Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2006 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Detection of Slime Factor Production and Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus Strains Isolated from Various Animal Clinical Samples

Pages
201–206
Publication Date
2006-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the CRA test could be used for the detection of slime production in Staphylococcus spp. because it is reliable and practical.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the production of slime factor in 180 Staphylococcus spp. (90 coagulase-positive Staphylococcus (CoPS) and 90 coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS)) isolated from various animal clinical specimens was investigated with Congo Red Agar (CRA), Microplate (MP), and Standard Tube (ST) tests and the results were compared to each other.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The rate of production of slime factor in all of the Staphylococcus spp. investigated with CRA, MP, and ST tests were 61.1%, 55.5%, and 50.5%, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the CRA test could be used for the detection of slime production in Staphylococcus spp. because it is reliable and practical.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Slime production · detection techniques · Staphylococcus spp.

Abstract

In this study, the production of slime factor in 180 Staphylococcus spp. (90 coagulase-positive Staphylococcus (CoPS) and 90 coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS)) isolated from various animal clinical specimens was investigated with Congo Red Agar (CRA), Microplate (MP), and Standard Tube (ST) tests and the results were compared to each other. The rate of production of slime factor in all of the Staphylococcus spp. investigated with CRA, MP, and ST tests were 61.1%, 55.5%, and 50.5%, respectively. The existence of Staphylococcus spp. resistance against various antibiotics was also determined by the agar disk diffusion method. The percentage of resistance against penicillin, methicillin, ampicillin, and gentamycin in slime-producing (SP) Staphylococcus spp. was 49.0%, 24.5%, 23.6%, and 13.6%, respectively, whereas for non-slime-producing (NSP) strains it was 42.9%, 15.7%, 14.2%, and 12.9%, respectively. The comparison of SP strains with NSP strains revealed that SP strains had more resistance to those antibiotics. It was determined that all of the Staphylococcus spp. were susceptible to vancomycin. The results observed from this study showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the tests applied (CRA, MP, and ST tests; X2 = 0.28). In conclusion, the CRA test could be used for the detection of slime production in Staphylococcus spp. because it is reliable and practical.

Özet

In this study, the production of slime factor in 180 Staphylococcus spp. (90 coagulase-positive Staphylococcus (CoPS) and 90 coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS)) isolated from various animal clinical specimens was investigated with Congo Red Agar (CRA), Microplate (MP), and Standard Tube (ST) tests and the results were compared to each other. The rate of production of slime factor in all of the Staphylococcus spp. investigated with CRA, MP, and ST tests were 61.1%, 55.5%, and 50.5%, respectively. The existence of Staphylococcus spp. resistance against various antibiotics was also determined by the agar disk diffusion method. The percentage of resistance against penicillin, methicillin, ampicillin, and gentamycin in slime-producing (SP) Staphylococcus spp. was 49.0%, 24.5%, 23.6%, and 13.6%, respectively, whereas for non-slime-producing (NSP) strains it was 42.9%, 15.7%, 14.2%, and 12.9%, respectively. The comparison of SP strains with NSP strains revealed that SP strains had more resistance to those antibiotics. It was determined that all of the Staphylococcus spp. were susceptible to vancomycin. The results observed from this study showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the tests applied (CRA, MP, and ST tests; X2 = 0.28). In conclusion, the CRA test could be used for the detection of slime production in Staphylococcus spp. because it is reliable and practical.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKYILMAZ, S., ESKİİZMİRLİLER, S. (2006). Detection of Slime Factor Production and Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus Strains Isolated from Various Animal Clinical Samples. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 201–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/122288

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Arciola, C.R., Campoccia, D., Montanora, L.: Detection of biofilm- forming strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus. Expert. Rev. Mol. Diagn., 2002; 2: 478-484. 2. Vandenesch, F., Eykyn, S., Bes, M., Meugnier, H., Fleurette, J., Etienne, J.: Identification and ribotypes of Staphylococcus caprae isolates isolated as human pathogens and from goat milk. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1995; 33: 888-892. 3. Veenstra, G., Cremers, F., van Dijk, H., Fleer, A.: Ultrastructural organization and regulation of a biomaterial adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Bacteriol., 1996; 178: 537-541. 4. Baselga, R., Albizu, I., De La Cruz, M., Del Cacho, E., Barberan, M., Amorena, B.: Phase variation of slime production in Staphylococcus aureus: implications in colonization and virulence. Infect. Immun., 1993; 61: 4857-4862.
  2. Tenover, F.C., Lancaster, M.V., Hill, B.C.: Characterization of staphylococci with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin and other glycopeptides. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1988; 36: 1020-1027
  3. Christensen, G.D., Simpson, W.A., Bisno, A.L., Beachey, E.H.: Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces. Infect. Immun., 1982; 37: 318- 26. Pfaller, M.A., Davenport, D., Bale, M., Barret, M., Koontz, F., Massanari, R.: Development of the quantitative micro-test for slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 1988; 7: 30-33.
  4. Christensen, G., Simpson, W.A., Jounger, J.J., Baddour, L.M., Barret, F.F., Melton, D.M., Beachey, E.H.: Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1985; 22: 996-1006.
  5. Davenport, D.S., Massanari, R.M., Pfaller, M.A., Bale, M.J., Streed, S.A., Hierholzer, W.J.: Usefulness of a test for slime production as a marker for clinically significant infections with coagulase negative staphylococci. J. Infect. Dis., 1986; 153: 332- 339. Wilson, M.: Bacterial biofilms and human disease. Sci. Prog., 2001; 84: 235-254.
  6. Donlan, R.M., Costerton, J.W. Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol., Rev. 2002; 15: 167-193.
  7. Souli, M., Giamarellou, H.: Effects of slime produced by clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci on activities of various antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 1998; 42: 939-941.
  8. Quinn, P.J., Carter, M.E., Markey, B.K., Cartey, G.R.: Clinical