Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 6

Comparison of the isolation and inhibition abilities of selective media used for Brucella spp. Isolation

Pages
781–786
Publication Date
2017-12-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, it might be suggested that researchers should initially use Farrell medium and, afterwards, use it simultaneously with another medium to be able to increase the isolation ability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to compare and contrast the isolation ability of selective media developed for Brucella spp. isolation and their inhibition ability against contaminant microorganisms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fifty-one field strains biotyped from abortion case samples and 25 Brucella spp. negative organ samples were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, it might be suggested that researchers should initially use Farrell medium and, afterwards, use it simultaneously with another medium to be able to increase the isolation ability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:51 samples
⚙️Variables:Biovar · Brucella spp . · contaminant inhibition

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare and contrast the isolation ability of selective media developed for Brucella spp. isolation and their inhibition ability against contaminant microorganisms. Fifty-one field strains biotyped from abortion case samples and 25 Brucella spp. negative organ samples were used. Strain suspensions and organ suspensions were prepared separately. The turbidity of the strain suspensions was measured via spectrophotometer. The bacterial density of the strain suspensions was prepared in such a way that the suspensions would have different turbidity values. Inoculation into Farrell, Agrifood Research and Technology Center of Aragon, Jones & Morgan, and Modified Thayer Martin media was performed simultaneously from a dilution of each strain suspension and organ suspension. It was incubated in a 37 °C, 5%-10% CO2 condition for 5-8 days. Brucella isolates were identified via a conventional biotyping method. The results of this study illustrate that selective media have isolation and cultivation ability for B. abortus biovar (bv) 3, B. abortus bv1, B. melitensis bv3, B. melitensis bv1, Rev1, and S-19 strains isolated from the field. There is more variation in the contaminant inhibition ability of the media compared to their isolation sensitivity. Farrell medium has 47 Brucella spp. isolations in 51 samples. It showed the highest performance with an isolation sensitivity of 92.1% and an inhibition ability of 80%. In this context, it might be suggested that researchers should initially use Farrell medium and, afterwards, use it simultaneously with another medium to be able to increase the isolation ability.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAGÜL, M. S., İKİZ, S. (2017). Comparison of the isolation and inhibition abilities of selective media used for Brucella spp. Isolation. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 6, 781–786. https://ajindex.com/articles/122464

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Songer JG, Post KW. Brusella cinsi. In: Anğ Ö, Özgür Y, editors. Veteriner Hekimlik Mikrobiyolojisi-Hayvan Hastalığı Etkeni Olan Bakteriler ve Mantarlar. İstanbul, Türkiye: Nobel Matbacılık, 2012. pp. 200-207 (in Turkish). Godfroid J, Cloeckaert A, Liautard JP, Kohler S, Fretin D, Walravens K, Garin-Bastuji B, Letesson JJ. From the discovery of the Malta fever’s agent to the discovery of a marine mammal reservoir, brusellosis has continuously been a re-emerging zoonosis. Vet Res 2005; 36: 313-326.
  2. Yumuk Z, O’Callaghan D. Brucellosis in Turkey - an overview. Int J Infect Dis 2012; 16: 228-235. World Health Organization. Laboratory Safety Manual. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland, 2004. World Organisation for Animal Health. Terrestrial Manual. Chapter 2.7.2. Caprine and Ovine Brucellosis. OIE, 2009. World Organisation for Animal Health. Terrestrial Manual. Chapter 2.4.3. Bovine Brucellosis. OIE, 2012.
  3. Garin-Bastuji B, Blasco JM, Marin C, Albert D. The diagnosis of brucellosis in sheep and goats, old and new tools. Small Ruminant Res 2006; 62: 63-70.
  4. Marin CM, Alabart JL, Blasco JM. Effect of antibiotics contained in two Brucella selective media on growth of Brucella abortus, B. melitensis, and B. ovis. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34: 426-428.
  5. Stack JA, Harrison M, Perrett LL. Evaluation of a selective medium for Brucella isolation using natamycin. J Appl Microbiol 2002; 92: 724-728. Pappas G. The changing Brucella ecology: novel reservoirs, new threats. Int J Antimicrob Ag 2010; 365: 8-11. Farrell ID. The development of a new selective medium for the isolation of Brucella abortus from contaminated sources. Res Vet Sci 1974; 16: 280-286. KARAGÜL and İKİZ / Turk J Vet Anim Sci Her M, Choa DH, Kang SI, Cho YS, Hwang IY, BaeYC,Yoona H, Heo YR, Junga SC, Yoo HS. The development of a selective medium for the Brucella abortus strains and its comparison with the currently recommended and used medium. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2010; 67: 15-21.
  6. De Miguel MM, Marin CM, Munoz PM., Dieste L, Grillo MJ, Blasco JM. Development of a selective culture medium for primary isolation of the main Brucella species. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49: 1458-1463.
  7. Ferreira AC, Almendra C, Cardoso R, Pereira MS, Pereira AB, Luikart G, Correa de Sa MI. Development and evaluation of a selective medium for Brucella suis. Res Vet Sci 2012; 93: 565- 567. Hornsby RL, Jensen AE, Olsen SC, Thoen CC. Selective media for isolation of Brucella abortus strain RB51. Vet Microbiol 2000; 73: 51-60.
  8. Marin CM, Jimen