Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Development Patterns of Imported and Native Bombus terrestris L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Colonies in the Mediterranean Coastal Region

Pages
393–398
Publication Date
2005-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The numbers of workers and males produced, switch and competition points in the social phase of the colonies founded by the queens collected from the field were determined to be an average of 167.2 ± 34.90 bees, 98.6 ± 21.50 bees, 18.9 ± 2.37 days and 37.3 ± 2.68 days, while those in the colonies founded by the queens taken from the commercial company were 225.3 ± 30.90 bees, 156.0 ± 42.60 bees, 25.0 ± 3.69 days and 50.8 ± 4.44 days, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to compare the colony development patterns of native and commercially imported Bombus terrestris colonies, which were used in greenhouses for pollination in the Mediterranean coastal region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Total of 57 queens, 23 of which were collected from the field and 34 obtained from the commercial company, were used. 91% of the queens collected from the field and 82% of the queens obtained from the commercial company laid eggs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The numbers of workers and males produced, switch and competition points in the social phase of the colonies founded by the queens collected from the field were determined to be an average of 167.2 ± 34.90 bees, 98.6 ± 21.50 bees, 18.9 ± 2.37 days and 37.3 ± 2.68 days, while those in the colonies founded by the queens taken from the commercial company were 225.3 ± 30.90 bees, 156.0 ± 42.60 bees, 25.0 ± 3.69 days and 50.8 ± 4.44 days, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bumblebee · Bombus terrestris · colony development patterns

Abstract

This study was carried out to compare the colony development patterns of native and commercially imported Bombus terrestris colonies, which were used in greenhouses for pollination in the Mediterranean coastal region. Total of 57 queens, 23 of which were collected from the field and 34 obtained from the commercial company, were used. 91% of the queens collected from the field and 82% of the queens obtained from the commercial company laid eggs. The colony foundation ratio of the queens was determined as approximately 57%. The colonies founded by the queens taken from the commercial company produced 60.8 ± 12.70 queens, while the colonies founded by the queens collected from the field did not produced queens. The numbers of workers and males produced, switch and competition points in the social phase of the colonies founded by the queens collected from the field were determined to be an average of 167.2 ± 34.90 bees, 98.6 ± 21.50 bees, 18.9 ± 2.37 days and 37.3 ± 2.68 days, while those in the colonies founded by the queens taken from the commercial company were 225.3 ± 30.90 bees, 156.0 ± 42.60 bees, 25.0 ± 3.69 days and 50.8 ± 4.44 days, respectively.

Özet

This study was carried out to compare the colony development patterns of native and commercially imported Bombus terrestris colonies, which were used in greenhouses for pollination in the Mediterranean coastal region. Total of 57 queens, 23 of which were collected from the field and 34 obtained from the commercial company, were used. 91% of the queens collected from the field and 82% of the queens obtained from the commercial company laid eggs. The colony foundation ratio of the queens was determined as approximately 57%. The colonies founded by the queens taken from the commercial company produced 60.8 ± 12.70 queens, while the colonies founded by the queens collected from the field did not produced queens. The numbers of workers and males produced, switch and competition points in the social phase of the colonies founded by the queens collected from the field were determined to be an average of 167.2 ± 34.90 bees, 98.6 ± 21.50 bees, 18.9 ± 2.37 days and 37.3 ± 2.68 days, while those in the colonies founded by the queens taken from the commercial company were 225.3 ± 30.90 bees, 156.0 ± 42.60 bees, 25.0 ± 3.69 days and 50.8 ± 4.44 days, respectively.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖSTERİT, A., GÜREL, F. (2005). Comparison of Development Patterns of Imported and Native Bombus terrestris L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Colonies in the Mediterranean Coastal Region. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 393–398. https://ajindex.com/articles/122361

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aytekin, A.M., Cağatay, N., Hazır, S.: Floral choices, parasites and microorganisms in natural populations of bumblebees (Apidae: Hymenoptera) in Ankara province. Turk. J. Zool., 2002; 26: 149-155.
  2. Kaftanoğlu, O.: Biodiversity and faunistics of bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) for pollination in greenhouses. Proceedings of the Specialists’ meeting on insect pollination in greenhouses, Soesterberg. 1999.
  3. Kaftanoğlu, O., Yeninar, H., Talay, R.: Breeding bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) for the pollination of cultivated crops grown in greenhouses. III Asian Apic. Assoc. Conf., Hanoi. 1996; 141- 143. Yeninar, H.: Bombus arısı yetifltiriciliği üzerine arafltırmalar. PhD Dissertation. Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey. 1997 (in Turkish, with English abstract). Yeninar, H., Kaftanoğlu, O.: Colony development of Anatolian bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) under laboratory conditions. VII Int’l. Symp. on pollination, Lethbridge. 1997; 277-281.
  4. Yeninar, H., Duchateau, M.J., Kaftanoğlu, O., Velthuis, H.: Colony developmental patterns in different local populations of the Turkish bumblebee, Bombus terrestris dalmatinus. J. Apic. Res. 2000; 39: 107-116.
  5. Goka, K., Okabe, K., Yoneda, M., Niwa, S.: Bumblebee commercialization will cause worldwide migration of parasitic mites. Mol. Ecol., 2001; 10: 2095-2099.
  6. Dafni, A.: The threat of Bombus terrestris spread. Bee World, 1998; 79: 113-114.
  7. Aytekin, A.M., Rasmont, P., Cağatay, N.: Molecular and morphometric variation in Bombus terrestris lucoformis Kruger and Bombus terrestris dalmatinus Dalla Torre (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Mellifera, 2003; 3: 34-40.
  8. Gretenkord, C., Drescher, W.: Successful colony foundation and development of experimentally hibernated Bombus terrestris queens depending on different starting methods. VII Int’l. Symp. on pollination, Lethbridge. 1997; 437. Duchateau, M.J., Velthuis, H.H.W.: Development and reproductive strategies in Bombus terrestris colonies. Behaviour. 1988; 107: 186-207.
  9. Baydar, H., Gürel, F.: Antalya doğal florasında bal arısı (Apis mellifera)’nın pollen toplama aktivitesi, pollen tercihi ve farklı pollen tiplerinin morfolojik ve kalite özellikleri. Turk. J. Agric. For., 1998; 22: 475-482 (in Turkish, with English abstract). Minitab: Minitab release 10.2 for windows. Minitab inc. USA. 1994.
  10. Beekman, M., Stratum, P.V., Veerman, A.: Selection for non- diapause in the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, with notes on the effect of inbreeding. Ent. Exp. Appl., 1999; 93: 67-75.
  11. Beekman, M., Lingeman, R., Kl