Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

The Effects of Formic Acid, Molasses and Inoculant as Silage Additives on Corn Silage Composition and Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics in Sheep

Pages
469–474
Publication Date
2005-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, percentages of propionic acid did not differ among treatments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study was to determine the effects of formic acid, molasses, and microbial inoculant (homofermentative lactic acid bacteria) as silage additives on silage quality and ruminal fermentation characteristics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Silages with or without formic acid (0.5%), molasses (5%), or microbial inoculant (10 g/t) were fed to ruminally cannulated, 1.5 year-old Kıvırcık x Morkaraman sheep.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, percentages of propionic acid did not differ among treatments.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Corn silage · formic acid · molasses

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of formic acid, molasses, and microbial inoculant (homofermentative lactic acid bacteria) as silage additives on silage quality and ruminal fermentation characteristics. Silages with or without formic acid (0.5%), molasses (5%), or microbial inoculant (10 g/t) were fed to ruminally cannulated, 1.5 year-old Kıvırcık x Morkaraman sheep. Silage treated with molasses had significantly greater DM and CP concentrations compared with other groups (P < 0.05). pH values did not significantly differ among treatments (P > 0.05). Lactic acid concentrations were significantly higher in silages treated with enzyme or molasses compared with others (P < 0.05). While acetic acid concentration was the highest in silage treated with acid, it was the lowest in silage treated with molasses (P < 0.05). Silage NH3-N concentration was the highest in silage treated with molasses, but the lowest in silage treated with acid (P < 0.05). Post-feeding ruminal total organic acid concentrations were significantly greater in sheep fed silages with additive than the control (P < 0.05). While percentages of acetic acid were greater, percentages of butyric acids were less in the rumen fluid of sheep fed silage without additive compared with the rumen fluid of sheep fed silage treated with silage additives. However, percentages of propionic acid did not differ among treatments.

Özet

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of formic acid, molasses, and microbial inoculant (homofermentative lactic acid bacteria) as silage additives on silage quality and ruminal fermentation characteristics. Silages with or without formic acid (0.5%), molasses (5%), or microbial inoculant (10 g/t) were fed to ruminally cannulated, 1.5 year-old Kıvırcık x Morkaraman sheep. Silage treated with molasses had significantly greater DM and CP concentrations compared with other groups (P < 0.05). pH values did not significantly differ among treatments (P > 0.05). Lactic acid concentrations were significantly higher in silages treated with enzyme or molasses compared with others (P < 0.05). While acetic acid concentration was the highest in silage treated with acid, it was the lowest in silage treated with molasses (P < 0.05). Silage NH3-N concentration was the highest in silage treated with molasses, but the lowest in silage treated with acid (P < 0.05). Post-feeding ruminal total organic acid concentrations were significantly greater in sheep fed silages with additive than the control (P < 0.05). While percentages of acetic acid were greater, percentages of butyric acids were less in the rumen fluid of sheep fed silage without additive compared with the rumen fluid of sheep fed silage treated with silage additives. However, percentages of propionic acid did not differ among treatments.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYTOK, E., AKSU, T. (2005). The Effects of Formic Acid, Molasses and Inoculant as Silage Additives on Corn Silage Composition and Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics in Sheep. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 469–474. https://ajindex.com/articles/122377

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Bosch, M.W., Janssen, I.M., van Bruchem, J., Boer, H., Hof, G.: Digestion of alfalfa and grass silages in sheep. 1. rates of fermentation in and passage from the reticulorumen. Neth. J. Agric. Sci., 1988; 36: 175-178. Bosch, M.W., Lammers-Weienhoven, S.C.W., Bangma, G.A., Boer, H.: Influence of Stage Maturity of Grass Silages on Digestion Processes in Dairy Cows
  2. Rumen Contents and Ruminal Passage Rates, Wageningen, 1991, Pp:33. Leventini, M.W., Hunt, C.W., Roffler, R.E., Casebolt, D.G.: Effects of dietary levels of barley-based supplements and ruminal buffer on digestion and growth by beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 1990; 68: 4334-4344 A.O.A.C.: Offical Methods of Analysis of Agricultural Chemists. 1990, Virginia, D. C., v+1213. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B.: Systems of analyses for evaluation of fibrous feed. In, Pigden, W.J., Balch, C.C. and Graham, M. Eds. Proc. Int. Workshop on Standardization of Analytical Methodology for Feeds, Int. Dev. Res. Center, Ottawa, Canada, 1979, pp 49-60. Polan, C.E., Stieve, D.E., Garret, J.C.: Protein preservation and ruminal degradation of ensiled forage treated with formic acid, ammonia or microbial inoculant. J. Dairy Sci., 1998; 81: 765- 776 SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 5 ed., SAS inst., Inc., 1998, Cary, NC. Steel, R.G., Torrie J.H.: Principle and Procedures of Statistics (2nd Ed.), McDonald Book Co., Inc., 1980., New York Hinds, M.A., Bolsen, K.K. Brethour, J., Milliken, G., Hoover, J.: Effects of molasses/urea and bacterial inoculant additives on silage quality, dry matter recovery and feeding value for cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Techn., 1985; 12: 205-214. Lattemae, P., Ohlsson, C., Lingvall, P.: The combined effect of molasses and formic acid and quality of red-clover silage. Swedish J. Agric. Res., 1985; 1: 31-41. Kennedy, S.J.: Comparison of the fermentation quality and nutritive value of sulphuric and formic acid-treated silages feed to beef cattle. Grass Forage Sci., 1990; 45: 17-28. Spoelstra, S.F., Steg, A., Beuvink, J.M.W.: Application of cell wall degrading enzymes to grass silage, In: J.J. Dekkers, H.C. van der Plas and D.K. Vuijk (Eds), Agricultural Biotechnology in Focus in The Netherlands, Pudoc, Wageningen, 1990. O’Kiely, P.: The effect of ensiling sugar beet pulp with grass composition, effluent production and animal performance. Irish J. Agric. Food Resh., 1992; 31: 115-128 Moore, A.C., Kennedy, S.J.: The effect of sugar beet pulp based silage additives on effluent production, fermentation