SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Estimating the Body Weight of Dogs Unearthed from the Van-Yoncatepe Necropolis in Eastern Anatolia

Vedat ONAR
Pages
495–498
Publication Date
2005-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Considering their weights, it was concluded that Van-Yoncatepe dogs could be placed in the group of large-size dogs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Two burial chambers dating back to 1000 BC have been brought to light in the Van-Yoncatepe necropolis in Eastern Anatolia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In these two chambers (M5 and M6), plenty of skeletal remains belonging to dogs buried together with humans were discovered.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering their weights, it was concluded that Van-Yoncatepe dogs could be placed in the group of large-size dogs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Body weight · bone measurements · dog

Abstract

Two burial chambers dating back to 1000 BC have been brought to light in the Van-Yoncatepe necropolis in Eastern Anatolia. In these two chambers (M5 and M6), plenty of skeletal remains belonging to dogs buried together with humans were discovered. The finds were a dog skeleton lying in-situ in burial chamber M5 and a number of bones scattered in three layers in burial chamber M6. Humeral and femoral circumferences were used to estimate the body weight of these dogs, and the data obtained from these measurements enabled us to further our knowledge of the formats of Van-Yoncatepe dogs. The dog from burial chamber M5 was estimated to have a body weight of 20.963 kg. The measurements of the bones discovered in M6 revealed that the dogs in this chamber might have had a mean body weight of 28.105 kg. Considering their weights, it was concluded that Van-Yoncatepe dogs could be placed in the group of large-size dogs. These dogs were deemed to assume significant social roles in and to have a close relation with the prehistoric societies living in the area at that time.

Özet

Two burial chambers dating back to 1000 BC have been brought to light in the Van-Yoncatepe necropolis in Eastern Anatolia. In these two chambers (M5 and M6), plenty of skeletal remains belonging to dogs buried together with humans were discovered. The finds were a dog skeleton lying in-situ in burial chamber M5 and a number of bones scattered in three layers in burial chamber M6. Humeral and femoral circumferences were used to estimate the body weight of these dogs, and the data obtained from these measurements enabled us to further our knowledge of the formats of Van-Yoncatepe dogs. The dog from burial chamber M5 was estimated to have a body weight of 20.963 kg. The measurements of the bones discovered in M6 revealed that the dogs in this chamber might have had a mean body weight of 28.105 kg. Considering their weights, it was concluded that Van-Yoncatepe dogs could be placed in the group of large-size dogs. These dogs were deemed to assume significant social roles in and to have a close relation with the prehistoric societies living in the area at that time.

🔖

Cite This Article

ONAR, V. (2005). Estimating the Body Weight of Dogs Unearthed from the Van-Yoncatepe Necropolis in Eastern Anatolia. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 495–498. https://ajindex.com/articles/122383

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Gingerich, P.D., Smith. B.H., Rosenberg, K.: Allometric scaling in the dentition of primates and prediction of body weight from tooth size in fossils. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1982; 58: 81-100.
  2. Onar, V., Armutak, A., Belli, O., Konyar, E.: Skeletal remains of dogs unearthed from the Van-Yoncatepe Necropolies. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol., 2002; 12: 317-334.
  3. Jungers, W.L.: Body size and scaling of limb proportions in Primates. In: Jungers, W.L., Eds. Size and Scaling in Primate Biology. Plenum Press, New York, 1985; 345-381.
  4. Clark, G.: Osteology of the Kuri Maori: the dog of New Zealand. J. Archaeol. Sci., 1997; 24: 113-126.
  5. Anderson, J.F., Hall-Martin, A., Russell, D.A.: Long-bone circumference and weight in mammals, birds, and dinosaurs. J. Zool., 1985; 207: 53-61.
  6. Belli, O., Konyar, E.: Excavations of Van-Yoncatepe Fortress and Necropolis (1997-1999). In: Belli, O., Eds. Istanbul University’s Contributions to Archaeology in Turkey (1932-2000). No. 4285, Istanbul University Rectorate Publication, Istanbul, 2001; 150- 156. Belli, O., Konyar, E.: Excavations at Van-Yoncatepe fortress and necropolis. J. Inst. Archaeol. Tel Aviv Univ., 2001; 28: 169-219.
  7. Smith, R.J.: Logarithmic transformation bias in allometry. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1993; 90: 215-228.
  8. Lignereux, Y., Regedon. S., Personnaz, B., Pavaux, C.I.: Typologie céphalique du Chien et ostéo-archéologie: a propos d’une population canine du XVIIe siècle Toulousain. Rev. Med. Vet.- Toulouse, 1992; 143: 139-149.
  9. Wijngaarden-Bakker, L.H., Ijzereff, G.F.: Mittelalterliche Hunde aus Niederlanden. Z. Saugetierkd., 1977; 42: 13-36.
  10. Rittatore Vonwiller, F., Falchetti, F., Negroni Catacchio, N.: Preistoria e Protostoria della Valle del Fiume Fiora, in Un decennio di Ricerche Archaeologiche. Quad. Ricerca Sci., 1978; 100: 27- 82. Morey, D.F.: Studies on Amerindian dogs: Taxonomic analysis of Canid crania from the Northern Plains. J. Archaeol. Sci., 1986; 13: 119-145.
  11. Alderton, D.: Dogs. Dorling Kindersley Limited, London, 1993; 1- 304. Evans, H.E.: Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog. 3rd ed., Saunders Company. Philadelphia, 1993; 1-15.