Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2008 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

The Determination of the Shelf Life and Some Nutritional Components of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata L., 1758) after Cold and Hot Smoking

Pages
49–56
Publication Date
2008-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Microbiological analysis results demonstrated that the smoking techniques reduced the microbial content of the fish, whereas microbial content increased during storage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to determine the shelf life, as well as chemical and microbiological quality of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L., 1758) prepared by 2 different methods of smoking (hot smoking and cold smoking).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Significant (P < 0.05) differences were found in the chemical composition of fresh and smoked seabream.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Microbiological analysis results demonstrated that the smoking techniques reduced the microbial content of the fish, whereas microbial content increased during storage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gilthead seabream · hot and cold smoking · shelf life

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the shelf life, as well as chemical and microbiological quality of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L., 1758) prepared by 2 different methods of smoking (hot smoking and cold smoking). The effects of hot and cold smoking on the chemical composition and microbial load of gilthead seabream, as well as organoleptic analysis of the smoked product were investigated. Significant (P < 0.05) differences were found in the chemical composition of fresh and smoked seabream. The panelists liked the hot smoked fish more than the cold smoked fish, according to sensory analysis results. Changes in pH, thiobarbituric acid (TBA), and total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) values were significant (P < 0.05) during storage at 4 °C. Microbiological analysis results demonstrated that the smoking techniques reduced the microbial content of the fish, whereas microbial content increased during storage. The smoking methods tested had a small effect on the level of vitamin D3 in gilthead seabream.

Özet

This study aimed to determine the shelf life, as well as chemical and microbiological quality of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L., 1758) prepared by 2 different methods of smoking (hot smoking and cold smoking). The effects of hot and cold smoking on the chemical composition and microbial load of gilthead seabream, as well as organoleptic analysis of the smoked product were investigated. Significant (P < 0.05) differences were found in the chemical composition of fresh and smoked seabream. The panelists liked the hot smoked fish more than the cold smoked fish, according to sensory analysis results. Changes in pH, thiobarbituric acid (TBA), and total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) values were significant (P < 0.05) during storage at 4 °C. Microbiological analysis results demonstrated that the smoking techniques reduced the microbial content of the fish, whereas microbial content increased during storage. The smoking methods tested had a small effect on the level of vitamin D3 in gilthead seabream.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİN, Ş., ÜNLÜSAYIN, M., İZCİ, L., GÜNLÜ, A. (2008). The Determination of the Shelf Life and Some Nutritional Components of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata L., 1758) after Cold and Hot Smoking. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 49–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/122313

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Cardinal, M., Gunnlaugsdottir, H., Bjoernevik, M., Ouisse, A., Vallet, J.L., Leroi, F.: Sensory characteristics of cold-smoked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from European market and relationships with chemical, physical and microbiological measurements. Food Res. Int., 2004; 37: 181-193.
  2. Çolakoğlu, F.A.: The effects of processing techniques on microflora of roach (Rutilus rutilus) and whitefish (Coregonus sp.). Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 2004; 28: 239-247. (in Turkish with an abstract in English) Dondero, M., Cisternas, F., Carvajal, L., Simpson, R.: Changes in quality of vacuum-packed cold-smoked salmon (Salmo salar) as a function of storage temperature. Food Chem., 2004; 87: 543- 550. Goulas, A.E., Kontominas, M.G.: Effect of salting and smoking- method on the keeping quality of chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus): biochemical and sensory attributes. Food Chem., 2005; 93: 511-520.
  3. Ünlüsayın, M., Kaleli, S., Gülyavuz, H.: The determination of flesh productivity and protein components of some fish species after hot smoking. J. Sci. Food Agr., 2001; 81: 661-664.
  4. Cardinal, M., Knockaert, C., Torrissen, O., Sigurgisladottir, S., Mİrkİre, T., Thomassen, M., Vallet, J.L.: Relation of smoking parameters to the yield, colour and sensory quality of smoked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Food Res. Int., 2001; 34: 537- 550. Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Moisture content. 950.46. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th edn. Gaithersburg, Maryland. 2002. Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Protein content in meat. 928.08. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th edn. Gaithersburg, Maryland. 2002. Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Fat content in meat. 960.39. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th edn. Gaithersburg, Maryland. 2002. Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Ash content. 920.153. Official Methods of Analysis. 17edn. Gaithersburg, Maryland. 2002.
  5. Altuğ, T, Demirağ, K., Kurtcan, Ü., İçibal, N.: Food Quality Control. Aegean University Engineering Faculty Press, Publication No. 85, Bornova, İzmir. 1994.
  6. Varlık, C., Uğur, M., Gökoğlu, N., Gün, H.: Su ürünlerinde kalite kontrol ilke ve yöntemleri. Gıda Tek. Der. Yay. No:17. Ayrıntı Matbaası, Ankara. 1993
  7. İnal, T.: Besin hijyeni. In: Hayvansal Gıdaların Sağlık Kontrolü. Final Ofset. Genişletilmiş 2. Baskı. İstanbul. 1992.
  8. Refai, M.K.: Manual of Food Quality Control, 4. Microbiology Analysis, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 1979. ICMSF: Microorganism in Food, 1: