Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 32 Issue: 4

Comparison of Different Lateral Depths and Irrigation Scenarios for Optimal Sorghum Cultivation using HYDRUS-2D

Begüm Polat(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6493-4118
Dursun Büyüktaş(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9130-9112
Jiří šimůnek(University of California Riverside)0000-0002-0166-6563
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that the model provided the most consistent and reliable water content predictions at a soil depth of 40 cm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to evaluate the HYDRUS-2D model’s ability to simulate soil water content in the soil profile under sweet sorghum with drip irrigation at different lateral depths and irrigation levels.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was carried out in Antalya, Turkey, in 2020 and 2021, using a randomized block design with three replications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that the model provided the most consistent and reliable water content predictions at a soil depth of 40 cm.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Subsurface drip irrigation · Optimum lateral depth · Sweet sorghum

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the HYDRUS-2D model’s ability to simulate soil water content in the soil profile under sweet sorghum with drip irrigation at different lateral depths and irrigation levels. It also aims to determine the optimal lateral depth by numerically evaluating various depth scenarios. The study was carried out in Antalya, Turkey, in 2020 and 2021, using a randomized block design with three replications. Three irrigation levels, 33% (S33), 66% (S66), and 100% (S100) of reference evapotranspiration, were applied when cumulative ET₀ reached 25 ± 5 mm. Two lateral depths, 25 cm (D25) and 50 cm (D50), were used. Soil water contents measured at 20, 40, and 60 cm were used in both the calibration and validation phases. To examine the effect of lateral depth on soil water variations, five additional scenarios (20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 cm) were modeled using the same inputs. During the calibration phase, R² values ranged from 0.90 to 0.99, the root mean square errors (RMSEs) from 0.01 to 0.03 cm3 cm-3, and the mean absolute errors (MAEs) from 0.01 to 0.06 cm3 cm-3 at the three depths. It was concluded that the model provided the most consistent and reliable water content predictions at a soil depth of 40 cm. In contrast, no trend was observed during the validation phase, suggesting that the model's prediction accuracy varied with different soil depths. Additionally, model simulations indicated that a 30 cm lateral depth was the most suitable among the evaluated scenarios; however, this result is subject to the assumptions and constraints of the HYDRUS-2D modeling framework, in which only lateral depth was varied while other conditions were held constant.

🔖

Cite This Article

Polat, B., Büyüktaş, D., šimůnek, J. (2026). Comparison of Different Lateral Depths and Irrigation Scenarios for Optimal Sorghum Cultivation using HYDRUS-2D. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 32 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1844333

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (46)

  1. Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D & Smith M (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements (FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  2. Appiah-Nkansah N B, Li J, Rooney W & Wang D (2019). A review of sweet sorghum as a viable renewable bioenergy crop and its techno economic analysis. Renewable Energy 143: 1121–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.066
  3. Arbat G, Cufí S, Duran-Ros M, Pinsach J, Puig-Bargués J, Pujol J & Ramírez de Cartagena F (2020). Modeling approaches for determining dripline depth and irrigation frequency of subsurface drip irrigated rice on different soil textures. Water 12(6): 1724. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061724
  4. Aydinsakir K, Buyuktas D, Dinç N, Erdurmus C, Bayram E & Yegin A B (2021). Yield and bioethanol productivity of sorghum under surface and subsurface drip irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 243: 106452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106452
  5. Belmans C, Wesseling J G & Feddes R A (1983). Simulation model of the water balance of a cropped soil: SWATRE. Journal of Hydrology 63: 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(83)90045-8
  6. Blake G R & Hartge K H (1986). Bulk density. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods (2nd ed., pp. 363–382). American Society of Agronomy; Soil Science Society of America.
  7. Bufon V B, Lascano R J, Bednarz C, Booker J D & Gitz D C (2012). Soil water content on drip irrigated cotton: Comparison of measured and simulated values obtained with the HYDRUS-2D model. Irrigation Science 30(4): 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0279-z
  8. Cote C M, Bristow K L, Charlesworth P B, Cook F J & Thorburn P J (2003). Analysis of soil wetting and solute transport in subsurface trickle irrigation. Irrigation Science 22: 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-003-0080-8
  9. Dehghanisanij H, Haji Agha Bozorgi H & Kanani E (2020). Application of HYDRUS-2D model to investigate soil moisture changes under pistachio trees with subsurface drip irrigation. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 13(6): 1538–1549.
  10. Dhakal M, West C P, Deb S K, Kharel G & Ritchie G L (2019). Field calibration of PR2 capacitance probe in Pullman clay-loam soil of southern high plains. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment 2: 180043. https://doi.org/10.2134/age2018.10.0043
  11. Domínguez-Niño J M, Oliver-Manera J, Arbat G, Girona J & Casadesús J (2020). Analysis of the variability in soil moisture measurements by capacitance sensors in a drip-irrigated orchard. Sensors 20: 5100. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185100
  12. Dukes M D & Scholberg J M (2005). Soil moisture controlled subsurface drip irrigation on sandy soils. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 21(1): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.17916
  13. Elings A (2000). Estimation of leaf area in tropical maize. Agronomy Journal, 92(3): 436–444. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.923436x
  14. Eltarabily M G, Mohamed A Z, Begna S, Wang D, Putnam D H, Scudiero E & Bali K M (2024). Simulated soil water distribution patterns and water use of alfalfa under different subsurface drip irrigation depths. Agricultural Water Management 293: 108693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108693
  15. El-Nesr M N, Alazba A A & Šimůnek J (2014). HYDRUS simulations of the effects of dual-drip subsurface irrigation and a physical barrier on water movement and solute transport in soils. Irrigation Science 32: 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-013-0417-x
  16. Feddes R A, Kowalik P & Zaradny H (1978). Simulation of field water use and crop yield John Wiley & Sons. Gee G W & Bauder J W (1986). Particle-size analysis. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods (2nd ed., pp. 383–411). American Society of Agronomy; Soil Science Society of America.
  17. Ghazouani H, Autovino D, Rallo G, Douh B & Provenzano G (2016). Using HYDRUS-2D model to assess the optimal drip lateral depth for eggplant crop in a sandy loam soil of central Tunisia. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology 1: 47–58. https://doi.org/10.19199/2016.1.2038 5625.047
  18. Güngör Y & Yıldırım O (1989). Field irrigation systems. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publications (In Turkish).
  19. Ismail S M, Zien El-Abedin T K, Wassif M M & El-Nesr M N (2006). Physical and hydraulic barriers under surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems. In: The 14th Annual Conference of Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering (MSAE). 23(4): 1021–1034
  20. Kandelous M M & Šimůnek J (2010). Numerical simulations of water movement in a subsurface drip irrigation system under field and laboratory conditions using HYDRUS-2D. Agricultural Water Management 97(7): 1070–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.02.012
  21. Klute A (1986). Water retention: Laboratory methods. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods (2nd ed., pp. 635–662). American Society of Agronomy; Soil Science Society of America.
  22. Lamm F R, Bordovsky J P, Schwankl L J, Grabow G L, Enciso-Medina J, Peters R T, Colaizzi P. D, Trooien T P & Porter D O (2012). Subsurface drip irrigation: Status of the technology in 2010. Transactions of the ASABE, 55(2): 483–491. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.41387
  23. Legates D R & McCabe G J (1999). Evaluating the use of goodness-of-fit measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research 35(1): 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018
  24. Merrill S D & Rawlins S L (1979). Distribution and growth of sorghum roots in response to irrigation frequency. Agronomy Journal 71(5): 879–883. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1979.00021962007100050009x
  25. Meshkat M, Warner R C & Workman S R (2000). Evaporation reduction potential in an undisturbed soil irrigated with surface and sand tube irrigation. Transactions of the ASAE: 43: 79–86
  26. Moriasi D N, Arnold J G, Van Liew M W, Bingner R L, Harmel R D & Veith T L (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulation. Transactions of the ASABE 50(3): 885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153
  27. Mualem Y (1976). A new model predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research 12(3): 513 522. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513
  28. Mygdakos E, Papanikolaou C & Sakellariou-Makrantonaki M (2009). Sorghum economics under different irrigation methods and water doses. New Medit 8(4): 47–54
  29. Nazari E, Besharat S, Zeinalzadeh K & Mohammadi A (2021). Measurement and simulation of the water flow and root uptake in soil under subsurface drip irrigation of apple tree. Agricultural Water Management 255: 106972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106972
  30. Nazli R I, Aslankaciran C, Yang D, Liaqat W, Polat M, Cavdar A S, Tansi V & Baloch F S (2024). Assessment of sweet sorghum genotypes for bioethanol production potential and bagasse combustion characteristics in a semi-arid Mediterranean climate. Agronomy 14: 2626. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112626
  31. Patel N & Rajput T B S (2008). Dynamics and modeling of soil water under subsurface drip irrigated onion. Agricultural Water Management 95: 1335–1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.06.002
  32. Provenzano G (2007). Using HYDRUS-2D simulation model to evaluate wetted soil volume in subsurface drip irrigation systems. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 133(4): 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:4(342)
  33. Ramos,T B, Šimůnek J, Gonçalves C, Martins J C, Prazeres A & Pereira L S (2012). Two-dimensional modeling of water and nitrogen fate from sweet sorghum irrigated with fresh and blended saline waters. Agricultural Water Management 111: 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.05.007
  34. Reyes-Esteves R G (2019). Modeling approaches for determining appropriate depth of subsurface drip irrigation tubing in alfalfa. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 145(10): 04019021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001409
  35. Richards L A (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils (USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 60). U.S. Department of Agriculture.
  36. Romero P, Botia P & Garcia F (2004). Effects of regulated deficit irrigation under subsurface drip irrigation conditions on water relations of mature almond trees. Plant and Soil 260: 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000030178.24522.b3
  37. Sakaguchi A, Yanai Y & Sasaki H (2019). Subsurface irrigation system design for vegetable production using HYDRUS-2D. Agricultural Water Management, 219: 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.04.003
  38. Sakellariou-Makrantonaki, M, Papalexis, D, Nakos, N, Dassios, S, Chatzinikos A, Papanikos N & Danalatos N (2006). Potential and water limited growth and productivity of fiber sorghum in Central Greece irrigated by surface and subsurface drip methods. In Proceedings of the 2006 IASME/WSEAS International Conference on Energy & Environmental Systems (pp. 49–54).
  39. Sakellariou-Makrantonaki M, Papalexis D, Nakos N & Kalavrouziotis I (2007). Effect of modern irrigation methods on growth and energy production of sweet sorghum (var. Keller) on a dry year in Central Greece. Agricultural Water Management 90(3): 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.03.004
  40. Šimůnek J, Šejna M & van Genuchten M Th (1999). The HYDRUS-2D software package for simulating the two-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably saturated media (Version 2.0). International Ground Water Modeling Center.
  41. Šimůnek J, van Genuchten M Th & Šejna M (2011). The HYDRUS software package for simulating two- and three-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably saturated media: Technical manual (Version 2.0). PC Progress.
  42. Šimůnek J, van Genuchten M Th & Šejna M (2016). Recent developments and applications of the HYDRUS computer software packages. Vadose Zone Journal 15(7): 25. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.04.0033
  43. Šimůnek J, Brunetti G, Jacques D, van Genuchten M Th & Šejna M. (2024). Recent developments and applications of the HYDRUS computer software packages since 2016. Vadose Zone Journal 23(4): e20310. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20310
  44. Skaggs T H, Trout T J, Šimůnek J & Shouse P J (2004). Comparison of HYDRUS-2D simulations of drip irrigation with experimental observations. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 130(4): 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733 9437(2004)130:4(304)
  45. van Genuchten M Th (1980). A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44(5): 892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
  46. Yıldırım O (2013). Design of irrigation systems. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publications (In Turkish).