Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2008 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

Anticoagulant Rodenticide Intoxication in Animals – A Review

Pages
237–243
Publication Date
2008-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The general prophylaxis consists of placing baits out of reach of animals, daily control of baits and dead rodents, which are to be timely removed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The newest measures for the control of harmful rodent populations are from the anticoagulant rodenticide group, which are divided into 2 subgroups: first and second generations, and indandione derivatives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Anticoagulant rodenticides inhibit the enzyme vitamin K-dependent carboxylase and thus impair the reactivation of vitamin K1, indirectly affecting physiological blood coagulation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The general prophylaxis consists of placing baits out of reach of animals, daily control of baits and dead rodents, which are to be timely removed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Intoxication · anticoagulant rodenticides · animals

Abstract

The newest measures for the control of harmful rodent populations are from the anticoagulant rodenticide group, which are divided into 2 subgroups: first and second generations, and indandione derivatives. Non-target organisms are potentially at risk of direct consumption of baits (primary hazard) and of eating poisoned rodents (secondary hazard). Anticoagulant rodenticides inhibit the enzyme vitamin K-dependent carboxylase and thus impair the reactivation of vitamin K1, indirectly affecting physiological blood coagulation. The diagnosis is made on the basis of clinical signs (massive hemorrhages), laboratory findings, and especially the changes in coagulation markers (APTT, PT, TT, PCT, ACT, FDPs, and PIVKA). The specific antidote is vitamin K1. The general prophylaxis consists of placing baits out of reach of animals, daily control of baits and dead rodents, which are to be timely removed.

Özet

The newest measures for the control of harmful rodent populations are from the anticoagulant rodenticide group, which are divided into 2 subgroups: first and second generations, and indandione derivatives. Non-target organisms are potentially at risk of direct consumption of baits (primary hazard) and of eating poisoned rodents (secondary hazard). Anticoagulant rodenticides inhibit the enzyme vitamin K-dependent carboxylase and thus impair the reactivation of vitamin K1, indirectly affecting physiological blood coagulation. The diagnosis is made on the basis of clinical signs (massive hemorrhages), laboratory findings, and especially the changes in coagulation markers (APTT, PT, TT, PCT, ACT, FDPs, and PIVKA). The specific antidote is vitamin K1. The general prophylaxis consists of placing baits out of reach of animals, daily control of baits and dead rodents, which are to be timely removed.

🔖

Cite This Article

VALCHEV, İ., BINEV, R., YORDANOVA, V., NIKOLOV, Y. (2008). Anticoagulant Rodenticide Intoxication in Animals – A Review. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 237–243. https://ajindex.com/articles/122468

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Litovitz, T.L., Klein-Schwartz, W., Dyer, K.S., Shannon, M., Lee, S., Powers, M.:: 1997 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System. Am. J. Emerg. Med., 1998; 16: 443-497.
  2. Maroni, M., Colosio, C., Ferioli, A., Fait, A.: Biological monitoring of pesticide exposure: a review. Toxicology, 2000; 143: 1-118. 3. Morrissey, B., Burgess, J.L, Robertson, W.O.: Washington's experience and recommendations Re: anticoagulant rodenticides. Vet. Hum. Toxicol., 1995; 37: 362-363. 4. Murphy, M.J.: Rodenticides. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract., 2002; 32: 469-484. 5. Dorman, D.C., Simon, J., Harlin, K.A., Buck, W.B.: Diagnosis of bromethalin toxicosis in the dog. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest., 1990; 2: 123-128. 6. Dorman, D.C., Zachary, J.F., Buck, W.B.: Neuropathologic Endepols, S., Klemann, N., Pelz, H.J., Ziebell, K.L.: A scheme for the placement of rodenticide baits for rat eradication on confinement livestock farms. Prev. Vet. Med., 2003; 58: 115- 123. Fournier-Chambrillon, C., Berny, P.J., Coiffier, O., Barbedienne, P., Dassé, B., Delas, G., Galineau, H., Mazet, A., Pouzenc, P., Rosoux, R., Fournier, P.: Evidence of secondary poisoning of free-ranging riparian mustelids by anticoagulant rodenticides in France: implications for conservation of European mink (Mustela lutreola). J. Wildl. Dis., 2004; 40: 688-695.
  3. Berny, P.J., Buronfosse, T., Buronfosse, F., Lamarque, F., Lorgue, G.: Field evidence of secondary poisoning of foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and buzzards (Buteo buteo) by bromadiolone, a 4-year survey. Chemosphere, 1997; 35: 1817-1829.
  4. Binev, R., Petkov, P., Rusenov, A.: Intoxication with anticoagulant rodenticide bromadiolone in a dog – a case report. Vet. Arhiv, 2005; 75: 273-282.
  5. Blocker, T.L., Roberts, B.K.: Acute tracheal obstruction associated with anticoagulant rodenticide intoxication in a dog. J. Small Anim. Pract., 1999; 40: 577-580.
  6. Boermans, H.J., Johnstone, I., Black, W.D., Murphy, M.: Clinical signs, laboratory changes and toxicokinetics of brodifacoum in the horse. Can. J. Vet. Res., 1991; 55: 21-27.
  7. Haug, B., Schjİdt-Iversen, L., Rygh, J.: Poisoning with long-acting anticoagulants Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 1992; 112: 1958- 1960. (article in Norwegian with an abstract in English) Hansen, N., Beck, C.: Bilateral hydronephrosis secondary to anticoagulant rodenticide intoxication in a dog. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care, 2003; 13: 103-107.
  8. James, S.B., Raphael, B.L., Cook, R.A.: Brodifacoum toxicity and