaminated sand system and its disinfection by products formation. Water resistance 221: 118806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118806
  23. Lei L, Wu S, Lu S, Liu M, Song Y, Fu Z, Shi H, Raley-Susman K M & He D (2018a). Microplastic particles cause intestinal damage in zebrafish and nematodes. Science of the Total Environment 619: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.103
  24. Li H, Gu Y, Jiang Y, Ding P, Chen X, Chen C, Pan R, Shi C, Wang S & Chen H (2024). Environmentally persistent free radicals on photoaged nanopolystyrene induce neurotoxicity by affecting dopamine, glutamate, serotonin and GABA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science of The Total Environment 906: 167684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167684
  25. Li M, Ha B, Li Y, Vrieling K, Fu Z, Yu Q, Rasman S, Wei X & Ruan W (2024). Toxicological impacts of microplastics on virulence, reproduction and physiological process of entomopathogenic nematodes. 273: 116153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116153
  26. Liu H, Zhao Y, Bi K, Rui Q & Wang D (2021). Dysregulated mir-76 mediated a protective response to nanopolystyrene by modulating heme homeostasis related molecular signaling in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 212: 112018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112018 Liu Y, Luo Z, Xiao Y, Li Y, Liu M, Shi Y, Li Z, Lei W, Li C, Jin L N & Yan W (2026). Microplastics in motion: How earthworm guts become microbial gateways through plastic surface dynamics. Environmental Science & Technology 60(1): 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c15257 of
  27. Luo Y, Wang L, Cao T, Chen J, Lv M, Wei S, Lu S & Tian X (2023). Microplastics are transferred by soil fauna and regulate soil function as material carriers. Science of The Total Environment 857(3):159690. Doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159690
  28. Mueller M T, Fueser H, Höss S & Traunspurger W (2020). Species-specific effects of long-term microplastic exposure on the population growth nematodes, with a focus https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106698 on microplastic ingestion. Ecological indicators, 118, 106698.
  29. Oliveira M, Ameixa O M, & Soares A M (2019). Are ecosystem services provided by insects “bugged” by micro (nano) plastics? TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 113: 317-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.02.018
  30. Qu M, Liu Y, Xu K & Wang D (2019). Activation of p38 MAPK signaling‐mediated endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response by nanopolystyrene particles. Advanced Biosystems 3(4): 1800325. DOI: 10.1002/adbi.201800325
  31. Qu M, Xu K, Li Y, Wong G & Wang D (2018). Using acs-22 mutant Caenorhabditis elegans to detect the toxicity of nanopolystyrene particles. Science of the Total Environment 643: 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.173
  32. Pehlivan N, Terzi Y, Gündoğdu S, Öztürk R Ç & Gedik K (2026). Navigating microplastic-induced stress in plants: adaptations from physiology to gene regulation. Plant Molecular Biology 116(1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-025-01669-4
  33. Rillig M C (2012). Microplastic in terrestrial ecosystems and the soil? Environmental Science & Technology 46(12): 6453-6454
  34. Rillig M C, Kim S W & Zhu Y G (2024). The soil plastisphere. Nature Reviews Microbiologyn 22(2): 64-74
  35. Sajjad M, Huang Q, Khan S, Khan M A, Liu Y, Wang J, Lian F, Wang Q & Guo G (2022). Microplastics in the soil environment: A critical review. Environmental Technology & Innovation 27: 102408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102408
  36. Sánchez-Moreno S, Inoshıma M H, Ferrıs H & Jackson L E (2006): Linking soil properties and nematode community composition: effects of soil managementon soil food webs. Nematology 8: 703 – 715. https://doi.org/ 10.1163/156854106778877857
  37. Schöpfer L, Menzel R, Schnepf U, Ruess L, Marhan S, Brümmer F, Pagel H & Kandeler E (2020). Microplastics effects on reproduction and body length of the soil-dwelling nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Frontiers in Environmental Science 8: 41. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00041
  38. Sucharitakul P, Wu W M, Zhang Y, Peng B Y, Gao J, Wang L & Hou D (2024). Exposure pathways and toxicity of microplastics in terrestrial insects. Environmental Science & Technology 58(27): 11887-11900. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c02842
  39. Trojan M, Koutný M, Brtnický M, Holátko J, Zlámalová Gargošová H, Fojt J & Kučerík J (2024). The interaction of microplastics and microbioplastics with soil and a comparison of their potential to spread pathogens. Applied Sciences 14(11): 4643
  40. Wang Y, Nan X, Sun H, Shi Y, Miao J, Li Y, Han X, Zhang N, Wang H, Ren N, Zhao X & Liu B (2024). From insects to mammals! Tissue accumulation and transgenerational transfer of micro/nano-plastics through the food chain. Journal of Hazardous Materials 480: 136424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136424
  41. Wang Z, Li J, Qu Z, Ayurzana B, Zhao G & Li W (2024). Effects of microplastics on the pore structure and connectivity with different soil textures: Based on CT scanning. Environmental Technology & Innovation 36: 103791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2024.103791
  42. Xu G, Li Y, Lin X & Yu Y (2024). Effects and mechanisms of polystyrene micro- and nano-plastics on the spread of antibiotic resistance genes from soil to lettuce. Science of the Total Environment 912: 169293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169293
  43. Yang Y, Wu Q & Wang D (2020). Epigenetic response to nanopolystyrene in germline of nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 206: 111404. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111404
  44. Yang B, Li P, Entemake W, Guo Z & Xue S (2022). Concentration-dependent impacts of microplastics on soil nematode community in bulk soils of maize: evidence from a pot experiment. Frontiers in environmental science. 10, 22. 10:872898. Doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.872898
  45. Yang B, Wu L, Feng W & Lin Q (2024) Global perspective of ecological risk of plastic pollution on soil microbial communities. Front. Microbiol. 15:1468592. Doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1468592
  46. Yeates G W, Ferris H, Moens T & van der Putten W H (2009). Nematodes as environmental indicators (Eds.: Wilson, M. J. and Kakouli Duarte, T.) “The role of nematodes in ecosystems”. 1-44 pp
  47. Yeates G W, Speir T W, Taylor M D, Clucas L & Van Schaik A P (2006). Nematode responses to biosolids incorporation in five soil types. Biology and Fertility of Soils 42(6): 550-555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-005-0050-9
  48. Yue J, He Y, Ma W, Zhao C, Liu Y, Zhang L, Li G & Zhang Y (2026). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mitigate microplastic-induced shifts in soil nematode communities. Applied Soil Ecology 219: 106765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106765
  49. Zaman F, Tasneem F, Shoaib N, Zaib S, Pan Y, Sun X, Tadesse Z, Pan K, Wu X & Zhang L (2026). Selenium-driven trophic restructuring of soil nematode communities and biochemical regulation alleviate the toxicity caused by microplastic pollution in highland barley. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 309: 119673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2026.119673
  50. Zhang X & Ruess L (2025). Microplastics lead to behavioral disorders in soil nematode movement, foraging and food choice. Pedobiologia, 111: 151054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2025.151054