Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Seroprevalence of Brucellosis and Leptospirosis in Aborted Dairy Cows

Pages
359–366
Publication Date
2005-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the animals vaccinated with this vaccine should be revaccinated before six months.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was designed to determine the seroprevalence of brucellosis and leptospirosis in aborted dairy cattle.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, serum samples were collected from 163 aborted dairy cattle that had no history of vaccination against either brucellosis or leptospirosis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the animals vaccinated with this vaccine should be revaccinated before six months.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Brucellosis · leptospirosis · serology

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the seroprevalence of brucellosis and leptospirosis in aborted dairy cattle. For this purpose, serum samples were collected from 163 aborted dairy cattle that had no history of vaccination against either brucellosis or leptospirosis. The antibodies against B. abortus were detected in these serum samples as 68.1%, 65.6%, 58.9% and 55.2%, respectively by the Competitive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (C-ELISA), Complement Fixation Test (CFT), Rosebengal Plate Test (RBPT) and Serum Agglutination Test (SAT). In the study, the serum samples were also collected from 15 healthy dairy cattle which had been vaccinated with reduced dose of B. abortus S-19 vaccine six months before the collection of the serum samples. These serum samples were used to compare the differences in the antibody titers between the vaccinated and naturally infected dairy cows by using C-ELISA and CFT. It was found that the animals vaccinated with this vaccine should be revaccinated before six months. Serum samples of aborted cows were then used to detect dominant Leptospira serovars by ELISA and Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT). MAT was used as a standard test to establish the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA for leptospirosis. The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were 92.6% and 92%, respectively, when L. hardjo antigen was used for both tests. It is found that the total of 66 (40.5%) of sera were positive for both L. grippotyphosa and L. hardjo antigens and 46 (28.2%) sera were positive for antibodies against L. hardjo and 39 (23.9%) of these sera were positive for antibodies against L. grippotyphosa by MAT. None of the sera was positive for other Leptospira serovars tested.

Özet

This study was designed to determine the seroprevalence of brucellosis and leptospirosis in aborted dairy cattle. For this purpose, serum samples were collected from 163 aborted dairy cattle that had no history of vaccination against either brucellosis or leptospirosis. The antibodies against B. abortus were detected in these serum samples as 68.1%, 65.6%, 58.9% and 55.2%, respectively by the Competitive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (C-ELISA), Complement Fixation Test (CFT), Rosebengal Plate Test (RBPT) and Serum Agglutination Test (SAT). In the study, the serum samples were also collected from 15 healthy dairy cattle which had been vaccinated with reduced dose of B. abortus S-19 vaccine six months before the collection of the serum samples. These serum samples were used to compare the differences in the antibody titers between the vaccinated and naturally infected dairy cows by using C-ELISA and CFT. It was found that the animals vaccinated with this vaccine should be revaccinated before six months. Serum samples of aborted cows were then used to detect dominant Leptospira serovars by ELISA and Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT). MAT was used as a standard test to establish the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA for leptospirosis. The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were 92.6% and 92%, respectively, when L. hardjo antigen was used for both tests. It is found that the total of 66 (40.5%) of sera were positive for both L. grippotyphosa and L. hardjo antigens and 46 (28.2%) sera were positive for antibodies against L. hardjo and 39 (23.9%) of these sera were positive for antibodies against L. grippotyphosa by MAT. None of the sera was positive for other Leptospira serovars tested.

🔖

Cite This Article

GENÇ, O., OTLU, S., ŞAHİN, M. (2005). Seroprevalence of Brucellosis and Leptospirosis in Aborted Dairy Cows. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 359–366. https://ajindex.com/articles/122354

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Anonymous: Office Intenational des Epizooties. World Organisation for animal health. Manual of standards for diagnostic tests and vaccines. 3 rd ed., ISBN, 92-9044-423-1, 1996. 2. Corner, L.A., Alton, G.G., Iyer, H.: Distribution of Brucella abortus in infected cattle. Aust. Vet. J., 1987; 64: 241-244. 3. Hungerford, T.G.: Diseases of Livestock. 9thed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, Sydney. 1990; 1302-1304. 4. Corbel, M.J., Brinley-Morgan, W.J.: Brucella. In: Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 9thed., Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore. 1994; 377-388. 5. Fensterbank, R.: Brucellosis in cattle, sheep and goats. OIE Technical Series No.6. 1987; 9-35. 6. Radostitis, O.M., Blood, D.C., Gay, C.C.: Veterinary Medicine. A Textbook of The Diseases of Catlle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats and Horses. 8thed. Bailliere, Tindall. 1994; 803-812.
  2. Carter, G.R., Chengappa, M.M.: Essentials of Veterinary Bacteriology and Mycology. 4thed., Lea -Febiger, Philadelphia. 1991; 196-201.
  3. Nicoletti, P.: Brucella. In: Diagnostic Procedures in Veterinary Bacteriology and Mycology, 5th ed. 1990; 95-104. 9. Kenar, B., Erganifl, O., Kaya, O., Güler, E.: Konya bölgesinde atıklara sebep olan Brucella, Campylobacter, Salmonella ve Chlamydia'ların bakteriolojik ve serolojik incelenmesi. Veterinarium, 1990; 1: 17-20.
  4. Sağlam, Y.S., Türkütanıt, S.S., Tafltan, R., Bozoğlu,H., Otlu, S.: Kuzeydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde görülen bakteriyel koyun ve sığır abortlarının etiyolojik ve patolojik yönden incelenmesi. Vet. Bil. Derg. 1998; 14: 133-145.
  5. Mohan, K., Makaya, P.V., Muvavarirma, P., Matope, G., Mahembe, E., Pawandiwa, A.: Brucellosis surveillance and control in Zimbabwe: bacteriological and serological investigation in dairy herds. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res., 1996; 63: 47-51.
  6. İyisan, A.S., Akmaz Ö, Düzgün S., Ersoy Y., Eskiizmirliler, S., Güler, L., Gündüz, K., Iflık, N., İçyerioğlu, K., Kalender, H., Karaman, Z., Küçükayan, U., Özcan, C., Seyitoğlu, fi., Tuna, İ., Tunca, T., Üstünakın, K., Yurtalan, S.: Türkiye'de sığır ve koyunlarda brucellosis'in seroepidemiyolojisi. Pendik Vet. Mikrobiyol. Derg., 2000; 31: 21-75.
  7. Alton, G.G., Jones, L.M., Angus, R.D., Verger, J.M.: Techniques for the Brucellosis Laboratory, INRA, Paris, France. 1988; 34-60.
  8. Corbel, M.J., Gill, K.P.W., Thomas, E.L.: Methods for the identification of Brucella. Central Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge, UK. 1983.
  9. MacMillan, A.P.: Conventional serological tests. In: Nielsen, K., Duncan, J.R., Eds., Animal Brucellosis, CRC Press, Boca